本研究旨在分析十二年國教課程改革中，綜合活動領域素養導向課程設計原則，並探討國中綜合活動領域教師知覺素養導向課程設計原則的主觀權重，以及其受到不同新課綱培訓經驗之影響。研究共分為兩部分，第一部分透過文獻分析、專家意見建構綜合活動領域素養導向課程設計原則，第二部份邀請26位現職國中綜合活動領域教師，以層級分析法（analytic hierarchy process, AHP）評定研究參與教師對於各項原則主觀知覺的權重與排序，並依據素養導向培訓經驗將研究參與教師區分為推廣教師與一般教師各13位，以斯皮爾曼等級相關及曼—惠特尼U考驗分析兩組教師之一致性與差異。第一部分研究結果建立兩階層三層面13項原則之素養導向課程設計原則架構，第二部分研究結果：（1）全體教師依據面向區分，最為重視「教學活動與效能」面向，該面向中權重排序最高兩項為「使學生應用所學解決生活問題、因應未來挑戰」、「使學生體驗省思並形成內在信念」；反之「課程發展原則」重要性最低，該面向中「課程能跨領域或融入重要議題」排序最末，同時也為全架構原則中排序最後的原則。（2）全體教師對於全部原則的權重與排序，最高的三項原則依序為「課程運用有效教學與評量的策略」、「使學生應用所學解決生活問題、因應未來挑戰」、「課程教學與評量目標一致」。（3）推廣教師與一般教師對素養導向課程設計原則之權重排序無明顯相關，且其中三項原則排序有明顯差異，推廣教師顯著較重視「課程教學與評量目標一致」，一般教師則較重視「課程運用多元教學與評量的策略」與「使學生連接生活經驗與脈絡」。基於上述發現，本研究提出相關研究討論與建議。

This study aims to analyze the design principles of the competency-based integrative activities domain curriculum in the 12-year basic education curriculum reform. To explore the subjective weight of teachers’ perception of competence-based curriculum design principles in the integrative activities domain and the influence of different training experiences in the new curriculum, we carry out this study. This research is divided into two parts. First part uses literature analysis and expert opinions to construct competence-based curriculum design principles in the integrative activities domain. Second part, 26 teachers of integrative activities domain are invited to use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the weight and ranking of the teachers’ subjective perceptions of each principle. According to the experience of promoting competence-based curriculum, teachers were equally divided into promotion-teacher and general-teacher. Spearman Rank Correlation and Mann-Whitney U Test were used to analyze the consistency and differences between two groups of teachers. On the first part, we establish a framework of competence-based curriculum design with 13 principles of two levels and three dimensions. The results of the second part include: (1) All teachers are divided according to the aspect, and the most important aspect is “Teaching activities and effectiveness.” The two principles with the highest weight in this aspect are “Enable students to apply what they have learned to solve life problems and respond to future challenges” and “Enable students to experience reflection and form inner beliefs.” On the contrary, the aspect with the least importance of “Curriculum development principles.” In this aspect, “The curriculum can cross fields or integrate into important issues” is ranked last, and it is also the last principle in the overall framework principles. (2) The weight and ranking of all the principles for all teachers, the highest three principles are “The curriculum uses effective teaching and evaluation strategies,” “Enable students to apply what they have learned to solve life problems and respond to future challenges” and “The goal of curriculum teaching and assessment is consistent.” (3) There is no significant correlation between promotion teachers and general teachers in the weight ranking of competence-based curriculum design principles, but there are significant differences in the ranking of three principles. Promotion teachers pay more attention to “The goal of curriculum teaching and assessment is consistent” while general teachers pay more attention to “The curriculum uses a variety of teaching and assessment strategies” and “Connecting students with life experience and context.” Based on the results, this study provides relevant research discussion and suggestions.

十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2014年11月）。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52 [Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education: General Guidelines. (2014, November). https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52]
方德隆、丘愛鈴、王為國（2018）：〈綜合活動領域教材教法的現況、趨勢與展望〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，7（5），145–153。[Fang, D.-L., Chiu, A.-L., & Wang W.-K. (2018). Zonghe huodong lingyu jiaocai jiaofa de xiankuang qushi yu zhanwang. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 7(5), 145–153.]
王秀槐（2008）：〈課程改革與教師專業成長〉。《中等教育季刊》，59（3），28–41。[Wang, H.-H. (2008). Teacher’s professional development in the era of curriculum reform. Secondary Education, 59(3), 28–41.]
王金國（2021）：〈素養導向教學設計的問題分析與建議〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，10（1），186–192。[Wang, C.-K. (2021). Suyang daoxiang jiaoxue sheji de wenti fenxi yu jianyi. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(1), 186–192.]
王奕婷（2019）：《體育代理教師實施素養導向課程之多重個案分析》（未出版碩士論文），國立高雄師範大學。[Wang, Y.-T. (2019). The product of times multiple-case research on physical education substitute teachers’ implementations of their literacy-based curriculum design (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University.]
王為國（2020）：〈國小教師對綜合活動領域課綱之釋意研究〉。《當代教育研究季刊》，28（1），75–108。[Wang W.-K. (2020). Sensemaking of elementary school teachers in the curriculum guidelines of the integrative activities learning area. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 28(1), 75–108.] https://doi.org/10.6151/cerq.202003_28(1).0003
成虹飛、黃志順（1999）：〈從教師成長看課程改革的意義〉。《應用心理研究》，1，69–97。[Cherng H., & Hwang C.-S. (1999). What does curriculum reform mean to teachers? Research in Applied Psychology, 1, 69–97.]
江海韻（2011）：《國中綜合活動學習領域教師角色改變歷程》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Chiang H.-Y. (2011). The changing process of teacher’s roles of integraties actities learning areas in junior high school (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
吳清山（2018）：〈素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，63（4），261–293。[Wu C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261–293.] https://doi.org/10.6209/jories.201812_63(4).0009
吳菜霞（2004）：《臺北市國中綜合活動學習領域理念與實施現況之研究》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Wu, C.-X. (2004). A study on taipei city junior high school integrative activity learning field concept and current fulfillment (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
呂易城（2019）：《國民中學教師對素養導向教學認知及其因應策略之研究－以彰化縣為例》（未出版碩士論文），國立彰化師範大學。[Lu, Y.-C. (2019). A study on junior high school teachers’ cognition in competence-based curriculum and their coping strategies-changhua county as an example (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua Normal University.]
宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）：〈混合研究在教育研究的應用〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，55（4），97–130。[Sung, Y. T., & Pan, P. Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97–130.]
李幸真（2021）：《臺中市國小教師對十二年國教課綱素養導向教學之態度研究》（未出版碩士論文），靜宜大學。[Li, H.-C. (2021). A study of the attitudes of the elementary school teachers toward the competency-based instruction for the 12-year basic education curricula in taichung city (Unpublished master’s thesis). Providence University.]
李駱遜（2017）：〈十二年國民基本教育中綜合活動領域課程綱要的新面貌〉。《教育脈動》，10，d1–13。[Lee, L.-H. (2017). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu zhong zonghe huodong lingyu kecheng gangyao de xinmianmao. Pulse of Education, 10, d1–13.]
李駱遜（2018）：〈綜合活動領域素養導向教學模組研發〉。《國家教育研究院電子報》，174。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=174&content_no=3057 [Lee, L.-H. (2018). Zonghe huodong lingyu suyang daoxiang jiaoxue mozu yanfa. Epaper of NAER, 174. https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=2&edm_no=174&content_no=3057]
李駱遜（主編）（2019）：《十二年國民基本教育綜合活動領域教學模組國中階段教師手冊》。國家教育研究院。[Lee, L.-H. (Ed.). (2019). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu zonghe huodong lingyu jiaoxue mozu guozhong jieduan jiaoshi shouce. National Academy for Educational Research.]
沈羿成、王金國（2021）：〈素養導向課程與教學設計的問題與建議〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，10（7），108–114。[Shen, Y.-C., & Wang C.-K. (2021). Suyang daoxiang kecheng yu jiaoxue sheji de wenti yu jianyi. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(7), 108–114.]
周麗端（主編）（2021）：《素養導向系列叢書：中學家政教材教法》。五南出版社。[Chou, L.-T. (Ed.).(2021). Suyang daoxiang xilie congshu zhongxue jiazheng jiaocai jiaofa. Wu-Nan.]
林永豐（2017）：〈核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計〉。《教育研究月刊》，275，4–17。[Lin, Y.-F. (2017) Transformation and design of competence-based curriculum and instruction. Journal of Education Research, 275, 4–17.] https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017030275001
林志龍（2021）：〈國小教師對素養導向教學的覺知－以桃園市108學年度一年級教師為例〉。《學校行政》，134，160–186。[Lin, C.-L. (2021). Elementary school teachers’ awareness of competence-oriented teaching-take the first grade teacher in taoyuan city 108 school year as an example, Journal of School Administration, 134, 160–186.] https://doi.org/10.6423/hhhc.202107_(134).0008
林佳慧、劉理枝、盧奕利（2017）：〈綜合活動領域素養導向教學實踐－以「心靈即時通」為例〉。《教育脈動》，10，f1–8。[Lin, J.-H., Liu, L. Z., & Lu, Y.-L. (2017). Zonghe huodong lingyu suyang daoxiang jiaoxue shijian yi xinling jishitong weili. Pulse of Education, 10, f1–8.]
林易萱、龔心怡（2017）：〈教師信念、專業承諾與班級經營效能比較之研究－以國高中新手與資深教師為例〉。《師資培育與教師專業發展期刊》，10（2），111–138。[Lin, Y.-H., & Kung, H.-Y. (2017). Teacher’s belief, professional commitment and classroom management effectiveness: a comparison of novice and senior teachers in junior and senior high schools in taiwan, Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 10(2), 111–138.] https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492017081002005
林郡雯（2018）：〈幾個關於以核心素養為導向的課程轉化問題〉。《中等教育》，69（2），40–56。[Lin, C.-W. (2018). Questions about curriculum transformation based on the core competencies, Secondary Education, 69(2), 40–56.] https://doi.org/10.6249/se.201806_69(2).0017
林清山（1992）：《心理與教育統計學》。東華書局。[Lin, C.-S. (1992) Psychological and educational statistics. Tung-Hwa.]
林進材（2020）：〈從課程改革的軌跡論述教師教學理念的實踐與轉變〉。《台灣教育研究期刊》，1（1），157–175。[Lin, C.-T. (2020). Discussing the practice and transformation of teachers’ teaching ideas from the track of curriculum reform. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 1(1), 157–175.]
林鼎鈞（2019）：《高中體育教師素養導向體育教學概念之探討》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Lin, T.-C. (2019). Identifying senior high school physical education teachers’ concepts toward competency-based education in physical education (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
洪詠善（2018）：〈素養導向教學的界定、轉化與實踐〉。見蔡清華（主編），《課程協作與實踐第二輯》，頁59–74。教育部。[Hung, Y.-S. (2018). Suyang daoxiang jiaoxue de jieding zhuanhua yu shijian. In C. Tsai (Ed.), Kecheng xiezuo yu shijian di er ji (pp. 59–74). Ministry of Education.]
洪詠善（2019）：〈台灣課程改革脈絡中教師專業發展的回顧與展望〉。《教育學報》，47（1），49–69。[Hung, Y.-S. (2019). Teachers’ professional development in the context of curriculum reforms in taiwan: retrospect and prospect. Education Journal, 47(1), 49–69.]
洪詠善、范信賢（2015）:《同行－走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱》。國家教育研究院。[Hung, Y.-S., & Fan, H.-H. (2015). Tongxing zoujin shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu kecheng gangyao zonggang. National Academy for Educational Research.]
范信賢（2016）：〈核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：導讀《國民核心素養：十二年國教課程改革的DNA》〉。《教育脈動》，5，r1–7。[Fan, H.-H. (2016). Core competencies and directions governing for the 12-year basic education curriculum: Introduction “National core competencies: DNA of 12-year national education curriculum reform.” Pulse of Education, 5, r1–7.]
孫志麟（1992）：〈生手如何才能成為專家呢？－教師專業表現之探討〉。《師友月刊》，297，21–25。[Sun, C.-L. (1992). Shengshou ruhe caineng chengwei zhuanjia ni jiaoshi zhuanye biaoxian zhi tan tao. The Educator Monthly, 297, 21–25.] https://doi.org/10.6437/em.199203.0021
徐向閱（2021）：《高中體育教師實施素養導向教學的學習評量之個案探討》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Hsu, H.-Y. (2021). A case study of implement of assessment of the competency-based teaching of high school physical education teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
徐秀婕（2021）：〈綜合活動領綱中學習評量演變與落實素養導向之課題〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，10（3），48–51。[Hsu, H.-C. (2021). Zonghe huodong linggang zhong xuexi pingliang yanbian yu luoshi suyang daoxiang zhi keti. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(3), 48–51.]
徐敬容（2017）：《十二年國教綜合活動領域學習內容重要性比較—以雙北市國中童軍教師為例》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Hsu, C.-J. (2017). A study of the learning point in curriculum guidelines of integrative activities area in the twelve-year public education program using the analytical hierarchy process–taking scout teachers in junior high school of taipei city and new taipei city as sample (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
秦玉友（2002）：〈課程理解～課程改革與課程實施中日漸凸現的問題〉。《課程與教學》，5（4），75–88+165。[Qin, Y.-Y. (2002). Curriculum comprehension-curriculum reform and curriculum implementation. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 5(4), 75–88+165.] https://doi.org/10.6384/ciq.200210.0075
秦聖翔（2019）：《中學體育教師在UBD專業學習社群中關於素養導向體育學習評量之探究》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺灣師範大學。[Chin, S.-S. (2019). Physical education learning assessment under the new curriculum framework in Taiwan: A case of professional learning community (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University.]
國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要總綱（2008年5月）。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=F34E9417-8374-4A02-97CC-0DEDFD13514F [Grade 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines. (2008, May). https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=F34E9417-8374-4A02-97CC-0DEDFD13514F]
國家教育研究院（2014年2月）：〈十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引〉。教育部國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=8435 [National Academy for Educational Research. (2014, February). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu kecheng fazhan zhiyin. CIRN. https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=8435]
國家教育研究院（2018年12月）：《十二年國民基本教育課程綱要綜合活動領域課程手冊》。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52 [National Academy for Educational Research. (2018). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu kecheng gangyao zonghe huodong lingyu kecheng shouce. https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52]
張孟莉、張景然（2011）：〈國中綜合活動教師在教育情境中的行動選擇研究〉。《輔導與諮商學報》，33（2），33–53。[Chang, M.-L., & Chang, C.-J. (2011). A study of junior high school integrated activities teachers’ action decisions in educational situation. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 33(2), 33–53.] https://doi.org/10.7040/jgc.201111.0033
張雨霖（2021）：〈輔導科教材教法理論發展趨勢〉。見陳學志、張雨霖（主編），《素養導向系列叢書：國中輔導教材教法》，頁17–30。五南出版社。[Chang, Y.-L. (2021). Fudao ke jiaocai jiaofa lilun fazhan qushi. In H.-C. Chen & Y.-L. Chang (Ed.), Suyang daoxiang xilie congshu guozhong fudao jiaocai jiaofa. (pp. 17–30). Wu-Nan.]
張素貞（2021）：〈可行乎？素養導向教學的實踐〉。《師友雙月刊》，625，43–46。[Chang, S.-J. (2021). Ke xing hu suyang daoxiang jiaoxue di shijian. The Educator Bimonthly, 625, 43–46.]
張景媛、林佳慧（2017）：〈綜合活動領域素養導向教學設計發展與實例〉。《教育研究月刊》，275，34–49。[Chang, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-H. (2017). The development of teaching design for cultivating key competencies and practices in the integrated activities curriculum. Journal of Education Research, 275, 34–49.] https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017030275003
張德銳（2021）：〈以教學輔導教師制度促進素養導向教學的發展〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，10（3），56–61。[Chang, D. (2021). Yi jiaoxue fudao jiaoshi zhidu cujin suyang daoxiang jiaoxue de fazhan. Journal of Education Research, 10(3), 56–61.]
張瀞文（2018）：《面向未來的能力：素養導向教學教戰手冊》。教育部。[Chang, C.-W. (2018). Mianxiang weilai de nengli suyang daoxiang jiaoxue jiaozhan shouce. Ministry of Education.]
教育部（2018年10月23日）：〈十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校－綜合活動領域〉。國家教育研究院。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52 [Ministry of Education. (2018, October 23). Shiernian guomin jiben jiaoyu kecheng gangyao guomin zhong xiaoxue ji putongxing gaoji zhongdeng xuexiao zonghe huodong lingyu, Ministry of Education. https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52]
教育部（2021年11月23日）：〈十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱宣講(第九版)〉。教育部國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=1172&mid=9289 [Ministry of Education. (2021, November 23). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education general guidelines (9th ed.). CIRN. https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=1172&mid=9289]
郭光蓮（2016）：〈以AHP來探究國小教師對數學專業標準之看法〉。《管理資訊計算》，5（1），181–192。[Kuo, K.-L. (2016). Based on AHP to study on the perspectives of elementary school teachers’ mathematics professional standards. Management Information Computing, 5(1), 181–192.] https://doi.org/10.6285/mic.5(1).15
郭宗鑫（2021）：《國小體育教師十二年國教素養導向教學認知與實踐-以北部某國小為例》（未出版碩士論文），國立清華大學。[Kuo, T.-H. (2021). The physical education teachers’ perception and application of the 12-year basic guidelines: a case study in an elementary school in new taipei city (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tsing Hua University.]
陳正達（2018）：《學習組織文化、持續進修動機、教師教學信念對國中綜合活動領域教師學科教學知識之影響》（未出版碩士論文），國立成功大學。[Chen, C.-T. (2018). The influence of organizational culture of learning, motivation of in-service education and teaching belief on teachers “integrative activities pedagogical content knowledge”of junior high school (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University.]
陳柏霖（2022）：〈以品味策略為調節角色：國中初任與資深教師品味信念與圓滿人生之關係〉。《教育心理學報》，53，587–616。[Chen, P.-L. (2022). Savoring strategies moderate the relationship between junior high school novice and senior teachers’ savoring beliefs and level of flourishing in life. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 53, 587–616.] https://doi.org/10.6251/bep.202203_53(3).0004
陳禹彤（2019）：《高中英語教師素養導向教學之個案研究》（未出版碩士論文），淡江大學。[Chen, Y.-T. (2019). A case study on the competency-based instruction of senior high school english teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tamkang University.]
陳茹玲、蔡鑫廷、宋曜廷、李宜憲（2015）：〈文本適讀性分級架構之建立研究〉。《教育科學研究期刊》，60（1），1–32。[Chen, J.-L., Tsai, S.-T., Sung, Y. T., & Lee, Y.-S. (2015). The development of a text leveling framework. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(1), 1–32.] https://doi.org/10.6209/jories.2015.60(1).01
陳雅欣（2020）：《高雄市國小英語教師對十二年國民基本教育英語領域素養導向課程瞭解與看法之調查研究》（未出版碩士論文），國立臺南大學。[Chen, Y.-S. (2020). A survey of kaohsiung’s elementary school english teachers’ understanding and perceptions of the literacy-based english curriculum of 12-year basic education (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tainan University.]
陳馨怡、徐秀婕、賴怡妏（2018）：〈能力再進化，素養新視野－綜合活動領域素養導向課程實例分享〉。《中等教育》，69（2），113–126。[Chen, H.-Y., Hsu, H.-C., & Lai, Y.-W. (2018). Competence-based curriculum design: an example in integrative activity learning area. Secondary Education, 69(2), 113–126.] https://doi.org/10.6249/se.201806_69(2).0022
曾榮祥、黃詩媛（2019）：〈兒童益智營隊指導員專業知能指標及其權重建構〉。《教育與心理研究》，42(1)，71–103。[Tseng, H.-J., & Huang, S.-Y. (2019). A study of constructing the counselors’ professional competency indicators and weights of children puzzle camp. Journal of Education ＆ Psychology, 42(1), 71–103.] https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852019034201003
游自達（2019）：〈素養導向教學的實踐：深化學習的開展〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，8（10），6–12。[Yiu, T. T. (2019). Suyang daoxiang jiaoxue di shijian shenhua xuexi de kaizhan. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 8(10), 6–12.]
黃文定（2012年10月）：〈課程轉化層級〉。教育大辭書。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1453926/ [Huang, W. (2012, October). Curriculum transformation. Jiaoyu da cishu. https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1453926/]
黃郁倫（2021）：《國中英語教師對素養導向英語教學之釋意研究》（未出版碩士論文），國立清華大學。[Huang, Y.-L. (2021). Sensemaking of junior high school english teachers’ competence-oriented english teaching (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Tsing Hua University.]
詹惠雪、黃曰鴻（2020）：〈教師對素養導向課程設計的理解與實踐反思〉。《課程與教學》，23（3），29–58。[Chan, H.-H., & Huang, Y.-H. (2020). Teachers’ understanding and practical reflection of competency-oriented curriculum design. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(3), 29–58.] https://doi.org/10.6384/ciq.202007_23(3).0002
甄曉蘭（2000）：〈新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建〉。《教育研究集刊》，44，61–90。[Chen, H. L. S. (2000). Challenges of curriculum reform and the reconstruction of practical theories for curriculum praxis for the 21st century. Bulletin of Educational Research, 44, 61–90.] https://doi.org/10.6910/ber.200001_(44).0003
臺南市教育局（2017年12月29日）：〈臺南市國中小遭遇課綱困難調查表〉。臺南市教育局。http://tadm.dyes.tn.edu.tw/~dnes_www/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=730 [Tainan City Education Bureau. (2017, December 29). Tainan city elementary and middle school encountered curriculum difficulties survey. Tainan City Education Bureau. http://tadm.dyes.tn.edu.tw/~dnes_www/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=730]
趙宥寧（2020年10月24日）：〈把素養變教學內容好難？教育部回應了〉。聯合報。https://udn.com/news/story/121690/4960347 [Zhao, Y.-N.(2020, October 24). Ba suyang bian jiaoxue neirong hao nan jiaoyubu huiying lia. UDN. https://udn.com/news/story/121690/4960347]
趙曉美（2019）：〈素養導向教學的思考與課堂實踐〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，8（10），27–30。[Chao, H.-M. (2019). Suyang daoxiang jiaoxue de sikao yu ketang shijian. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 8(10), 27–30.]
潘慧玲、黃曬莉、陳文彥、鄭淑惠（2020）：〈學校準備好了嗎？國高中教育人員實施108課綱的變革準備度〉。《教育研究與發展期刊》，16（1），65–100。[Pan, H.-L. W., Huang, L.-L., Chen, W.-Y., & Cheng, S.-H. (2020). Are Schools Ready? School Practitioners’ Change Readiness for the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 16(1), 65–100.] https://doi.org/10.6925/scj.202003_16(1).0003
蔡立勳（2019年11月5日）：〈第一線教師的質疑：「素養」定義好抽象，教育部到底希望怎麼教？〉。天下雜誌。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5097543 [Tsai, L.-X. (2019, November 5). Diyixian jiaoshi de zhiyi suyang dingyi hao chouxiang jiaoyubu daodi xiwang zenme jiao. Common Wealth Magazine. https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5097543]
蔡居澤（2019年8月13日）：〈12年國教綜合活動新領綱素養導向教學與課程設計〉。國民中小學部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫。http://immersion.ntue.edu.tw/main/Study/detail?id=43 [Tsai, G.-T. (2019, August 13). Teaching and curriculum design of the competency-based integrative activities domain curriculum in the 12-year basic education. Bilingual Teaching Implementation Plan for National Primary and Secondary Schools in Some Fields. http://immersion.ntue.edu.tw/main/Study/detail?id=43]
蔡居澤、徐秀婕（主編）（2021）：《素養導向系列叢書：國中童軍教材教法》。五南出版社。[Tsai, G.-T., & Hsu, H.-C. (Eds.). (2021). Suyang daoxiang xilie congshu guozhong tongjun jiaocai jiaofa. Wu-Nan.]
蔡清田（2000年12月）：〈課程設計〉。教育大辭書。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314073/ [Tsai, C.-T. (2000, December). Curriculum design. Jiaoyu da cishu. http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314073/]
蔡清田、陳延興（2013）：〈國民核心素養之課程轉化〉。《課程與教學》，16（3），59–78。[Tsai, C.-T., & Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Curriculum transformation of the key competencies for nationals. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(3), 59–78.] https://doi.org/10.6384/ciq.201307_16(3).0003
鄧振源（2012）：《多準則決策分析─方法與應用》。鼎茂圖書。[Deng, C. Y. (2012). Multiple criteria decision making: methods and applications. Ting-Mao.]
賴光真（2017）：〈課程實施觀點新論〉。《臺灣教育評論月刊》，6（11），35–40。[Lai, K.-J. (2017). Kecheng shishi guandian xinlun. Journal of Education Research, 6(11), 35–40.]
韓岳樺、張雨霖（2022）：《國中綜合活動領域師資職前培育生及現職教師對素養導向教學的建構及差異分析》（計畫編號：110-2813-C-003-108-H）。科技部補助大專學生研究計畫，科技部。[Han, Y.-H., & Chang Y.-L. (2022). Analyzing the similarities and differences in the constructs of “Competency-Based Teaching” between serving teachers and teacher trainees in the field of junior-high-school integrative activities (Report No. 110-2813-C-003-108-H ) (Grant). Ministry of Science and Technology.]
顧荃（2019年8月8日）：〈108課綱上路 教育部配套措施投入450億〉。中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201908080185.aspx [Gu, Q. (2019, August 8).108 kegang shanglu jiaoyubu peitao cuoshi touru 450 yi. CNA. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201908080185.aspx]
Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. (2006). Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 14, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114
Alwin, D. F., & Krosnick, J. A. (1985). The measurement of values in surveys: a comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1086/268949
Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the eastern cape province, south africa.International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.002
Brophy, J. E. (1982). How teachers influence what is taught and learned in classrooms.The Elementary School Journal, 83, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/461287
Goodlad, J. I. (Ed.). (1979). Curriculum inquiry: the study of curriculum practice. McGraw-Hill.
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Large-scale curriculum reform in finland–exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence. The Curriculum Journal, 28, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1179205
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.