氣候變遷是當今全球面臨的最嚴峻挑戰之一，政治人物的言論和態度對於制定有效的氣候政策至關重要，不僅影響民眾對於氣候變遷的信念與行動，也會左右相關政策、立法、教育環境以及研究資金的分配。儘管臺灣公眾對氣候變遷的風險感知度普遍較高，針對政治人物在氣候議題上的言論分析卻仍相對稀缺。本研究採用語料庫輔助論述分析（CADS）方法，針對2022年三位臺北市長候選人的公開演說進行分析，揭示其在氣候變遷議題上的言論特徵與策略。研究結果顯示，候選人對氣候變遷具有高度共識，展現出重視與積極治理的態度，並以2050淨零排放作為共同目標，以「我們」為核心詞彙營造集體行動的氛圍。在溝通策略上，雖然三位候選人各有側重，但普遍缺乏對科學資料的引用，未能充分重視教育的角色與科學的不確定性，並迴避了具爭議性的能源議題。

Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges of our time. The discourse and attitudes of political figures play a crucial role in shaping effective climate policies, influencing public beliefs and actions on climate change, as well as affecting policy development, legislation, education, and research funding allocation. Although public awareness of climate change risks is relatively high in Taiwan, systematic analyses of political discourse on climate issues remain scarce. This study employs a Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) approach to analyze the public speeches of three Taipei mayoral candidates in 2022, uncovering their discursive characteristics and strategies on climate change. The findings reveal a high level of consensus among the candidates, who demonstrate strong commitment and proactive attitudes toward addressing climate change, with a shared goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. The candidates frequently use the pronoun “we” to foster a sense of collective action. However, while each candidate emphasizes different aspects of the issue, they generally lack references to scientific data, overlook the role of education and scientific uncertainty, and avoid addressing contentious energy topics.

許晃雄、王嘉琪、陳正達、李明旭、詹士樑（2024年）。國家氣候變遷科學報告2024：現象、衝擊與調適。國家科學及技術委員會與環境部。https://tccip.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/ScientificReport2024/
國際氣候發展智庫（2023年10月14日)。聲明。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/internationalclimatedevelopmentinstitute/posts/pfbid033TVJAyaeLw8fT8TChCDdXK1wW6xMDCg3xjQ1gtyW9AutmwCo6b66tXrV7VG4uimSl
臺北市政府環境保護局（2022年6月8日)。加速減碳行動 邁向零碳臺北 臺北市發表「2050淨零行動白皮書」。https://www.dep.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=CB6D5C560DE4D2DD&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=8534353F2BE7786F
闕河嘉、陳光華（2016年）。庫博中文獨立語料庫分析工具之開發與應用。在項潔（編），數位人文研究與技藝第六輯，285-313頁。臺北市：國立臺灣大學出版中心。
行政院節能減碳推動會秘書處（2012年2月29日）。行政院節能減碳推動會 重要工作報告。https://www.moeaea.gov.tw/ecw/main/content/wHandMenuFile.ashx?file_id=370
許晃雄、王嘉琪、陳正達、李明旭與詹士樑（2024）。國家氣候變遷科學報告2024：現象、衝擊與調適。國家科學及技術委員會與環境部聯合出版。https://tccip.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/ScientificReport2024/
陳耀德與黃泓維（2024年12月26日)。碳費開徵，我們「算」對了嗎？從盤查的爭議空間看徵收碳費的挑戰。CSR@天下。https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/43966
黃泓瑜（2024年10月12日）碳費300元終於拍板，為何經濟部、環團、業界都不滿？一文解析。ESG遠見 - 永續共好。https://esg.gvm.com.tw/article/70305
Abade, L. P. (2019). Climate Change Awareness: Role of Education. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Climate Action (pp. 1–6). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_122-1
Akerlof, K., & Maibach, E. W. (2011). A rose by any other name ...?: What members of the general public prefer to call “climate change”: A letter. Climatic Change, 106(4), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0070-4
Alan Partington. (2007). Metaphors, motifs and similes across discourse types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at work. In S. Anatol & G. Stefan Th (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 267–304). De Gruyter Mouton.
Arias, P., Bellouin, N., Coppola, E., Jones, R., Krinner, G., Marotzke, J., Naik, V., Palmer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Rogelj, J., & others. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; technical summary.
Baiardi, D., & Morana, C. (2021). Climate change awareness: Empirical evidence for the European Union. Energy Economics, 96, 105163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105163
Banks, D. (2021). Passive voice, first person pronouns and mental process verbs in the physical sciences reseach article. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 16, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2021.14434
Bevitori, C. (2010). Representations of Climate Change. News and opinion discourse in UK and US quality press: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study. ITA. https://cris.unibo.it/handle/11585/90043
Bomberg, E. (2017). Environmental politics in the Trump era: An early assessment. Environmental Politics, 26(5), 956–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1332543
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316410899
Bromley-Trujillo, R., & Holman, M. R. (2020). Climate Change Policymaking in the States: A View at 2020. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 50(3), 446–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjaa008
Bromley-Trujillo, R., & Poe, J. (2020). The importance of salience: Public opinion and state policy action on climate change. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000375
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
Buckland, P., Goodstein, E., Alexander, R., Muchnick, B., Mallia, M. E., Leary, N., Andrejewski, R., & Barsom, S. (2018). The challenge of coordinated civic climate change education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-018-0473-x
Budescu, D. V., Broomell, S., & Por, H.-H. (2009). Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Psychological Science, 20(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x
California Air Resources Board. (2013). Proposed Amendments to the California Cap on Greenhouse. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2013/capandtrade13/capandtrade13isor.pdf
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. WIREs Climate Change, 6(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.321
Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change, 7(12), 850–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0021-9
Chiang, S.-H., & Chang, K.-T. (2011). The potential impact of climate change on typhoon-triggered landslides in Taiwan, 2010–2099. Geomorphology, 133(3–4), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.028
Chinn, S., Hart, P. S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and Polarization in Climate Change News Content, 1985-2017. Science Communication, 42(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019900290
Chou, K. T. (2013). The public perception of climate change in Taiwan and its paradigm shift. Energy Policy, 61, 1252–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.016
Chung, Y. (2021). Party politics and civil society: The role of policy entrepreneurs in nuclear power politics in Taiwan. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1920
Collins, S. D. (2020). America First: The Trump Effect on Climate Change Policy. In J. C. Pereira & A. Saramago (Eds.), Non-Human Nature in World Politics (pp. 179–203). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_10
Curry, J. A., & Webster, P. J. (2011). Climate Science and the Uncertainty Monster. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92(12), 1667–1682. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3139.1
De Pryck, K., & Gemenne, F. (2017). The Denier-in-Chief: Climate Change, Science and the Election of Donald J. Trump. Law and Critique, 28(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-017-9207-6
Di Giusto, B., Lavallee, J. P., & Yu, T.-Y. (2018). Towards an East Asian model of climate change awareness: A questionnaire study among university students in Taiwan. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0206298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206298
Durr-e-Nayab, Dr. (2024). Unraveling The Ecological Perspective Of Green Discourse: A Critical Study Of Newspaper Articles. Migration Letters, 21(S14), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21iS2.11211
Enago Academy. (2019). We Vs. They: Using the First & Third Person in Research Papers. https://www.enago.com/academy/we-vs-they-using-first-or-third-person-in-a-research-paper/
Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
Fiorino, D. J. (2022). Climate change and right-wing populism in the United States. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 801–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.2018854
Fleming, A., Vanclay, F., Hiller, C., & Wilson, S. (2014). Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Climatic Change, 127(3–4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1268-z
Freake, R., & Mary, Q. (2012). A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse study of language ideologies in Canadian newspapers. Proceedings of the 2011 Corpus Linguistics Conference, 1–11.
Gallina, V., Torresan, S., Critto, A., Sperotto, A., Glade, T., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 168, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
Gann, T., & Matlock, T. (2014). The Semantics of Climate Change and Global Warming. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36(36). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3pw2d2qc
Gardiner, S. M. (2004). Ethics and Global Climate Change. Ethics, 114(3), 555–600. https://doi.org/10.1086/382247
Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Fraser, J. (2017). Creating a climate for change: Interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010
Giddens, A. (2008). The politics of climate change.
Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience (Northeastern University Press ed). Northeastern University Press.
Grundmann, R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 4(2), 125–146.
Grundmann, R., & Scott, M. (2014). Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 23(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512467732
Hamilton, L. C. (2011). Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change, 104(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8
Hess, D. J., & Collins, B. M. (2018). Climate change and higher education: Assessing factors that affect curriculum requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.215
Hess, D. J., & Maki, A. (2019). Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher-education curriculum reform. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1157–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.291
Hindman, D. B. (2009). Mass Media Flow and Differential Distribution of Politically Disputed Beliefs: The Belief Gap Hypothesis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 790–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600405
Ho, E. H., Budescu, D. V., Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2015). Improving the communication of uncertainty in climate science and intelligence analysis. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151500100206
Ho, M.-S. (2018). Taiwan’s Anti-Nuclear Movement: The Making of a Militant Citizen Movement. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(3), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1421251
Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002
Howe, P. D., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Geographic Variation in U.S. Climate Change Opinion at State and Local Scales. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2515649
Hsu, H.-H., & Chen, C.-T. (2002). Observed and projected climate change in Taiwan. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 79(1–2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s703-002-8230-x
Huang, G. C., & Chen, R. (2021). Uncovering regime resistance in energy transition: Role of electricity iron triangle in Taiwan. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1921
Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200
Hwang, J. J., & Chang, W. R. (2011). Policy progress in mitigation of climate change in Taiwan. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1113–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.033
Innocenti, M., Santarelli, G., Lombardi, G. S., Ciabini, L., Zjalic, D., Di Russo, M., & Cadeddu, C. (2023). How Can Climate Change Anxiety Induce Both Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Eco-Paralysis? The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043085
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (pp. 35–115). 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Jaskulsky, L., & Besel, R. (2013). Words That (Don’t) Matter: An Exploratory Study of Four Climate Change Names in Environmental Discourse. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 12(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2013.795836
Jaworska, S. (2016). A comparative corpus-assisted discourse study of the representations of hosts in promotional tourism discourse. Corpora, 11(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0086
Jaworska, S. (2018). Change But no Climate Change: Discourses of Climate Change in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Oil Industry. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417753951
Jobin, P. (2021). Environmental Movements in Taiwan’s Anthropocene: A Civic Eco-Nationalism. In P. Jobin, Mi. Ho, & H.-H. M. Hsiao (Eds.), Environmental Movements and Politics of the Asian Anthropocene (pp. 37–80). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814951401-006
Joharry, S. A. (2020). Examining Malaysian Public Letters to Editor on COVID-19 Pandemic: A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 20(3), 242–260. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2003-14
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
Kapranov, O. (2017). The Framing of Climate-Change Discourse by Shell and the Framing of Shell’s Climate Change-Related Activities by The Economist and The Financial Times. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 7. https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v7i0.1088
Karlina, Y. (2023). Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study (CADS): Women With Disabilities in kompas.com’s News Reporting. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v16i2.45222
Koletsou, A., & Mancy, R. (2011). Which efficacy constructs for large-scale social dilemma problems? Individual and collective forms of efficacy and outcome expectancies in the context of climate change mitigation. Risk Management, 13(4), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2011.12
Kousser, T., & Tranter, B. (2018). The influence of political leaders on climate change attitudes. Global Environmental Change, 50, 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.005
Kranz, J., Schwichow, M., Breitenmoser, P., & Niebert, K. (2022). The (Un)political Perspective on Climate Change in Education—A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(7), 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074194
Lee, C.-C., Huang, K.-C., Kuo, S.-Y., Cheng, C.-K., Tung, C.-P., & Liu, T.-M. (2023). Climate change research in Taiwan: Beyond following the mainstream. Environmental Hazards, 22(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2022.2074954
Li, B. (2023). Corpus-Based Discourse Analysis of Climate Change in TED. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 5(5), p139. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v5n5p139
Li, P.-H., Fu, T.-J., & Ma, W.-Y. (2019). Why Attention? Analyze BiLSTM Deficiency and Its Remedies in the Case of NER (Version 3). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1908.11046
Li, Y.-Y., & Liu, S.-C. (2022). Examining Taiwanese students’ views on climate change and the teaching of climate change in the context of higher education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1830268
Lin, H. C. (2019). The analysis of carbon dioxide emissions from taiwan’s export industry. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_98659880
Liu, J. C., & Chao, C. (2023). Politics of climate change mitigation in Taiwan: International isolation, developmentalism legacy, and civil society responses. WIREs Climate Change, 14(4), e834. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.834
Liu, M., & Huang, J. (2022). “Climate change” vs. “Global warming”: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of two popular terms in The New York Times. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2022-0004
Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., & Langer, G. (2009). The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming: Trusted Information Sources Shape Public Thinking. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 633–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
McCright, A. (2009). The Social Bases of Climate Change Knowledge, Concern, and Policy Support in the U.S. General Public. Hofstra Law Review, 37(4). https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol37/iss4/7
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement’s Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2010). Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement’s Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409356001
McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public’s Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
McLoughlin, N. (2021). Communicating efficacy: How the IPCC, scientists, and other communicators can facilitate adaptive responses to climate change without compromising on policy neutrality. Climatic Change, 169(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03232-8
Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1360842
Morris, B. S., Chrysochou, P., Christensen, J. D., Orquin, J. L., Barraza, J., Zak, P. J., & Mitkidis, P. (2019). Stories vs. facts: Triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change. Climatic Change, 154(1–2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02425-6
Moser, S. C. (2014). Communicating adaptation to climate change: The art and science of public engagement when climate change comes home. WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.276
Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? WIREs Climate Change, 7(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.403
Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (Eds.). (2007). Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A Letter. Climatic Change, 113(3–4), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6
Napolitano, A., & Aiezza, M. C. (2019). Trump is erasing climatecChange... Language. A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the US online environmental communications under Obama and Trump (Version 1) [Dataset]. University of Salento. https://doi.org/10.1285/I22390359V29P147
Nerlich, B., Evans, V., & Koteyko, N. (2011). Low carbon diet: Reducing the complexities of climate change to human scale. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 45–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2011.003
Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2009). Compounds, creativity and complexity in climate change communication: The case of ‘carbon indulgences.’ Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.03.001
Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. WIREs Climate Change, 1(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2
Ng, A., & Nathwani, J. (Eds.). (2024). Financial and technological innovation for sustainability: Environmental, social and governance performance. Routledge.
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation: Forcing People to be Green or Fostering Grass-Roots Engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328969
Oxford English Dictionary. (2023). Carbon dioxide, n. Oxford University Press; Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/7402085580
Oxford English Dictionary. (2024a). Carbon credit, n. Oxford University Press; Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1043436412
Oxford English Dictionary. (2024b). Carbon footprint, n. Oxford University Press; Oxford English Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1055270024
Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. Corpora and Discourse, 1, 11–20.
Partington, A. (2010). Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101
Partington, A. (Ed.). (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Paterson, M., & P‐Laberge, X. (2018). Political economies of climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 9(2), e506. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.506
Pearce, W., Brown, B., Nerlich, B., & Koteyko, N. (2015). Communicating climate change: Conduits, content, and consensus. WIREs Climate Change, 6(6), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.366
Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527
Pew Research Center. (2017, October 5). The Partisan Divide on Political Values Grows Even Wider. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider/
Potter, E., & Oster, C. (2008). Communicating Climate Change: Public Responsiveness and Matters of Concern. Media International Australia, 127(1), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0812700115
Priest, S. (2016). Communicating Climate Change. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58579-0
Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2012). Unquestioned Answers or Unanswered Questions: Beliefs About Science Guide Responses to Uncertainty in Climate Change Risk Communication. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 992–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x
Rayson, P., & Garside, R. (2000). Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora -, 9, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3115/1117729.1117730
Reid, C. (2023, August 30). ULEZ Worldwide—London Is Not Alone In Charging Polluting Motor Vehicles. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2023/08/29/ulez-around-the-world---london-is-not-alone-in-charging-polluting-cars/
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Gregg, J. W., Lenton, T. M., Palomo, I., Eikelboom, J. A. J., Law, B. E., Huq, S., Duffy, P. B., & Rockström, J. (2021). World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency 2021. BioScience, 71(9), 894–898. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab079
Roper, J., Ganesh, S., & Zorn, T. E. (2016). Doubt, Delay, and Discourse: Skeptics’ Strategies to Politicize Climate Change. Science Communication, 38(6), 776–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016677043
Rose, E. R. (Ed.). (2017). A Month of Climate Change in Australia: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Media Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59849-3
Roughgarden, T., & Schneider, S. H. (1999). Climate change policy: Quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes. Energy Policy, 27(7), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00030-0
Ryan, D. (2017). Politics and climate change: Exploring the relationship between political parties and climate issues in Latin America. Ambiente & Sociedade, 20(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asocex0007v2032017
Sawer, M. (2007). Wearing your Politics on your Sleeve: The Role of Political Colours in Social Movements. Social Movement Studies, 6(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701251294
Scartozzi, C. M. (2022). Climate Change in the UN Security Council: An Analysis of Discourses and Organizational Trends. International Studies Perspectives, 23(3), 290–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac003
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Schloss, K. B., & Palmer, S. E. (2014). The politics of color: Preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1481–1488. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0635-0
Schneider, S. H., Rosencranz, A., & Niles, J. O. (Eds.). (2002). Climate change policy: A survey. Island Press.
Schuldt, J. P., Konrath, S. H., & Schwarz, N. (2011). “Global warming” or “climate change”?: Whether the planet is warming depends on question wording. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq073
Sharma, A. (2012). Global Climate Change: What has Science Education Got to Do with it? Science & Education, 21(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1
Sinclair, J. M., & Carter, R. (2004). Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge.
Smith, E. K., & Mayer, A. (2019). Anomalous Anglophones? Contours of free market ideology, political polarization, and climate change attitudes in English-speaking countries, Western European and post-Communist states. Climatic Change, 152(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2332-x
Soutter, A. R. B., & Mõttus, R. (2020). “Global warming” versus “climate change”: A replication on the association between political self-identification, question wording, and environmental beliefs. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101413
Stănculete, I.-M. (2019). I vs. We. First Person Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches. East-West Cultural Passage, 19(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.2478/ewcp-2019-0008
Stevenson, K. T., King, T. L., Selm, K. R., Peterson, M. N., & Monroe, M. C. (2018). Framing climate change communication to prompt individual and collective action among adolescents from agricultural communities. Environmental Education Research, 24(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1318114
Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). What Is Climate Change Education? Curriculum Perspectives, 37(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9
Stubbs, M. (1998). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture (1. publ., reprint). Blackwell.
Stubbs, M. (2005). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics (Reprint.). Blackwell.
Sun, Y., & Han, Z. (2018). Climate Change Risk Perception in Taiwan: Correlation with Individual and Societal Factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010091
Tesler, M. (2018). Elite Domination of Public Doubts About Climate Change (Not Evolution). Political Communication, 35(2), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092
Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do differences in attitudes explain differences in national climate change policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019
Tranter, B. (2013). The Great Divide: Political Candidate and Voter Polarisation over Global Warming in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59(3), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12023
Tsereteli, A. (2017). The Use of Pronouns in Political Discourse. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252276839
UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
Visschers, V. H. M. (2018). Public Perception of Uncertainties Within Climate Change Science. Risk Analysis, 38(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12818
Wang, M.-H., Chang, W.-Y., Kuo, K.-H., & Tsai, K.-Y. (2023). Analyzing image-based political propaganda in referendum campaigns: From elements to strategies. EPJ Data Science, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00407-4
Wang, S., Tseng, W.-T., & Johanson, R. (2021). To We or Not to We: Corpus-Based Research on First-Person Pronoun Use in Abstracts and Conclusions. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211008893. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008893
Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
Willis, R. (2017). Taming the Climate? Corpus analysis of politicians’ speech on climate change. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1274504
Wood, B. D., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00267.x
World Economic Forum. (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024, 19th Edition—Insight Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
World Health Organization. (2022, July 11). Climate change and health. Climate Change. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health
Yu, P.-S., Yang, T.-C., & Wu, C.-K. (2002). Impact of climate change on water resources in southern Taiwan. Journal of Hydrology, 260(1–4), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00614-X
Yu, T.-K., Lavallee, J. P., Di Giusto, B., Chang, I.-C., & Yu, T.-Y. (2020). Risk perception and response toward climate change for higher education students in Taiwan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(20), 24749–24759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07450-7
Zawadzki, S. J., Bouman, T., Steg, L., Bojarskich, V., & Druen, P. B. (2020). Translating climate beliefs into action in a changing political landscape. Climatic Change, 161(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02739-w
Zhang, H.-B., Dai, H.-C., Lai, H.-X., & Wang, W.-T. (2017). U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: Reasons, impacts, and China’s response. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8(4), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.09.002
Zhang, Y.-X., Chao, Q.-C., Zheng, Q.-H., & Huang, L. (2017). The withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and its impact on global climate change governance. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8(4), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.08.005
Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509357871