本研究目的旨在探討課程美學探究取向之理論基礎與實踐方法，進行藝術統整課程之教育批評探究，提出對課程美學探究取向與教育批評的評析，最後歸納研究結果提出結論與啟示，以作為應用課程美學探究取向與實施藝術統整課程之參考。為達成上述目的，本研究採用文獻分析與教育批評兩種方法，而教育批評則是進行國小藝術統整課程實施之經驗探究。
本研究獲得結論如下：
一、課程美學探究取向緣自對實證典範的批判與超越，融合現象學、符號互動論，亦反映批判立場，是一種探尋意義的「闡釋美學」。
二、課程美學探究取向兼融理性思維與藝術直觀的認知模式，與課程情境的互動中，透過「想像」與「移情」，辨識與呈現影響情境的經驗特質。
三、課程美學探究取向視知識如同藝術品一般，是建構而來的，其認識歷程體現了「認知的創制論」，其認知結果包含理解世界的知識與美感自身的知識。
四、課程美學探究取向類比自藝術批評，視教學乃藝術之展現，主張運用故事隱喻之語言造型再現經驗，並蘊涵移情理解之人文關懷。
五、教育批評是對教室實務知覺的再教育，融合科學的嚴謹與藝術的思維，是一種系統性的質化研究。
六、國小藝術統整課程之教育批評
（一）部分教師已感知藝術統整課程思維的轉變，但對「統整」概念仍有所偏誤。（二）藝術統整課程實施採取多元學習策略，有助於引導學生體驗藝術經驗，但是合作學習適用性仍需再思考。（三）學生於藝術統整課程的學習中，展現自信並能瞭解學習內容，但是學習歷程中，提供學生運用高層次思維的機會仍是不足。（四）藝術統整課程實施有助於學校合作之生態文化建立，但也出現「權力知識化」的危機。

The main aim of this study is to explore the theory and practice of aesthetic form of curriculum inquiry. In order to understand the concept of aesthetic inquiry, literature review and educational criticism-one of the modes of aesthetic inquiry- were applied in this study. The focuses of the literature are on: 1. the history and meaning of aesthetic form of curriculum inquiry; 2. the epistemology of aesthetic form of curriculum inquiry; 3. the essential ideas of aesthetic form of curriculum inquiry; 4. the content and the method of educational criticism. The observations, interviews as well as document analysis that the researcher conducted for the educational criticism were designed for data collection from the arts integrated curriculum in the primary school.
According to the literature review and educational criticism, the research findings are followed:
1. With countering and beyond the shortcomings of positivist paradigm, aesthetic inquiry, interpretive aesthetics, as a tool for understanding curricular problems has been formulated by infusing phenomenology, symbolic interaction, and critical theory.
2. Aesthetic inquiry is both the rational and the artistic modes of knowing. With the interaction with curricular situations, it’s main purpose is to identify and represent the experience qualities by imagination and empathy.
3. Aesthetic inquiry as a mode of knowing which holds ‘knowledge as arts’ is as enactivism of knowledge. There are two results of aesthetic inquiry: One is the referential knowledge, the other is the knowledge of the aesthetic qualities of form per se.
4. Four essential ideas are included in aesthetic inquiry: analogous to art criticism; teaching as art; representing experiences by the shape of literary language; embodied empathy and understanding.
5.Educaitonal criticism is re-education of the perception of classrooms. It’s a systematic qualitative research which infuses the rigor of science and thought of art.
6. Educational criticisms of arts integrated curriculum in primary school: some teachers have realized the change of arts integrated curriculum, but some problems are presented mainly because the misunderstanding of the “integration”.; It’s helpful for students using varieties of learning strategies to undergo the art experience, but the teacher ought to rethink the use of cooperative learning; In the learning process, students showed the self-confident and got the meanings of content, but it’s still not enough for high level thought.; To practice arts integrated curriculum helps to establish the cooperative culture of the school, but the crises of power struggle are involved in curriculum planning.

一、中文部分
尹萍（譯），J. Naisbitt ＆ P. Aburdene著（1990）。2000年大趨勢。臺北：天下文化。
方德隆（2000）。課程統整的模式與實務。高雄師大學報，11期，181-212。
方德隆、卯靜儒、高新建、黃琡慧、葉郁菁、蔡清田、甄曉蘭、顧瑜君（譯），S. M. Drake著（2001）。統整課程的設計。高雄：麗文。
王秀雄（1992）。美術批評鑑賞教學的研究。輯於教育部國教司、中教司主辦，學校美感教育國際學術研討會，臺北。
甘陽（譯），E. Cassier著（1997）。人論－人類文化哲學導引。臺北：桂冠。
朱光潛（1987）。談美。臺北：金楓。
余秋雨（1990）。藝術創造工程。臺北：允晨文化。
吳瑪俐（譯），N. Kandinsky著（1995）。藝術與藝術家論。臺北：藝術家。
呂廷和（譯），H. Read著（1975）。透過藝術的教育。臺北：雄獅。
李渝（譯），A. H. Barr著（1998）。現代畫是什麼? 臺北：雄獅。
李醒塵（1996）。西方美學史教程。臺北：淑馨。
邢莉、常寧生（譯），A. D. Efland著（2000）。西方藝術教育史。成都：四川人民出版社。
周珮儀（1994）。艾斯納教育批評理論之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
林曼麗（2000）。臺灣視覺藝術教育研究。臺北：雄獅美術。
林逢祺（1999）。美學與教育。輯於歐陽教主編，教育哲學（頁121-143）。高雄：麗文。
施麗薰（譯），Antoine de Saint-Exupery著（1991）。小王子。臺北：漢藝色研。
洪麗珠、談玉儀、李文珊、劉美玲、曾于珍、桂雅文（譯），E. B. Feldman著（1996）。藝術教育的本質。臺北：五觀藝術。
洪懿妍（2001）。世界向美走。天下雜誌，特刊，24-30。
孫嘉妏（2001）。九年一貫藝術與人文學習領域課程統整之研究。國立臺灣師範大學美術研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
高強華（2001）。九年一貫課程統整革新與教師專業成長。中等教育，52(1)，136-148。
張世忠（2000）。多元智慧與建構教學之統整及應用。中等教育，51(6)，124-135。
郭小平、翟燦（譯），R. Arnheim著（1992）。藝術心理學新論。臺北：臺灣商務。
郭禎祥（1999a）。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106期，1-9。
郭禎祥（1999b）。描繪新世紀藝術教育藍圖。美育，110期，1-9。
郭禎祥（2001）。新世紀藝術教育的變動。發表於國立臺灣師範大學美術學系主辦，新世紀藝術教育理論與實務國際學術研討會論文集（頁33-47），臺北。
郭禎祥（譯），E. W. Eisner著（1998）。藝術視覺的教育（二版）。臺北：文景。
陳伯璋（1985）。潛在課程研究。臺北：五南。
陳建伶（2002）。我們的生活周遭有什麼正在改變。論文發表於國立彰化社會教育館主辦，九十一年藝術鑑賞暨創作研習，臺中縣清水鎮。
陳箐繡（2001）。藝術教育課程統整與社區環境脈絡探索。發表於花蓮師院藝術教育研究所主辦「社區、文化與藝術教育國際學術研討會」，花蓮。
彭吉象（1994）。藝術學概論。臺北：淑馨。
黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。臺北：東華。
黃政傑（1993）。課程評鑑。臺北：師大書苑。
黃政傑（2001）。課程統整的理念與做法－專訪教育部高等教育司黃政傑司長。教育研究，85期，8-13。
黃慶明（1991）。知識論（一）懷疑與確定性。鵝湖，16(6)，18-30。
黃譯瑩（1998）。實施課程統整的走向和原則。教育資料與研究，25期，12-13。
葉興華（2000）。我國國小推行課程統整之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。
甄曉蘭（2001）。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊，4(1)，1-20。
甄曉蘭、曾志華（1997）。建構教學理念的興起與應用。國民教育研究學報，3期，179-208。
劉文潭（1972）。美學與藝術批評。臺北：環宇。
劉昌元（1994）。西方美學導論。臺北：聯經。
劉豐榮（1991）。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。臺北：水牛。
劉豐榮（1997）。幼兒藝術表現模式之理論建構與其教育義涵之研究。臺北：水牛。
劉豐榮（2001a）。後現代主義對當前藝術批評教學之啟示。論文發表於國立彰化師大美術系主辦之國際藝術教育學會（InSEA）亞洲地區學術研討會，彰化。
劉豐榮（2001b）。當代藝術教育論題之評析。視覺藝術，4期，59-96。
歐用生（2000）。課程改革。臺北：師大書苑。
歐陽教（1999）。教育哲學。高雄：麗文。
滕守堯（譯），R. Arnheim著（1998）。視覺思維。四川：四川人民出版社。
嚴祥鸞（1996）。參與觀察法。輯於胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（頁195-222）。臺北：巨流。
二、西文部分
Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum interaction. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (pp.25-38). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Audi, R. (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Barone, T. (1987). On equality, visibility, and the fine arts program in a black elementary school. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(4), 421-463.
Barone, T. (1990). Using the narrative text as an occasion for conspiracy. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate(pp.305-326). New York: Teachers College Press.
Barone, T. (1993). Acquiring a public voice: Curriculum specialists, critical storytelling, and educational reform. JCT, 10(1), 139-152
Barone, T. (1994). Things of use and things of beauty: The story of the Swain county high school arts program. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs (pp.273-292)(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Barone, T., & Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S. (1998). Curriculum platforms and moral stories. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum-problems, politics, and possibilities(2nd). N.Y.: State University of New York.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (1997). Arts-based educational research. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education(2nd ). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration- Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Beyer, L. E. (1995). Beyond the formal and the psychological: The arts and social possibility. In W. Kohli (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York: Routledge.
Broudy, H. S. (1988). Aesthetics and the Curriculum. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.332-342). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Bulter-Kisber, L. (1998). Representing qualitative data in poetic form. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420709)
Clandinin, D. J., ＆ Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Darby, J. T., ＆ Catterall, J. S. (1994). The fourth R: The arts and learning. Teachers College Record, 96(2), 299-328.
Davenport, M. (2000). Culture and education: Polishing the lenses. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 361-375.
Davis, M. (1999). Design’s inherent interdisciplinarity: The arts in integrated curricula. Arts Education Policy Review, 101(1), 8-13.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Van Rees.
Doll, W. E. (1998). Curriculum and concepts of control. In W. F. Pinar （Ed.）, Curriculum: Toward new identities（pp.295-323）. New York: Garland.
Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Columbia University.
Donmoyer, R. (1993). Art criticism as a guide to student evaluation. Theory into Practice, 32(4), 252-259.
Dotson, M. L. (2000). The theories of action of three prekindergarten teachers: A study in teaching thinking. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(05), 1736. (University Microfilms No. AAT9971538)
Efland, A. D. (1979). Conceptions of teaching in art education. Art Education, 32(4), 21-33.
Efland, A. D. (1995). The spiral and the lattice: Changes in cognitive learning theory with implications for art education. Studies in Art Education, 36(3), 134-153.
Efland, A. D. (2000). The city as metaphor for integrated learning in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 276-289.
Efland, A. D., & Freedman, K. & Stuhr, P. （1996）. Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Virginia: National Art Education Association.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning- ages 8 to 15. London: Routledge.
Eisner, E. W. (1985). Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination: On the design of evaluation of school programs(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Eisner, E. W. (1996). Evaluating the teaching of art. In D. Boughton, E. W. Eisner, & J. Ligtvoet(Eds.), Evaluating and assessing the visual arts in education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
Erickson, M. (1996). Our place in the world. Retrieved April 15, 2002, from Arts EDNet URL: Http://www.artsednet.getty.edu.
Flinders, D. J. (1987). What teachers learn from teaching: Educational criticism of instructional adaptation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, California.
Flinders, D. J., & Eisner, E. W. (1994). Educational criticism as a form of qualitative inquiry. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 341-390.
Fogarty, R. (1991). Tens ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61-65.
Garrison, J. (1997). Dewey and eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Glatthorn, A. A., & Foshay, A. W. (1991). Integrated curriculum. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum (160-162). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Gough, N. (1998). Reflections and diffractions: Functions of fiction in curriculum inquiry. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
Greene, M. (1991). Texts and margins. Harvard Educational Review, 61(1), 27-39.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
Haggerson, N. L. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding. New York: Peter Lang.
Hamblen, K. A. (1993). The emergence of neo-DBAE. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED364459)
Hamilton, D., King, C., MacDonald, B., Jenkins, D., & Parlett, M. (1977). Beyond the numbers game. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Hatch, T. (1994). What’s art got to do with it? Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 362-365.
Huebner, D. E. (1975). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.217-236). California: McCutchan.
Huebner, D. E. (1985). Spirituality and knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching: The ways of knowing. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago.
Hutchens, J., & Pankratz, D. B. (2000). Change in arts education: Transforming Education Through the arts challenge(TETAC). Arts Education Policy Review, 101(4), 5-10.
Hynds, S. (1994). An artful science. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 366-373.
Irwin, R., Rogers, T., & Wan, Y. (1998). Reclamation, reconciliation, and reconstruction: Art practices of contemporary aboriginal artists from Canada, Australia, and Taiwan. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art Education, 16(1), 61-72.
Jackson, P. W. (1966). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jackson, P. W. (1992). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Design options for an integrated curriculum. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: design and implementation (pp.13-24). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jacobs, H. H. (1991). Planning for curriculum integration. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 27-28.
Jaeger, R. M. (1997). Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
jagodzinski, j. (1992). Curriculum as felt through six layers of an aesthetically embodied skin: The arch-writing on the body. In W. F. Pinar & W. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp.159-183). New York: Teachers College Press.
Kliebard, H. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing (pp.70-83). Berkeley, California: McCutchan.
Krug, K. H., & Cohen-Evron, N. (2000). Curriculum integration positions and practices in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 259-272 .
Macdonald, J. B. (1975). Curriculum theory. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.5-14) Berkeley: McCutchan.
Mann, J. (1975). Curriculum criticism. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists (pp.133-148). California: McCutchan.
Mazza, K. A. (1982). Reconceptual inquiry as an alternative mode of curriculum theory and practice: A critical study. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 4(2), 5-89.
McFee, J. K. (1995). Change and the cultural dimensions of art education. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education- beyond postmodernism (pp.171-192). New York: Teachers college, Columbia University.
McFee, J. K. (1998). Cultural diversity and the structure and practice of art education. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
Neperud, R. W. (1995). Context, content, and community in art education: Beyond postmodernism. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Northwest Educational Service District(1989). Restructuring schools: Integrating the curriculum. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313806)
Parsons, M. J. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 103-113.
Perkins, D. N. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 4-8.
Pinar, W. F. (1975). Curriculum theorizing- the reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F. (1988). “Whole, bright, deep with understanding.” Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. In W. F. Pinar(Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses(pp.134-153). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Rist, R. C. (1987). Research in the shadows: A critique of “on equality, visibility, and the fine arts program in a black elementary school”. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(4), 447-451
Salina Arts and Humanities Commission (1992). Life in the past lane: An arts/social studies infusion project. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED368605)
Schrag, F. (1992). Conceptions of knowledge. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum(pp.268-301). New York: Macmillan.
Schubert, M. B., & Melnick, S. A. (1997). The arts in curriculum integration. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424151)
Short, E. C. (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Siegesmund, R. E. (2000). Reasoned perception: Art education at the end of art. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(11), 4261. (University Microfilms No. AAT9995283)
Slattery, P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. New York: Garland.
Soltis, J. F. (1990). The ethics of qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Stankiewicz, M. A. (2000). Discipline and the future of art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 301-313.
Stuhr, P. L. (1995). Social Reconstructionist multicultural art curriculum design: Using the powwow as an example. In Neperud, R. W. (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education- beyond postmodernism(pp.193-221) . New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Sumara, D. J., ＆ Davis, B. (1998). Unskinning curriculum. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum: Toward new identities(pp.75-92). New York: Garland.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. (1990). History of the school curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Ulbricht, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary art education reconsidered. Art Education, 51(4), 13-17.
Vallance, E. (1981). Focus on students in curriculum knowledge: A critique of curriculum criticism. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED201556)
Vallance, E. (1991). Aesthetic inquiry: Art criticism. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry(pp.155-172). New York: State University of New York Press.
Walker, D. F. (1971). The process of curriculum development: A naturalistic model. School Review, 80, 51-65.
Willis, G. (1978). Qualitative evaluation. California: McCutchan.