對於社會企業的商業模式尚未有明確的概念，故本研究將探討社會企業有別於一般企業兼顧社會與經濟價值的創新商業模式，理解如何驅動與運作，持續創造效益且永續經營。本研究採用質性研究之個案研究，探討全台灣第一家續食餐廳─「書屋花甲」之社會企業創新商業模式，研究參與者為書屋花甲續食餐廳的相關經營者與員工，首先透過非干擾性資料取得對個案的初步瞭解，再以Osterwalder & Pigneur (2010) 提出的「商業模式圖」作為研究架構，進行深度訪談，再藉由參與店內相關活動進行觀察，以獲得較詳盡的資料蒐集，對其豐富的歷史淵源與情境脈絡進行全面且深入的探究。本研究透過個案的商業模式圖發現社會企業可由關鍵趨勢獲得市場需求的價值主張，並重新組合原有的社區服務加上新元素達到社會創新，且社會企業相較一般企業更多了社會使命，因此在「產品創新」及「基礎設施」兩大構面兼具社會與經濟價值，兩者相輔相成能透過構面的多點導向來驅動創新商業模式，以社會網絡支持社會企業的公益運作，並將社會公益的受益者納入組織共同創造經濟價值，因此有效的調整商業模式能幫助社會企業發展，以因應未來的挑戰，達到兼顧社會進步與經濟自主的目的。

There is no clear concept for the business model of social enterprises. Therefore, this research will explore how social enterprises are different from general enterprises in achieving innovative business models that balance social and economic values and understand how to drive and operate them, and continue to create benefits and sustainable management. A case study of qualitative research is used to explore the social enterprise innovation business model of “Bookhouse60”, which is Taiwan’s first surplus food restaurant. The research participants were the managers and employees of the restaurant. First of all, using an unobtrusive data collection to get a preliminary understanding of the case, and then taking “Business Model Canvas” proposed by Osterwalder & Pigneur (2010) as a research framework to conduct in-depth interviews. Additionally, participating in store’s activities to obtain more detailed information, which provides comprehensive and in-depth exploration of its rich history and context. This research finds that social enterprises can obtain the value proposition of market demand from key trends through the business model canvas of the case, and recombine the original community service with new elements to achieve social innovation; moreover, social enterprises have more social missions than general enterprises. Accordingly, the two major aspects of “product innovation” and “infrastructure” have both social and economic values. The two values complement each other, driving innovative business models through multifaceted orientations of the facet, supporting the social welfare of social enterprises through social networks, and also incorporating the beneficiaries of social welfare into the organization to create economic value. Therefore, effectively adjusting the business model can help the development of social enterprises in order to meet the challenges of the future, and achieve the purpose of social progress and economic autonomy.

一、中文文獻
尤傳莉(譯)(2012)。獲利時代：自己動手，畫出你的商業模式(原作者：Osterwalder & Pigneur)。臺北市：早安財經(原著出版年：2010)
吳宜蓉(2013)。社會企業的經營模式－以里仁事業股份有限公司為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理研究所，台北市。
沈寶莉(2017年11月)。低碳生活，從惜食開始。台灣主婦聯盟生活消費合作社綠主張月刊，169，24-25。
林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學主編，質的教育研究方法，頁239-262。
林以涵(2014)社企力：社會企業！翻轉世界的變革力量。用愛創業，做好事又能獲利！。臺北市：果力文化，漫遊者文化出版
林妍廷(2017)。初探臺灣社會企業之經營模式(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩論文系統
邱紹煒(2017)。慢飛兒社會企業創新商模式(碩士論文)。中華大學企業管理學系。
洪蘭(譯)(1947)。芬蘭的100個社會創新(原作者：Taipale, Ilkka)。臺北市 : 天下雜誌。(原著出版年：1942)
紐文英(2016)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉書廊。
陳金貴(2002)。非營利組織社會企業化經營之探討。社會企業化－非營利組織發展之新趨向研討會之論文。台北財團法人青年服務事業文教基金會。
陳向明(2002)：社會科學質性研究。臺北：五南。
陳宗文(2012)。社會／創新如何可能？一種塔德式的理解。政治與社會哲學評論，41， 153-203
陳寶玲(2017)。臺灣地區剩食處理方式之策略規劃(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩論文系統
黃惠勤(2009)。非營利組織社會創新之研究－以台北市文化基金會受託管理四個機構為例(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩論文系統
黃信傑(2013)。社會企業經營模式之驗證與分析(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩論文系統
鄒敏惠(2015年8月14日)。聯合國：全球少1/4食物浪費 就可餵飽每個人。臺灣環境資訊中心。取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/109472
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。台北：心理。
蔡佳蓉(2016)。光原社會企業經營問題解決之探索－ 商業模式畫布之應用(碩士論文)。實踐大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班。
蕭富峰, 李田樹(譯)(2009)。創新與創業精神 : 管理大師彼得.杜拉克談創新實務與策略(原作者：PeterF. Drucker)。臺北市 : 臉譜出版(原著出版年：1985)
賴秀儀(2015)。社會企業經營模式之探討─以喜憨兒社會福利基金會為例(碩士論文)。銘傳大學企業管理學系。
戴嘉萱(2016)。台灣社會企業商業模式初探─以身心障礙者就業為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程碩士班。
謝孟錡(2016)。亞洲社會創新發展趨勢─以香港為例。臺灣經濟研究月刊，9，頁83-89。

二、英文文獻
2017 THE STATE OF FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION IN THE WORLD.http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/
Alter, K. 2004, “Social Enterprise Typology”, search date: 2013.06.21, From http://www.virtueventures.com/setypology.pdf.
Austin, J. E., Stevenson, H .H., and Wei-Skillern, J. 2006, “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship : Same, Different, or Both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory andPractice, Vol. 30(1), 1-22.
Certo ST, Miller T. 2008. Social entrepreneurship: keyissues and concepts. Business Horizons 51(4): 267-271.
Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard business review, 76, 54-67.
Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of „Organizational Lag’’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, pp. 392-409.
Defourny, J., 2001, “Introduction: From third sector to social enterprise”. In Carol Borzaga and Jacques Defourny (Eds.), The Emergence of Social Enterprise, London & New York: Routledge, 1-28.
Davila, T., Marc, J. E. and Robert, S. (2006) Making Innovation Work: How to Manage it, Measure it, and Profit from it, Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.
Deraedt, E. (2009). Social enterprise: A conceptual framework: Conceptual Discussion Paper for the ILO Social Enterprise Development Targeting
Unemployed Youth in South Africa (SETYSA) project. Leuven: Hiva.
Grassl, W.,2012,”Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity”. Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1(1):37–60.
Haugh, H., and Tracey. P. , 2004, “The role of social enterprise in regional development” Paperpresented at the Social Enterprise and Regional Development Conference,Cambridge-MIT Institute, University of Cambridge.
James A. Phills Jr., Kriss Deiglmeier, & Dale T. Miller (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morrisa, M., Schindehutteb, M. & Allen J.,2005.”The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective”,Journal of Business Research, 58: 726-735.
Mair,J. and Schoen, O., 2007, “Successful social entrepreneurial business models in the context of developing economies”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 1(2).
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation（Revised and expanded from case study research in education）(4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Northland Institute (2001), What is “Social Enterprise”? http://www.northlandinst.org/socialent.cfm
OECD(1999). Social Enterprise.OECD
Pol, E. & Ville, S. (2009), Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term? The Journal of Socio-E conomics, Vol.38, No.6, pp.878-885.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Schumann, P. A., Prestwood, D. C. L., Tong, A. H. and Vanston, J. H.(1994), Innovate:straight path to quality, customer delight & competitive advantage,McGraw-Hill, New York.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L., (2010),“Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience.”, Long range planning,Vol.43(2),pp.308-325.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Newbury Park,CA: Sage.