本研究主要目的在了解我國國民中學音樂教學評量實施情形、教學評量實施成效與困擾評量實施之因素，並探討音樂教學評量相關議題。研究者以自編之「國中音樂教學評量實施情形調查問卷」為工具，對台北縣、市公立國中348位音樂教師進行普查，總計有效回收問卷232份，回收率為67%，問卷回收資料以描述統計之次數分配、平均數、標準差，及百分比方式進行分析，並整理歸納開放式問題所得資料。本研究所得結論如下：(一)整體來看，我國音樂教學評量具有多重功能，成績計算方式周全，部分評量實施符合藝術與人文領域課程綱要之理念。(二)音樂基礎、歌唱、樂器、創作與音樂欣賞五大類別的評量各具特色，在評量內容、方式、次數、參與評量人員與成績報告系統上有所差異。(三)教師自評結果顯示音樂教學評量具有高成效。(四)「音樂教學節數少，可供評量時間不足」、「班級人數過多」為困擾我國音樂教學評量實施的主要因素。(五)音樂教師多認同多元音樂評量的理念，但對音樂多元評量是否造成教學負擔的看法較為分歧。(六)音樂課程在學校教育中仍較不受重視，使音樂評量實施備受限制。最後依據研究結果，對國中音樂教學評量、教育行政單位與未來研究提出建議。

The purposes of this study were as follows: (a) to investigate the status of assessment in junior high school general music classrooms; (b) to examine the effect of music assessment and to inquire the factors that hampered the practice of music assessment; and (c) to study related issues of music assessment. An investigator-developed questionnaire “The survey of the practice status of junior high school music assessment” was used as the research tool to be distributed to a census sample of 348 public junior high school music teachers in Taipei City and Taipei County. Among them, 232 were effective replies and the return rate was 67%. Descriptive statistics as well as qualitative analysis were used to analyze the data.
Conclusions indicated the following: (a). The grading system was thorough and the practices of music assessment partially corresponded to the curriculum guideline ideas of the Arts and Humanities Learning Area; (b) The assessment of music fundamentals, singing, instrument performing, creating and appreciation each possessed special characteristics and were different from each other in assessment contents, methods, frequencies, people involved and grading systems; (c) Music teachers self evaluated their assessment to be effective; (d) The factors of “lack of time to implement assessment” and “over large class size” were found to be the main obstacles to the practices of music assessment; (e) Most music teachers agreed with the ideas of multiple assessments, but their viewpoints diverged when it comes to whether multiple assessments caused them teaching burdens; (f) Music curriculum was still ignored in schooling, which resulted in the limitations of music assessment implementation. Based on research findings, the researcher proposed suggestions for junior high school music assessment, for educational management and for future research.

參考文獻
壹、中文部分
朱富榮（2005）。國小音樂創作課程實施現況之研究。臺北市立教育大學音樂
教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
余民寧（1999）。邁向21世紀學校教育革新之研究----中小學生多元學習能
力評量革新之研究。行政院國家科學委院會專題研究計畫成果報告(編
號：NSC89-2420-H-004-001-F19)，未出版。
李坤崇（1999）。多元化教學評量。台北：心理。
李佳霓（2003）。國小音樂才能班術科評量方式之調查研究。台北市立師範學
院音樂藝術育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
莫啟慧（2003）。高中生音樂評量成績與其他學科評量成績之相關性研究。國
立台灣師範大學音樂研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
郭生玉（2004）。教育測驗與評量(修訂第一板)。台北：精華。
教育部（1960）。初級中學音樂課程標準草案。台北：教育部。
教育部（1962）。初級中學音樂課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1968）。國民中學音樂暫行標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1972）。國民中學音樂課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1983）。國民中學音樂課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（1994）。國民中學音樂課程標準。台北：教育部。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。
莊敏仁（2005）。運用教學檔案夾強化音樂教師省思之個案研究。藝術教育研
究，9，71-94。
張惠雯（2002）。國小四年級音樂評量編製。國立屏東師範學院音樂教育研究
所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
劉安彥（2003）。教學評量的理論與實用。教育資料與研究，55，100-
108。
賴美鈴（2002）。運用多元評量於音樂教學之探討—藝術與人文課程之評量策
略。行政院國家科學委院會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號：
NSC91-2411-H-003-036)，未出版。
歐滄和（2002）。教育測驗與評量。 台北：心理。
謝苑玫（2000）。國小四年級音樂學習檔案評量工具之發展研究(Ⅰ)。行政
院國家科學委院會補助專題研究計畫成果報告(編號：
NSC89-2411-H-024-008)，未出版。
謝苑玫（2001）。國小四年級音樂學習檔案評量工具之發展研究(Ⅱ)。行政
院國家科學委院會補助專題研究計畫成果報告(編號：
NSC89-2411-H-024-008)，未出版。
謝苑玫（2003）。改善歌唱教學評量的實作與討論。國民教育，43(6)，71-
78。
簡茂發（1999）。多元評量之理念與方法。師大校友，298，9-15。

貳、英文部分
Asmus, E. P. (1999). Music assessment concepts. Music
Educators Journal , 86(2),19 - 24.
Airasian, P. W. (1996). Assessment in the classroom. New
York: McGraw-Hall.
Boyle, J. D., & Radocy, R. E. (1987). Measurement and
evaluation of musical experiences. New York: Schirmer.
Boyle, J. D. (1992). Evaluation of music ability. In R.
Colwell (Ed), Handbook of research on music teaching
and learning (pp.247-265). Reston, VA: MENC.
Brophy, T. S. (2000). Assessing the developing child
musician. Chicago, GIA.
Colwell, R. (2002). Assessment’s potential of music
education. In R. Colwell & C. Richardson (Eds.), The
new handbook of research on music teaching and
learning (pp.1128-1158). Reston, VA: MENC.
Cunningham, G. K. (1998). Assessment in the classroom：
Constructing and interpreting texts. Washington,
D. C.: The Falmer Press.
Dirth, K. A. (2000). Implementing portfolio assessment in
the music performance classroom. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 61(06), 2229-A.
Doherty, D. M. (2000). An assessment rubric for the soprano
recorder. Master Abstracts International, 38(6),1428.
Eppink, J. A. (2002). The effect of Web-based portfolio
assessment strategies on the attitudes and self-
perceived growth in music learning of non-music
elementary general classroom educators in a basics of
music course. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63
(06), 2170-A.
Fransen, J. C. (1998). An investigation into the use of
portfolio assessment in elementary music education.
Master Abstracts International, 37(02), 420.
Frankel, J. T. (2002). An evaluation of a Web-based model
of assessment for the New Jersey State Core Curriculum
Content Standards in music. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 63(05), 1760-A.
Goolsby, T. W. (1995). Portfolio assessment for better
evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 82(3), 39-44.
Hepworth-Osiowy, K. (2004). Assessment in elementary music
education: Perspectives and practices of teachers in
Winnipeg public schools. Master Abstracts
International, 42(06), 1951.
Hickey, M. (1999). Assessment rubrics for music
composition. Music Educators Journal , 85(4), 20-24.
Hill, K. W. (1995). A descriptive study of assessment
procedures, assessment attitudes, and grading policies
in selected public high school band performance
classroom in Mississippi. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 60(06), 1954-A.
Hoffer, C. R. (2001). Teaching music in the secondary
school (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Kotora, E. J. (2001). Assessment practices in the choral
music classroom: A survey of Ohio high school choral
music teachers and college choral methods teachers.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(12), 4102-A.
Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and
assessment in teaching.(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mehrens, W. A. (1992). Using performance assessment for
accountahility purposes. Educational Measurement：
Issue and Practices, 11(1), 3-9.
National Assessmet Governing Board (NAGB). (1994). Arts
educational assessment framework. Washington, D. C.：
The Council of Chief State School Officers.
Nitko, A. J. (1996). Educational assessment of students
(2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational assessment.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Raid, M. (2005). Music assessment collaboration model for
secondary music teachers. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 67(01), 126-A.
Simanton, E. G. (2000). Assessment and grading practices
among high school band teachers in the United States:
A descriptive study. Dissertation Abstracts
International, 61(09), 3500-A.
Smith, V. L. (2005). The music assessment of the 1971-1972
National Assessment of Educational Progress: A
history. Master Abstracts International, 35(06), 1591.
Talley, K. E. (2005). An investigation of the frequency,
methods, objectives, and applications of assessment in
Michigan elementary general music classrooms. Master
Abstracts International, 44(02), 627.
Ward, A. W., & Murray-Ward, M. (1999). Assessment in the
classroom. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing.
Winggins, G. (1992).Creating tests worth taking.
Educational Leadership, 49(8), 26-33.