國家奧林匹克學院在各國扮演奧林匹克教育的重要推手。中華奧林匹克學院 (Chinese Taipei Olympic Academy, CTOA) 於臺灣推動奧林匹克教育長達四十年。然而，儘管CTOA長期以來之努力備受國際肯定，但其至今仍未擁有實體組織機構及場域。因此，本研究旨在以地方依附理論觀點瞭解臺灣奧林匹克教育發展現況，並探討國家奧林匹克學院對奧林匹克教育實踐之影響，進而分析國家奧林匹克學院實體組織架構和場域建構之必要性與方向。研究方法以半結構式訪談法為主，輔以文件分析法，針對六位奧林匹克相關組織成員進行資料蒐集。研究結果顯示：(一) 現今臺灣奧林匹克教育實踐現況雖已今非昔比，朝向各個年齡階段發展，但仍面臨著人力、資源及金錢不足的困境。(二) 中華奧林匹克學院因未有實體的組織人員編制和穩定的經費來源，導致無法完全發揮其原有功能。(三) 基於地方依附理論，CTOA屬實有建構實體組織架構及場域的必要性。此外，CTOA的實體組織架構和場域應依循國際奧林匹克委員會、國際奧林匹克學院及中華奧林匹克委員會的成立宗旨，並圍繞奧林匹克精神進行打造。本研究建議未來奧林匹克相關組織應致力於扎實奧林匹克教育推展基礎，且在建構CTOA實體組織架構與場域前應先制定適切合宜的發展計畫，以完善臺灣的奧林匹克教育之實踐。

Chinese Taipei Olympic Academy (CTOA) has been promoting Olympic education in Taiwan for over forty years. Despite its internationally recognized efforts, the CTOA still lacks physical organization and environment. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the status of Olympic education development in Taiwan and explore the necessity and direction for establishing a physical organization and environment for the National Olympic Academy. The research methods include semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The results reveal that: (1) While Olympic education practices in Taiwan have improved, challenges such as shortages of manpower, resources, and funding persist. (2) The lack of a physical organization and stable funding sources hampers the CTOA from fully realizing its potential functions. (3) From the perspective of place attachment, there is a clear necessity for the CTOA to establish a physical organization and environment. Additionally, the physical organization and environment of the CTOA should align with the founding principles of the International Olympic Committee, the International Olympic Academy, and the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee. This study suggests that relevant organizations should focus on laying a solid foundation for Olympic education promotion and develop an appropriate plan before constructing the physical organization and environment for the CTOA, thereby enhancing the practice of Olympic education in Taiwan.

Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2003)。環境心理學 (聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯) 五南圖書。(原著出版於1978)
中華奧林匹克委員會 (1983)。奧林匹克常識。作者。
中華奧林匹克委員會 (2023)。第45屆奧林匹克研討會報告書。作者。
中華奧林匹克委員會 (2023)。第46屆奧林匹克研討會報告書。作者。
中華奧林匹克委員會 (無日期)。奧林匹克學院 (CTOA)。中華奧林匹克委員會。擷取於10月30日2023年，https://www.tpenoc.net/ctoa/
王文科、王智弘 (2020)。教育研究法 (第十九版)。五南圖書。
竹村瑞穂、真田久、大林太郎 (2012)。日本奧林匹克教育研究的發展：從筑波大學奧林匹克教育平臺的事例談起。身體文化學報，(14)，1-13。https://doi.org/10.6782/BCJ.201206.0001
吳克文、許立宏 (2023)。2023奧林匹克教育專欄系列1：國文教室裡的奧林匹克教育──國文與健體跨領域融合教學實例分享。學校體育，(194)，94-107。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-N202306080003-00009
呂潔如 (2010)。奧林匹克運動與奧林匹克主義的哲學研究。政大體育研究，(19)，19-33。https://doi.org/10.30411/CTTYYC.201012_(19).0002
李建興、劉宏裕 (2011)。「奧會模式」形成與爭議之探討。中華體育季刊，25(3)，555-563。https://doi.org/10.6223/qcpe.2503.201109.2018
林建淂、洪睿聲 (2004)。奧林匹克精神與教育。大專體育，(72)，58-64。https://doi.org/10.6162/SRR.2004.72.11
林嘉男、許毅璿 (2007)。人與環境關係之論述：釐清 “地方感”、“地方依附”與“社區依附”在環境研究上的角色。環境教育研究，5(1)，41-71。https://doi.org/10.6555/JEER.5.1.041
張力可、黃東治 (2009)。奧林匹克主義與全球公民身分－對北京奧林匹亞德的分析。台灣國際研究季刊，5(1)，129-156。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18162622-200903-200906240014-200906240014-129-156
張智瑋、施致平 (2013)。「奧會模式」之使用現況分析－賽局理論觀點。臺灣體育學術研究，(55)，1-20。https://doi.org/10.6590/TJSSR.2013.12.01
曹勝雄、孫君儀 (2009)。建構地方依附因果關係模式。地理學報，(55)，43-63。https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.2009.55.03
許立宏 (2010)。品格教育與奧林匹克教育。學校體育，(116)，58-66。https://doi.org/10.29937/PES.201002.0009
許立宏 (2019)。第一屆奧林匹克主義行動論壇簡介。學校體育，(170)，64-75。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-201902-201907260008-201907260008-64-75
許立宏 (2020)。日本推動東京2020 (2021) 奧運的奧林匹克教育概況。學校體育，(181)，88-99。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-202012-202101180012-202101180012-88-99
許立宏 (2020)。臺灣體育運動大學第一屆奧林匹克教育創作特展紀實。學校體育，(179)，105-114。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-202008-202101120012-202101120012-105-114
許立宏 (2022)。2022奧林匹克教育文章系列 (II) 運動身體美學素養教育推動－2022臺灣體大通識跨域論壇記實。學校體育，(190)，102-115。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-202206-202211220011-202211220011-102-115
許立宏、曾荃鈺 (2019)。臺灣體大奧林匹克教育特色課程：多元設計理念與國際交流成果分享。學校體育，(171)，55-75。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-201904-201911070018-201911070018-55-75
陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南圖書。
陳沛悌、巫哲緯、裴蕾 (2020)。影視節目觀光景點置入對涉入、地方依附與旅遊意願影響之研究。觀光與休閒管理期刊，8(2)，124-142。https://doi.org/10.6510/JTLM.202012_8(2).0012
陳東韋、李仁佐、謝旻凱 (2014)。從歷史、教育及文化的觀點談奧林匹克運動會。政大體育研究，(23)，43-58。https://doi.org/10.30411/CTTYYC.201410_(23).0003
陳淑芬、翁志航、潘義祥 (2021)。奧林匹克教育的情境教學－以華德福奧林匹克運動會為例。學校體育，(185)，59-75。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20160217001-202108-202201040029-202201040029-59-75
陳智郁、陳光輝、陸康豪、湯文慈 (2021)。2018、2019年世界競技體操錦標賽臺灣選手成績與2020年東京奧林匹克運動會參賽資格的關係。大專體育學刊，23(3)，293-306。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202109_23(3).0005
彭逸坤、徐振德 (2022)。以沙灘排球資料庫分析沙灘排球選手奧林匹克運動會參賽資格之策略。大專體育學刊，24(1)，63-82。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202203_24(1).0005
鈕文英 (2023)。質性研究方法與論文寫作 (第四版)。雙葉書廊。
黃瑞琴 (2021)。質性教育研究方法 (第三版)。心理出版社。
趙諓華 (2000)。論奧林匹克主義的內涵及其特點與意義。屏師體育，4，111-116。
劉進枰 (2005)。論奧林匹克主義的帝國主義色彩。體育學報，38(1)，143-153。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.3801.200503.1212
劉進枰、蔡禎雄 (1994)。促成“奧會模式”的國際奧會主席－薩馬蘭奇～以1981年前後爲中心～。體育學報，(18)，47-56。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.0018.199412.3405
潘淑滿 (2022)。質性研究：理論與應用 (第二版)。心理出版社。
蔡和成 (1984)。奧林匹克精神。健行文化。
謝文全、黃乃熒、吳清山、陳麗珠、王麗雲、王如哲、秦夢群、張德銳、張明輝、林新發、黃宗顯、張鈿富、林明地、湯志民、潘慧玲 (2009)。教育行政學：理論與案例。五南圖書。
Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Binder, D. (2007). Teaching values: An Olympic education toolkit. International Olympic Committee. https://library.olympics.com/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/39546/teaching-values-an-olympic-education-toolkit-a-project-of-the-international-olympic-committee-ed-dea?_lg=en-GB
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed.). Pearson.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202285
Burndage, A. (1963). The Olympic philosophy. Proceedings of the International Olympic Academy, 29-39.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Georgiadis, K. (2010). The implementation of Olympic education programs at world level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(5), 6711-6718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.017
Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
Hsu, L. (2020). A critique of the IOC's Olympic Values Education Program. Taiwan Society for Sport Management, (50), 21-38. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18148972-202010-202009260014-202009260014-21-38
Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In S. M. Low & I. Altman (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 253-278). Springer.
Hwang, B., & Henry, I. (2023). Identifying the field of Olympic education: a meta-narrative review. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(2), 561-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2021.1895861
Inalhan, G., & Finch, E. (2004). Place attachment and sense of belonging. Facilities, 22(5/6), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410540333
Inalhan, G., Yang, E., & Weber, C. (2021). Place attachment theory. A handbook of theories on designing alignment between people and the office environment, 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-16
International Olympic Academy. (2008). 9th Joint International Session for Presidents or Directors of National Olympic Academies and Officials of National Olympic Committees. (Author)
International Olympic Academy. (n.d.). All About IOA. International Olympic Academy. Retrieved October 30, 2023, from https://www.ioa.org.gr/
International Olympic Academy. (n.d.). National Olympic Academies. International Olympic Academy. Retrieved November 1, 2023, from https://www.ioa.org.gr/the-academy/noas
International Olympic Committee. (2017). Host City Contract Operational Requirements. Author. https://library.olympics.com/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/171361/host-city-contract-operational-requirements-international-olympic-committee?_lg=en-GB
International Olympic Committee. (2017). The Fundamentals of Olympic Values Education (2nd ed.). Author. https://library.olympics.com/Default/doc/SYRACUSE/207045/the-fundamentals-of-olympic-values-education-a-sport-based-programme-international-olympic-committee
International Olympic Committee. (2023). Olympic Charter. Author. https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/General/EN-Olympic-Charter.pdf?_ga=2.184732329.1085704567.1698597087-898396751.1695998528
Koulouri, C., & Georgiadis, K. (2011). The International Olympic Academy: a history of an Olympic institution (2nd ed.). International Olympic Academy.
Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(3), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2003.11949993
Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2016) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Michelson, W. (1976). Man and his urban environment: A sociological approach, with revisions. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail‐trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409409513214
Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
Parry, J. (2003). Olympic education in practice. Centre dEstudis Olímpics. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jim-Parry/publication/229035675_Olympic_education_in_practice/links/0c9605196363374fab000000/Olympic-education-in-practice.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Rioux, L., & Pavalache-Ilie, M. (2013). Workplace attachment and organizational commitment-are they predictors of organizational citizenship behavior? Study on french health care workers. Annals of AII Cuza University. Psychology Series, 22(1), 5-18.
Salepi, P., Georgiadis, K., Kriemadis, A., & Travlos, A. (2022). Dependence on resources and cooperation networks of the National Olympic Academies. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 17(4), 824-838. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2022.174.10
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
Scrima, F., Rioux, L., & Guarnaccia, C. (2019). A study of the relationship between workplace attachment and job satisfaction. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 26(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM26.2.3
Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. National Recreation and Park Association Research Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.