本研究旨在瞭解臺北市青少年在領導才能內涵認知及領導才能發展情況，透過文獻分析設計問卷，將問卷分為「個人基本資料」、「領導才能」二部份，採用卡方檢定來探討不同背景變項的青少年，對於其領導才能內涵認知及領導才能發展的程度。正式問卷是以臺北市公立國中及臺北市公私立高中職（未含補習學校及特殊學校）之學生為取樣範圍，為顧及樣本的代表性，取樣方式國中部份以「分層叢集便利抽樣」產生，高中職以「便利抽樣」產生，國高中各1,100份，共計抽取樣本2,200份，共回收2,115份，回收率為96%，有效樣本為2,096份，可用率為95%。。將所蒐集之資料進行研究分析，根據分析結果提出本研究之結論與建議。
本研究發現如下：
一、 臺北市青少年的領導模式與僕人領導最相似。
二、 青少女對自我信心較缺乏且自我設限情況較多。
三、 領導的機會多寡會影響青少年擔任領導者的意願。
四、 成人對臺北市青少年在領導上的支持與協助較少。

本研究歸納量化研究結果作成結論，並對教育主管機關、家長、童軍會及未來之相關研究提出建議。

A Study of the Leadership Cognition and its Development of Youth in Taipei
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand leadership cognition and its development of young people in Taipei City. The study was conducted with questionnaires that were designed based on literature review and related empirical studies. Then a chi-square test approach was used to explore how the background variables affect young people’s leadership development. Considering the representativeness of the samples, “Convenience stratified cluster sampling method” was applied to the junior high school students, and “Convenience sampling method” was used to the senior high school students in this study. With 2,096 effective samples, the major findings of this study were summarized as follows:
1. The leadership mode of youth in Taipei is similar to servant leadership.
2. The teenage girls are lack of self-confidence and will set limit for themselves often.
3. The opportunities of leadership will affect young people ‘s wish to be a leader.
4. The adult people give little support to young people in leadership development in Taipei.
Finally, according to the results of this study, some suggestions were offered to education authorities, teachers, families, and future research.

一、 中文部分
王振德 (1998)。領導才能教育實施意見調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，16， 427-442。
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育新辭書。臺北市：高等教育。
林孟儀 (2004)。社會狀元贏在事業考卷。商業週刊，870，98-100。
周震歐、鄭心雄、廖榮利 (1976)。青年領導概念及領導能力調查研究。臺北：幼獅文化。
胡愈寧、周慧貞譯（2004）。R. K.Greenleaf著。僕人領導學。台北：啟示出版。
教育部 (2006)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。臺北：教育部。
張春興 (1998) 。教育心理學三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北：東華。
張沛文譯（2001）。J. C. Hunter著。僕人—修道院的領導啟示錄。台北：商周出版。
張馨濤譯（2002）。Peggy Ornstein著。校園中的女學生︰探究年輕女孩自尊與自信的缺口。台北︰女書。
郭謹瑜 (1996)。臺灣女性主管管理風格、人際關係、決策型態與領導行為之相關研究。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
黃囇莉 (1999)。跳脫性別框框-兩性平等教育教師/家長解惑手冊。臺北：女書文化。
劉玉玲 (2005)。青少年發展：危機與轉機。台北：揚智。
鄭聖敏 (2005)。中學生領導才能內涵建構及相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所特殊教育學系博士論文。

二、 英文部分
Astin, H., & Leland, C. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A crossgenerational study of leaders and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bass, B. (1981). Stogdill’s handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
Blake &Mouton (1964),The Management Grid. Houston:Texas century (pp. 19-26). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Brown, L.M. & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development. New York: Ballantine Books.
Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2004). Youth participation in evaluation and research as a way of lifting new voices. Children, Youth and Environments, 14(2), 84–98.
Eagly, Alice H. & Johnson, Blair T.(1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), Sep 1990, 233-256.
Fertman, C. & van Linden, J (1999). Character Education: An Essential Ingredient for Youth Leadership Development. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin. 83(609), 9-15
Gardner, J. (1990). On leadership. New York: Free Press.
Girl Scout Research Institute (2003). Paths to Positive Youth Development. New York: Girl Scouts of the USA.
Girl Scout Research Institute. (2008). Exploring Girl's Leadership. New York: Girl Scout of the USA.
Girl Scouts of the USA. (2008). Transforming Leadership. NY: Girl Scouts of the USA.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Essentials of servant-leadership. In L. C. Spears & M.Lawrence (Eds.), Focus on leadership: Servant-leadership for the twenty-first. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Halpin, A.W. and Winer, B.J. (1957). A factorial study of the leader behavior descriptions. In R.M. Stogdill and A.E. Coons (eds), Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Buisness Research, Ohio State University
Jackson, C. (2005). Girls and Leadership: Embracing Differences (November 2, 2005). Accessed from: http://www.tolerance.org
Kress, C. A. (2006), Youth leadership and youth development: Connections and questions. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(109): 45–56.
Kretzmann & McKnight. (1993). Medoff, P., & Sklar, H. (1994). Streets of hope: The fall and rise of an urban neighborhood. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Lakes, R. (1996). Youth development and critical education:The promise of democratic action. New York: SUNY Press.
MacNeil, C. A. (2006), Bridging generations: Applying “adult” leadership theories to youth leadership development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(109), 27–43.
Margaret Libby, Maureen Sedonaen, Steven Bliss.(2006) The mystery of youth leadership development: The path to just communities. New Directions for Youth Development ,2006(109), 13 – 25.
McLaughlin, M. (2000). Community counts: How organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
Mitra, D. L. (2005). Increasing student voice and moving toward youth leadership. The Prevention Researcher, 13(1), pp 7–10.
Mohamed, I., & Wheeler, W. (2001). Broadening the bounds of youth development:Youth as engaged citizens. Chevy Chase, MD: The Innovation Center and the Ford Foundation.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
O’Connell, B. (1994). People power: Service, advocacy, empowerment. New York: Foundation Center.
O'Donoghue, J.; Kirshner, B.; and McLaughlin, M. (2006). Youth Participation: From Myths to Effective Practice. The Prevention Researcher, 13, 3-6.
Olson, J., Goddard, H., Solheim, C., & Sandt, L. (2004). Making a case for engaging adolescents in program decision-making. Journal of Extension,42(6).
Pittman, Karen Johnson, Merita Irby, Joel Tolman, Nicole Yohalem, and Thaddeus Ferber( 2001), Preventing Problems, Promoting Development, Encouraging Engagement: Competing Priorities or Inseparable Goals.The Forum for Youth Investment.
Rost, J. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Simmons, R. (2002). Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls. Harcourt: New York.
Sisk ,D.A ,& Shallcross,D.H.(1986). Leadership: A special type of giftedness . NY: Bearly Limited.
Sisk, D.A. & Rosselli, H. (1987). leadership: A special type of giftedness. New York: Trillium.
Stephen D. Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam& Michael J. Platow(2007). Scientific American Mind:The New Psychology of Leadership,17(3) ,22-29
Stogdill ,R.M.(1974).Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
The Innovation Center. (2003). Youth-Adult Partnerships: A Training Manual. The Innovation Center for Community and Youth Development, National Network for Youth, Youth Leadership Institute. Chevy Chase, MD.
Wheeler, W. and Edlebeck, C. (2006), Leading, learning, and unleashing potential: Youth leadership and civic engagement. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006（109）: 89–97.
Yip, J., Liu, J. and Nadel, A. (2006), A question of leadership: Is there a difference between youth leaders and adult leaders, and if so, should leadership development for youths differ from that for adults?. Leadership in Action, 26: 12–13.
Zeldin, S., & Camino, L. (1999). Youth leadership: Linking research and program theory to exemplary practice. New Designs for Youth Development,15(1), 10–15, p. 11.
Zeldin, S., & Petrokubi, J. (2006). Understanding innovation: Youth-adult partnerships in decision-making. Prevention Researcher, 13, 11-17.
Zeldin, S., Kusgen-McDaniel, A., Topitzes, D., & Calvert, M. (2000). Youth in decision-making: A study on the impacts of youth on adults and organizations. Chevy Chase, MD: National 4-H Council.
Zeldin, S., O'Connor, C., & Camino, L. (2005). Youth participation in research and evaluation. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin–Madison.