簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 柯愷瑄
Kai-Hsuan Ko
論文名稱: 女性雙胞胎生涯自我認同發展之敘說研究
The Narrative Research of Career self-identity development of female twins
指導教授: 金樹人
Jin, Shuh-Ren
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 248
中文關鍵詞: 生涯自我認同女性雙胞胎生涯發展歷程
英文關鍵詞: career self-identity, female identical twins, career developmental process
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:606下載:110
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨從女性雙胞胎敘說生涯自我認同發展的故事中,理解雙胞胎生涯自我認同的發展脈絡及其可能面臨的特殊議題;並進一步瞭解女性雙胞胎生涯自我認同影響其生涯發展的歷程。

    本研究的研究參與者為四位(兩對)女性雙胞胎,研究方法採用敘說研究的方法論與「整體-內容」的分析方法。經由文本分析的結果,呈現以下的研究結果與發現:

    一、兩對女性雙胞胎其生涯自我認同發展脈絡呈現:
    (一)早年記憶對重要他人肯定之重視,貫穿生涯自我認同之發展
    (二)雙胞胎生涯自我認同之發展根源於雙胞胎共享及競爭重要他人關注之早期經驗
    (三)不同的關係形態影響雙胞胎不同之生涯自我認同發展
    1.親密又競爭的關係,雙胞胎生涯自我認同建立在「輸贏」、「優劣」上,傾向「競爭式」與「分裂式」的認同
    2.親密共生的關係,雙胞胎生涯自我認同傾向於兩人「完全一致」的認同
    (四)父母教養態度將影響雙胞胎對於彼此差異的看法
    (五)雙胞胎成雙成對的狀態發展出「連體我」的認同
    1. 雙胞胎「連體我」的認同受到「雙胞胎為前世緣份」之詮釋而強化
    2.雙胞胎引人注目、「力量加乘」之優勢,增強其「連體我」的認同
    3.緊密的雙胞胎關係產生兩人一組的角色分工,進一步影響自我認同
    4. 「雙胞胎能力應該相當」的期望引起自我標籤化之效應
    (六)物理空間的分離、青春期獨立意識的發展及情愛關係私密性的追求促發「獨立」自我認同的開展
    (七)親密又競爭的關係,「分」反而是一種各自開展自我的解脫

    二、兩對女性雙胞胎在生涯自我認同發展歷程中呈現的特殊議題:
    (一)物理空間分離引發心理「分離」的適應議題
    (二)雙胞胎將對方視為最重要的依附對象,且具有無可取代的獨特地位
    (三)將彼此作為自我的一種延伸,存在著「連體我」的認同
    (四)雙胞胎第二次分離-個體化歷程同時面臨與父母分化及雙胞胎相互箝制的壓力
    三、兩對女性雙胞胎其生涯自我認同影響其生涯發展的歷程
    (一)生涯自我認同與雙胞胎關係交織起舞、進一步影響生涯發展中的「試探」、「承諾」與「抉擇」。且親密與競爭的雙胞胎,生涯自我認同與生涯發展歷程為「自我」、「雙胞胎」與「父母期望」三股動力間逐漸形塑、來回辨證的歷程;和諧共生的雙胞胎其生涯自我認同與生涯發展歷程則為「我」、「我們」以及「父母期望」纏繞交錯的生涯抉擇歷程。
    (二)雙胞胎生涯自我認同與生涯發展之複雜性:在「我是」與「我們是」之間分辨以及在「同中求異」、「異中求同」兩股動力中擺盪
    (三)四位研究參與者其生涯角色「為人子女」角色突顯並傾向彼此分工

    最後根據研究結果進行綜合性討論,並提出本研究的限制及具體建議,以作為未來研究、心理諮商實務與生涯諮商實務之參考。

    The purpose of this study is to understand the development context of career self–identity of female twins, and the specific issue. Otherwise, researcher want to understand the female twins’ career self-identity how to effect their career development in advanced.

    This study invited two dyad identical female twins to narrate their life story. The Methodology of the thesis are narrative research and the analysis of holistic content.

    Several findings according to the data analysis are as follows:

    1. Career self identity developmental context of female twins are:
    a. To value the positive regard from significant others in the early memories is throughout the whole career self-identity development.
    b. Career self identity development of twins begins from the share and competition of significant others’ regard with her twin.
    c. Different relationship pattern influence the different career self identity development of twins
    (1) Close and competent relationship impact self identity which based on the 「Winner-Loser」、「Superior -Inferior」thoughts
    (2) Close and harmonic relationship induce the identity of coincidence between themselves
    d. The attitude of parents influence the twins how to view the difference between them.
    e. Twins are often together and their alikeness,seems to develop the twins’ 「we-self」identity.
    (1)The interpretation to be a twins - twins should come from the intimate relationship of pre-existence, enforce the twins 「we-self」identity .
    (2)To be the twins could easily become the focus and have double strength seems amplify the twins「we-self」identity .
    (3)As twins are used to be together-just like a couple,would influence the twins develop different and specific roles, and effect the development of self-identity in advanced.
    (4)Others assume that twins are the same individual and possessing the equal ability, would cause the labeling effect.
    f. Independent self identity evolvement is associated with physical space separation、independent sense in adolescence, and the chase of love and privacy.
    g. As with intimate and competitive relationship, separation may attribute to independent development for the twin themselves.

    2. The special issues in the career self-identity development are:
    a. Separation of physical space induce the adaptation issues of psychological separation
    b. Twins regard each-other as the most important attachment object and unique position that can’t be replaced.
    c. Twins assume each other as expansion of themselves, their self-identity contain the identity of twins “we-self”.
    d. During the second separation-individualization process, the twins may encounter the pressure to differentiate from their parents and their twins.
    3. The career self-identity of the 2 dyad female identical twins influence the
    a. The career self–identity development of the twins is associated with the twin-ship, and it may influence career exploration, career commitment and career choice making. As with intimate and competitive twin-ship, the career self-identity and career developmental process of the twins are fused and formed by three forces as “self”、”twinship”, and ”parents` expectation”. The career self- identity and career developmental process of the harmonic twin-ship are career choice making process organized by “we”, ”us”, and “parents` expectation”.
    b. The complexity of the twin`s career self-identity and the career development:
    (1) differentiation between “ I am” and “ we are”
    (2) fusion of “alike” and “unique”
    c. The career roles of the four research anticipants were highlighted as being daughterly offspring and cooperative partners.

    Lastly, according to the research result and discussion, the limitation and recommendation of this research could be future references of related researches, psychological counseling and career counseling.

    中文摘要 英文摘要 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………1 第二節 名詞定義…………………………………………………………5 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 雙胞胎成長歷程中的發展議題…………………………………6 第二節 雙胞胎生涯自我認同與相關研究………………………………11 第三節 生涯自我認同……………………………………………………22 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究方法…………………………………………………………38 第二節 研究者……………………………………………………………39 第三節 研究參與者………………………………………………………43 第四節 研究工具…………………………………………………………44 第五節 研究歷程…………………………………………………………45 第六節 資料整理與分析…………………………………………………48 第七節 研究判準…………………………………………………………51 第四章 研究結果 第一節 子昀與子翎生涯自我認同發展的故事……………………………53 第二節 品婕與品恩生涯自我認同發展的故事……………………………105 第三節 子昀與子翎生涯自我認同發展脈絡………………………………143 第四節 品婕與品恩生涯自我認同發展脈絡………………………………150 第五節 生涯自我認同的發展脈絡及其特殊議題…………………………156 第六節 雙胞胎生涯自我認同影響其生涯發展的歷程……………………165 第五章 綜合討論 第一節 生涯自我認同的發展脈絡及其特殊議題…………………………172 第二節 雙胞胎生涯自我認同影響其生涯發展的歷程……………………177 第三節 雙胞胎生涯自我認同在離合當中的辯證…………………………179 第四節 研究者的反思………………………………………………………183 第六章 研究結論與建議 第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………192 第二節 研究限制與建議……………………………………………………196 參考文獻 中文文獻………………………………………………………………………201 英文文獻………………………………………………………………………202 附 錄 附錄一 四位研究參與者的故事文本 ……………………………………206 附錄二 訪談指南 …………………………………………………………241 附錄三 參與研究同意書 …………………………………………………242 附錄四 訪談札記【舉隅】 ………………………………………………243 附錄五 研究檢核函 ………………………………………………………248 附表目次 表1-1 青少女的個體化模式………………………………………………29 表1-2 Super 生涯發展階段的任務 ……………………………………32 表3-1 研究參與者基本資料一覽表………………………………………44 表3-2 研究參與者訪談時間一覽表………………………………………47 表3-3 資料分析編碼表……………………………………………………49 表4-1 子昀與子翎認同主題與關係主題對照表…………………………143 表4-2 品婕與品恩認同主題與關係主題對照表…………………………150 表5-1 雙胞胎的「離」-「合」狀態…………………………………….182 附圖目次 圖4-1 子昀的生涯自我認同發展脈絡圖…………………………………80 圖4-2 子翎的生涯自我認同發展脈絡圖…………………………………102 圖4-3 品婕的生涯自我認同發展脈絡圖…………………………………127 圖4-4 品恩的生涯自我認同發展脈絡圖…………………………………140 圖5-1 雙胞胎生涯自我認同及生涯發展動力圖…………………………178

    中文部份
    朱儀羚等譯,吳芝儀校閱(民93),Michele, L. C.(2002)原著。敘事心理與研究 / 自我創傷與意義的建構(Introduction narrative psychology-self , trauma , and the construction of meaning)。嘉義:濤石文化事業有限公司。
    林春金、黃美智(民82)。一位雙胞胎初產婦的生產感受與照顧新生兒之行為特性。長庚護理,4卷1期,56-62。
    林世華、楊智馨(民87)。大學生生涯發展狀況與自我認定狀態的關係。教育心理學報,30卷2期,1-16
    林幸台(民79)。生計輔導的理論與實施。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    金樹人(民86)。生涯諮商與輔導。台北:東華書局。
    胡幼慧主編(民86)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土化女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    孫世維(民83)。青少年與父母的情感關係:依附的性質與重要性。法商學報,29期,259-304。
    孫世維(民86)。親子依附與分離-個體化:大學時期的發展。國立政治大學「教育與心理研究」,20期,271-296
    栗珍鳳(民88)。大學生自我分化和心理社會發展之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    張玨(民78)。單胞胎與雙胞胎產婦產後焦慮的比較。中華衛誌,9卷1期,29-37。
    張玨(民87)。從雙胞胎談親子關係。嬰兒與母親,265期,150-153。
    張玨編著(民84)。雙胞胎事典。台北:號角。
    陳春華(民72)。一位初產婦面對照顧其雙胞胎新生兒之行為特性。護理雜誌,30卷3期,99-103。
    楊添圍、周仁宇譯(民88),Hamilton, N. G..(1990)原著。人我之間(Self and others:object relations theory in practice.)。台北:心理出版社。
    劉姿君(民83)。大學生自我認定狀態與其生涯決定程度及自我分化水準之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所碩士論文。
    蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯(民92),Jean C. D.&Michael C. F.(2000)原著。敘事探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(Narrative Inquiry-experience and story in qualitative research.)。台北:心理出版社。
    劉清彥、張國燕譯(民89):育兒百科(The parents answer book—from birth through age five)。台北:新手父母出版社(Parents magazine.(2000)原編著)
    劉惠琴(民國89)。青少女在母女關係中的個體化模式。中華心理衛生學刊,地12卷4期,53-91。
    賴誠斌、丁興祥(民91)。歷史與社會文化脈絡中個人主體性之建構:以沈從文的堅持為例。應用心理學研究,16期,173-214。
    羅櫻鑫(民 87)。胖與瘦--一對分離教養雙胞胎的故事。臺東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文
    蘇建文等人(民85)。發展心理學。台北:心理出版社。
    蘇建文主持(民86)。對父母及對友伴的依附關係與青少年的內在運作模式及個人適應之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究(國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系執行)。

    西文部份
    Ainslie, R. C. (1997). The psychology of twinship. Northvale, NJ:Jason Aronson, Inc.
    Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716.
    Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Akerman, B. A. (2003). Twins at puberty: A follow-up study of 32 twin pairs. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 10, 228-236.
    Åkerman, B. A., & Suurvee, E. (2003). The Cognitive and Identity Development of Twins at 16 Years of Age: A Follow-up Study of 32 Twin Pairs . Twin Research, 6, 328-333
    Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
    Bacon, K. (2006). It's Good to be Different: Parent and Child Negotiations of 'Twin' Identity . Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 141-147.
    Berg, K., Tambs, K., & Sundet, J. M., (1985). Cotwin closeness in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: A biasing factor in IQ heritability analysis? Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae: Twin Research, 34, 33-39.
    Blos, P.(1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. Psychoanalytic study of the child, 72, 162-186.
    Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol I. Attachment. New York:Basic Books.
    Braun-Scharm, H., Hepp, U., & Milos, G.(2003).Gender Identity and Anorexia Nervosa in Male Monozygotic Twins. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(2) ,239-243.
    Buckler, J. M. H.(1999). Growth and development of twins. In A. C. Sandbank (Ed.), Twin and Triplet Psychology-a Professional Guide to Working with Multiples (pp. 167-186). New York:Routledge
    Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In K. Bartholomew, & D. Perlman (Eds.), Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 53-90). Bristol, PA: Jessica Kingsley
    Cropanzano, R. & James, K. (1990). Some Methodological Considerations for the Behavioral Genetic Analysis of Work Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 433-439
    Denise L. N, Auke T., & Thomas J. B. (1998). Individual Differences in Adult Ego Development:Sources of Influence in Twins Reared Apart. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 985-995.
    Doherty, N. A., & Feeney, J. A. (2004). The composition of attachment networks throughout the adult years. Personal Relationships, 11, 469-488.
    Donald E. S., Mark L. S, Charles M. S. (1996) The Life-Space Approach to Careers. Career Choice & Development. 121-178
    Eicker, Martha.(1998)Guidelines for the Education of Multiple Birth Children. .New Mexico
    Fraley R. C., & Tancredy M. T. (2006). The Nature of Adult Twin Relationships: An Attachment-Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 78-93
    Fuchs,H. (1978). Sibling deidetification Judged by Mothers.Cross-validation and development.Vol.38,1055-1064
    Goossens, L., & Phinney, J. S. (1996). Identity,Context,and Development. Journal of Adolescence, 19,491-496
    Hartman D. C., Crisp, A. H., & McClelland, L. (1997). Two heart beats as one: Eating disorder in a twin pair with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy . Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 66, 222-226.
    Hazan, C., Hutt, M. J., Sturgeon, J., & Bricker, T. (1991). The process of relinquishing parents as attachment figures. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.
    Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
    James E. M. (1988). Common Processes Underlying Ego Identity, Cognitive/ Moral Development, and Individuation. Self, Ego, and identity integrative Approaches.
    Jane, K. & Kathy, E. G.(1996).Event associated with identity status change.
    Journal of Adolescence,19, 477-490.
    Jenkins S. M., Buboltz Jr, W. C. , Schwartz, J. P. & Johnson, P.(2005)Differentiation of self and psychosocial development. Contemparary Family Therapy, 27(2), 251-261.
    Johnson, E. & Johnson G. D. (1982). Premature Developmental Jumps: The    Effects of Early Intimacy on the Adult Lives of Identical Twins. Perspectives in psychiatric care, XX(2), 86-90
    Justice, Judith Spieth; Utesch, William E.(1994).Counseling Twins and Their Families: Special Considerations for Assessment and Intervention. Indiana
    Kathleen, M., Monica J. H., Frank B. (1990) Growing up and Growing Apart , a Development Meta-analysis of Twin Studies. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 226-237
    Katz, L. G..(1998).Twins in School: What Teachers Should Know Illinois
    Koch, H. L. (1966). Twins and twin relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Kroger, J (1985). Separation- individuation and Ego Identity Status in New Zealand University Students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,14,133-147
    Lassers, E., & Nordan, R. (1978). Separation: Individuation of an identical twin. Adolescent Psychiatry, 6, 469-479
    Laut, William; Laut, Sheila (1999)Raising Multiple Birth Children: A Parents' Survival Guide. Surviving the First Three Years of Twins & Supertwins. Massachusetts
    Leary,M.R.,& Tangney,J.P.(2003). The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. In Leary,M.R.,& Tangney,J.P. (Eds.).Handbook of Self and identity (pp3-14). NY : The Guilford Press.
    Leonard, M. (1961). Problems in identification and ego development in twins. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 300-320.
    Lewin, V. (1994). Working with a twin: Implications for the transference . British Journal of Psychotherapy, 10, 499-510.
    Lytton, H. (1977). Parent-child interaction: The socialization process observed in twin and singleton families. New York: Plenum.
    Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
    Miliora, M. T.(2003). “ Losers” and “Winners” within an intertwin dyad: a case of a twinship selfobject relationship of a twin. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31(3), 263-274.
    Moilanen, I. (1987). Inter-twin relationships and mental health: Review of the literature and clinical experiences . Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift, 41, 279-284.
    Nelson & Martin(1985)Increased Child Abuse in Twins. International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect , 9(4), 501-505
    Neyer, F. J. (2002a). The dyadic interdependence of attachment security and dependency: A conceptual replication across older twin pairs and younger couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 483-503.
    Orr, D. (1941). A Psychoanalytic Study of a Fraternal Twin. Psychoanal. Q. 10:284,
    Pearlman, E. M. (1990). Separation-individuation, self-concept, and object relations in fraternal twins, identical twins, and singletons. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 124, 619-628
    Preedy,P. & Lowe,M.(1998)Multiple voices,Tamworth,Staffs:The Wine Press.
    Sandbank, A. C. (1999). Personality, identity, and family relationships. In A. C. Sandbank (Ed.), Twin and triplet psychology: A professional guide to working with multiples (pp. 167-185). New York: Routledge.
    Savic, S. (1980). How twins learn to talk. New York: Academic Press.
    Schave, B., & Ciriello, J. (1983). Identity and intimacy in twins. New York:Praeger.
    Segal, N. L. (1997). Twin research perspective on human development. In N. L. Segal, G. E. Weisfeld, & C. C. Weisfeld (Eds.), Uniting psychology and biology: Integrative perspectives on human development (pp. 145-173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Siemon, M. (1980 ). The Separation-individuation process in adult twins. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 34(3), 387-400
    Tancredy, C. M. (1999). Autonomy and connection in twin relationships. Unpublished manuscript.
    Trinke, S. J., & Bartholomew, K. (1997). Hierarchies of attachment relationships in young adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 603-625.
    Wilson, L. R. (1995). Differences between identical twin and singleton adjustment to sibling death in adolescence . Journal of Psychological Practice, 1, 100-104.
    Woodward, J. (1998). The lone twin: Understanding twin bereavement and loss. London: Free Association Books.

    QR CODE