大學的實驗課程對於科學課程，尤其是物理領域有著舉足輕重的地位。而實驗物理課程更是物理系學生踏入研究前培養專家能力的重要課程。本研究將借助專門用以評估大學物理實驗課程的工具：E-CLASS，分析大學的物理實驗課程是否有助於學生發展專家觀點。本研究透過E-CLASS問卷調查學生在修習「自然科學領域探究與實作」後，本科系學生是否能因此發展出實驗物理學家的專家觀點。研究發現學生在課程後的E-CLASS整體分數沒有顯著差異，然而受到課程目標的影響，使得問卷中部分單一題目的分數有著顯著變化。再者透過學生對於實驗觀點的質性簡答則發現學生的回應多能與課程目標切合。而透過本研究的結果，期望能幫助大學實驗物理課程能更有效的培養學生的實驗物理能力。

Experimental courses have an important place in science courses, especially in the field of physics. The experimental physics course is an important course for the students of the Department of Physics to cultivate their expert abilities before entering into research. This research uses E-CLASS: a tool dedicated to evaluating university physics lab courses to analyze whether university physics lab courses are helpful for students to develop expert’s views. This research uses the E-CLASS questionnaire to investigate whether students can develop an expert opinion of an experimental physicist after taking "Inquiry and Inquiry and Practice in Natural Science". The research found that there was no significant difference in the overall scores of students in the E-CLASS after the course. However, due to the impact of the course objectives, the scores of some single questions in the questionnaire changed significantly. Furthermore, through the qualitative short answers of students to the experimental viewpoints, it is found that the students' responses are mostly in line with the course objectives. Through the results of this research, it is expected to help the experimental physics course to cultivate students' experimental physics ability more effectively.

1.National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

2.Wieman, C. (2015). Comparative cognitive task analyses of experimental science and instructional laboratory courses. The Physics Teacher, 53(6), 349-351.

3.Freedman, D. A. (2009). Observational Studies and Experiments. In Freedman, D.A.(Eds.),Statistical models: theory and practice(chap. 1,pp.3-9). cambridge university press.

4.Hu, D., Zwickl, B. M., Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2017). Qualitative investigation of students’ views about experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020134.

5.Lederman, N.G. & Lederman, J.S.（2002）. Scientific Inquiry：How Is It Defined/Used in Curriculum Reform?

6.Miller, W.L. & Crabtree, B.F. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B.F. Crabtee & W.L. Miller eds., Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

7.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2015). Correlating students' beliefs about experimental physics with lab course success. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03933.

8.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016 a). Impact of instructional approach on students' epistemologies about experimental physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05758.

9.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016 b). Open-ended versus guided laboratory activities: Impact on students’ beliefs about experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020132.

10.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016 c). based assessment of students’ beliefs about experimental physics: When is gender a factor?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020130.

11.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2016 d). Students’ epistemologies about
experimental physics: Validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science
Survey for experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010123.

12.Wilcox, B. R., Zwickl, B. M., Hobbs, R. D., Aiken, J. M., Welch, N. M., &
Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Alternative model for administration and analysis of research-based assessments. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010139.

13.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2017 a). Improvement or selection? A
longitudinal analysis of students’ views about experimental physics in their lab
courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 023101.

14.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2017 b). Students’ views about the nature
of experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020110.

15.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2017 c). Developing skills versus reinforcing concepts in physics labs: Insight from a survey of students’ beliefs about experimental physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010108.

16.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2018 a). Impact of perceived grading
practices on students' beliefs about experimental physics. 2017 PERC Proceedings.

17.Wilcox, B. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2018 b). A summary of research-based
assessment of students' beliefs about the nature of experimental physics. American Journal of Physics, 86(3), 212-219.

18.Zwickl, B. M., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2013, January). Development and validation of the Colorado learning attitudes about science survey for experimental physics. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1513, No.1, pp. 442-445). American Institute of Physics.

19.Zwickl, B. M., Hirokawa, T., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2013).
Development and results from a survey on students views of experiments in lab
classes and research. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.5760.

20.Zwickl, B. M., Hirokawa, T., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2014).
Epistemology and expectations survey about experimental physics: Development and initial results. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010120

21.張芬芬、Chang, Fen-fen (2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟：在抽象階梯上爬升，初等教育學刊，35，頁87-120。

22.王守玉、Carol Windsor, Patsy Yates（2012）。簡介紮根理論研究法。護理雜誌，59(1)，90-94。

23.盧俊宏（2009）。以紮根理論初探升遷動機-以國營事業電力工員轉換為職員為例。國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士班碩士論文。

24.許榮富(1989)。專科普通物理學與專科普通物理實驗教學改進之理念，物理會刊，11(1)，頁6-13。

25.傅昭銘(2006)。大學物理實驗教學的思維。物理雙月刊，28(3)，頁573-579。

26.蘇宇暉、羅凱揚(2019)。質化研究與量化研究的差異。檢自：
https://reurl.cc/mLKVEM

27.林本炫（2003）。紮根理論研究法評介。於齊力、林本炫編，質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義：南華教社所。