研究生: |
姚廷滄 Yao,Ting-Tsang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
增能式混成教學對機械基礎實習課程學習成效之影響:以學習動機為調節變項 The Impact of Enhancement Blended Learning on the Learning Outcomes of the Basics Machinery Works Practice Course: Using Learning Motivation as a Moderating Variable |
指導教授: |
李懿芳
Lee, Yi-Fang |
口試委員: |
李懿芳
LEE, Yi-Fang 曾璧光 TSENG, Pi-Kuang 宋修德 SUNG, Hsiu-Te |
口試日期: | 2024/07/31 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系技職教育行政碩士在職專班 Department of Industrial Education_Continuing Education Master's Program of Administration in Technological-Vocational Education |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 101 |
中文關鍵詞: | 增能式混成教學 、學習成效 、學習動機 、機械基礎實習課程 |
英文關鍵詞: | Enhancement Blended learning, Learning Effect, Learning Motivation, Mechanical Basics Laboratory Course |
研究方法: | 準實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401645 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:145 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探究翻轉式混成教學對機械基礎實習課程學習成效之影響,並以學習動機為調節變項,探究其對學習成效的調節效果。採準實驗研究法的不等組前後測實驗設計,以新北市立某技術型高中一年級兩班學生為研究對象,控制組與實驗組各32位學生。研究結果發現:一、不論是增能式混成教學或傳統式教學皆對於機械基礎實習成就測驗有良好的學習成效;二、增能式混成教學對於機械基礎實習實作測驗表現沒有顯著效果;三、學習動機在增能式混成教學中未具調節效果。根據研究發現,本研究提出以下具體建議:一、技高教師宜持續精進增能式混成教學在實作課程之教學設計;二、技高教師在實作課程教學時,宜視學生能力的差異,提供適合的教學方法;三、課程設計中融入激勵活動及即時反饋機制,以提升學習動機;四、未來研究設計宜避免同班分組;五、宜擴大樣本量與教學策略之多樣性。
This study aimed to investigate the impact of Enhancement Blended Learning on the learning outcomes of mechanical basic practice courses, with learning motivation as a moderating variable to explore its moderating effects on learning outcomes. A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent groups and pre- and post-tests was used, involving two classes of first-year students from a technical high school in New Taipei City, with 32 students in the control group and 32 in the experimental group. The results revealed that: 1) Both Enhancement Blended Learning and traditional teaching methods showed good learning outcomes in mechanical basic practice achievement tests; 2) Enhancement Blended Learning had no significant effect on performance in mechanical basic practice practical tests; 3) Learning motivation did not have a moderating effect in the Enhancement Blended Learning context. Based on these findings, the study suggested the following recommendations: 1) Technical high school teachers should continuously refine the design of Enhancement Blended Learning for practical courses; 2) Teachers should provide appropriate teaching methods according to students' abilities in practical courses; 3) Incorporate motivational activities and immediate feedback mechanisms into course design to enhance learning motivation; 4) Future research should avoid grouping students within the same class; 5) Increase sample size and diversify teaching strategies.
壹、中文部分
王文賢(2020)。樂趣化與傳統式教學對國中七年級學生籃球運球技能學習成效與學習動機之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東科技大學,屏東市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bjaant。
王怡文(2018)。臺北市國民中學教師翻轉教學與創新教學效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/rdn655
王春惠(2022)。國小混成教學常用數位教育平臺之比較分析(未出版之碩士論文)。崑山科技大學,高雄市。
江佳宣(2018)。國中數學科翻轉教學實施歷程之研究。國立臺灣師範大學(未出版之碩士論文),臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3d288w
何恭與(2020)。翻轉教學應用於高中烹飪社團之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d3nrmv
呂頌恩(2017)。混成式學習對高職學生「機械電學實習」學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
卓玥雲(2019)。團隊遊戲取向體適能教育模式籃球教學對國中生健康體適能及學習動機之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立體育大學,桃園市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/punyx3。
林佳蓉(2015)。探討數位學習下的翻轉教室迷思與新素養的「良心品德」翻轉案例。國民教育,55(1),78-89。
林俊宏(2022)。後疫情時代:混成教學於補習教育之現況分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。林昱呈(2022)。實施混成學習對國小六年級學生自主學習之影響-以數學領域為例(未出版之碩士論文)。開南大學,桃園市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tnbnhu
林奕維(2013)。自我挑戰機制對於學生之學習成就及學習動機之影響-以「程式設計」混成課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h3z5c7。
林舜治(2011)。融入學習風格之混成教學中學生學習成效之研究—以理工學院學生為例(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學,宜蘭市。
林詩芸(2019)。混成學習應用於國小英語補救教學對學習成就之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,台北市。
洪偉哲(2022)。運用Minecraft教育版融入普通高中化學科課程學習動機與學習成效之研究–以必修化學課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立陽明交通大學,新竹市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dgp762。
國立臺灣大學教務處教學發展中心x數位學習中心(2024). 教學新知-混成教學。
張玉茹(2009)。混成學習對大學生研究計畫寫作態度、寫作品質與班級氣氛的影響。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),143-177。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=2073753X-200903-201308140007-201308140007-143-177
張育通(2022)。大學生在不同心肺復甦術教育介入方法之學習成效–傳統教學法、翻轉教學法、虛擬實境教學法之比較(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。臺北市。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200957
張春興(2003)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張家祥(2023)。多媒體融入國小四年級體育課程教學對學童學習動機與技能表現之影響-以臺南市某小學排球低手單元為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j595g7。
教育部(2021)。十二年國民基本教育技術型高級中等學校群科課程綱要-機械群。https://vtedu.k12ea.gov.tw/nss/s/MGC/0401
教育部(2023)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=9968
郭鎧伊(2016)。應用手機通訊軟體LINE於數學課後輔導之學習成效研究分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中興大學,臺中市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ex8nds。
曾明山(2018)。翻轉課堂教學對技術型高中專業科目學習成效之研究:以認知風格為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
曾婉玲(2015)。以學生觀點探討影響學思達教學法學習成效及學生參與翻轉教學的意圖(未出版之碩士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6g333m
黃美珍(2017)。翻轉教學應用於高職學生學習動機與學習成效之研究—以高職經濟學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8c6xyx
黃敦煌(2014)。數位學習與混成學習於高職數學補救教學之成效研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f984q2。
葉怡伶(2021)。國中青少年籃球運動技能學習動機與觀賞行為之探討 -以新北市永和國中為例(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/37etar。
鄒景帄(2007)。混成學習的策略與應用實務。訓練與發展,62,1-29。
廖苗秀(2017)。翻轉教學在高職餐旅群課程之成效研究-以「飲料與調酒」課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄餐旅大學,高雄市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9x3h4n
潘錱烱(2014)。線上影像教學對實習課程學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。康寧大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s95452
蔡柏豪(2012)。隨選視訊混成補救教學模式對於高職生英語閱讀表現之效益研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/32vqud。
鄧文傑(2016)。翻轉教學應用於高職數學對學生學習動機與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/s7u988
鄧敬威(2021)。翻轉教學融入教育機器人課程之學習成效與真實性評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2nhx7t
鄭斌用(2013)。不同比例混成學習模式在高職電子學之教學成效研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jkq4c4
賴旭婕(2017)。應用翻轉教室於技能學習之研究:以大專木器設計與製造課程為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xy5bh8。
鍾智林(2021)。以混成學習精進英語授課課程之行動研究。大學教學實務與研究學刊,5(1),71-104。https://doi.org/10.6870/JTPRHE.202106_5(1).0003
顏俊杰(2018)。QR Code融入混成學習對高職生製圖實習課程學習動機、心流經驗與學習成效之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DIE.005.2018.E01
貳、英文部分
Bergmann, J. K. & Sams, A. K. (2019). The Flipped Classroom: A Comprehensive Model for Hybrid Learning. Educational Research Review, 14(3), 87-101.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97-110
Collis, B. (2002). The net as a tool for blended learning: What are the ingredients for success? Paper presented at Netlearning 2002, Ronneby, Sweden.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education, 78(7), 674-681.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic Intrinsic Motivation in Young Elementary School Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525-538.
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Heather, S., & Michael, B. H. (2012),CLSSIFYING K-12 BLENDED LEARNING. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student Achievement Through Staff Development (3rd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lee,R. W. & Chen,J. R. & Lu,M. Y. (2021). Empowerment in Hybrid Learning: Enhancing Student Autonomy and Engagement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 45-59.
M. H. Brown & S. P. Smith. (2020). Enhancing Traditional Learning with Hybrid Approaches: A Review of Best Practices. International Journal of Learning Technology, 15(2), 120-136.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50-51.
McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, DesLauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332, 862-864.
McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-243.
McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, DesLauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332, 862-864.
O’Dowd, D. K., & Aguilar-Roca N.M. (2009).Garage Demos: Using Physical Models to Illustrate Dynamic Aspects of Microscopic Biological Processes. CBE Life Science Education, 8, 118–122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2689147/
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Salman, K. (2011). Let's use video to reinvent education, Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/salman_khan_let_s_use_video_to_reinvent_education/transcr ipt?language=en#t-23336
Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Does what we feel matter? The role of affect in autonomous learning. Psychological bulletin, 131(2), 306.
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational technology, 43(6), 51-54.
Singh, H. (2021). Building Effective Blended Learning Programs. In B. Khan, S. Affouneh, S. Hussein Salha, & Z. Najee Khlaif (Eds.), Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks (pp. 15- 23). IGI Global. http://doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7607-6.ch002
Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. National Science and Technology Program for e-Learning. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4682f258301a95acd44368e0035c039f79d1e0a9
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Retrieved from https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal Intelligence: Experimental Studies. New York: Macmillan.
Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316-320.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158-177
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-7