本研究以參與「第一屆全國少年科技創作競賽」表現傑出的隊伍做深度訪談，針對創造者個人特質、創造歷程、創造環境三方面進行研究，從人格特質、多元智能、點子擷取方法、問題解決模式、家庭教育以及學校學習經驗的各項因素逐一探討。研究者設計半結構式訪談大綱，在訪談的過程中，學童的部分先以團體訪談的方式進行，以得知其團隊『問題解決模式』，之後再進行個別訪談，以得知其『人格特質』、『多元智能』、『家庭教育』、『學校學習經驗』及『點子擷取方法』；而教師及家長的部分則直接以電話訪談的方式進行，做為三角交叉檢核之用。
主要研究結果如下：
一、創造者個人特質
(一)人格特質：傑出科技創作學童的創造性人格特質分別為好奇的、有
自信的、好勝的、負責的、隨機應變的、愛創新的、善用時間的。
(二)多元智能：學童在多元智能部分以肢體-動覺智能及人際智能為高
傾向、音樂智能及語文智能為低傾向。
二、創造歷程
(一)問題解決模式：主要解決材料本質、材料加工、機械特性問題。
(二)點子擷取方式：學童在萬獸之王方面的問題，最常使用的點子擷取
方式是「與人討論」，再來才是「參考類似物」及「找文獻」。
三、創造環境
(一)家庭環境：家長在教導孩子方面，大部分是以策略及民主的方式，
較少使用權威的方式；安排課外活動、家庭成員興趣以及兒時接觸
玩具方面，有分佈不均的現象。
(二)學校學習經驗：學校中最拿手的科目依序是體育、自然、藝能科；
大部分都有擔任幹部及其他得獎的經驗；影響事件方面以學校相關
的事件影響最大。
最後，本研究依據研究結果，針對教導應用及未來相關研究提出建議。

Creativity can not only be developed through art performance, language, and mathematics for child, but also from technology practice and competition. In order to develop the young pupils’ creativity from elementary school, the Chinese Creativity Development Association organized a nation-wide youth robot contest last year. Besides, the contest we adapted the best practice concept to examine the traits of creation from those best teams in personal traits, creative process in completing projects, and environment for creation. Through focus group interview, the results of this study indicated as the followings:
1.On the personality for creation: Those team members expressed
themselves are curious with confidence, win-diven,responsible,
flexible and good sense of timing, and most of them are
better are bodily and interpersonal intelligence among
Gardner’s multiple-intelligence categories.
2.On the process of creating a robot: The troubles have to be
shot included material cutting and assembling, and they
thought the suitable approaches to get idea to solve problem
are a) peer discussing, b) referring to similar robot, c) on-
line searching.
3.On the environment for creation: Most of sample’s parents
adapted the democratic and strategic approaches to discipline
their children, and arrange various kinds of activities
besides of school regular curriculum for them to explore.

中文部分：
木村惠次、江崎通修 (1998)：「假說設定，檢證，評價，意思決定」的
思考行為。第二十屆日本創造年會論文集。東京：日本創造協會。
高橋誠 (1993)：創造力事典。日本: 學園出版局。
王怡云 (1995)：從家庭環境和學校環境看幼兒同儕互動。國立臺灣師範
大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
王振德 (1996)：國民中小學資優教育課程與教學實況調查研究。特殊教
育研究學刊, 14, 207-228。
王為國 (1999)：國民小學應用多元智能理論的歷程分析與評估之研究。
國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
林奕宏 (2000)：「多元智能與問題解決整合型教學模式」對國小學生數
學學習表現之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士
論文。
林逸媛 (1991)：家庭環境與子女創造性之相關研究。國立政治大學社會
研究所碩士論文。
俞國良 (1996)：創造力心理學。林崇德、沈德立主編：當代智力心理學
叢書。杭州：淅江人民出版社。
洪榮昭 (1998)：創意領先-如何激發個人與組織的創造力。台北：張老
師文化。
洪榮昭 (1997)：精釋(Hermeneutic)研究法在政策評量的應用。中等教
育, 48(5)，39-47。
陳龍安 (1995)：創造思考教學的理論與實際(4版)。台北：心理。
張玉成 (1983)：思考技巧與教學。台北：東華。
張春興 (1994)：教育心理學--三化取向。東華書局。
張春興 (1989)：張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張春興、林清山 (1985)：教育心理學(六版)。台北：東華。
張志平 (1985)：發明與教育。北京：發明創造者基金會。
張高賓 (1998)：單親兒童教養方式、家庭環境與情緒穩定之關係研究。
國立屏東師院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
湯誌龍 (1999)：高工機械科學生專業創造力及其相關因素之研究。國立
臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
董奇 (1995)：兒童創造力發展心理。台北：五南。
詹秀美 (1988)：國小學生創造力與問題解決能力的相關變項研究。國立
臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
郭素蘭 (1994)：國小資優兒童與普通兒童在家庭社經背景與父母管教態
度上的差異。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡順良 (1985)：家庭社經地位、父母管教態度與學校環境對國中學生自
我肯定及生活適應之影響研究。教育心理學報, 18, 239-264。
盧雪梅 (1990)：創造性的人格特質。創造思考教育, 2, 33-39。
英文部分：
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in
organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10,
123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in the context. New York:
Springer-Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through
motivational synergy. Journal of Creativity Behavior, 31
(1), 18-26.
Aldous, J. (1973). Family background factors and originality in
children. Gifted child Quarterly, 17, 183-192.
Baraan, F. (1969). Creativity person and creative process. New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the Creative Process in
Organizations. In Mark A. Runco (Ed.), Problem Finding,
Problem Solving, and Creativity. New Jersey: Ablex
Publishing Corporation.
Bayard De Volo, C. L. & Fiebert, M. S. (1977). Creativity in
the preschool child and its relationship to parental
authoritarianism. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 45, 170.
Brown, A.(1998). Organization culture. London: Pitman.
Busse, T. V. (1967). Childrearing antecedents of flexible
thinking. (Eric Document ED022530.)
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal
experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the
psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper
Collins Publishers.
Davis, G. A. (1986). Creativity is forever(2nd ed.). Dubuque,
Iowa: Kendall/Hunt.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: Heath.
Evans, C. (1995). Access, equity, and intelligence: Another
look at Tracking. English Journal. 84(8), 63- .
Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Creativity: A knowledge base,
metacognitive skill, and personality factors. Journal of
Creative Behavior, 29(4), 255-268.
Friedman, S.(1991). Where employees go for information.
Administrative Management, September.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple
intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H.(1987). Multiple intelligences: Implications for art
and creativity. In W.J.Moody(Ed.). Artistic Intelligences,
(pp. 11-27). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gardner, H. (1989). Toward more effective Arts Education. In Gardner, H. & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.), Arts, mind, and education:
research from Project Zero. Urbana: University Illinois
Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in
Practices. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on Multiple Intelligences:
Myths and Messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200-209.
Gardner, H. (1997). Multiple Intelligences as a partner in
school improvement. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 20-21.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligences Reframed. New York: Basic
Books.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity American Psychologist, 5,
444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1971). Creativity and its caltiration. N. T:
Harper and row.
Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents. Buffalo, New York:
Creative Education Foundation.
Hong, J.C.(1998). The thinking modes of problem solving.
Proceedings of 20th Japan Creativity Conference(Oct
31~Nov.1). 117-128. Tokyo: Japan Creative Society.
Hong, J.C.(1997). An explorative analysis of technological
creativity. International Conference on Creativity
Development in Technical Education and Training, Taipei,
Taiwan, R.O.C.
Hong, J.C., Wu, M.T., & Liu, M.C.(1996). Obstruction management
factors of the product development and technical
innovation in Taiwan’s enterprises. International
Conference on Technology Management.
University/Industry/Government Collabortation, Istanbul,
Turkey.
Howe, R. (1997). Handbook of seminar on instruction for
creative thinking. Taipei: NTNU.
Jacob, J. F. & Cunningham, M. A. (1970). Creativity and
intelligence, their relationship to peer acceptance.
Psychological Abstracts, 44, 14-92.
Koestler, A. (1969). The act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.
Krechevsky, M. & Seidel, S. (1998). Minds at work: Applying
Multiple Intelligences in the classroom. In Sternberg, R.
J. & Williams, W. M. (Eds.), Intelligence, Instruction,
and Assessment-theory into practice.(pp.17-42). New
Jersey: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Lair, J. (1984). Change induction groups, group psychotherapy,
integrity groups, peer counseling. In R. J. Corsini(Ed).
Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 2, 493-494.
Mooney, R. L. (1963). A conceptual model for integrating four
approaches to the identification talent. In C.W. Taylor &
F. Barron(Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition
and development. New York: Wiley.
Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity.
Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(2), 126-149.
Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity:
Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of
Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Osborn, A.F.(1993). Applied imagination. Bufallo, New York:
Creative Education Foundation.
Pervin, L. A. (1970). Personality: Theory, Assessment, and
Research. New York: Wiley.
Reif, F. & Scott, L. A. (1997). Students and Computers Coaching
Each Other: a method for teaching important thinking
skills. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED407925)
Rejskind, F. G. (1982). Autonomy and creativity in children.
The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(1), 58-67.
Rose, L. H. & Lin,H. T. (1985). A metaanalysis of long-term
creativity training programs. The Journal of Creative
Behavior, 18, 11-22.
Rossman, J. (1931). The psychology of the inventor. Washington,
D. C.: Inventors Publishing Company.
Schwartz, L. L. (1981). Are you a gifted parent of a gifted
child? The Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(1), 31-35.
Schwartz, P. (1975). The antecedents of creativity in
authoritarianism and other variables. New York: Wiley.
Shaw, M. P. (1994). Affective Components of Scientific
Creativity. In Shaw, M. P. & Runco, M. A. (Ed.),
Creativity and Affect. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing
Corporation.
Simonton, K. D. (1984). Genius, Creativity, and Leadership. MA:
Harvard University Press.
Sternberg, R.J.(1988). The trochaic mind: a new theory of human
intelligences. New York: Viling.
Sternberg, R.J.(1998). Thinking Styles. Cambridge, U.K.:
Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J.(1985). Beyond IQ: Atriarchic theory of human
intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of
Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg
(Ed). Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge:
Cambridge University press.
Tardif, T. Z. & Sternberg, R. J. (1993). What do we know about
creativity? In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), The nature of
creativity. 4th ed. New York: McGrow-Hill.
Taylor (1988). Creativity: Progress and Potential. New York:
McGrow-Hill.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children it think
creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114-143.
Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. New York: Harcourt
Brace.
Williams, F. E. (1967). Intellectual creativity and the
teacher. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 173-180.