本論文旨在探討余伯特．達彌施《／雲／的理論：為了一種繪畫史》一書展示的思考方式。筆者以「模造」來看待此一思考方式，並且指出它變形概念的作法涉及到材料串接、引發對話的多樣方式，有別於固定架構的思考。
研究從兩個疑問開展：其一，這本書涉及繪畫史，但它的書寫呈現拼貼性、討論角度不一致性，此一有別於常見繪畫史書寫的用意值得探究。其二，此書與結構主義相關概念之間看似矛盾的關係顯得有待說明。本研究透過切入論述本身的組裝方式來探究這一些問題。
各章皆以達彌施對某一個或多個概念的變換操作過程作為探討對象。論文的第一章揭示達彌施書中三個主要概念的變形過程，三個概念為：「形象」、「符號」、「透視」。第二至第五章根據摘錄觀察，提出了四個書中的重要議題來討論。這些都是以作品為主要材料並拉入概念的操作過程。第二章觀察以蘇爾巴蘭、里帕、拉斐爾為例，對「再現」概念的討論。針對「再現」概念，達彌施透過三個例子來勾勒既維繫連結但又給出層層差異的，構成再現的微妙動態。第三章處理結構議題，以喬托、阿爾貝蒂為例。此章除了辨識達彌施所點出的作品結構，更著重其有關結構形成的動態歷程之討論。第四章探討以科雷喬、達文西為例，對於「何謂風格？」的思考。達彌施透過這兩個例子將「風格」指為一種突出既有範疇的動態。第五章探討以塞尚為例引發的「裂斷」議題，點出了達彌施對作品問題的看法和其碎片化的書寫方式的關聯。
本研究的發現指出了三種達彌施的思考方式的關鍵操作：並置作品與概念、串接書寫，與縫補概念。三種操作顯現了達彌施的思考方式貼近作品特有的問題性，作品與概念的相對關係，如此的思考作為轉換概念的過程，既有別於否定批判，也有別於直接建立新觀點的作法。此外，模造的思考方式和結構主義的關係，在於結構成為一種工具、一種持續變換的對象。

This thesis explores Hubert Damisch's mode of thinking as exemplified in his book Théorie du /Nuage/ : Pour une Histoire de la peinture. Viewing this thinking as a form of “modeling,” I suggest that its conceptual deformations arise from the montage of diverse materials and varied dialogues, distinguishing it from approaches grounded in fixed structures.
This study emerges from two key questions. First, given its engagement with the history of painting, the writing of this book displays a patchwork-like structure and constantly shifting viewpoints. The purpose of such unconventional writing style demands closer analysis. Second, the book's seemingly ambiguous relationship with Structuralist thought necessitates clarification. This thesis addresses these questions by examining the way Damisch assembles his writing.
Each chapter provides an in-depth analysis of Damisch's modification of one or more concepts. Chapter One identifies the deformation of three key concepts in his discourse: “figure,” “sign,” and “perspective.” Chapters Two through Five address four distinctive subjects outlined by Damisch, identified through close reading. Each subject illustrates a thought process grounded in specific artworks, with concepts juxtaposed to stimulate further inquiry. Chapter Two examines the subject of “representation,” developed through three case studies: Zurbarán, Ripa, and Raphael. Damisch reveals the complex dynamics of representation, demonstrating how it simultaneously establishes connections and proliferates differentiations. Chapter Three explores the subject of “structure,” which consists of discussions of Giotto and Alberti. This chapter explores not only Damisch's analysis of painting structure but also his insights into how these structures come to be. Chapter Four addresses the question, “What is style?” by focusing on Damisch's case studies of Correggio and Leonardo da Vinci. Damisch shows that “style” emerges as a movement of deviation from existing categories. Chapter Five examines the subject of the “cut,” which is drawn from the case of Cézanne's painting. This chapter reveals connections between Damisch's fragmented writing and his take on artworks.
The conclusion of this thesis identifies three key characteristics of Damisch's thinking: the juxtaposition of works and concepts, a fragmented, bead-like writing style, and the patchwork manner in which he reconfigures concepts. Together, these tactics create a mode of thought that resonates with the complexity of artworks and their connections with concepts. It transforms concepts while distinguishing itself from criticism and the establishment of new perspectives. Moreover, Damisch's “modeling” process engages with Structuralism through employing structure as a tool, subject to modification and reformation.

中文文獻
專書
李幼蒸（1993）。結構與意義。台北：聯經出版社。
陳瑞文（2018）。德勒茲的藝術理論。台北：五南出版社。
陳瑞文，陳方（2022）。外部與範式轉移：德勒茲論繪畫。台北：五南出版社。
張漢良（2018）。符號與修辭——古典詩學文獻的現代詮釋學意義。臺北：書林。
達彌施（H. Damisch）（2002）。雲的理論：為了建立一種新的繪畫史（董強譯）。台北：揚智出版社。（原作名稱：Théorie du /Nuage/ : Pour une histoire de la peinture，出版於1972年）
————（2011）。窗戶、色彩與抽象（林志明譯）。台北：南天出版社。
德沃夏克（M. Dvořák）（2010）。作為精神史的美術史（陳平譯）。北京：北京大學出版社。（原作名稱：Kunstgeschichte Als Geistesgeschichte，出版1924年）
德勒茲（G. Deleuze）（2000）。德勒茲論傅柯（楊凱麟譯）。台北：麥田出版社。（原作名稱：Foucault，出版1988年）

期刊論文
陳懷恩（2005）。帕諾夫斯基藝術學的基本概念。揭諦，9，頁75-124。
柴冬冬（2019）。作為視覺範式的透視——達彌施的透視學及其意義。外國文學，03，頁83-94。
柴冬冬（2019）。「思考」的圖像——達彌施藝術思想初探。湖北師範大學學報（哲學社會科學版），39（04），頁1-5。
柴冬冬，金元浦（2020）。重審藝術史及其方法論——論達彌施「雲的理論」及其藝術史學意義。南京社會科學，01，頁135-141。
彭筠（2021）。轉向結構領域的透視話語——帕諾夫斯基、古德曼與達彌施。美術研究。頁86-101。
彭筠（2020）。窺視孔與格子窗——文藝復興透視再現的觀看機制與理論範型。世界美術。頁117-125。
張佳峰（2018）。達彌施藝術史研究範式及其當代意義。美術與設計。頁29-35。
曹雅鵬，趙奎英（2021）。從「知覺的再現」到「符號的再認」——布列遜的話語符號藝術觀及其與貢布里希的論爭。山東社會科學，308，頁82-88。
魯明軍（2013）。視覺敘事與繪畫史句法新探——圍繞達彌施「雲的理論」的討論。文藝研究，7，頁119-126。
劉子琦，諸葛沂（2021）。畫框的語義：路易・馬林藝術理論的一個重要面向。美育學刊，12（2），頁91-99。

西文文獻
專書
Alberti, L. B. (1992). De la peinture (J. L. Schefer, Trans.). Macula. (Original work published 1435)
Arnauld, A. & Nicole, P. (1674). La logique, ou l'art de penser. G. Desprez.
Baccheschi, E. (1982). Tout l’œuvre peint de Giotto (A. Veinstein, Trans.). Flammarion. (Original work published 1967)
Barthes, R. (1973). Elements of Semiology. (A. Lavers & C. Smith, Trans.). Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1964)
Bailly, M. A. (s. d.). Dictionnaire grec-français. Hachette.
Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Gallimard.
Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans.). Schocken books. (Original work published 1955).
Berenson, B. (1968). The Italian Painters of the Renaissance (vol.2 The Florentine Painters, The Central Italian Painters). Phaidon.
Bois, Y. A. (1990). Painting as Model. The MIT Press.
Boulnois, O. (2008). Au-delà de l’image: Une archéologie du visual au Moyen Âge (Ve – XVe siècle). Seuil.
Brockett, O. G. & Hildy F. J. (2014). History of the Theatre. Pearson Education Limited.
Buccheri, A. (2014). The Spectacle of Clouds, 1439-1650: Italian Art and Theatre. Ashgate Book.
Burckhardt, J. (1873). Cicerone (A. H. Clough, Trans.). John Murray. (Original work published 1855)
Careri, G. & Didi-Huberman, G. (2016). Hubert Damisch, l’art au travail. Mimesis.
Cézanne, P. (1978). Correspondance (J. Rewald, Ed.). Grasset.
Caturla, M. L. (1994). Francisco de Zurbarán (O. Delenda, Trans.). Wildenstein Institute.
Chapman, H., Henry, T., Plazzotta, C., Nesselrath, A., Penny, N. (2004). Raphael : From Urbino to Rome. National Gallery Company.
Cohn, D. (Ed.). (2003). Y voir mieux, y regarder de plus près. Éditions Rue d’Ulm.
Cooper, D. & Robson, J. (2013). The Making of Assisi. Yale University Press.
Da Vinci, L. (2019). Léonard de Vinci, Carnets (L. Servicen, Trans.). Gallimard.
Damisch, H. (1972). Théorie du /Nuage/ : Pour une histoire de la peinture. Éditions du Seuil.
Damisch, H. (1984). Fenêtre jaune cadmium. Ou les dessous de la peinture. Éditions du Seuil.
Damisch, H. (1987). L'Origine de la perspective. Flammarion.
Damisch, H. (2002). Theory of /Cloud/: Toward a History of Painting (J. Lloyd, Trans.). Standford University Press. (Original work published 1972)
Damisch, H. (2022). Goya : Le mythe de l'assimilation. Ediciones Akal.
De Chérancé, L. (1900). Saint François d'Assise. C. Poussielgue.
De Saussure, F. (1997). Cours de linguistique générale. Éditions Payot.
Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. PUF.
Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1991). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie ?. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Deleuze, G. (2002). Francis Bacon : Logique de la sensation (2nd ed.). Éditions du Seuil. (Original work published 1981)
Deledallle, G. (2000). Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs: Essays in Comparitive Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Derrida, J. (1967). De la Grammatologie. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). John Hopkins University Press. (Original work published 1967)
Dosse, F. (1997). History of Structuralism, Volume I: The Rising Sign, 1945-1966 (D. Glassman, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1991)
Farago, C. (Ed.). (2009). Re-Reading Leonardo: The Treatise on Painting Across Europe. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Flores D’Arcais, F. (1995) Giotto (R. Rosenthal, Trans.). Abbeville Press Publishers.
Focillon, H. (1934). Vie des formes. Presses Universitaires de France.
Forcellino, A. (2012). Raphael: A Passionate Life (L. Byatt, Trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 2006)
Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les choses. Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du savoir. Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books Edition. (Original work published 1966)
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1969)
Francastel, P. (1965). La réalité figurative : Éléments structurels de sociologie de l’art. Éditions Gonthier.
Francastel, P. (1967). La figure et le lieu : L’ordre visuel du Quattrocento. Gallimard.
Freud, S. (2010). The Interpretation of Dream (J. Strachey, Trans.). Basic Books. (Original work published 1899)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, vol. I (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1835)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art (vol.2) (T. M. Knox, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1835)
Herbet, R. L. (Ed.). (2000). Modern Artists on Art. Dover Publications.
Hjelmslev, L. (1968). Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. (A. M. Leonard, Trans.). Les Éditions de Minuit. (Original work published 1966)
Iversen, M. (1993). Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory. The MIT Press.
Kemp, M. (1990). The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art From Brunelleschi to Seurat. Yale University Press.
Landrot, G. (2010). Cézanne: Aquarelles. Éditions Langlaude.
Marin, L. (2001). On Representation (C. Porter, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1994)
Meiss, M. (1970). The Great Age of Fresco: Discoveries, Recoveries and Survivals. George Braziller.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). La Phénoménologie de la Perception. Éditions Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Signes. Éditions Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). L’œil et l’esprit. Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1966). Sens et Non-Sens. Les Éditions Nagel.
Mengs, A. R. (1762). Gedanken über die Schönheit und über den Geschmak In der malerey. Heidegger und Compagnie.
Mengs, A. R. (2000). Pensées sur la beauté et sur le goût dans la Peinture. (D. Modigliani, Trans.). École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts. (Original work published 1762)
Murray, L. (1967). The High Renaissance and Mannerism. Thames and Hudson LTD.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (vol.2 Elements of Logic) (C. Hartshorne, & P. Weiss, Eds.). Thoemmes Press. (Original work published 1931)
Preziosi, D. (1989). Rethinking Art History: Mediations on a Coy Science. Yale University Press.
Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in The Visual Arts. Doubleday Anchor Books.
Panofsky, E. (1991). Perspective as Symbolic Form. (C. S. Wood, Trans.). Zone Books. (Original work published 1924)
Richter, I. A. (2008). Leonardo Da Vinci: Notebooks. Oxford University Press.
Richter, J. P. (1970). The Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci: Compiled and Edited From the Original Manuscripts (vol. 1). Dover Publications.
Riegl, A. (1993). L’origine de l’art baroque à Rome (S. Muller, Trans.). Éditions Klincksieck. (Original work published 1907)
Ripa, C. (1636). Iconologie, ou explication nouvelle de plusieurs images (J. Baudoin, Trans.). L’autheur. (Original work published 1593)
Ripa, C. P. (1709). Iconologia, or, Moral Embles . Benj. Motte.
Ruskin, J. (1907). Modern Painters vol. 1. J. M. Dent and sons.
Rousseau, J.J. (1990). Essai sur l’origine des langues (J. Starobinski, Éd.). Gallimard.
Saussure, F. (1997). Cours de linguistique générale. Payot.
Saussure, F. (2013). Course in General Linguistics. (R. Harris, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1916)
Schneider, L. (Ed.). (1974). Giotto: in Perspective. Prentice Hall Inc.
Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology and Semiotics. Springer Verlag New York Inc.
Schapiro, M. (1978). Modern Art 19th & 20th Centuries: Selected Papers. George Braziller.
Tintori, L. & Meiss, M. (1962). The Painting of The Life of St. Francis in Assisi. New York University Press.
Vasari, G. (1991). The Lives of the Artists (J. C. Bondanella, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1550)
Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Philosophical Investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)
Wood, C. S. (Ed.). (2000). The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Historical Methods in the 1930s. Zone Books.
Wolfflin, H. (1950). Principles of Art History (M. D. Hottinger, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1915)
Wöfflin, H. (1964). Renaissance and Baroque (K. Simon, Trans.). Collins. (Original work published 1888)

期刊論文與單篇文章
Alloa, E. (2015). Could Perspective Ever be a Symbolic Form? Revisiting Panofsky with Cassirer. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 2(1), 51-71, DOI: 10.1080/20539320.2015.11428459
Bal, M., & Bryson, N. (1991). Semiotics and Art History. The Art Bulletin, 73(2), 174–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/3045790
Bessot, D.(2002). Léonard de Vinci et les distorsions perspectives. Les Cahiers de la Perspective Point de vue,7, 45-61.
Bois, Y.-A., & Shepley, J. (1986). Painting as Model. October, 37, 125-137, https://doi.org/10.2307/778524.
Bois, Y.-A., Hollier, D., Krauss, R., & Damisch, H. (1998). A Conversation with Hubert Damisch. October, 85, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/779179
Bois, Y.-A (2005). Tough Love. Oxford Art Journal, 28(2), 245–255, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500020.
Broadfoot, K. (2002). Perspective Yet Again: Damisch with Lacan. Oxford Art Journal, 25(1), 71–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600421
Careri, G. (2018). “L’objet théorique” entre structure et histoire. La Part de l’Œil, 32, 12-23
Cassegrain, G. (2022). « Nuage langue coupée » (à propos de la Théorie du Nuage de Hubert Damisch). Immagine & Parola, 3, 91-97.
Caws, M. A. (1973). Review of Théorie du nuage: Pour une histoire de la peinture, by H. Damisch. Books Abroad, 47(4), 828–828. https://doi.org/10.2307/40127796
Coletta, E. (2022). Signs in the noise. Intervista a Hubert Damisch. Journal of visual arts, 50, 39-53.
Damisch, H. (1960). L’art aujourd’hui, Le commentaire. Arguments, 19, 6-9.
Damisch, H. (2003). La mise du sujet. In D. Cohn (Éd.), Y voir mieux, y regarder de plus près (pp. 209-227). Éditions Rue d’Ulm.
Damisch, H., & Bann, S. (2005). Hubert Damisch and Stephen Bann: A Conversation. Oxford Art Journal, 28(2), 155–181. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500014
Damisch, H., Careri, G., & Vouilloux, B. (2013). Hors Cadre : entretien avec Hubert Damisch. Perspective [En ligne], 1. doi : https://doi.org/10.4000/perspective.1670.
Damisch, H., & Schapiro, M. (2019). Letters, 1972-1973. October, 167, 25-123. https://doi.org/10.1162/octo_a_00337
Davila, T., & Mavridorakis, V. (2023). L’anonymat est un combat : Entretien avec Jean Clay. Les Cahiers du Mnam, 165, 95-116.
Farago, C. (2004). How Leonardo Da Vinci’s Editors Organized His ‘Treatise on Painting’ and How Leonardo Would Have Done It Differently. Studies in the History of Art, 59, 20–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42622652.
Gubser, M. (2005). Time and History in Alois Riegl’s Theory of Perception. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66(3), 451–474. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3654190
Iversen, M. (2005). The Discourse of Perspective in the Twentieth Century: Panofsky, Damisch, Lacan. Oxford Art Journal, 28(2), 191–202, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500016.
Klein, R. (1961). Pomponius Gauricus on Perspective. The Art Bulletin, 43 (3), 211-230.
Koering, J. (2019). The Other “Sch,” or When Damisch Met Schapiro. October, 167, 3-24.
Lutz, H. (2022). Tableaux tressés. Hubert Damisch, l’art et la topologie. Actes Sémiotiques, 127. https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7762
Marin, L. (1974). Champ Théorique et Pratique Symbolique. Critique, 321, 121-145.
Melville, S. (2005). Object and Objectivity in Damisch. Oxford Art Journal, 28(2), 183–189, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4500015.
Pelzel, T. (1967). Anton Raphael Mengs and His British Critics. Studies in Romanticism, 15(3), 405–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/25600035.
Pérez Sánchez, A. E. (1987). The Artistic Milieu in Seville During The First Third of the Seventeenth Century. In J. Baticle (Éd.), Zurbaran (pp. 37-52). The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Philippot, P. (1993). Présentation. In S. Muller (Trans.), L’origine de l’art baroque à Rome (pp. 7-34). Éditions Klincksieck.
Prévost, B. (2017). The image and the problem of expression: Towards an Aesthetic Cosmology, In S. van Tuinen & S. Zepke (Eds.), Art History after Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 125-143). Leuven University Press.
Van Alphen, E. (2003). Hubert Damisch. In C. Murray (Ed.), Key Writers on Art: The Twentieth Century (pp. 73-77). Routledge.
Van Alphen, E. (2005). ‘What History, Whose History, History to What Purpose?’: Notions of History in Art History and Visual Culture Studies. Journal of Visual Culture, 4 (2), 191-202.
Verstegen, I. (2004). Review of A Theory of /Cloud/: Toward a History of Painting, by H. Damisch. Leonardo, 37(5), 415–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1577696
White, J. (1974). The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space. In L. Schneider (Ed.), Giotto: in Perspective (pp. 125-141). Prentice Hall Inc.

學位論文
Coletta, E. (2011). Hubert Damisch. Pour une perspective oblique dans la production d’un historien et philospohe de l’art. Thèse de doctorat, Sapienza Università di Roma en co-tutelle avec EHESS. EHESS, Paris.

網路資源
Académie française. (1879). « Théorie ». Dans Dictionnaire de l’académie française (Septième édition). Consulté le 6 Août 2024, https://num.classiques-garnier.com/index.php?module=App&action=FrameMain
ACCEUIL. (s.d.). HUBERT DAMISCH. Consulté le 9 janv. 25, https://damisch.hypotheses.org/
Blum, C., et al. (s. d.). Grand Corpus des Dictionnaires. Garnier. https://bnf.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.classiques-garnier.com/numerique-bases/corpusdictionnaires
Catalogue SUDOC. (s. d.). https://www.sudoc.fr/04138590X
La Curne de Sainte-Palaye, J. P. (1875-1882). « Image ». Dans Dictionnaire historique de l'ancien langage français depuis son origine jusqu'au siècle de Louis XIV (version en ligne). Consulté le 19 Juillet 2024, https://num-classiques-garnier-com.bnf.idm.oclc.org/index.php?module=Imprim&action=Imprim&event=1_0_0_0_0
Richelet, P. (1680). « Image ». Dans Dictionnaire françois. Consulté le 19 Juillet 2024, https://num-classiques-garnier-com.bnf.idm.oclc.org/index.php?module=Imprim&action=Imprim&event=1_0_0_0_0
Saal, M. (2022, Dec). Raphael’s Sistine Madonna and its Frames. WERNER MURRER RAHMEN. Retrieved July 30th, 2024, https://www.murrer-rahmen.de/en/blog/raphael-s-em-sistine-madonna-em-and-her-frames.html.