研究生: |
李冠葶 Lee, Kuan-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
家族企業女性董事對企業社會責任績效之影響 Female Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance in Family Firm |
指導教授: |
康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping |
口試委員: | 林舒柔 酈芃羽 |
口試日期: | 2021/06/18 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 39 |
中文關鍵詞: | 企業社會責任 、女性董事 、家族企業 、家族持股 |
英文關鍵詞: | CSR, female directors, family firm, Family ownership |
研究方法: | 女性研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100801 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:198 下載:18 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
過去研究顯示,女性董事擁有不同背景、特質、能力、專長有助於董事會職能的發揮。本研究依據2015至2019年間TEJ台灣經濟新報資料庫作為研究樣本來源。企業社會責任分數採用台灣經濟新報資料庫中企業社會責任資料庫的TWSE公司治理評鑑分數建置而成。並採用階層迴歸模型進行實證分析,檢驗女性董事商業背景、教育程度、兼職其他企業董事以及任期與是否會對企業社會責任有正向影響,並將家族持股設為調節變數討論家族持股比例的高低是否會強化或弱化女性董事對企業社會責任績效的影響,藉此判斷女性董事在家族企業中進行企業社會活動的成效。實證結果顯示,女性董事具有相關商業背景、身兼其他企業董事或在公司任期愈長,公司的企業社會責任績效愈高。而家族持股則對企業社會責任有負向影響。然而,原本女性董事教育程度對企業社會責任績效無顯著影響,但當家族持股愈高,反而會調節並強化女性董事教育程度和企業社會責任績效的正向關係。
Past studies have shown that women directors have different backgrounds, characteristics, abilities, and expertise that contribute to the performance of board functions. This study is based on the TEJ (Taiwan Economic Journal) database from 2015 to 2019 as the sample source. And the CSR scores were constructed using the TWSE corporate governance assessment scores from the Corporate Social Responsibility database of TEJ . The empirical analysis was conducted using a hierarchical regression model to examine whether female directors' business background, education, busyness, and tenure have a positive impact on CSR, and to discuss whether being a family-owned company strengthens or weakens the impact of female directors on CSR performance. The results show that female directors have a strong influence on corporate social responsibility. The empirical results show that the more female directors have relevant business backgrounds are directors of other companies, or have longer tenure in the company, the higher the CSR performance of the company, while family businesses have a negative impact on CSR. However, while the education level of female directors does not have a significant impact on CSR performance, the higher the family shareholding, the more it adjusts and strengthens the positive relationship between the education level of female directors and CSR performance.
方世榮、黃瓊瑤及陳育成(2008)。 投資人關係管理-代理理論與關係行銷的觀點.中原企管評論, 6(1), 99-126
倪衍森及廖容岑(2006)。「家族企業負債代理成本及股利政策之研究-以台灣上市公司為例」,管理與系統,第 13 卷第二期,頁153-179。
戚靜玟、詹秋碧、張瑞晃及李馨蘋,(2018)。 家族持股與董事會結構對企業社會責任之影響. 東吳經濟商學學報, (97), 1-34。
郭麗娟(2007)。台灣家族企業所有權型態與生產力相關之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士論文。
鄧美貞及王琬青(2012)。企業社會責任與財務績效: 以經營效率為中介效果. 朝陽商管評論,11(2),77-104。
沈中華及張元(2008)。「企業社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE 社會責任指數為例」,經濟論文,36(3):339-385。
Ahern, R.B. , Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94 (2), 291–309 .
Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C.R.(2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics. 44 (1), 179–198.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., and Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Almazan, A., and Suarez, J. (2003). Managerial compensation and the market reaction to bank loans. The review of financial studies, 16(1), 237-261.
Anderson, R. C., and Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding‐family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the SandP 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
Anderson, R. C., Reeb,D. M.,Upadhyay, A., and Zhao, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5-38.
Banfield, E. C.,(1958), The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, 1st, Glencoe, IL: FreePress.
Barrett, M., and Moores, K. (2011). Gender diversity and family firm governance: Towards a research agenda. Paper presented at the Family Business Australia (FBA): Family Business Research & Education Symposium, Perth, Australia.
Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
Ben‐Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., and Labelle, R. (2013). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 85-101.
Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., and Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking and Finance, 88, 267-291.
Block, J. H., and Wagner, M. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(7), 475-492.
Bliss, R. T., and Potter, M. E. (2002). Mutual fund managers: Does gender matter. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 8(1): 1-15.
Boyd, B. (1990), “Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of the Resource Dependence Model,” Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419-430.
Browen, H. R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York: Harper and Row.
Bubolz, M. (2001), “Family as A Source, User and Builder of Social Capital.” Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, pp.129-131.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.
Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian economic history review, 47(1), 10-23.
Chami, R. (2001). What’s different about family business? University of Notre Dame and the I Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L. H. P., 2000, “The Separation of Ownership and
Control in East Asian Corporation,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1-2, 81-112. nternational Monetary Fund. Working Paper 01/70.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and Lang, L. H. P., 2000, “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1-2, 81-112.
Connelly, B. L., and Van Slyke, E. J. (2012). The power and peril of board interlocks. Business Horizons, 55(5), 403-408.
Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R.(2003). Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. Journal of Business strategy. 24 (5), 8–9.
Dang, R., Bender, A.F., Scotto, M.J., (2014). Women on French corporate board of directors: how do they differ from their male counterparts? J. Appl. Bus. Res. 30 (2), 489–507.
Davids, J. H., F. D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson (1997), “Toward A Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review, 22, pp.20-47.
Deng, X., J. Kang, and B. Low (2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization: Evidence from Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 110, No.1, pp.87-109.
Dimson, E., O. Karakas, and X. Li (2015), “Active Ownership.” The Review of Financial Studies, 28, No.12, pp.3225-3268.
DiTomaso, N. , Post, C. ,and Parks-Yancy, R. , (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: power, status, and numbers. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33, 473–501 .
Dyer, W., and D. A. Whetten (2006), “Family Firms and Social Responsibility: Preliminary Evidence from the S&P500.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, No.6, pp.785-802.
Eells, R., and C. Walton (1974), Conceptual Foundation of business, Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.Dawkins, J., and S. Lewis (2003), “CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy.” Journal of Business Ethics, 44, pp.185-193.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” The Academy of Management Review, 14:4, 532-550.
Falato, A., Kadyrzhanova, D., and Lel, U. (2014). Distracted directors: Does board busyness hurt shareholder value? Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3), 404-426.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C., 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Faller, C. M., and Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2018). Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A literature review of theories and recent empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 150,15–40.
Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Fama, E.F. (1980), “Agency problem and theory of the firm,” Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Fatemi, A., I. Fooladi, and H. Tehranian (2015), “Valuation Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 59, pp.182-192.
Fuerst, O., and Kang, S. (2000). Corporate Governance Expected Operating Performance (pp. 1-138). and Pricing. Working Papers.
Godfrey, P. C. (2005), “The Relationship between Corporate
Güner, A. B., Malmendier, U., and Tate, G. (2008). Financial expertise of directors. Journal of financial Economics, 88(2), 323-354.
Hambrick, D. C., and Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206.
Hans-Jörg, N. (2017). Helicopter Money: Central Banks as Spenders of Last Resort? Comments on the book Between Debt and the Devil: Money, Credit, and Fixing Global Finance by Adair Turner. Journal for Markets and Ethics, 5(2), 107-109.
Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American sociological review, 74(2), 208-224.
Hillman, A. J. and Keim, G. D.(2001), “Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, 125-139.
Hillman, A. J. and T. Dalziel (2003), “Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives,” Academy of Management Review, 28, 383-396.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella Jr, A. A., and Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of management, 28(6), 747-763.
Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., and Cannella Jr, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941-952.
Ingley, C. B. and N. T. Van der Walt (2003), “Board Configuration: Building Better Boards,” Corporate governance, 3:4, 5-17
Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto (2012), “The Causal Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics, 106, pp.53-72.
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., and Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of management, 39(1), 232-262.
Lamb, N. H., and Butler, F. C. (2018). The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Business and Society,
Masulis, R. W., and Mobbs, S. (2014). Independent director incentives: Where do talented directors spend their limited time and energy? Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2), 406-429.
Moon, J., Kang, N., and Gond, J. P. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and government. In D. Coen, W. Grant, and G. Wilson (Eds.). Oxford handbook of business and government (pp. 512–544). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morck, R. and Yeung, B., (2004), “Family Control and the Rent-Seeking Society,”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 28, No. 4, 391-409.
Nielsen, S. and M. Huse (2010), “Women Directors’ Contribution to Board Decision Making and Strategic Involvement: the Role of Equality Perception,” European Management Review, 7:1, 16-29.
Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., and Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of business ethics, 104(2), 283-297.57(7), 1374–1406.
Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation.” Business Society December, 41, No.4, pp.393-414.
Perspective.” Academy of Management Review, 30, No.4, pp.777- 798.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper and Row.
Preslmayer, C., Kuttner, M., and Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2018). Uncovering the research field of corporate social responsibility in family firms: A citation analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(2), 169–195.
Robinson, G., and Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21-31.
Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T. Y., and Nadisic, T. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR‐specific relative autonomy and individualism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 559–579.
Salganicoff, M. (1990). Women in family businesses: Challenges and opportunities. Family Business Review, 3(2): 125-137.
Schulze, W. G., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., and Buchholtz, A. K., (2001), “Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence,” Organization Science, Vol.12, No. 2, 99-116.
Seto-Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334–345
Singh, V., Terjesen, S., and Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European management journal, 26(1), 48-58.
Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., and Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 447-483.
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., and George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544.
Whetten, D., and A. Mackey (2002), “A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation. “Business and Society, 41, No.4, pp.393-414.
Williamson, O.E. (1983), “Organization form, residual claimants and corporate control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 431-460
Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., and Woidtke, T. (2001), “Family Control and Corporate Governance:
Evidence from Taiwan,” International Review of Finance, Vol. 2, No. 1-2, 21-48.