近年世界經濟論壇發布的《全球風險報告》皆指出氣候變遷造成的風險不容小覷，為此揭示氣候變遷是具高度危機性的全球問題。面臨氣候危機，青年世代未來將會擔負更大的角色，為應對氣候變遷的重要力量之一，且青年採取的氣候行動對於人類的永續發展至關重要。此外，近年有越來越多國外文獻，針對氣侯行動之影響因子進行探究，甚至著手有別於過去傳統聚焦在個人化的氣候行動因子，而是以其他的框架與模型，詮釋現今影響氣候行動的因素。為此，本研究結合多個模型與架構，進而更全面性探討我國青年採取氣候行動的確切原因。
本研究以我國青年為研究對象，採量化研究之問卷調查法，以立意取樣方式進行問卷發放，共回收1,566份有效問卷。藉以氣候變遷素養、集體行動之社會認同模型(SIMCA)以及健康信念模型(HBM)為架構，以瞭解青年氣候行動的現況，並探究影響青年採取氣候行動的關鍵因子。研究結果顯示，我國青年具有相當高的氣候行動意願，但實踐層面較著重「軟行動」層面，包含搜尋氣候相關資訊之技能、採取氣候說服行動、實踐氣候友善消費等。此外，影響青年採取行動的因素有知識構面中的內容知識、情意構面中的自我效能，以及集體模型中的恐懼和社會認同，故提升青年採取的氣候行動，可以透過增加氣候相關的內容知識或是強化自我效能感與社會認同感，進而促進其採取氣候相關行動。

Global Risk Report issued by Global Economic forum points out risks caused by climate change in 2022 should not be ignored, revealing that climate change is a highly critical global issue. In the face of the climate crisis, youth generations will play a significant role in tackling climate change in the future. which also supports sustainable development. In addition, there have been more and more foreign literatures exploring the affecting factors of climate action in recent years. Instead of traditionally focusing on individual climate action factors in the past, recent researches adopt other frameworks and models to explain factors affecting climate action nowadays. Therefore, this study combines multiple models and frameworks into the research for the purpose of more comprehensively and precisely exploring factors that drive youth to take climate action.
With young people in Taiwan as the targeted population, the study is designed as an quantitative study based on questionnaire survey, and totally collects 1,566 valid samples through purposive sampling. This research adopts the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) , Health Belief Model (HBM), and the framework of climate change literacy, to explore the climate action of the youth in Taiwan and the corresponding affecting factors.
The findings indicate that our youths have a high willingness to take climate action, but focuses more on the level of soft action when putting into practice, which includes the skills of searching for climate-related information, taking climate persuasive actions, and practicing climate-friendly consumption. In addition, the factors that affect youths to take action include content knowledge in the knowledge dimension, self-efficacy in the affective dimension, and fear and social identity in the collective model. Therefore, to promote youths to take climate action can be achieved by enhancing climate-related content knowledge or strengthening self-efficacy and social identity, which in turn enables them to take climate-related actions.

Arto-Blanco, M., Meira-Cartea, P. Á., & Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2017). Climate literacy among university students in Mexico and Spain: influence of scientific and popular culture in the representation of the causes of climate change. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3-4), 448-467.
Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., & Wolling, J. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 45-63.
Anyanwu, R. N. (2019). The Level of Climate Change Science Literacy among Teachers in Seychelles. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(2), 1-13.
Azevedo, J., & Marques, M. (2017). Climate literacy: a systematic review and model integration. International Journal of Global Warming, 12(3-4), 414-430.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165.
Barrett, B., Grabow, M., Middlecamp, C., Mooney, M., Checovich, M. M., Converse, A. K., ... & Yates, J. (2016). Mindful climate action: health and environmental co-benefits from mindfulness-based behavioral training. Sustainability, 8(10), 1040.
Bilali, R., Vollhardt, J. R., & Rarick, J. R. D. (2017). Modeling collective action through media to promote social change and positive intergroup relations in violent conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 200-211.
Böhm, G., & Pfister, H. R. (2000). Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 104(3), 317-337.
Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2012). Environmental education for behaviour change: Which actions should be targeted?. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1591-1614.
Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small group research, 33(5), 525-554.
Bury, S. M., Wenzel, M., & Woodyatt, L. (2019). Confusing hope and optimism when prospects are good: A matter of language pragmatics or conceptual equivalence?. Motivation and Emotion, 43(3), 483-492.
Bury, S. M., Wenzel, M., & Woodyatt, L. (2020). Against the odds: Hope as an antecedent of support for climate change action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(2), 289-310.
Brügger, A., Gubler, M., Steentjes, K., & Capstick, S. B. (2020). Social Identity and Risk Perception Explain Participation in the Swiss Youth Climate Strikes. Sustainability, 12(24), 10605.
Carmi, N., Arnon, S., & Orion, N. (2015). Transforming environmental knowledge into behavior: The mediating role of environmental emotions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 183-201.
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(1), 35-61.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(5), 752.
Change, I. P. O. C. (1990). Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment. Mass, Cambridge.
Choma, B. L., & McKeown, S. (2019). Introduction to intergroup contact and collective action: Integrative perspectives. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 3-10.
Cohen-Chen, S., & Van Zomeren, M. (2018). Yes we can? Group efficacy beliefs predict collective action, but only when hope is high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 50-59.
Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E. S., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523-534.
Davidson, K., Briggs, J., Nolan, E., Bush, J., Håkansson, I., & Moloney, S. (2020). The making of a climate emergency response: Examining the attributes of climate emergency plans. Urban Climate, 33, 100666.
De Vreede, C., Warner, A., & Pitter, R. (2014). Facilitating youth to take sustainability actions: The potential of peer education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(1), 37-56.
Doherty, K. L., & Webler, T. N. (2016). Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the alarmed segment’s public-sphere climate actions. Nature Climate Change, 6(9), 879-884.
Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9587-9592.
Ebel, R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. Prentice-Hall education series.
Extinction Rebellion (2018). Retrieve from：https://rebellion.global/
Fauville, G., Dupont, S., Von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60-73.
Fauville, G., Dupont, S., Von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60-73.
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological science, 22(1), 34-38.
Fiske, A. P., Seibt, B., & Schubert, T. (2019). The sudden devotion emotion: Kama muta and the cultural practices whose function is to evoke it. Emotion Review, 11(1), 74-86.
Folkman, S. (2013). Stress, coping, and hope. In Psychological aspects of cancer (pp. 119-127). Springer, Boston, MA.
Franco, E. G. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. In World Economic Forum.
Franco, E. G. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021. In World Economic Forum.
Fridays for future (2020). Retrieve from：https://fridaysforfuture.org/
Furlong, C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2020). Social identification in collective climate activism: Predicting participation in the environmental movement, extinction rebellion. Identity, 1-16.
Grundstein, A. J., & Williams, C. A. (2018). Heat exposure and the general public: health impacts, risk communication, and mitigation measures. In Human Health and Physical Activity During Heat Exposure (pp. 29-43). Springer, Cham.
Gold, A. U., Ledley, T. S., Sullivan, S. B., Kirk, K. B., & Grogan, M. (2010). Supporting energy education online: climate literacy and energy awareness network (CLEAN). Education, 2010.
Hamann, K. R., & Reese, G. (2020). My influence on the world (of others): Goal efficacy beliefs and efficacy affect predict private, public, and activist pro‐environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 35-53.
Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and behavior, 38(1), 48-71.
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 717-731.
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 1-14.
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature climate change, 6(6), 622-626.
Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26-34.
Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Bruce, J. P., Lee, H., Callander, B. A., & Haites, E. F. (Eds.). (1995). Climate change 1994: radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC 1992 IS92 emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press.
Hurtubise, R. (1995). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain.
Huang, H. (2016). Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2206-2212.
IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report (AR4). Geneva: Switzerland.
IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013 The Phisical Science Basis (AR5 WGI). Geneva: Switzerland.
IPCC(2021).Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (AR6). Retrieve from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Izadpanahi, P., Elkadi, H., & Tucker, R. (2017). Greenhouse affect: the relationship between the sustainable design of schools and children’s environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 901-918.
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature climate change, 2(10), 732-735.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kuehnast, M., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Being moved: linguistic representation and conceptual structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1242.
Kuthe, A., Keller, L., Körfgen, A., Stötter, H., Oberrauch, A., & Höferl, K. M. (2019). How many young generations are there?–A typology of teenagers’ climate change awareness in Germany and Austria. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 172-182.
Landmann, H., Cova, F., & Hess, U. (2019). Being moved by meaningfulness: Appraisals of surpassing internal standards elicit being moved by relationships and achievements. Cognition and emotion.
Landmann, H., Cova, F., & Hess, U. (2020). Being moved by meaningfulness: Appraisals of surpassing internal standards elicit being moved by relationships and achievements. Cognition and emotion.
Landmann, H., & Rohmann, A. (2020). Being moved by protest: Collective efficacy beliefs and injustice appraisals enhance collective action intentions for forest protection via positive and negative emotions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101491.
Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2018). Climate change in the American mind. University of Washington.
Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1-2), 73-95.
Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior, 29(3), 391-413.
Marcinkowski, T., Noh, K. I., Erdogan, M., & Sagy, G. S. (2011). Glimpses of climate literacy: Climate literacy as assessed partially by a limited set of items from four recent national assessments of environmental literacy. In Workshop on Climate Change Education in Elementary School Through the First Two Years of College, Washington, DC.
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global warming's six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis.
McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109-118.
Meira-Cartea, P. A., Gutiérrez-Pérez, J., Arto-Blanco, M., & Escoz-Roldán, A. (2018). Influence of academic education vs. common culture on the climate literacy of university students/Formación académica frente a cultura común en la alfabetización climática de estudiantes universitarios. Psyecology, 9(3), 301-340.
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions?. Psychological review, 126(2), 171.
Metag, J., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2017). Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of Science, 26(4), 434-451.
Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2010). Hope: The power of wish and possibility. Theory & Psychology, 20(2), 251-276.
Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, 161-174.
Milfont, T. L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: a one‐year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 1003-1020.
Miléř, T., & Sládek, P. (2011). The climate literacy challenge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 150-156.
Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: closing the science-action gap. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, 161-174.
Murray, V., & Ebi, K. L. (2012). IPCC special report on managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (SREX). J Epidemiol Community Health, 66(9), 759-760.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2009). Climate Literacy: The Essential
National Science Teachers Association (2007). GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE Resources for Environmental Literacy. United States of America.
O'Brien, K. L., & Wolf, J. (2010). A values‐based approach to vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(2), 232-242.
Oliver, M. C., & Adkins, M. J. (2020). “Hot-headed” students? Scientific literacy, perceptions and awareness of climate change in 15-year olds across 54 countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101641.
O'Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won't do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science communication, 30(3), 355-379.
Ojala, M. (2015). Student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation: Associations with hope about climate change. In European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2015), Education and Transition. Contributions from Educational Research, Budapest, Hungary, September 7-10, 2015.
Ojala, M., & Lakew, Y. (2017). Young people and climate change communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature climate change, 1(1), 35-41.
Powers, S. E., & PE, S. D. (2013). New project-based instructional modules improve climate literacy (research to practice). age, 23, 1.
Principles of Climate Science. Retrieved 2012, from http://www.climate.noaa.gov/education/pdfs/ClimateLiteracyPoster-8.5x11-Marc h09FinalLR.pdf
Rebecca, C., Aaron, M., & Meta, J. (2017). Integrating the social sciences to enhance climate literacy. Frontiers in ecology and the environment.
Reis, J., Póvoas, L., Barriga, F. J. A. S., Lopes, C., Santos, V. F., Ribeiro, B., ... & Pinto, A. (2014). Science education in a museum: enhancing earth sciences literacy as a way to enhance public awareness of geological heritage. Geoheritage, 6(3), 217-223.
Rees, J. H., & Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 466-473.
Ripple, W., Wolf, C., Newsome, T., Barnard, P., Moomaw, W., & Grandcolas, P. (2019). World scientists' warning of a climate emergency. BioScience.
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., & Zhao, X. (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic change, 125(2), 163-178.
Seibt, B., Schubert, T. W., Zickfeld, J. H., & Fiske, A. P. (2017). Interpersonal closeness and morality predict feelings of being moved. Emotion, 17(3), 389.
Seibt, B., Schubert, T. W., Zickfeld, J. H., Zhu, L., Arriaga, P., Simão, C., ... & Fiske, A. P. (2018). Kama muta: similar emotional responses to touching videos across the United States, Norway, China, Israel, and Portugal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(3), 418-435.
Shi, J., Hao, Z., Saeri, A. K., & Cui, L. (2015). The dual-pathway model of collective action: Impacts of types of collective action and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(1), 45-65
Shwom, R., Isenhour, C., Jordan, R. C., McCright, A. M., & Robinson, J. M. (2017). Integrating the social sciences to enhance climate literacy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(7), 377-384.
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(6), 957-972.
Steg, L., De Groot, J. I., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W., & Siero, F. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, 24(4), 349-367.
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Bondell, H. D., Moore, S. E., & Carrier, S. J. (2014). Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Climatic change, 126(3-4), 293-304.
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). Collective action: Towards a dual-pathway model.European Review of Social Psychology, 15(15), 59-99.
Taber, F., & Taylor, N. (2009). Climate of Concern--A Search for Effective Strategies for Teaching Children about Global Warming. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(2), 97-116.
Taddicken, M. (2013). Climate change from the user’s perspective: The impact of mass media and internet use and individual and moderating variables on knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 25(1), 39.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2003). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Underwood, C., & Schmid, M. (2019). PISA 2018: Reporting Australia’s Results. Volume I Student Performance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological review, 117(2), 440.
Turner, J. C., Wetherell, M. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1989). Referent informational influence and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 135-147.
UNFCCC, U. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Convention on climate change. Retrieve from: http://www. unfccc. de/resource/conv/index. html UNFCCC. In Forest Science.
UN Climate Change Conference (COP26). Retrieve from: https://ukcop26.org/cop26-goals/
UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) report. Retrieve from: https://ukcop26.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/COP26-Explained.pdf
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
Van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2009). Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action.
Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., & Leach, C. W. (2010). Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 339-346.
Van Zomeren, M., Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists” a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180-199.
Van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T., & Schellhaas, F. M. (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 618-634.
Van Zomeren, M., Pauls, I. L., & Cohen-Chen, S. (2019). Is hope good for motivating collective action in the context of climate change? Differentiating hope’s emotion-and problem-focused coping functions. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101915.
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315.
Williams Jr, R. M. (1979). Change and stability in values and value systems: A sociological perspective. Understanding human values, 15, 46.
Wright, S. C. (2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of social Issues, 65(4), 859-879.
Yu, T. Y., & Yu, T. K. (2017). The moderating effects of students’ personality traits on pro-environmental behavioral intentions in response to climate change. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(12), 1472.
方偉達 (2018)。人文社科研究方法：藝術、人文與社會學科，研究生完全達陣祕技。頁190-194。
周儒、潘淑蘭、吳忠宏 (2013)。大學生面對全球暖化議題採取行動之影響因子研。環境教育研究，10(1)。
柳中明、葉欣誠、朱瑞玲、洪志誠、吳明進 (2010)。我國國民全球暖化/節能減碳核心素養之養成。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。
施琮仁 (2017)。從雙路徑模型探討風險訊息的包裝與呈現對環境友善行為意圖的影響。傳播研究與實踐，7(1)，5-36。
施琮仁 (2017)。以公眾認知為中心的氣候變遷風險溝通：理論與實踐。傳播與文化雜誌。
徐美苓、楊意菁 (2011)。台灣全球暖化風險溝通的常民認知。傳播與社會學刊，(15)，71-104。
徐美苓、施琮仁 (2015)。氣候變遷相關政策民意支持的多元面貌。中華傳播學刊。
徐美苓 (2017)。再生能源的公眾支持及使用意願；環境信念，行動及議題傳播模式初探。中華傳播學刊，(32)，9-44。
陳向明 (2002)。教師如何做質性研究。臺北：洪葉文化。
潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究。臺北：心理。
葉欣誠、王悅玲、吳藹薇 (2018)。氣候變遷傳播中認知理性領域和情意感性領域之相互作用研究：從海 平面上升、北極熊到世界末日。中華民國科技部計畫。
葉欣誠 (2020)。全民氣候變遷素養調查先導計畫。行政院環境保護署計畫。
葉欣誠 (2021)。110年我國氣候變遷素養認知調查計畫。行政院環境保護署計畫。
楊惟任 (2016)。文化，氣候變遷與全球氣候行動。全球政治評論，(56)，75-94。
台灣永續能源基金會氣候變遷與能源民意調查。擷取自https://taise.org.tw/about.php?ID=17
臺灣能源轉型公眾感知度調查報告(2018)。擷取自風險社會與政策研究中心：　
https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/images/phocadownload/107/1205/1071205_report.pdf
綠色和平組織 (2020)。擷取自該網站：https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/3009/%E5%85
%A8%E7%90%83%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%B0%A3%E5%80%99%E9%81%8B%E 5%8B%95%EF%BC%8C%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E8%B5%B0%E5%87%BA%E8%87%AA%E5%B7%B1%E7%9A%84%E8%B7%AF/