本研究探討台灣流行時尚服飾廠商建立自有品牌之創業歷程，由辨識外部機會、建 立組織自身優勢、因應環境變化之策略選擇，對內採取資源重組，逐步建立消費者認同 的知名服飾品牌。
本研究將個案公司採取四個階段分析，分別是第一階段的「手工訂製」時期，以手 工客製之精品服飾滿足高階婦女客群之社交需求。第二階段的「成衣設計生產」時期， 將本身對於精品服飾的手工製程，轉換為成衣工廠大量生產流程，由經銷商通路銷售達 到生產規模經濟的效果。第三階段為「自有品牌零售擴張」時期，因應通路變化，積極 在全省建立零售點，其通路型態也採多元方式，且逐漸將營運重點轉往自有銷售通路， 以強化品牌精神。第四時期為「設計師品牌聚焦」時期，因應流行時尚變化快速的特性， 聚焦於百貨公司與購物中心等綜合性通路，其店面強化銷售人員對顧客關係經營能力， 以深耕品牌之高端客群。
本研究以四個階段為分析單位，分別以個案公司的創辦人在各階段對外部環境趨勢 的判斷、策略重點(價值活動)之選擇、組織內部資源的重整，以及循序漸進建立國內 服飾品牌之歷程。研究發現:創辦人蘇女士對服飾產業的熱忱是品牌永續的基礎，在創 業初期以累積生產規模為主，之後則以靈活且多元的通路政策站穩內銷市場，再逐步探 索海外市場機會。在組織能力調整部分，則可以發現個案公司的服飾品牌達到生產規模 之後，保留其設計之核心能力，將製造活動委外生產，以彈性生產滿足產品線廣度與目 標客群的需要，而組織內部資源快速重組，由製造能力轉成市場銷售能力，尤其是創業 後期各種通路皆有經驗豐富的專櫃銷售人員，充分傳遞品牌精神與創辦人對服飾的熱愛 與美好生活的想像。研究更進一步建議，在虛實通路整合的趨勢之下，以實體通路且經 營高端客群的品牌，仍應以自身核心能力為資源基礎，探索未來成長機會，並逐步資源 重組以形成新的商業策略。

This study explores the entrepreneurial process of Taiwanese fashion apparel manufacturers to establish their own brands. From identifying external opportunities, establishing organizational advantages, and choosing strategies in response to changes in the environment, internal resources are reorganized to gradually establish well-known apparel brands recognized by consumers.
This study analyzes the case company in four stages, namely the first stage of the "manual customization" period, where hand-made boutique clothing meets the social needs of high-end women's customers. In the second stage of the "clothing design and production" period, the manual process of fine clothing is transformed into the mass production process of the garment factory, and the dealers sell through the channels to achieve the effect of production scale economy. The third stage is the "private-brand retail expansion" period. In response to changes in distribution channels, it actively establishes retail outlets across the province. Its distribution types are also diversified, and its operation focus is gradually shifted to its own sales channels to strengthen the brand spirit. The fourth period is the "designer brand focus" period. In response to the fast-changing characteristics of fashion, it focuses on integrated channels such as department stores and shopping centers. Its storefronts strengthen the sales staff's ability to operate the relationship with customers to deepen the high-end customer base of the brand.
This research takes four stages as the analysis unit. The founders of the case company in each stage judge the external environment trends, the choice of strategic focus (value activities), the reorganization of internal resources of the organization, and the gradual establishment of domestic apparel brands course. The research found that the founder, Ms. Su’s enthusiasm for the apparel industry is the foundation of brand sustainability. At the initial stage of her business, she focused on accumulating production scale, and then used flexible and diversified channel policies to stabilize the domestic market, and then gradually explore overseas market opportunities. The study further suggests that under the trend of integration of virtual and real channels, brands that operate on physical channels and operate high-end customer groups should still use their core capabilities as the resource basis, explore future growth opportunities, and gradually reorganize resources to form new business strategies.

中文部分：
1. 紡織產業鏈資訊平台-紡織產業鏈(2020)，https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=O000
2. 流行快訊數位雜誌Fashion Express(2020)，鑒往知來，盤點台灣時尚產業樣貌
3. 羅蘭．羅蘭巴特（Roland Barthes）：流行體系（I）：符號學與服飾 符號（李維譯，1998）。32-63。臺北市，桂冠出版社。
4. 托比‧麥德斯（Toby Meadows）（2014）邱春煌（譯）。ZARA首席顧問教你，跟著全球時裝霸主，把生意做起來。18-19。臺北市，圓點出版社。
5. 臺灣文化統計網(2019)，文化創意產業發展年報
6. 台灣經濟研究院(2020)，2018流行時尚產業整體營收
7. 黃延聰(2020)，「組織能力之更新:組織認定觀點」，中山管理評論 第二十八卷第一期 ，p.9-66 。台中市，東海大學企管系。
8. 司徒達賢(2016)，策略管理新論：觀念架構與分析方法(三版)，19-69，台北市，元照出版。
9. 徐志宏、賴建榮、鄒伯衡(2014)，「臺灣全球運籌發展協會全球運籌研究中心，現代物流 · 物流技術與戰略」第 70 期。
10. 李嘉芸(2020)，「模特兒經紀公司策略轉型之研究-以凱渥個案為例」。臺北市，台灣師範大學國際時尚高階管理在職碩士班
11. 謝維合(2011)，美育第180期。台北市，國立台灣藝術教育館。
12. 謝維合(2021)，「品味流行—台灣時尚風騷百年」。台灣藝術教育網。
13. 謝如梅、劉常勇(2009)，創新機會便是：創業警覺能力、先前知識與資訊獲取之關聯性研究，組織與管理，第2卷第2期，pp77-108
14. 葉立誠，(2014)台灣服裝史/二版。新北市，商鼎數數位出版。
15. 王喆，韓陽（譯）(2017)，Martin Reeves, Knut Haanaes, Janmejay。「策略選擇：掌握解決問題的過程，面對複雜多變的挑戰」Your strategy Needs a Strategy: How to Choose and Execute the Right Approach。台北市，經濟新潮社
16. 尚榮安(譯)(2001)。個案研究法 Case study research : design and methods,2nd ed.。 Yin, R.K. (2001)。台北:弘智文化

英文部分：
1. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Rat, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
2. Aaker, D. A., 1989, “Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to A Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” California Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, 91-106.
3. Agarwal, R. and Helfat, C., 2009, “Strategic Renewal of Organizations,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 281-293.
4. Albert, S. and Whetten, D. A., 1985, “Organizational Identity” in Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 7), 1st, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 263-295.
5. Bowman, C. and Ambrosini, V., 2003, “How the Resource-Based and the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Competitive and Corporate Level Strategy,” British Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 289-303.
6. Baron, R. A. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs “connect the dots” to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 104-119.
7. Chen, M. J., 1996, “Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward A Theoretical Integration,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, 100-134.
8. De Koning, A. (1999). Conceptualizing opportunity recognition as a socio-cognitive process. France, Institute European d'Administration des Affaires.
9. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677-695.
10. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A., 2000, “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No.10-11, 1105-1121.
11. Grant, R. M., 1991, “The Resources-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, 114-135.
12. Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A., 2003, “The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability
Hills, H., Lumpkin, G., & Singh, G. T. (1997). Opportunity recognition: perception and behavior of entrepreneurs. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 8(2), 203-218
13. Lifecycles,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 997-1010.
14. Livengood, R. S. and Reger, R. K., 2010, “That’s Our Turf! Identity Domains and Competitive Dynamics,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 48-66.
15. Minniti, M. (2004). Entrepreneurial alertness and asymmetric information in a spin-glass model. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 637-658.
16. Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A., & Smith, J. B. (2002). Toward a yheory of rntrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the people Side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27(2), 93-104.
17. Miller, D., & Friesen P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4(3), 221-235. 。
18. Moon, M. J. (1999). The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter? Public Administration Review, 59(1), 31-43.
19. Porter, M. E., 1981, “The Contribution of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 609-620.
20. Powell, E. E. and Baker, T., 2014, “It’s What You Make of It: Founder Identity and Enacting Strategic Responses to Adversity,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 57, No. 5, 1406-1433.
21. Sharma, P., & Chrisman J. J. (1999). Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional. Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship, 23(3), 11-27.
22. Stimpert, J. L., Gustafson, L. T., and Sarason, Y., 1998, “Organizational Identity within the Strategic Management Conversation: Contributions and Assumptions,” in Whetten, D. A. and Godfrey, P. C. (eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory through Conversations, 1st, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.83-98.
23. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal. Vol.18, No.7, 1997, pp.509-533.
24. Teece, D. J., The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1976.
25. Teece, D. J., “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy. Vol.15, No.6, 1986, pp.285-305.
26. Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G., 2002, “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,” Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 339-351.
27. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H., and Davidsson, P., 2006, “Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, 917-955.
28. Yin, R. K. (1984). “Case study research: Design and Methods”. London: Sage.