研究生: |
黃佳君 Huang, Chia-Chun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
趨向精熟目標與趨向表現目標對提取引發遺忘現象的影響 The effects of mastery-approach goal and performance-approach goal on retrieval-induced forgetting |
指導教授: |
吳昭容
Wu, Chou-Jong |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 69 |
中文關鍵詞: | 成就目標 、趨向精熟目標 、趨向表現目標 、提取引發遺忘 |
英文關鍵詞: | achievement goals, mastery-approach goals, performance-approach goals, retrieval-induced forgetting |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203674 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:173 下載:15 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討趨向精熟與趨向表現目標對國中生提取引發遺忘之影響,亦即探討成就目標是如何影響個人重複提取練習部分記憶材料,而造成後續遺忘與該提取材料相關項目之現象。前導研究以86名國中生對於詩人王維與杜牧的了解,從華人七大基本性格所涵蓋的90個正面表述形容詞列表中挑選實驗材料,以確保實驗刺激材料能形成對詩人的鮮明、整體的印象,且非國中生原有的知識或記憶。正式研究採用提取引發遺忘之實驗派典,對262名七年級國中生進行實驗。以班級為單位將受試者分派到趨向精熟目標組或趨向表現目標組,在學校電腦教室進行實驗。實驗材料以E-prime 2.0的程式以隨機的順序在電腦上呈現,並以題本個別作答。刪除漏答數過高及操弄未成功的受試者,進入分析的人數為165人,趨向精熟目標組80人,趨向表現目標組85人。研究結果發現,採趨向精熟目標的國中生如預期地減少提取引發遺忘之抑制量,消除提取引發遺忘的現象;但採趨向表現目標的學生,卻與預期相反地,消除了提取引發遺忘的現象。本研究以操弄未成功的學生87人,確認本實驗材料是能有效引起提取引發遺忘之現象的;並比較有無提取引發遺忘現象的受試者之學業成就與自陳資料,在學業成就的表現並無差異,有提取引發遺忘現象的受試者其自評認真程度顯著地較低,但在記憶策略的使用上與理論矛盾。針對部分不符合假設的研究結果,筆者主張趨向表現目標也能使學生運用品質好的記憶策略,產生整合效果,消除提取引發遺忘之現象。筆者從實驗方法與邏輯的層次進行探討,提出影響本研究結果的可能因素,如資料分析、程序、材料、受試者、文化觀點、定義與研究方法,並提出具體建議。
The present study examined how mastery-approach goal and performance-approach goal affected retrieval-induced forgetting. In a pilot study, 86 junior high school students selected materials from the Chinese Big Seven personality dimensions based on their knowledge about the poet Wang Wei and Du Mu. The purpose of the pilot study was to ensure that with the help of the materials the students could form distinctive overall impressions about the poets, and to check that the students were not familiar with these materials. In a formal study, we manipulated the achievement goals using task instructions followed by a typical retrieval-practice paradigm to assess retrieval-induced forgetting. We used group testing, and presented stimulus by E-prime 2.0. 261 junior high school students were randomly assigned to two groups according to their classes. One was the mastery-approach goal group, and the other one was the performance-approach goal group. We deleted the data of the participants who failed to pass the manipulation check or missed too many answers, and we analyzed the data of the rest of the participants. The remaining participants included 80 students in the mastery-approach goal group, and 85 students in the performance-approach goal group. As per our expectation, the results showed that retrieval-induced forgetting was not statistically significant in the mastery-approach goal group. However, contrary to our expectation, retrieval-induced forgetting was not statistically significant in the performance-approach goal group either. We further analyzed the data of 87 participants who had failed to pass the manipulation check to confirm that the materials could cause retrieval-induced forgetting. We compared the participants who eliminated retrieval-induced forgetting with the participants who did not eliminate it. We found that there was no difference in the academic achievement of the two groups of participants. We also observed that the participants who eliminated retrieval-induced forgetting showed higher degrees of task commitment, and that there was a contradiction between the phenomenon of their use of memory strategies and theoretical expectations. However, a part of the study results did not meet our assumptions. We proposed that the students who adopted performance-approach goal were able to use good-quality memory strategies, and they were able to eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting. From the perspective of experimental methods and logic levels, we discussed that many factors could affect the results, such as analytical methods, procedures, materials, subjects, cultural perspective, definition of performance-approach goals, and research methods. Based on these discussions we made concrete proposals.
施淑慎(2004)。成就目標、自我效能、以及策略使用在考試焦慮上所扮演之角色。國立臺北師範學院學報,17(1),355-378。
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。 師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。
黃金蘭(2004)。不同類別型態之提取引發遺忘:提取練習與整合性的效果。國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。(編號NSC93-2413-H-011-001。)
楊國樞(1999)。中國人之基本性格向度、結構及效應的系統性研究。國家科學委員會特約研究計畫成果報告。(編號NSC86-2143-H002-026。)
謝岱陵(2002)。國中生四向度目標導向之中介效果分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南。
李玫蓉、程炳林(2005)。趨向表現目標的類別及其與適應性學習組型之關係。教育心理學報,37(1),61-78。
侯玫如、程炳林、于富雲(2004)。國中生多重目標導向與其自我調整學習之關係。教育心理學報,35(3),221-248。
彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報:教育類,50(2),69-95。
黃金蘭、林以正、葉怡玉(2006)。華人七大基本性格是否具有心理實質性?「提取引發遺忘效果」之檢驗。本土心理學研究,26,111-140。
Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 415-445.
Anderson, M. C., & Bell, T. (2001). Forgetting our facts: The role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 544-570.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20(5), 1063-1087.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 522-530.
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102(1), 68-100.
Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80(5), 706-722.
Bauml, K., & Hartinger, A. (2002) On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory,10(3), 215-224
Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Chan, J. C., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (2006). Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 553.
Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning & Individual Differences, 21(4), 337-346.
Ciranni, M. A., & Shimamura, A. P. (1999). Retrieval-induced forgetting in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25(6), 1403-1414.
Craik, F. I., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 12(6), 599-607.
Dweck, (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dunn, E. W., & Spellman, B. A. (2003). Forgetting by remembering: Stereotype inhibition through rehearsal of alternative aspects of identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 420-433.
Eccles, J. S. (1983). Achievement and achievement motives. In K. Wentzel, A. Wigfield, & D.Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school(pp. 77-104). San Francisco, CA: Routledge.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality & social Psychology, 76(4), 628-644.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613-628.
Elliot, A. J., Shell, M. M., Henry, K. B., & Maier, M. A. (2005). Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: An experimental test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 630-640.
Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students' academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 873-891.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
Haberlandt, K. (1999). Human memory: Exploration and application. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Ikeda, K., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2015). Mastery-approach goals eliminate retrieval-induced forgetting: The role of achievement goals in memory inhibition. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 687-695.
Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., & Galluccio, L. (1999). Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 478-493.
MacLeod, M. (2002). Retrieval‐induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: Forgetting as a consequence of remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology,16(2), 135-149.
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2011). Achievement motivation and memory: Achievement goals differentially influence immediate and delayed remember-know recognition memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1339-1348.
Macrae, C. N., & MacLeod, M. D. (1999). On recollections lost: When practice makes imperfect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(3), 463-473.
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383-1409.
Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61-75.
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL
suggestions. TESOL Journal, 18-22.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 92(3), 544-
555.
Penolazzi, B., Stramaccia, D. F., Braga, M., Mondini, S., & Galfano, G. (2014). Human memory retrieval and inhibitory control in the brain: Beyond correlational evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(19), 6606-6610.
Radvansky, G. A. (1999). Memory retrieval and suppression: The inhibition of situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 563-579.
Ravindran, B., Greene, B. A., & Debacker, T. K. (2005). Predicting preservice teachers' cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(4), 222-233.
Shih, S. S. (2005). Taiwanese sixth graders’ achievement goals and their motivation, strategy use, and grades: An examination of the multiple goal perspective. The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 39-58.
Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Nestojko, J. F. (2006). Is retrieval success a necessary condition for retrieval-induced forgetting? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1023-1027.
Shaw, J. S., Bjork, R. A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 249-253.
Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 827-843.
Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213-243.