本研究旨在探討及發展中文版創造性自我調節量表之信效度，並進一步分析跨群體測量恆等性。創造性自我調節意指個體在進行個人創造力活動時，個體透過對創意活動計畫所做的行為調整、策略調整、自我的省思以及調節自身行為的過程。研究者首先翻譯Zielińska等人（2022）編製的Creative Self-Regulation (CSR)量表，以臺灣210名成年人及研究學生為預試樣本，透過項目分析及因素分析做為刪題依據並確認正式量表題目，形成「中文版創造性自我調節量表（Chinese Version of the Creative Self-Regulation Scale, C-CSRS）」。正式施測階段招募445名各領域在職成人、126名大學生、194名高中生為參與者進行施測，並將參與者分組實施大五人格測驗、創意自我效能、創造力信念、新編創造思考測驗、自我調整學習、情緒調節量表等效標測量。接著據以進行驗證性因素分析、效標關聯分析，並比較不同性別（男、女性）、不同年齡層（高中生、大學生及就業成人）之測量恆等性。研究結果如下：
一、中文版創造性自我調節構面與原研究者所發展的不同，新萃取出三個向度：調整方法與目標、接納與開放態度、正向情緒激勵，並且縮減題數，為22題。
二、中文版創造性自我調節量表總量表Cronbach's α內部一致性係數為.829。各向度的Cronbach's α數值介於.680～.808；重測信度總量表相關為.737，分量表除「對困難的預期」、「不確定性接受度」兩者較低分別為.326、.411之外，其餘為.587～.670之高度正相關；驗證性因素分析整體模式適配度除χ2外，其他數值皆通過；整體而言中文版創造性自我調節與開放性人格、嚴謹性人格、創造力成長型信念有中度的正相關；與創意自我效能有高度正相關；與創造性思考中的語文流暢、語文變通、語文精進有低度正相關；與自我調整學習、情緒調節也都有高度正相關。表示本量表的信度與效度良好。
三、跨高中、大學、成人群體的測量恆等性方面，皆維持形貌恆等與尺度恆等，僅截距不恆等；跨性別的測量恆等性方面，則是形貌恆等、尺度恆等與截距恆等皆保持測量的恆等性。
依據研究結果，對後續研究及實務工作提出建議，供予參考。

This study aims to investigate and develop the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Creative Self-Regulation Scale (C-CSRS) and further analyze its cross-group measurement invariance. Creative self-regulation refers to the process by which individuals adjust behaviors, strategies, self-reflection, and regulate their own actions during personal creative activities. The researcher translated the Creative Self-Regulation (CSR) scale developed by Zielińska et al. (2022) into Chinese and conducted a preliminary test with 210 Taiwanese adult and postgraduate. Through item analysis and factor analysis as the basis for item deletion and confirmation of the formal scale items, the Chinese version of the Creative Self-Regulation Scale (C-CSRS) was developed. In the formal testing phase, 445 working adults from various fields, 126 university students, and 194 high school students were recruited as participants. Participants were grouped and underwent the Big Five Personality Test, Creative Self-Efficacy, Creativity Beliefs, a newly developed Creative Thinking Test, Self-Regulated Learning, and an Emotional Regulation scale as criterion measures. Confirmatory factor analysis and criterion-related validity analysis were conducted, and measurement invariance across different genders (male, female) and age groups (high school, university, and working adults) was compared. The results are as follows:
1.The Chinese version of the Creative Self-Regulation Scale revealed three dimensions different from those developed by the original researchers: Adjustment Methods and Goals, Acceptance and Open Attitude, Positive Emotional Motivation. The total number of items was reduced to 22.
2.The Cronbach's α internal consistency coefficient for the total scale of the Chinese version was 0.829. The Cronbach's α values for each dimension ranged from 0.680 to 0.808. The test-retest reliability for the total scale was 0.737, and the dimensions showed high positive correlations ranging from 0.587 to 0.670, except for "Expectations of Difficulty" and "Acceptance of Uncertainty," which had lower correlations of 0.326 and 0.411, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good overall model fit, except for the χ2 value. In general, The Chinese version of the Creative Self-Regulation demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with creative personality traits (openness, conscientiousness), creativity growth beliefs; a high positive correlation with creative self-efficacy; a low positive correlation with language fluency, flexibility, and elaboration in creative thinking; and a high positive correlation with self-regulated learning and emotional regulation. These findings indicate that the scale has good reliability and validity.
3.In terms of cross-group measurement invariance across high school, university, and adult groups, the scale maintained configural and scalar invariance, with only intercepts being non-invariant. Across genders, measurement invariance maintained configural, scalar, and intercept invariance.
Based on the research results, the researcher provides recommendations for reference in subsequent research and practical work.

壹、中文文獻
丁毓珊（2020）：《國中生成長心向課程之學習效果暨成長心向路徑模式分析》（未出版碩士論文），國立政治大學 https://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202000837
丁毓珊、葉玉珠（2021）：〈 國中生學習心向、 學習自我效能與學習適應之關係： 以自我調整學習為中介變項之路徑模式分析〉。《教育研究與發展期刊》，17(2)，83-117。 https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202106_17(2).0003
王佳玲（2004）：《大學生情緒智力信念、創造力信念與情緒智力、創造力之關係》（未出版碩士論文），國立政治大學。
江文慈（1999）：《情緒調整的發展軌跡與模式建構之研究》（未出版博士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20030731
江文慈（2001）：〈青少年情緒智力發展之研究〉。《世新大學學報》，11，51-82。
江文慈、孫志麟（1998）：《情緒智力量表之編製》。臺北市教師研習中心。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪（1998）：〈新編創造思考測驗指導及研究手冊〉。教育部訓委會，臺北。
吳靜吉、葉玉珠（1993）：〈十年前後台灣地區學生語文創造力發展之比較研究〉。中國超常兒童研究和教育15周年學術研討會，北京。
李慧賢（1996）：《原住民學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究》（未出版碩士論文）國立政治大學。
周進洋、韓承靜（1999）：〈心智表徵與創造思考〉。《科學與教育學報》，3，1–25。https://doi.org/10.6449/JSE.199905.0001
林佳慧（2020）：《學步兒氣質與母親教養雙向影響歷程及其對早期自我調節原型之影響》（未出版碩博士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200358
邱皓政（2012）。量化研究法：測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北市：雙葉。
柳秀蘭（1995）：《資優學生、普通學生、山地學生創造力與問題解決能力之比較研究》（未出版碩士論文），國立彰化師範大學。
洪素蘋、林珊如（2004）：〈Whatever you say, I can do it ─「學生創意自我效能量表」之編製〉。（口頭發表論文）。2004年第二屆創新與創造力研討會，臺北。
張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君（2010）：〈教師創造力信念、創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響〉。《復興崗學報》，99，151-172。https://doi.org/10.29857/FHKAJ.201009.0007
張原誠、蕭佳純（2016）：〈學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力：教師創造力教學有效嗎？〉。《教育實踐與研究》，29(2)，65-104。
教育部（2002）：《創造力教育白皮書》。教育部。https://talented.special.tyc.edu.tw/userfiles/talented.special.tyc.edu.tw/files/20210331034650577.pdf
莊麗敏（2020）：《運用自我調節健促方案改善代謝症候群個案之疾病成效探討》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺北護理健康大學。
郭嘉琪、林秋菊（2009）：〈自我調節方案對改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病人急性加重症狀之成效〉。《護理暨健康照護研究》，5(3)，182−192。https://doi.org/doi:10.6225/JNHR.5.3.182
陳秀惠（2010）：《國中生自我決定動機之發展模式及其相關影響因素探討》（未出版碩士論文），國立成功大學。
陳宗逸（1995）：《家庭背景、教師行為、制握信念與國小學童創造思考相關之研究》（未出版碩士論文）， 國立屏東師範學院。
陳相如、陳鏡如（2019）：〈以自我調節理論 分析中年就業者的有效求職自我調節策略〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》，55，123- 160。
彭淑玲（2010）：〈創造力動機歷程模式：未來目標、課室目標結構、自我決定動機、自我調整學習策略與創造力之關係〉（未出版博士論文），國立台灣師範大學。
程炳林（2002）：〈多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用〉。《師大學報》，47，36-58。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200204.0003
黃芳銘（2004）：《社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式》。五南。
黃芳銘（2007）：《結構方程模式：理論與應用（五版）》。五南。
楊坤原（2001）：〈創造力的意義及其影響因素簡介〉。《科學教育月刊》，239，3-12。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200105_(239).0002
溫怡梅（1987）：《領導才能訓諫課程對國小智能優異學生正向自我概念、創造力與領導能力的影響》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。
葉玉珠（2000）：〈創造力發展的生態系統模式及其應用於科技與資訊領域之內涵分析〉。《教育心理學報》，32(1)，頁95-121 https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20000612
劉士豪（1998）：《年齡、性別、成就目標、目標導向與創意生活經驗、創造力之關係》（未出版碩士論文），國立政治大學。
蔡文玲（1992）：《認知型式﹑自我效能﹑個人動機與創造性之關係研究》（未出版碩士論文），輔仁大學。
貳、英文文獻
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 247. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28).
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of personality, 2, 154-196.
Bandura, A., & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(1), 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041187
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & cognition, 42, 1186-1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). 22 Spontaneous and Controlled Processes. In The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming (p. 285). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190464745.013.22
Bentler, P. M. (1982). Comfirmatory factor analysis via noniterative estimation: A fast, inexpensive method. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151715
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Unfreezing creativity: A dynamic micro-longitudinal approach. Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice in education, 7-25.　 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_2
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In The creative self (pp. 3-22). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7
Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables.New York:Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Byrne, B. M.(1989).A Primer of LISREL: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models. New York:Springer-Verlag.
Byrne, B. M.(2010).Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming.New York:Routledge.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456-466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111
Chang, Y. L., Chen, H. C., Wu, I. C., Chang, J. H., & Wu, C. L. (2017). Developmental trends of divergent thinking and feeling across different grades for Taiwanese adolescence between 1990’s and 2010’s. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.002
Chang, E. C. (1996a). Cultural Differences in Optimism, Pessimism, and Coping: Predictors of Subsequent Adjustment in Asian American and Caucasian American College Students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.43.1.113
Chang, E. C. (1996b). Evidence for the cultural specificity of pessimism in Asians vs Caucasians: a test of a general negativity hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(5), 819-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00110-9
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.3102/1686524
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R.(1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assesment Resources.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Socity, cultureand person: A sistem view of creativity. The Nature of Creativity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 325-339.
Donoghue, M. L. (1994). Problem-solving effectiveness: The relationship of divergent and convergent thinking. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Febbraro, G. A., & Clum, G. A. (1998). Meta-analytic investigation of the effectiveness of self-regulatory components in the treatment of adult problem behaviors. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00008-1
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1996). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7722.003.0003
Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the" goal looms larger" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115
Goff, K. (1993). Creativity and life satisfaction of older adults. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 19(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/0360127930190304
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associate.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr.（2003）. A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418809534285
Guilford, J P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. N.Y. : McGraw-Hill. Kaufman.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280- 1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J. R., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610739208253916
Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2017). Meditation and metacontrol. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 1, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0017-4
Ivcevic, Z., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2017). From having an idea to doing something with it: Self-regulation for creativity. In The creative self (pp. 343-365). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00020-0
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1941
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2009). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y
Kleinmintz, O. M., Ivancovsky, T., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2019). The two-fold model of creativity: the neural underpinnings of the generation and evaluation of creative ideas. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 131-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.004
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Metcalfe, J. (1986). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12,(4) 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.4.623
Michael, L. H., HOU, S. T., & FAN, H. L. (2011). Creative self‐efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
Millsap, R. E., & Everson, H. (1991). Confirmatory measurement model comparisons using latent means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_6
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
Mumford, M. D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 317-322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003
Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323
Pesut, D. J. (1990). Creative Thinking as a Self‐Regulatory Metacognitive Process‐A Model for Education, Training and Further Research. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00532.x
Peterson, C. (2006). A Primer in Positive Psychology. Oxford university press.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., & Ridgley, L. M. (2018). Anchoring the creative process within a self-regulated learning framework: Inspiring assessment methods and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 921-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9431-5
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research. Development and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Histriometric inquiries. Harvard University Press. 　https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674424753
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151
Sinclair, C., Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M., & Wisdom, J. (2006). Developing students' creativity: Searching for an appropriate pedagogy. In Developing creativity in higher education: An imaginative curriculum (pp. 118-141).
Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. Viking Adult.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating Creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free press.
‌Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-000
Thompson, R. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational psychology review, 3, 269-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01319934
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2002.12.001
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428102005002001
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought, London: J. UK: Jonathan Cape.
Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(3), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1295105
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. science, 322(5898), 115-117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845
Wyer, R. S. Jr., & Lambert, A. J. (1994).The role of trait constructs in person perception: A historical perspective. Social cognition: Impact on social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
Zhang, W., Sjoerds, Z., & Hommel, B. (2020). Metacontrol of human creativity: The neurocognitive mechanisms of convergent and divergent thinking. NeuroImage, 210, 116572.　 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116572
Ziegler, A., Stoeger, H., & Grassinger, R. (2011). Actiotope model and self-regulated learning. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000001
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., Ivcevic, Z., & Karwowski, M. (2022). How adolescents develop and implement their ideas? On self-regulation of creative action. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100998
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2021). Self-regulation in creative learning: Agentic perspective. Creativity. Theories–Research-Applications, 8(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0005
Zielińska, A., Forthmann, B., Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2023). Self-regulation for creative activity: The same or different across domains?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B.J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulatedlearning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_1
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. (2nd edn., pp.289-307). Mahwah NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2