簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 吳適佐
Shih-Tso Wu
論文名稱： 結合設計式學習與密鋪圖形設計於多點觸控 平台之系統建置
The Development of a Multi-Touch System for Design-Based Learning of Tessellation
指導教授： 邱瓊慧
Chiu, Chiung-Hui
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年： 2013
畢業學年度： 101
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 62
中文關鍵詞： 多點觸控 、設計式學習 、密鋪圖形
英文關鍵詞： multi-touch, design-based learning, tessellation
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：170  下載：4 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究目的為開發一個以密鋪圖形設計為主題的多點觸控支援設計式學習系統，並於系統建置完成後進行系統評估以瞭解其易用性以及將系統用於實際課堂中的可能性。本研究系統開發環境選在Windows系統上進行開發，以C#以及XAML 為系統開發語言，Visual Studio為開發工具，並以系統開發生命週期中修改版瀑布式模型為系統開發方法，分別為系統規劃、系統分析、系統設計、系統建置、及系統評估五個主要步驟，且於開發過程中邀請國小高年級學生針對系統功能及介面進行測試與偵測系統錯誤，待建置完成以台北市某國小16位五年級學生為實驗對象進行學習活動，並於活動後針對系統易用性進行評估測試，藉此完成一能結合設計式學習與密鋪圖形設計於多點觸控平台之系統。經由使用者多次的測試以及系統評估的結果，得知本系統功能符合設計式學習各階段要素及密鋪圖形設計之需求，可實際用於課堂中，並能提供建議予未來支援設計式學習的多點觸控系統研究參考。

    The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a multi-touch enhanced collaborative design-based learning system, and tessellations used to be the topic of the design-based learning. Also it’s based on Windows, which was coded in C# (C sharp) and XAML using Visual Studio, and we utilizes the modified waterfall models in software development processes, which model including the five phases of requirements, analysis, design, implementation and evaluation. During development processes, there are totally 8 students who participated voluntarily in a series of testing and debugging, also we conducted the experiment that in a local school, who invited 16 students to assess the usability of the system. The evaluation of the system which via testing, debugging and the experiment concluded that (1) the design of the system on user interface and learning functions for design-based learning and tessellation are acceptable; (2) our system has the potential for school use.

    第一章 研究背景及目的............................................................................................. 1 壹、前言................................................................................................................. 1 貳、研究目的......................................................................................................... 3 參、研究方法與流程............................................................................................. 3 肆、論文架構......................................................................................................... 4 第二章 文獻探討......................................................................................................... 6 壹、設計式學習..................................................................................................... 6 貳、多點觸控技術................................................................................................. 8 一、多點觸控技術的特性及用途................................................................. 9 二、多點觸控技術使用案例與相關研究..................................................... 9 三、多點觸控技術小結............................................................................... 15 參、密鋪圖形....................................................................................................... 15 第三章 系統分析....................................................................................................... 17 壹、可行性分析................................................................................................... 17 一、硬體設備............................................................................................... 17 二、軟體技術............................................................................................... 19 貳、使用者分析................................................................................................... 19 參、系統功能分析............................................................................................... 20 一、設計式學習功能分析........................................................................... 20 二、多點觸控功能分析............................................................................... 23 三、密鋪圖形功能分析............................................................................... 23 四、使用者案例圖....................................................................................... 28 第四章 系統設計....................................................................................................... 29 壹、系統開發工具簡介....................................................................................... 29 貳、系統模組設計............................................................................................... 29 一、個人工作區模組................................................................................... 29 二、共同工作區模組................................................................................... 29 三、問題呈現模組....................................................................................... 30 四、資源工具模組....................................................................................... 30五、塗鴉板模組........................................................................................... 30 六、歷程檔案模組....................................................................................... 30 七、密鋪工具模組....................................................................................... 30 八、指導語提示模組................................................................................... 31 第五章 系統建置....................................................................................................... 32 壹、系統操作空間............................................................................................... 32 一、確認問題階段....................................................................................... 32 二、蒐集資訊階段....................................................................................... 33 三、設計與建構作品................................................................................... 33 四、評估檢討............................................................................................... 34 貳、系統模組功能............................................................................................... 35 一、個人工作區模組................................................................................... 36 二、共同工作區模組................................................................................... 37 三、問題呈現模組....................................................................................... 38 四、資源工具模組....................................................................................... 38 五、塗鴉板模組........................................................................................... 38 六、歷程檔案模組....................................................................................... 39 七、密鋪工具模組....................................................................................... 39 八、指導與提示模組................................................................................... 41 第六章 系統測試與評估........................................................................................... 42 壹、系統測試....................................................................................................... 42 一、第一次系統測試................................................................................... 42 二、第二次系統測試................................................................................... 44 貳、系統評估....................................................................................................... 46 一、活動參與者........................................................................................... 46 二、研究活動............................................................................................... 46 三、評估資料的收集與結果....................................................................... 50 第七章 結論與建議................................................................................................... 52 參考文獻....................................................................................................................... 54

    Agostini, A., Di Biase, E., & Loregian, M. (2010). Stimulating cooperative and participative learning to match digital natives' needs. In Proceedings of Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 274-279).
    Apedoe, X., & Ford, M. (2010). The empirical attitude, material practice and design activities. Science & Education, 19(2), 165-186.
    Apedoe, X., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.
    Barnett, M. (2005). Engaging inner city students in learning through designing remote operated vehicles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 87-100.
    Barron, B. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-311.
    Battocchi, A., Esposito, G., Ben-Sasson, A., Gal, E., Pianesi, F., Venuti, P., et al. (2008). Collaborative puzzle game - an interface for studying collaboration and social interaction for children who are typically developed or who have autistic spectrum disorder. In P. Sharkey (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International conference series on disability, virtual reality and associated technologies (ICDVRAT), Maia, Portugal.
    Brooke, J. (1996). Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189, 194.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., et al. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Davis, M., Hawley, P., McMullan, B., & Spilka, G. (1997). Design as a Catalyst for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt St., Alexandria, VA 22314-1453, tele.
    Dietz, P., & Leigh, D. (2001). Diamondtouch: A multi-user touch technology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Orlando, Florida.
    Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M. M., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.
    Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Design-based learning for biology: Genetic engineering experience improves understanding of gene expression. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298.
    Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
    Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879.
    Gerber, M. M., English, J., & Singer, G. S. (1999). Bridging between craft and academic knowledge: A computer supported, problem-based learning model for professional preparation in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 22(2), 100-113.
    Grünbaum, B., & Shephard, G. C. (1977). Tilings by regular polygons. Mathematics Magazine, 50(5), 227-247.
    Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., et al. (2009). Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Proceedings of Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1 (pp. 335-344), Rhodes, Greece. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
    Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
    Johnson, C. D., & Kashef, A. E. (1996). Tessellations in the technology education classroom. Technology Teacher, 56(3), 3-7.
    Jones, L. L. (1999). Learning chemistry through design and construction. UniServe Science News, 14, 3-7.
    Khaled, R., Barr, P., Johnston, H., & Biddle, R. (2009). Let's clean up this mess: Exploring multi-touch collaborative play. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Boston, MA, USA.
    Kharrufa, A., Leat, D., & Olivier, P. (2010). Digital mysteries: Designing for learning at the tabletop. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
    Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In A. Bruckman, M. Guzdial, J. L. Kolodner & A. Ram (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 1998) (pp. 16-22). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
    Kristensson, P. O., Arnell, O., Björk, A., Dahlbäck, N., Pennerup, J., Prytz, E., et al. (2008). Infotouch: An explorative multi-touch visualization interface for tagged photo collections. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges (pp. 491-494). ACM.
    Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73-86.
    Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The factor structure of the system usability scale. In Human centered design (pp. 94-103): Springer.
    Marshall, P., Hornecker, E., Morris, R., Sheep Dalton, N., & Rogers, Y. (2008). When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. In Proceedings of Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008. 3rd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 33-40).
    Martínez Maldonado, R., Kay, J., & Yacef, K. (2010). Collaborative concept mapping at the tabletop. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
    Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-85.
    Morey, J., & Sedig, K. (2002). Tileland: A microworld for creating mathematical art. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1778-1783).
    NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
    Nelson, D. (2009). The 6 ½ steps of backwards thinking™. Retrieved December 10, 2011, from http://www.csupomona.edu/~dnelson/methodology/6.5steps.html
    Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design (1st ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rick, J., Rogers, Y., Haig, C., & Yuill, N. (2009). Learning by doing with shareable interfaces. Children, Youth and Environments, 19(1), 321-342.
    Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133-1152.
    Satzinger, J. W., Jackson, R. B., & Burd, S. D. (2007). Systems analysis and design in a changing world(4 ed.): Course Technology Ptr.
    Shen, C., Everitt, K., & Ryall, K. (2003). {ubitable}: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces. In A. Dey, A. Schmidt & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Ubicomp 2003: Ubiquitous computing (Vol. 2864, pp. 281-288): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
    Silk, E., Schunn, C., & Strand Cary, M. (2009). The impact of an engineering design curriculum on science reasoning in an urban setting. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(3), 209-223.
    Silk, E. M., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Designing technology activities that teach mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 21-27.
    Stanford, U. (2011). Design-based learning (dbl) to innovate stem education: Use of mobile sensors and mobile eportfolios to promote critical thinking and problem solving. Retrieved December 10, 2011, from http://ldt.stanford.edu/~educ39109/POMI/DBL/
    Stewart, J., Bederson, B. B., & Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit (pp. 286-293). ACM.
    Sultanum, N., Sharlin, E., Sousa, M. C., Miranda-Filho, D. N., & Eastick, R. (2010). Touching the depths: Introducing tabletop interaction to reservoir engineering. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. Saarbrücken, Germany.
    Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills : Learning for life in our times (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Vattam, S. S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2011). On foundations of technological support for addressing challenges facing design-based science learning. Technology Enhanced Learning and Cognition, 27, 233.
    Vattam, S. S., Kramer, C. W., Kim, H., & Kolodner, J. L. (2007). Effects of technology-based support for explanation construction on learners' discourse during design-based learning in science. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
    Vosinakis, S., & Koutsabasis, P. (2011). A framework for problem-based learning activities in virtual worlds. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Informatics in Education (CIE).
    Ward, R. A. (2003). Teaching tessellations to preservice teachers using tesselmania! Deluxe: A vygotskian approach. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1), 69-78.
    吳健毓. (2008). 觸控技術百家爭鳴-如何挑選適合的觸控解決方案? Display-All(12), 17-26.
    李建億. (2006). 網際網路專題學習互動歷程之研究. 科學教育學刊, 14(1), 101-120.
    潘大綱. (2007). 觸控面板關鍵技術發展. Display-All(8), 6-18.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE