現存研究指出，做筆記的行為能透過增加訊息記憶、增強理解力，並提高後續的表現來有效輔助第一及第二語言學習者。然而，這些研究大多是在第一語言的課堂環境中進行的——也就是受試者邊聆聽課堂邊做筆記。此外，隨著科技的進步，越來越多的學生開始選擇筆記型電腦而不是紙筆來做筆記。為了使學習中記筆記的教育價值發揮到極致，必須了解第二語言學習者的記筆記的行為如何影響他們的閱讀理解。因此，本研究旨在探究台灣英語學習者對閱讀理解的不同筆記方式（筆記型電腦和手寫）的影響以及他們的筆記內容如何不同。
所有26名受試者都在閱讀研究論文的同時，用筆記本電腦或紙筆記筆記。接著，他們完成閱讀理解測驗，包含二十個問題（十個事實問題和十個概念性問題）。結果顯示，以不同方式記錄筆記的參與者在閱讀理解表現沒有顯著差異。此外，兩種筆記的字數沒有顯著差異。但是，使用Leximancer概念構圖系統分析，兩種筆記的內容在重要關鍵字（如概念Concept和主題Theme）中顯示出明顯的差別，本研究發現筆記型電腦的筆記與原始閱讀文本更相似。另一方面，手寫的受試者雖然記下較少關鍵字，但其理解結果與使用筆記型電腦的受試者相當。

Existing research has established that the act of note-taking can theoretically benefit both L1 and L2 students by increasing the information recalled, enhancing comprehension and leading to better later performance. However, these studies were mostly done in L1 lecture settings where participants listened and took notes. In addition, with the improvement of technology, more students start to choose laptop over pen and paper to take notes. To optimize the pedagogical value of taking notes during learning, it is important to understand how L2 learners’ note-taking can affect their reading comprehension. The current study was therefore set out to investigate the effects of different note-taking modalities (laptop versus longhand) on L2 reading comprehension of 26 Taiwanese EFL learners and how their note contents differ.
All participants read through a research paper while took notes with laptops or longhand. They then completed a reading comprehension test with 20 questions (10 factual questions and 10 conceptual questions). The results showed no significance difference on the reading comprehension between participants who took notes with different modalities. Moreover, the word count of the two notes were not significantly different. However, with Leximancer concept-mapping system, the contents of the two notes showed salient differences in their key idea units (Concepts and Themes). Laptop notes were found to be more similar to the original reading text. On the other hand, longhand participants took down fewer key concepts but had comparable comprehension outcome with their laptop counterparts.

Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439-444. doi: 10.1037/h0076613
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206-219. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01412.x
Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (p. 175–199). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ausubel, D. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Barnett, J. E., Di Vesta, F. J., & Rogozinski, J. T. (1981). What is learned in note taking?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 181-192. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.73.2.181
Barnhart, A. S., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access for handwritten words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 906-923. doi: 10.1037/a0019258
Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. The American Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 63-73. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063
Bonifacio, A., Kerin, R., Hartley, S., Rudelius, W., & Clements, C. (2015). Marketing: The Core (4th Canadian ed.). Toronto: McGraw- Hill Ryerson.
Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note‐taking strategies. Journal of research in science teaching, 43(8), 786-818. doi: 10.1002/tea.20115
Bretzing, B. H., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4(2), 145-153. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(79)90069-9
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso, 209-233. Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299-309. doi: 10.1037/a0030367
Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1990). Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 513-527. doi: 10.1080/14640749008401235
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(5), 1118-1133. doi: 10.1037/a0019902
Corcoran, D. W. J., & Rouse, R. O. (1970). An aspect of perceptual organization involved in reading typed and handwritten words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(3), 526-530. doi: 10.1080/14640747008401930
Corey, S. M. (1935). The efficacy of instruction in note making. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(3), 188-194. doi: 10.1037/h0055288
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Crawford, C. C. (1925). Some experimental studies of the results of college note-taking. The Journal of Educational Research, 12(5), 379-386. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1925.10879612
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of educational psychology, 63(1), 8. doi: 10.1037/h0032243
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of educational research, 61(2), 239-264. doi: 10.3102/00346543061002239
Dunkel, P. (1988). The content of L1 and L2 students' lecture notes and its relation to test performance. Tesol Quarterly, 22(2), 259-281. doi: 10.2307/3586936
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational psychology, 77(5), 522-532.
Ford, B., & Banks, W. P. (1977). Perceptual differences between reading handwritten and typed words. Memory & cognition, 5(6), 630-635. doi: 10.3758/BF03197409
Frase, L. T. (1970). Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors. Review of Educational Research, 40(3), 337-347. doi: 10.3102/00346543040003337
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006
Garman, M. (1990). Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gipson, S. Y. M. T., Kim, J. W., Shin, A. L., Kitts, R., & Maneta, E. (2017). Teaching child and adolescent psychiatry in the twenty-first century: A reflection on the role of technology in education. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 26(1), 93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2016.07.004
Horwitz, S. M. (2017). Is Note-Taking More Effective with a Keyboard or a Pen? (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of Colorado, Boulder.
Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. (2005). Encoding disruption associated with copy and paste note taking. Technologybased education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together, 107-119.
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in neuroscience and education, 1(1), 32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 1-18.
Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N. M., Hille, K., & Sachse, S. (2015). Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen-or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance in preschool children. Advances in cognitive psychology, 11(4), 136-146. doi: 10.5709/acp-0178-7
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review. Contemporary educational psychology, 10(4), 378-386. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(85)90034-7
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163-182. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294.
Kirkland, K. M. (2016). The Effect of Note Taking Media and Preference on the Cognitive Processes Involved in Learning (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). University of Colorado, Boulder.
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Mankinen, J. M. (2005). Visual and haptic exploratory procedures in children's judgments about tool function. Infant Behavior and Development, 28(3), 240-249. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.05.002
Kunkel, K. R. (2004). A research note assessing the benefit of presentation software in two different lecture courses. Teaching Sociology, 32(2), 188-196. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0403200204
Lalchandani, L., & Healy, A. F. (2016). Disentangling the effects in note-taking strategy: Generation and summarization (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Colorado, Boulder.
Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177-190. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00195
Leximancer Pty Ltd. (2018). Leximancer user guide: Release 4.5 Retrieved July 8, 2019, from http://doc.leximancer.com/doc/LeximancerManual.pdf
Lin, L., & Bigenho, C. (2011). Note-taking and memory in different media environments. Computers in the Schools, 28(3), 200-216. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2011.594989
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Lonka, K., & Leskinen, E. (1996). Selecting students for medical school: What predicts success during basic science studies? A cognitive approach. Higher Education, 31(4), 507-527. doi: 10.1007/BF00137129
Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J. C., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., & Velay, J. L. (2008). Learning through hand-or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20504
Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M. T., & Velay, J. L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta psychologica, 119(1), 67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The modern language journal, 75(2), 196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05350.x
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International journal of educational research, 58, 61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
Mangen, A., & Velay, J. L. (2010). Digitizing literacy: reflections on the haptics of writing. Advances in haptics, 385-401.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270-298. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.03.001
Morrow, L. M. (2008). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford Press.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25(6), 1159-1168. doi: 10.1177/0956797614524581
Nakamura, K., Kuo, W. J., Pegado, F., Cohen, L., Tzeng, O. J., & Dehaene, S. (2012). Universal brain systems for recognizing word shapes and handwriting gestures during reading. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(50), 20762-20767.
O'malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner‐Manzanares, G. L. O. R. I. A., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 557-584. doi: 10.2307/3586278
Oded, B., & Walters, J. (2001). Deeper processing for better EFL reading comprehension. System, 29(3), 357-370. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00023-9
Page, B., Sharp, A., Lockshin, L., & Sorensen, H. (2018). Parents and children in supermarkets: Incidence and influence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.023
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514-522. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.70.4.514
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational psychology, 78(1), 34-38. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.34
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. The science of reading: A handbook, 227-247.
Perea, M., Gil-López, C., Beléndez, V., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(8), 1631-1647. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091016
Peverly, S. T., Garner, J. K., & Vekaria, P. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312. doi: 10.1002/acp.1086
Pressley, M. (1990). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Brookline Books.
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 233-239. doi: 10.1037/a0017678
Salataci, R. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a foreign language, 14(1), 1-17.
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24-31. doi: j.compedu.2012.10.003
Skolnik, R., & Puzo, M. (2008). Utilization of laptop computers in the school of business classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12(2), 1-10.
Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of experimental Psychology: Human learning and Memory, 4(6), 592-604. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
Slotte, V., & Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(1), 1-20. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0980
Smoker, T. J., Murphy, C. E., & Rockwell, A. K. (2009, October). Comparing memory for handwriting versus typing. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 53, No. 22, pp. 1744-1747). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272-286. doi: 10.1177/154193120905302218
Trevors, G., Duffy, M., & Azevedo, R. (2014). Note-taking within MetaTutor: interactions between an intelligent tutoring system and prior knowledge on note-taking and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 507-528.
Van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension (pp. 11-12). New York: Academic Press.
Van Hove, S., Vanderhoven, E., & Cornillie, F. (2017). The tablet for Second Language Vocabulary Learning: Keyboard, Stylus or Multiple Choice. Comunicar, 25(50), 53.
Wolf, D. F. (1993). Issues in reading comprehension assessment: Implications for the development of research instruments and classroom tests. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 322-331. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb02289.x
Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1766-1783. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.006
Yamamoto, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassles?. Journal of Legal Education, 57(4), 477-520. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/42894041
Zwaan, R. A., & Brown, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation‐model construction. Discourse processes, 21(3), 289-327. doi: 10.1080/01638539609544960