簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡瑞敏
論文名稱: 故事結構教學對國中學習障礙學生口語敘事學習效果之研究
The Effect of Story Grammar Instruction on Oral Narrative Ability of Junior Students with Learning Disabilities
指導教授: 杞昭安
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 124
中文關鍵詞: 故事結構學習障礙口語敘事單一受試電腦多媒體
英文關鍵詞: story grammar, learning disabilities, oral narrative, single subject, computer multimedia
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:286下載:62
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究目的旨在運用故事結構教學(story grammar instruction)模式,在小團體情境中對國中資源班學習障礙學生進行敘事能力表達之實驗教學,藉以探討故事結構教學對增進國中學習障礙學生口語敘事學習能力之成效。研究對象為三名新北市某國中八至九年級接受資源班教學之學習障礙學生,研究方法採單一受試跨受試多探試設計,三位受試分別進行三週共三個單元之教學實驗,以電腦多媒體影片為教學媒材,
    每單元進行四節課的教學活動,每節課45分鐘。
    本研究之自變項為故事結構教學模式,依變項為受試在接受故事結構教學後,其口語敘事能力(總詞彙數、相異詞彙數、校正後相異詞彙數、錯誤句數、迷走語數)之變化情形。將各口語敘事指標所量化之量數,透過視覺分析、C 統計考驗、社會效度訪談來探討,以瞭解並分析受試各面向之口語敘事能力。最後提出結論及建議,作為未來從事口語敘事教學之參考。
    本研究之結果如下:
    一、故事結構教學對國中學習障礙學生口語敘事之總詞彙數、相異詞彙數、校正後相異詞彙數能力,具有教學成效與維持效果。
    二、故事結構教學對國中學習障礙學生口語敘事之錯誤句數及迷走語數能力,教學成效與維持效果較不顯著。
    三、運用故事結構教學在口語敘事能力表現之效果,獲得受試學生家長的肯定與支持。
    本研究依據研究結果及研究建議與限制,提出教學與研究之建議,並作為未來教學研究相關推論與驗證之參考。

    The Effect of Story Grammar Instruction on Oral Narrative Ability of Junior Students with Learning Disabilities
    ABSTRACT
    The purpose of this study was the use of story grammar instruction mode. In the small groups of junior students with learning disabilities were in the resource room for narrative expression of the experimental teaching ability. To examine the story grammar instruction for the junior students with learning disabilities in the learning ability to the effectiveness of oral narrative. The participles were three junior grades eight to nine students with learning disabilities receiving the resource room teaching in New Taipei City. Research employed a single subject multiple probe design across participles, three participles were a total of three units for three weeks of teaching experiments. Take the computer multimedia video as the teaching intermediary material, each unit carries on four classes the teaching activities, each class forty-five minutes.
    The independent variable was the story grammar instruction model, the dependent variables were tested after receiving story grammar instruction, the oral narrative ability (number of total words , number of different words, corrected type token radio, the error number of sentences, mazes) of the the variations. Quantity of number various oral narrative target quantification, to discuss by the visual analysis, the C statistics test, the social validity interview. To understand and analyze the participles for the oral narrative ability. Finally proposed that the conclusion and the suggestion, will be engaged in reference of the s oral narrative teaching in the future.
    The results of this study are as follows:
    1.Story grammar instruction on oral narratives of junior students with learning disabilities in the number of total words, number of different words, corrected type token radio , has the teaching result and the maintenance effect.
    2.Story grammar instruction on oral narratives of junior students with learning disabilities in the error number of sentences, mazes , has not the teaching result and the maintenance effect.
    3.Obtains to the parents have positively supportive attitudes to use of story grammar instruction to improve oral narrative ability.
    Based on the results and suggests that the restrictions of this study, put forward proposals for teaching research, as future for related inferences of reference and verification.

    誌謝……………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要………………………………………………………………iv 目錄……………………………………………………………………v 圖次……………………………………………………………………vii 表次……………………………………………………………………viii 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與背景………………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題…………………………………………5 第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………………7 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………9 第一節 學習障礙學生語言學習之特色與口語敘事能力………....9 第二節 故事結構教學之教學策略與口語敘事學習之評量……....14 第三節 故事結構教學對學習障礙學生在口語敘事學習能力 之相關研究……………………………………………………20 第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………29 第一節 研究設計與架構………………………………………………29 第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………..35 第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………..36 第四節 研究步驟…………………………………………..…………42 第五節 資料處理和分析……………………………………………..45 第四章 結果與討論……………………………………………………49 第一節 學習障礙學生口語敘事能力之總詞彙數、相異詞彙數、 校正後相異詞彙數效果分析……………………….……….49 第二節 學習障礙學生口語敘事能力之錯誤句數、迷走語數效果分 析………………………………………………………………67 第三節 社會效度與其他觀察資料分析………………………………78 第四節 綜合討論………………………………………………………83 第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………89 第一節 結論……………………………………………………………90 第二節 研究限制與建議………………………………………………92 參考文獻.………………………………………………………………98 附錄一家長同意書……………………………………………………107 附錄二影片故事篩選檢核表…………………………………………108 附錄三故事結構分析圖(一)………………………………………109 附錄四故事結構分析圖(二)………………………………………110 附錄五故事結構實驗教學後受試者口語敘事能力成效與 建議問卷………………………………………………………111 附錄六中央研究院資訊科學所「中文斷詞系統」…………………112 附錄七 CHILDES 軟體語料之轉譯分析系統…………….…………114

    一、 中文部分
    中央研究院(2004):中文詞知識庫小組。2010年12月12日,取自
    http://ckip.iis.sinica.edu.tw/CKIP/index.htm
    王大延、曹純瓊(1998):示範、時間延宕及提示對自閉症學童自發
    語言之成效研究。臺北市立師院學報,29,291-315。
    王瓊珠(2004):故事結構教學加分享閱讀對增進國小閱讀障礙學童
    讀寫能力與故事結構概念之研究。臺北市立師範學報,35,1-22。
    王瓊珠(2008):故事結構教學與分享閱讀。臺北市:心理。
    方淑貞(2003):FUN的教學-圖畫書與語文教學。臺北市:心理。
    李宛靜(2002):語言學習障礙兒童口語述說能力之研究:故事結構
    分析。臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,
    臺北市。
    李維(譯)(1998):維高斯基:思維與語言。臺北市:桂冠圖畫公
    司。
    杜正治(譯)(1994),Tawney, J.W. & Gast D.L.(著):單一受試
    研究法(Single subject research in special education)。臺北
    市:心理。
    杜正治(2006):單一受試研究法。臺北市:心理。
    林佩菁(2003):故事架構教學對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解表現之
    研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所論文,未出版,彰化市。
    林寶貴(1992):特殊兒童溝通訓練教材教法。臺北市:臺北市政府
    教育局。
    林寶貴(1994):語言障礙與矯治。臺北市:五南。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(2005):兒童口語理解測驗。教育部特殊教育工作
    小組發行。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(2000):聽覺障礙學生口語述說能力之研究。國科
    會專題研究報告(報告編號:89-2413-H-003-025-S),未出版。
    林寶貴、錡寶香(2002):聽覺障礙兒童口語述說能力之探討:語
    意、語法與迷走語之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,22,127-154。
    洪儷瑜、蔡東鍾主持,Hope設計(2007):中文補救教學資源網—文
    章分析。2010年12月10日,取自http://edu.nttu.edu.tw/NFL/
    contents/analy/analy_list.asp?menuID=369
    柯華葳(1999):閱讀理解困難篩選測驗。臺北:行政院國家科學委
    員會特殊教育工作小組。
    教育部特殊教育工作小組(2009):特殊教育法。臺北:教育部。
    教育部特殊教育工作小組(2006):特殊教育學生輔導手冊—學習障
    礙。臺南:教育部。
    教育部(2006):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準。臺
    北:教育部。
    許文章(2001):故事圖教學對國小六年級學生記敘文寫作表現與組
    織能力之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出
    版,花蓮市。
    張莉珍(2003):故事結構策略與摘要策略對增進國小六年級低閱讀
    能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。私立中原大學教育研究所碩士論
    文,未出版,桃園縣。
    陸世豪(2004):應用行為分析—行為改變技術實務。臺北市:心
    理。
    陸惠萍(2003):台灣閱讀障礙兒童在敘事中的語言缺失。私立輔仁
    大學語言學研究所,未出版,新北市。
    陳榮華(修訂)(1997),David Wechsler(著):魏氏兒童智力量
    表(第三版)。臺北:中華行為科學社。(原著第三版出版於1991
    年)
    陳姝蓉(2002):故事結構教學對增進國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解能
    力之研究。臺北市立師範學院身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文,未出
    版,臺北市。
    莊妙芬(1997):智能障礙兒童與自閉症兒童口語表達能力之比較研
    究。特殊教育與復建學報,5,1-35。
    曾進興(譯) (2002),June E.D.(著):教導重度障礙學生溝通技
    能:融合教育實務 (Teaching communication skills to
    students with severe disabilities)。臺北市:心理。
    曾鳯菊、吳咨杳、雲天湘(譯)(2008),William G.W., & Marie
    G.P.(著):說的自在,維持說話流暢技巧 (Facilitating
    fluency:transfer strategies for adult stuttering
    treatment programs)。臺北市:心理。
    鈕文英(2007):美國身心障礙個體教育增進法案的修訂緣起與內
    涵。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,96,349-366。
    葉淑美(2002):合作故事圖解教學法對國小低閱讀能力學生閱讀理
    解成效之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,
    臺中市。
    黃秀霜(2002):中文年級認字量表。臺北:心理。
    黃瑞珍(1999):故事結構分析法在語言學習障礙兒童教學之應用。
    國小特殊教育,27,4-10。
    董媛卿(1995):如何提升表達能力。臺北市:書泉。
    楊坤堂(1999):我國國民小學一、三、五年級一般兒童與國語學習
    障礙兒童書寫語文能力之研究。臺北市政府教育局補助。臺北市立
    師範學院印行。
    蔡毓玲(2004):智能障礙學生的語言溝通訓練。載於林寶貴(主
    編),溝通障礙:理論與實務(215-231頁)。臺北:心理。
    劉福鎔、鄭淑君、陳玉菁、施錚懿、蔡楓霖(2004):學習障礙資源
    手冊(41頁)。臺中市:教育部中部辦公室。
    劉麗容(1994):如何克服溝通障礙。臺北市:遠流出版社。
    鄭美良(2005):運用故事結構教學提升國小三年級學生閱讀理解能
    力之行動研究。國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出
    版,臺中市。
    錡寶香(1998):國小學童語意與語法能力之研究。國教學
    報,10,165-196。
    錡寶香(1999):口語述說:理論、評量與學習障礙。載於迎千禧談
    特教,249-291。臺北:中華民國特殊教育學會。
    錡寶香(2001):國小低閱讀成就學生的口語述說能力:語言層面的
    分析。特殊教育學報,15,129-176。
    錡寶香(2003):國小低閱讀能力學童與一般閱讀能力學童的敘事能
    力:篇章凝聚之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,24,63-84。
    錡寶香(2004):國小低閱讀能力學童與一般閱讀能力學童的敘事能
    力:故事結構之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,26,247-269。
    錡寶香(2006):兒童語言障礙,理論、評量與教學。臺北市:心
    理。

    二、英文部分
    Almasi,J.F.,Palmer,B.M., & Gambrell,L.B.(1994). Toward
    inquiry: A methodological analysis of whole language
    research. Educational Psychologist,29(4),193-202.
    Araujo,L.(2000).Traversing home/school,English
    /Portuguese:Young learners path to literacy
    learning.Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
    University Of Delaware,Delaware.
    Arthaud,T.J., & Goracke,T.(2006).Implementing a structured
    Story web and outline strategy to assist struggling
    readers. The Reading Teacher,59(6),581-586.
    Boulineau,T,Fore,G.,Hagan-Burke,S., & Burke,M.D.(2004). Use
    of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text
    comprehension of elementary students with learning
    disabilities. Learning Disability
    Quarterly, 27(2),105-121.
    Brophy,J. & Good,T.L.(1986). Teacher behavior and student
    achievement in M.Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of reseach on
    teaching, NY:Macmillan.
    Brown,M.I.(1990).Improving reading comprehension of
    second grade students through the use of”Story
    Mapping”. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED322468
    Catts,H.(1993). The relationship between speech-language
    impairments and reading disabilities.Journal of Speech
    and Hearing Research, 36,948-958.
    Cook,V.J., & Newson,M.(1996).Chomsky’s universal Grammar.
    An Introduction (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Blackwell
    publishers Ltd.
    Copmann,K.P., & Griffith,P.L.(1994). Event and story
    structure recall by Children with specific learning
    disabilities, Language impairments, and
    normally achieving children. Journal of Psycholinguistic
    Reasearch,23,231-248.
    Davies,P.,Shanks,B., & Davies,K.(2004).Improving narrative
    skills in young children with delayed language
    development. Educational Review, 56(3),271-286.
    Eder,L.(1988).Building cohesion through collaborative
    narration. Social Psychology Quarterly,51(3),225-235.
    Fiestas,G.E., & Pena,E.D.(2004).Narrative discourse in
    bilingual children:Language and task eftects. Language,Speech and Hearing Services in
    Schools,35(1),155-168.
    Forgan,J.W., & Vaughn,S.(2000).Adolescents with and without
    LD make the transition to middle school. Journal of
    Learning Disabilities,33,33-44.
    Fry,E.(2002).Read ability versus leveling. Reading Teacher,
    56(3),286-291.
    Gardill,M.C., & Jitendra,A.K.,(1999). Advanced story map
    instruction:Effects on the reading comprehension of
    students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special
    Education, 33(1),2-17,28.
    Gersten,R.(1998).Rencent advances in instructional
    reaserch for students with learning disabilities: An
    overview. Learning Disabilities Reserch &
    Practice,13(3),162-170.
    Gillam,R., & Johnston,J.R.(1992). Spoken and written
    language in language/learning-impaired and normally
    achieving school age-children.
    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,35, 1303-1315.
    Griffey,Q.L.,Zigmond, N., & Leinhardt,G.(1988). The effects
    of self-questioning and story structure training on the
    reading comprehension of poor readers. Learning
    Disability Quarterly, 4(1),45-51.
    Gurney,D.,Gersten,R.M.,Dimino,J., & Carnine,D.(1990).Story
    grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school
    students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning
    Disabilities,23(6),335-342.
    Gutierrez,C.V., & Quinn,R.(1993).Assessing narratives of
    Children from diverse cultureal/linguistic groups.
    Language, speech,and Hearing Services in Schools,24,2-9.
    Hammill,D.D., & Bartel,N.R.(1990).Teaching students with
    Learning and behavior problems (5th ed.).Boston,MA:Allyn
    & Bacon.
    Hayward,D., & Schneider,P.(2000).Effecdveness of teaching
    story grammar instruction knowledge to pre-school
    children with language impairment: An exploratory study.
    Child Language Teaching & Therapy,26(3),255-284.
    Idol,L., & Croll,V.J.(1987).Story-mapping training as a
    means of improving reading comprehension. Learning
    Disability Quarterly ,20(3),214-228.
    Kavale,K.A., & Forness,S.R.(1986).School learning, time and
    learning disabilities: The disassociated learner. Journal
    of Learning Disabilities,19,130-138.
    Kuldanek,K.(1998).The effects of using a combination of
    story frames and retelling strategies with learning
    disabled students to build their comprehension
    ability.(ERIC Document No. ED416469)
    Liles,B.Z.,Duffy,R.J.,Merritt,D.D., & Purcell,S.L.(1995).
    Measurement of narrative discourse ability in children
    with language disorders. Journal of
    Speech and Hearing Research, 38(2),415-425.
    McCabe,A.,(1996). Evaluating narrative discourse skills. In
    Cole, K.N.,Dale,P.S., & Thal,D.J.(Eds.),Communication and
    Language Intervention series, V6. Assessment of
    communication and Language (pp.97-120).Baltimore:
    Paul H. Brookes,Publishing Co.
    McGregor,K.K.(2000).The development and enhancement of
    narrative skills in a preschool classroom: Towards a
    solution to clinician-client mismatch.American Journal of
    Speech-Language Pathology,9(1),55-92.
    Merritt,D.D., & Liles,B.Z.(1987). Story grammar instruction
    ability in Children with and without language disorder:
    Story generation, story retelling, and story
    comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing
    Researcg,30,539-551.
    Miller,J.F.(1996). Progress in Assessing, Describing, and
    Definiting Child Language disorder. In
    Cole,K.N.,Dale,P.S.,& Thal,D.J(Eds.),
    Communication and Language (pp.309-324).Batlimore: Paul
    H.Brookes,Publishing Co.
    Norris,J.A., & Brunning,R.H.(1988). Cohesion in the
    narratives of good and
    poor readers. Journal of Speech and Hearing
    Disorders,55,416-424.
    Owens,R.E.(2004). Language disorder: A functional approach
    to assessment and intervention (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn &
    Bacon.
    Pooja,P.,& Leslie,E.L. (2009). Using Goal-Setting in “P(paw)LANS”to Improve Writing. Teaching Exceptional
    Children Plus 4(5).
    Pressley,M.J.(2002). Metacognition and self-regulated
    comprehension. In A.E.Farstrup & S.J.Samuels (Eds.),
    What research has to say about reading instruction
    (3rd.ed., pp. 291-309).Newark,Delaware:International
    Reading Association.
    Ripich,D.N., & Griffith,P.L.(1988). Narrative abilities of
    children with learning disabilities and nondisabled
    children: Story structure, cohesion,and propositions.
    Journal of Learning Disabilities,21,165-173.
    Rog,L.J., & Burton,W.(2002). Matching texts and readers:
    Leveling early Reading materials for assessment and
    instruction. The Reading Teacher,55(4),348-356.
    Roth,F.P., & Spekman,N.J.(1989). Oral syntactic proficiency
    of learning disabled students: A spontaneous speech
    sampling analysis. Journal of Speech and Hearing
    Research,32,67-77.
    Roth,F.,Spekman,N., & Fye,E.(1995). Reference cohesion in
    the oral Narratives of students with learning
    disabilities and normally achieving students. Learning
    Disability Quarterly, 18,25-40.
    Scott,C.(1988). A perspective on the evaluation of school
    children’s narratives. Language, speech, and Hearing
    Services in Schools,19,51-66.
    Snyder,L.S., & Downey,D.M.(1991). The language-reading
    relationship in normal and reading-disabled children.
    Journal of Speech and Hearing research,34,129-140.
    Stahl,V.(1990). Reference cohesion in LLD preadolescents’
    procedural and narrative discourses. Paper presented at
    the American Speech-Language-Hearing
    Convention,Seattle,WA.
    Stetter,M.E., & Hughes,M.T. (2010). Using Story Grammar to
    Assist Students with Learning Disabilities and Reading
    Difficulties Improve their Comprehension. Education and
    Treatment of Children,33(1),115-151.
    Therrien,W.J. & Kubuina,R.M.(2006). Developong reading
    fluency with repeated reading. Intervention in School &
    Clinic,41(3), 156-160.
    Vallecorsa,A.L., & DeBettencourt,L.U.(1997). Using a
    mapping procedure to teach reading and writing skills to
    middle grade students with learning disabilities.
    Education and Treatment of Children,20(2),173-188.
    Westby,C.E.(1991). Learning to talking to learn:
    Oral-literate language differences. In
    C.S.Simon(Ed.),Communication skill and classroom
    success(pp.334-357). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking.
    Wilkinson,I.A.G.,Elkins,J., & Bain,J.D.(1995). Individual
    differences in story comprehension and recall of poor
    readers. British Journal of Educational
    Psychology,65(4),393-407.
    Ysseldyke,J.E., & Algozzine,B.(1995). Special education: A
    practical approach for teachers. Princeton, NJ: Houghton
    Mifflin.

    QR CODE