簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 簡育詳
Chien, Yu-Hsiang
論文名稱: 國民中學專任輔導教師有效能之親師合作探討
A Study of Effective Teacher-parent Collaboration of Junior High School Counselors in Taiwan
指導教授: 王麗斐
Wang, Li-Fei
口試委員: 林淑君
Lin, Shu-Chun
陳婉真
Chen, Wan-Chen
口試日期: 2021/07/20
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系碩士在職專班
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling_Continuing Education Master's Program of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 146
中文關鍵詞: 國中專任輔導教師親師合作雙師合作
英文關鍵詞: middle school counselor, teacher-parent collaboration, the collaboration between school counselor and teacher
研究方法: 內容分析法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100832
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:182下載:19
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究旨在探索國中專任輔導教師的親師合作經驗,從中找尋專輔親師合作的成功因子,並歸納出有哪些技巧、策略、資源能使合作順利,以及面對親師合作的挫折與困難時,有哪些因應之道。
本研究以立意取樣 的方式找尋參與者,訪談八位國中專任輔導教師並運用內容分析法進行整理與歸納。本研究結論如下:
專輔進行親師合作時,評估的向度包含家庭、執行效益以及系統狀態等層面;有效能的親師合作方式,包含在認知層面,需要具備彈性開放的心態,以及設身處地思考家長狀態的思維;在與家長互動層面,建議從幫忙角度出發、展現非評價姿態、提供有感協助、營造信任感,建立平等夥伴關係 等 。 若遇到困難,則可以調整想法、放慢步調、堅持系統合作的信念,或是調整做法來因應。
本研究也發現系統合作的重要性 其中又以和導師合作最為重要,上述有效能的親師合作 不僅適用於家長,同樣也適用於和導師合作。
本研究認為成功的專輔教師親師合作建立在穩定的系統支持,與良好的雙師合作之上,兩者對於專輔親師合作有事半功倍 之效。最後本研究將上述結果進行討論,並提出實務與未來研究的建議 。
本研究發現成功的專輔教師親師合作建立在穩定的系統支持,與良好的雙師合作之上,兩者對於專輔親師合作有事半功倍之效。最後本研究將上述結果進行討論,並提出實務與未來研究的建議。

This study aims to explore the experience of parent-teacher collaboration of school counselors in junior high schools, to analyze the factors attributed to successful collaboration, and to summarize what skills, strategies, and resources can make the collaboration go smoothly. Additionally, this study also concludes with the corresponding approaches to adopt when counselors confront difficulties in collaboration.
The researcher used purposive sampling to select participants, interviewed 8 middle school counselors, and used content analysis to sort out and summarize the cases. The results show:
When counselors conduct parent-teacher collaboration, the assessment include the dimensions of family, implementation benefits, and system status. Effective parent-teacher collaboration methods include the cognitive level, requiring a flexible and open mindset, and thinking about parental status. As for the level of interaction with parents, it is recommended to start from the perspective of helping, show a non-judgement attitude, provide practical assistance, create a sense of trust, and establish an equal partnership. If counselors encounter difficulties, they can adjust their mind, slow down the pace, adhere to the belief in the systematic collaboration, or adjust the practices to respond.
This study also indicates several significant findings of systematic collaboration. Among them, collaboration with homeroom teacher is the most prominent. The above-mentioned effective parent-teacher collaboration applies not only to parents, but also to collaboration with homeroom teachers.
Lastly, this study reveals that successful collaboration between counselors and parents is based on stable system support and good collaboration between counselors and homeroom teachers. The above-mentioned are more effective for the collaboration between counselors and parents. Finally, suggestions and practical implications for further study findings of parent-teacher collaboration of middle-school counselors are discussed.

謝誌 i 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 目次 vii 表次 ix 圖次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 6 第三節 名詞釋義 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 生態系統理論 9 第二節 親師合作相關文獻 14 第三節 專任教師親師合作相關文獻 22 第三章 研究方法 31 第一節 研究取向與方法 31 第二節 研究對象 34 第三節 研究工具 37 第四節 研究程序 41 第五節 研究資料處理與分析 43 第六節 研究資料信實度 47 第七節 研究倫理 50 第四章 研究結果 51 第一節 專輔對親師合作重要性之認定 51 第二節 專輔對成功親師合作之定義 58 第三節 專輔進行親師合作時之評估 64 第四節 專輔認為有效能的親師合作之作法 70 第五節 專輔執行親師合作時之重要資源 88 第六節 專輔面對挫折時之因應方式 97 第七節 專輔認為雙師合作像是親師合作之調節變數 105 第八節 有效能的系統工作方式 116 第五章 研究討論與建議 119 第一節 專輔親師合作成功因素之討論 119 第二節 研究限制與建議 127 第三節 研究者省思 130 參考文獻 131 中文部分 131 英文部分 136 附錄 143 附錄一 研究邀請函 143 附錄二 半結構式訪談大綱 144 附錄三 知後同意書 145 附錄四 參與者檢核函 146

一、中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2010):質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報,17,29–50。https://doi.org/10.6769%2fJENCUE.201006.0029
王守玉, Windsor, C., & Yates, P.(2012):簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌,59(1),91–95。https://doi.org/10.6224%2fJN.59.1.90
王麗斐(2020):國民中學學校輔導工作參考手冊(第二版)。教育部。
王麗斐、杜淑芬(2009):臺北市國小輔導人員與諮商心理師之有效跨專業合作研究。教育心理學報,41,295–320。
王麗斐、杜淑芬、趙曉美(2008):國小駐校諮商心理師有效諮商策略之探索性研究。教育心理學報,39(3)413–434。https://doi.org/10.6251%2fBEP.20070808
王麗斐、杜淑芬、羅明華、楊國如、卓瑛、謝曜任(2013):生態合作取向的學校三級輔導體制:WISER模式介紹。輔導季刊,49(2),4–11。
王麗斐、李旻陽、羅明華(2013):WISER生態系統合作觀的雙師合作策略。輔導季刊,49(3),2–12。
刑志彬、許育光(2014):學校心理師服務實務與模式建構初探:困境因應與專業發展期待分析。中華輔導與諮商學報,39,117–150。
刑志彬,陳思帆,黃勇智(2020):系統合作告訴學校心理師什麼?從典範、模式與經驗的對話。輔導季刊,56(4),11–20。
任恩儀、陳偉仁(2016):誰的資優班─一位高中階段資優教育工作者的十年省思。中等教育,67(1),167–177。https://doi.org/10.6249%2fSE.2016.67.1.13
李佩珊(2019):Bronfenbrenner生態系統理論的近期發展與應用。輔導季刊,55(3),14–24。
李建興(2013):親師合作策略與願景。台灣教育,684,24–27。
宋宥賢(2017):臺灣國中中輟輔導復學資源運用之困境與相關挑戰:以生態系統論整合國中輔導教師觀點為例。臺北市立大學學報教育類,48(2),53–84。https://doi.org/10.6336/JUTEE.4802.003
杜淑芬、王淑玲(2014):學校輔導教師與外部諮商心理師的團隊合作。諮商與輔導,337,4–7。
林世欣、曾仁美、徐西森(2021):專任輔導教師之督導需求初探。諮商心理與復健諮商學報,35,47–63。https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC.202102_(35).0003
吳欣怡(2018):國中輔導主任與輔導教師有效合作經驗之探究(未出版碩士論文),中原大學。
吳東彥(2013):如何以個案概念化為基礎推動學校輔導系統合作:一個案例舉隅。諮商與輔導,334,35–38。
林小文(2018):國小導師與輔導教師合作經驗探究:以親師晤談歷程為例(未出版碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學。
林美珠(2002):諮詢能力內涵與評量之探討研究。中華輔導學報,12,117–152。https://doi.org/10.7082%2fCARGC.200209.0117
林容葵(2013):國中兼任輔導教師在學校系統之合作經驗的困境與突破(未出版碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學。
林淑君(2019):運用行動研究精神催化學校系統改變與提高輔導成效能見度之關鍵技術。輔導季刊,55(1),42–51。
林意綠(2018):生態系統理論在嚴重行為問題之自閉症類群障礙症與注意力不足過動症共病兒童跨專業合作輔導之運用。雲嘉特教期刊,27,69–75。
徐昀(2015):國小高年級學童課後活動主觀經驗分群與生活品質:生物生態系統理論 PPCT 的應用(未出版碩士論文),國立交通大學。
桃園市政府教育局(2018):桃園市國中專任輔導教師工作職掌說明。https://www.tycg.gov.tw/fckdowndoc?file=/files/040013/201810/20181004155327.pdf&flag=doc
陳必卿、鄒宜庭(2012):原漢家長對幼兒數學學習觀點之探究。南台人文社會學報,7,53–81。https://doi.org/10.29841%2fSTUTJHSS.201205.0003
許育光(2011):國小輔導教師之實務培訓與督導需求初探。教育實踐與研究,24(2),99–128。https://doi.org/10.6776%2fJEPR.201112.0102
陳欣希(2011):家庭語文經驗對幼兒詞彙表達能力影響之研究─生態系統理論 PPCT 的應用(未出版碩士論文),國立臺灣師範大學。
陳幸宜(2012):導師如何知覺與輔導教師在學生輔導上的成功合作歷程(未出版碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學。
畢恆達(2010):教授為什麼沒告訴我(2010全見版)。小畢空間出版社。
張淑芬(2015):心理師從事家庭暴力暨性侵害類社區諮商之跨專業系統合作能力初探研究。教育心理學報,47(1),23–43。https://doi.org/10.6251%2fBEP.20140904
梁淑媛、莊宇慧、吳淑芳(2012):內容分析技巧在護理質性資料之初步應用。護理雜誌,59(5),84–90。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.59.5.84
陳婉真、黃禎慧、侯瑀彤、江守峻、洪雅鳳(2018):心理師與學校輔導合作經驗初探:北部地區心理師之觀點。輔導與諮商學報,40(1),25–44。
麥雅嵐(2013):以生物生態模式為基礎探討一位育有重度多重障礙幼兒之中國籍母親教養歷程(未出版碩士論文),國立臺北教育大學。
莊凱博(2018):親師合作:教養孩子的任務。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(3),104–106。
許倪瑋(2007):國小教師與外籍配偶親師合作之行動研究。教育與社會研究,14,33–74。https://doi.org/10.6429%2fFES.200712.0033
許維素(2005):輔導教師學校系統觀的重要性。輔導季刊,41(3),72–74。https://doi.org/10.29742%2fGQ.200509.0010
國立臺灣師範大學(2021):國立臺灣師範大學中等學校教師師資職前教育課程教育專業科目及學分表。https://tecs.otecs.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/tep/professional/4-2-28.pdf
國立臺灣師範大學(2019):國立臺灣師範大學中等學校師資職前教育專門課程「輔導教師」。https://tecs.otecs.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/tep/specialized/523/108A_PDF/108A25.pdf
曾淑賢、王文伶(2007):影響早期療育機構間合作的因素之探討。特殊教育研究學刊。32(1),57–76。https://doi.org/10.6172%2fBSE200703.3201004
新北市教育局(2020):新北市109學年度國民中學置輔導教師實施計畫。https://friendly.tw/modules/tad_uploader/index.php?op=dlfile&cfsn=978&cat_sn=92&name=109%E5%AD%B8%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%B8%E7%BD%AE%E8%BC%94%E5%B0%8E%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB(%E7%99%BC%E6%96%87%E7%89%88).doc
楊淑蘭(2019):建構本土心理諮商(治療)模式之必要性與可能性。本土心理學研究,52,3–68。https://doi.org/10.6254%2fIPRCS.201912_(52).0001
楊嫊薰(2008):質性研究田野練習實錄-訪談國中導師之親師溝通情形。台灣教育,650,40–46。https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.200804.0040
趙文滔(2015):中小學輔導教師跨系統合作之成功經驗探究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,19,1–31。
趙文滔、陳德茂(2017):中小學輔導教師在跨專業系統合作中的挑戰:可能遭遇的困境,阻礙合作的因素以及如何克服。應用心理研究,67,119–179。https://doi.org/10.3966%2f156092512017120067005
趙文滔、謝政廷、謝曜任、梁淑娟、林淑卿、吳柄緯、呂伯杰(2021):一起陪孩子找幸福:給專業助人者的系統合作完全手冊。張老師文化。
趙品灃、莊梅裙(2019):Line進行親師溝通、家長參與與班級經營效能之研究。工業科技教育學刊,12,115–132。https://doi.org/10.6306%2fJITE.201912_(12).0008
劉紋坊(2015):高職教師如何建立良好親師關係。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(12),41–46。
劉凱、曾淑賢(2012):循著中介系統的脈絡來探討特教與幼教老師在自然情境中的合作歷程。特殊教育研究學刊,37(2),1–27。
劉麗娟、高淑貞(2020):探究國小輔導實務工作中之教師諮詢執行經驗—雙向現象場視框之觀照。中華輔導與諮商學報,57,85–120。https://doi.org/10.3966%2f172851862020010057004
蕭瑞麟(2017):不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡(4版)。臺北市:五南。
謝曜任(2013):從WISER模式談專任輔教師的角色與功能。輔導季刊,49(3),13–18。
藍佩嘉(2021,3月31日):探照社會〔apple podcast〕。大家來談拚教養。
https://podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/%E6%8E%A2%E7%85%A7%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83/id1480704716#episodeGuid=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mirrorvoice.com.tw%2Fpodcasts%2F73%2F1693
顏瑞隆、張正芬(2012):從生態系統理論談自閉症學生的學校適應。特殊教育季刊,124,11–19。https://doi.org/10.6217%2fSEQ.201209_(124).0002
克魯斯維爾(2015):研究設計:質化、量化及混合方法取向(中文二版;林正昌譯)。學富文化。(原著出版年:2014)
應國瑞(2014):質性研究:從開始到完成(李正賢譯)。五南。(原著出版年:2011)

二、英文部分
Adams, D., Harris, A., & Jones, M. S. (2018). Teacher-parent collaboration for an inclusive classroom: Success for every child. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 58–72.
Azad, G. F., Marcus, S. C., Sheridan, S. M., & Mandell, D. S. (2018). Partners in School: An innovative parent-teacher consultation model for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(4), 460–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2018.1431550
Bodvin, K., Verschueren, K., & Struyf, E. (2018). School counsellors’ beliefs regarding collaboration with parents of students with special educational needs in Flanders: Parents as partners or opposites? British Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3333
Burns, M. K., Warmbold-Brann, K., & Zaslofsky, A. F. (2015). Ecological systems theory in school psychology review. School Psychology Review, 44(3), 249–261. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.17105/spr-15-0092.1
Conus, X., & Fahrni, L. (2019). Routine communication between teachers and parents from minority groups: An endless misunderstanding? Educational Review, 71(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1387098
Cook, C. R., Xie, S. R., Earl, R. K., Lyon, A. R., Dart, E., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of the courage and confidence mentor program as a tier 2 intervention for middle school students with identified internalizing problems. School Mental Health, 7(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-014-9137-5
Davis, K. M., & Lambie, G. W. (2005). Family engagement: A collaborative, systemic approach for middle school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 9(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0500900202
Downe‐Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Garbacz, S. A., Beattie, T., Novotnak, T., Kurtz-Nelson, E., Zahn, M., Yim-Dockery, H., Cohenour, J., & Jordan, P. (2020). Examining the efficacy of conjoint behavioral consultation for middle school students with externalizing behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 46(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919888844
Garbacz, S. A., Hirano, K., McIntosh, K., Eagle, J. W., Minch, D., & Vatland, C. (2018). Family engagement in schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Barriers and facilitators to implementation. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000216
Gisewhite, R. A., Jeanfreau, M. M., & Holden, C. L. (2019). A call for ecologically-based teacher-parent communication skills training in pre-service teacher education programmes. Educational Review, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1666794
Gold, R. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573808
Goodman‐Scott, E., Sink, C. A., Cholewa, B. E., & Burgess, M. (2018). An ecological view of school counselor ratios and student academic outcomes: A national investigation. Journal of Counseling & Development, 96(4), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12221
Griffin, D., & Steen, S. (2010). School-family-community partnerships: Applying Epstein's theory of the six types of involvement to school counselor practice. Professional School Counseling, 13(4), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2156759X1001300402
Hannon, M. D. (2016). Professional development needs of urban school counselors: A review of the literature. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 8(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.7729/82.1171
Harris, P. N., Shillingford, M. A., & Bryan, J. (2018). Factors influencing school counselor involvement in partnerships with families of color: A social cognitive exploration. Professional School Counseling, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2156759X18814712
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The counseling psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000097254001
Hill, C. E. (2015). Consensual qualitative research (CQR): Methods for conducting psychotherapy research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundation, process, and outcome (pp. 485–499). Vienna: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1382-0_23
Hornby, G., & Blackwell, I. (2018). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An update. Educational Review, 70(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1388612
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Kim, J., Fletcher, K., & Bryan, J. (2017). Empowering marginalized parents: An emerging parent empowerment model for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 21(1b), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X18773585
Kraft, M. A., Rogers, T. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.001
Kranzler, J. H., Floyd, R. G., Bray, M. A., & Demaray, M. K. (2020). Past, present, and future of research in school psychology: The biopsychosocial ecological model as an overarching framework. School psychology, 35(6), 419–427. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/spq0000401
McMahon, H. G., Mason, E. C., Daluga‐Guenther, N., & Ruiz, A. (2014). An ecological model of professional school counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00172.x
McMahon, H. G., Mason, E. C. M., & Paisley, P. O. (2009). School counselor educators as educational leaders promoting systemic change. Professional School Counseling, 13(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-13.116
Miller, G. E., Colebrook, J., & Ellis, B. R. (2014). Advocating for the rights of the child through family–school collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychological Consultation, 24(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2014.870483
Mitchell, B. S., Lewis, T. J., & Stormont, M. (2020). A daily check-in/check-out intervention for students with internalizing concerns. Journal of Behavioral Education, 30(2), 1–24. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10864-020-09365-7
Moore-Thomas, C., & Day-Vines, N. L. (2010). Culturally competent collaboration: School counselor collaboration with African American families and communities. Professional School Counseling, 14(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X1001400106
Myende, P. E., & Nhlumayo, B. S. (2020). Enhancing parent–teacher collaboration in rural schools: Parents’ voices and implications for schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1731764
Pérez-Rosas, V., Wu, X., Resnicow, K., & Mihalcea, R. (2019). What makes a good counselor? learning to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality counseling conversations. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 926–935, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Prosek, E. A., & Gibson, D. M. (2021). Promoting rigorous research by examining lived experiences: A review of four qualitative traditions. Journal of Counseling and Development, 99(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12364
Smith, T. E., Holmes, S. R., Sheridan, S. M., Cooper, J. M., Bloomfield, B. S., & Preast, J. L. (2020). The effects of consultation-based family-school engagement on student and parent outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(3), 278–306. http://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1749062
Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703771910080
Stroetinga, M., Leeman, Y., & Veugelers, W. (2019). Primary school teachers’ collaboration with parents on upbringing: A review of the empirical literature. Educational Review, 71(5), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1459478
Thomas, V., Muls, J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2019). Middle school student and parent perceptions of parental involvement: Unravelling the associations with school achievement and wellbeing. Educational Studies, 46(4), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1590182
Tudge, J. R., Mokrova, I., Hatfield, B. E., & Karnik, R. B. (2009). Uses and misuses of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 1(4), 198–210. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00026.x
Tudge, J. R., Payir, A., Merçon‐Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., & O'Brien, L. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12165
Wang, M. T. & Sheikh‐Khalil, S. (2014). Does parental involvement matter for student achievement and mental health in high school? Child Development, 85(2), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12153

下載圖示
QR CODE