簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張凌倩
論文名稱: 生產導向專題式學習:電腦教師支援協同教學方法之研究
Production-oriented Project-based Learning: A Computer Teacher Supported Team-teaching Approach
指導教授: 李忠謀
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 121
中文關鍵詞: 專題式學習協同式教學電腦科
英文關鍵詞: Improving classroom teaching, Teaching/learning strategies, Secondary education, Project based learning, Team-teaching
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:126下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在升學主義導向的高中實施學科專題式學習主要受到授課時數及學科教師教學準備工作繁重的限制,因此往往無法實施或普及。本研究採準實驗法,藉由實際在國內高中電腦課程及其他學科(以地理、英文科為例)實施協同式專題學習,評估在升學主義導向的高中實施專題學習之可行性,透過一年級電腦課程的適當的專題活動設計與學習引導,使學生兼顧學科知識與操作技能的學習,並具備專題式學習能力,並於二年級和三年級的英文科及地理科進行專題式學習。從中了解教師之課前準備、教室管理、成績評量與知能成長情形,以及學生能否同時兼顧學科知識與21世紀技能的學習。本研究以文獻探討、師生訪談紀錄、問卷調查、教學實驗、課堂觀察及後測等方式蒐集所需資料,評估學生學習成效。經過三年的實驗研究,整理出可供國內電腦科教師及其他學科教師參考之建議實施方案。研究結果發現,將專題導向學習應用在高中課程後,學生對於這種教學方式的學習滿意度呈正向反應;而學習成效方面,學生經過專題導向學習之後在學習成效的表現有顯著進步;在實作方面,透過三位教師評分以及學生學習心得、訪談內容三方面綜合分析,大部分學生的作品有深度,而且能夠發揮團隊合作精神以及相關21世紀技能!

    Project-based learning (PBL) is a highly effective teaching method that is dedicated to motivating students to learn independently. Project-based curriculum is student centered; PBL identify students’ knowledge deficits, generate appropriate learning issues, independently search for learning issues, critique the resources used for research, and apply the new knowledge to the project. PBL helps students in small groups engage in collaborative reflection on self-directed behaviors, thus improving such behaviors. However, training or encouraging teachers to practice PBL in their classrooms is challenging, especially when the educational system does not accommodate creative teaching practices. In particular, in a test-driven educational system, teachers’ limited teaching hours resulting from the overload of teaching materials makes it difficult for them to practice PBL at high school level.
    In light of this constraint, the present work presents a novel team-teaching model that is based on the collaboration between subject teachers and computer teacher to facilitate PBL in class. A three-year experiment was conducted to test the feasibility of the proposed model. In the experiment, the school computer teacher trains and conducts PBL with the 10th grade students in the first year, and subject teachers then follow up the practice of PBL in the second and the third year. The experimental results show that the proposed model is highly feasible. That is, while the subject teachers successfully carry out PBL activities, no instruction time was sacrificed. In addition, a follow-up survey indicates that the participants enjoyed PBL activities in both computer and subject classes.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES III LIST OF FIGURES IV CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF STUDY 5 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 6 1.4 DEFINITION OF TERMS 6 CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 9 2.1 PROJECT BASED LEARNING (PBL) 9 2.1.1 Overview of Project-Based Learning (PBL) 9 2.1.2 Theoretical Bases of Project-Based Learning 11 2.1.3 Project-Based Learning and Technology 16 2.1.4 Practicing PBL in a test-driven educational setting 22 2.2 TEAM-TEACHING 26 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 31 3.1 PROPOSED TEAM-TEACHING APPROACH 31 3.2 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 34 3.2.1 Subjects 34 3.2.2 Procedure 36 3.2.3 Data Collection 40 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 43 4.1 ANALYSIS OF THE ACHIEVEMENT TEST 43 4.1.1 Phase II study 43 4.1.1 Phase III study 44 4.2 STUDENT QUESTIONNAIRE ON PBL ACTIVITIES 47 4.2.1 Student Questionnaire on PBL Activities in phase I 47 4.2.2 Student Questionnaire on PBL Activities in phase II and III 51 4.3 TEACHERS’ REFLECTIONS 57 4.3.1 Computer Teacher’s Observations and Afterthoughts of the Project in phase I study 57 4.3.2 Computer and Subject Teacher’s Observations in phase II and III study 62 4.4 DISCUSSIONS 65 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORKS 68 5.1 CONCLUSIONS 68 5.2 FUTURE WORKS 70 REFERENCES 72 APPENDICES 89 APPENDIX A PHASE II ENGLISH ACIEVEMENT TEST 90 APPENDIX B PHASE II GEOGRAPHY ACIEVEMENT TEST 96 APPENDIX C PHASE III ENGLISH ACIEVEMENT TEST 100 APPENDIX D PHASE III GEOGRAPHY ACIEVEMENT TEST 105 APPENDIX E STUDENT PROGRESS AND WEEKLY PROJECT REPORTS 109 APPENDIX F WEBSITE ASSESSMENT FORM 121

    Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24, 201-216.

    Albanese, M.A., and Mitchell, S. (1993). Project-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 52-81.

    Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183(1), 33-48.

    Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Andrews, K., & Wooten, B. (2005). Closing the gap: Helping students identify the skills employers want. NACE Journal, 64(4), 41-44.

    Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: effects on preservice teachers’ technology competency. Computers & Education, 45, 383–398.

    Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2002). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation, Science Education, 87(4), 454-467.

    Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2004). Enhancing undergraduate student’s chemistry understanding through Project based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117-149.

    Barron, B. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 7 (3&4), 271-311.
    Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 271-311.

    Belland, B. R., Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Perceptions of the value of problem-based learning among students with special needs and their teachers. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learing, 1(2), 1-18.

    Blumentfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398.

    Booth M, Chey T, Wake M, Norton K, Hesketh K, Dollman J & Robertson I 2003. Change in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young Australians, 1969–1997. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77:29–36.

    Bosley, C., & Moon, S. (2003). Review of existing literature on the use of information and communication technology within an educational context. Derby: Centre for Guidance Studies, University of Derby.

    Bradley, G., & Russell, G. (1997). Computer experience. School support and computer anxieties. Educational Psychology, 17, 267–284.

    Brinkerhoff, R.O. (2006). Telling training’s story: Evaluation made simple, credible, and effective. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

    Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2008). The effects of multimedia-supported problem-based inquiry on student engagement, empathy, and assumptions about history. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learing, 2(1), 21-56.

    Buck Institute for Education (2003). Project Based Learning Handbook: A Guide to Standards-Focused Project Based Learning for Middle and High School Teachers. Retrieved October 12, 2009, Introduction chapter free to download at: http://www.bie.org/tools/handbook

    Buck Institute for Education (2009). PBL Starter Kit: To-the-Point Advice, Tools and Tips for Your First Project. Introduction chapter free to download at: http://www.bie.org/tools/toolkit/starter

    Bullough, R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., & Clark, D. C. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 57–73.

    Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 8(2), 22–28.

    Chai, C. S., & Tan, S. C. (2009). Professional development of teachers for computer-supported collaborative learning: A knowledge-building approach. Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1296-1327.

    Challenge 2000 (2000). Challenge 2000 Project-Based Learning & Multimedia web site. Retrieved October 18, 2002, from http://pblmm.k12.ca.us/

    Chang, L. C., & Lee, G. C. (2010). A team-teaching model for practicing project-based learning in high school: Collaboration between computer and subject teachers. Computers & Education, 55, 961-969

    Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1996). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. In E. Meyen, G. Vergason, & R. Whelan (Eds.), Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings (pp. 155–182). Denver: Love.
    Cuban, L. (1999). The technology puzzle. Education Week, 18(43).

    Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 813–834.

    Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303–329.

    Dawson, K., Pringle, R., & Adams, T. L. (2003). Providing links between technology integration, methods courses, and school-based field experiences: a curriculum-based and technology-enhanced microteaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(1), 41–47.

    Demirci, A.(2009). How do Teachers Approach New Technologies: Geography Teachers’ Attitudes towards Geographic Information Systems (GIS). European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 43-53

    Denis, H., Harald, K., Hermann, M., Nick, S. (2005). Enabling Project-Based Learning in WBT Systems. International Journal on ELearning, 4(4), 445-462.

    Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainly. Minton, New York.

    Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research in Education, 35(3), 342–361.

    Ebersole, S., & Vorndam, M. (2002). Adoption of computer-base instructional methodologies: A case study. In Presented at world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, Denver, Colorado.

    Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D.N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450.
    Edward, L. D. (1995). The design and analysis of a mathematical micro-world. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 77-94.

    Eick, C., & Dias, M. (2005). Building the authority of experience in communities of practice: The development of preservice teachers’ practical knowledge through coteaching in inquiry classrooms. Science Education, 89(3), 470-491.

    Eick, C., Ware, F., & Williams, P. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 74–85.

    Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.

    Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 54–72.

    Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

    Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Evertson, Carolyn M. (2006). Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. Edited by Carol Simon Weinstein. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Fabry, D., & Higgs, J. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education. Journal of Educational Computing, 17, 385–395.

    Faison, C. (1996). Modeling instructional technology use in teacher preparation: Why we can't wait. Educational Technology, 36, 57-59

    Finn, C. E. (1991). We must take charge: Our schools and our future. New York: Free Press.

    Foulger, T.S. & Jimenez-Silva, M. (2007). Enhancing the writing development of English learners: Teacher perceptions of common technology in project-based learning. Journal of Research on Childhood Education, 22(2), 109-124.

    George Lucas Educational Foundation. (2001, November 1). Project-based learning research.

    Goldenkoff, R. (2004). “Using Focus Groups” in Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 2nd edition, edited by Wholey, Hatry and Newcomer (eds.). 340-362. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

    Guillaume, A. M., & Rudney, G. L. (1993). Student teachers’ growth toward independence: An analysis of their changing concerns. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 65–80.

    Hafner, W., & Ellis, J. T. (2004). Project-Based, Asynchronous Collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS). Big Island, Hawaii. January

    Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers & Education, 20(2), 147–156.

    Harel & S. Papert (1991). Constructionism (pp. 141-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Harris, J. (1998). Virtual architecture: Designing and directing curriculum-based telecomputing. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE)
    Harris, J. H., & Katz, L. G. (2001). Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. New York

    Harrison, J., Lawson, T., & Wortley, A. (2005). Mentoring the beginning teacher: Developing professional autonomy through critical reflection on practice. Reflective Practice, 6, 419–441.

    Hartenian, L. S., Schellenger, M., &Frederickson, P. (2001) .Creation and Assessment of an Integrated Business Course. Journal of Education for Business, 76(3), 149-159.

    Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M.,&Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60(1), 27-36.

    Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.

    Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252.

    Hickey, D. T., Honeyford, M. A., Clinton, K. A., & McWilliams, J. (2010). Participatory assessment of 21st Century proficiencies. In V. J. Schute and B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment in the 21st century: Supporting educational needs. Springer.

    Intel® TWT Program(2011). Retrieved October 18, 2011, from http://www.intel.com/education/teach/

    Jang, S. J. (2002). The inquiry for models of team teaching. Educational Research and Information, 9(4), 66–82.

    Jang, S. J. (2006a). The effects of incorporating web assisted learning with team teaching in seventh-grade science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 615–632.

    Jang, S. J. (2006b). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177-194.

    Jang, S. J. (2008b). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659.

    John F. & Rebecca T. (2013) "Integrating project-based learning into an undergraduate programmer using Web 2.0 and videoconferencing", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 5(1), pp.129 - 140

    Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy frame work for online learning environments. New Directions for Adult and continuing Education, 2003(100), 31-44.

    Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mind tools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Kay, K. S., Rosalyn, T. & Debra, P.(2008). Creating a Ripple Effect: Incorporating Multimedia-Assisted Project-Based Learning in Teacher Education, Theory Into Practice, 47, 259-265.

    Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method, Teachers College Record, 19(4), 319-335.

    Kong, S. C. (2007). Information technology and project-based learning: Activating and facilitating. Hong Kong: Education and manpower Bureau.

    Kozma, R.B. & Schank, P. (1998). Connecting with the twenty-first century: Technology in support of educational reform. In D. Palumbo & C. Dede (Eds.), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1998 Yearbook: Learning and Technology, pp. 3-27. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Lam, S. f., Yim, P. s., & Lam, T. (2002). Transforming school culture: can true collaboration be initiated? Educational Research, 44, 181-195.

    Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45-66.

    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Lebow, D. (1995) Constructivist values for instructional systems design: five principles toward a new mindset. In B. Seels (Ed. ) Instructional design fundamentals: A reconsideration. (pp. 175-185). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Lewis, P. S., Alacaci, C., & O’Brien, E. G. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ use of mathematics in a project-based science approach. PreQuest Education Journals, 102(4), 172.

    Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591–596.

    Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review, Computers and Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.

    Little, J. W. (1993). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers’ College Record, 91, 509–536.

    Marina, P. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12

    Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards focused project based learning (2nd Ed.). Novato, Califonia: Buck Institute for Education.

    Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M.L. (1998). Creating and Sustaining the Constructivist Classroom. California : Corwin Press.

    Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P.C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358.

    Mayer, R.E. (1982). Instructional variables in text processing. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (eds) Discourse processing, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.

    Mayer, R.E., & Greeno, J.G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 165-173.

    McCombs, B. L. (2003). A framework for the redesign of K-12 education in the context of current educational reform. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 93-101

    Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117-125.
    Moursund, D. (2003). Project-based learning using information technology (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Moursund, D., Bielefeldt, T., & Underwood, S. (1997). Foundations for The Road Ahead: Project-based learning and information technologies. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. Retrieved July 10, 2002, from http://www.iste.org/research/roadahead/pbl.html

    Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 319–341.

    Newell, Ronald. Passion for Learning: how project-based learning meets the needs of 21st-century students. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2003.

    Norman, G.T., Schmidt, H.G. (1992). The Psychological basis of problem based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 557-572

    Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 398-422.

    Prensky, M. 2000. Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Preston, C., Cox, M., & Cox, K. (2000). Teachers as innovators: An evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use information and communications technology. MirandaNet.

    Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and leaning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14-20.

    Pringle, R., Dawson, K., & Marshall, S. (2002). Technology, science, and preservice teachers: Creating a culture of technology-savvy elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Society for information Technology.

    Pulkkinen, J. (2007). Cultural globalization and integration of ICT in education. In K. Kumpulainen (Ed.), Educational technology: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 13–23). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.

    Quinn, S. L., & Kanter, S. B. (1984, December). Team Teaching: An Alternative to Lecture Fatigue. In Innovation Abstracts (Vol. 6, No. 34, p. n34).

    Railsback, J. (2002). Project-based instruction: Creating excitement for learning. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Roblyer, M.D. (2005). Educational Technology Research That Makes a Difference: Series Introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 192-201. AACE.

    Roblyer, M. D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M. A. (1997). Integrating educational technology into teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Rooij, S. W. (2009). Scaffolding project-based learning with the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 210-219.

    Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: an activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 253–282.

    Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Samuel, K. W. C., Tse, S. K. & Ken, C.(2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132-143

    Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39-50.

    Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Project based learning: A constructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

    Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2004). Scaffolding problem-based teaching in a traditional social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 32, 349 -378.

    Schmidt, H.G. (1983). Project-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11-16.

    Schmidt, H.G. (1993). Foundations of project-based learning: Some explanatory notes. Medical Education, 27, 422-432.

    Schneider, Daniel K. Project-based Learning. 2005. Retrieved July 12, 2009, from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Project-based_learning.

    Seo, K. K., Templeton, R., & Pellegrino, D. (2008). Creating a Ripple Effect: Incorporating Multimedia-Assisted Project-Based Learning in Teacher Education. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 259-265.

    Shapiro, E. J., & Dempsey, C. J. (2008). Conflict resolution in team teaching: A case study in interdisciplinary teaching. College Teaching, 56(3), 157-162.

    Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726-764).

    Simkins, M., Cole, K., Tavalin, F. & Means, B. (2002) Increasing student learning through multimedia projects. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Smith, B. N., Hornsby, J. S., & Kite, M. (2000). Broadening the business curriculum via a cross-disciplinary approach: A mobile unit on cultural diversity. Education, 120(4), 713–722.

    Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. (2001). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30, 85–111.

    Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology & Learning, 23 (6), 20.

    SRI International. (2000, January). Silicon valley challenge 2000: Year 4 Report. San Jose, CA: Joint Venture, Silicon Valley Network.

    Steelman, J. D.(2005). Multimedia Makes Its Mark. Learning and Leading with Technology, 33(1), 16-18.

    Stites, R. (1998). Adult learning theory: An argument for technology. In C. E. Hopey (Ed.), Technology, basic skills, and adult education: Getting ready and moving forward (pp. 51-58). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, & Vocational Education.

    Synteta, P., & Schneider, D. (2002). EVA_pm: How XML can Scaffold Project-Based Learning. In Proceeding of the 4th International Conference on New Educational Environments (ICNEE'02), Lugano, Switzerland.

    Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285 (1988).

    Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.

    The Buck Institute for Education and Boise State University, Department of Educational Technology. Project Based Learning: The Onine Resource for PBL. 2005. http://www.pbl-online.org/

    Thomas, J.W. (1998). Project-based learning: Overview. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

    Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk. Retrieved July 20, 2003,
    from http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research*

    Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003). Technology collaborative for simultaneous renewal in teacher education.

    Tobin, K., Roth, W.-N., & Zimmermann, A. (2001). Learning to teach science in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 941–964.

    Tse, S. K., Lam, W. I., Lam, Y. H., & Loh, E. K. Y. (2005). Learn to read: The performance of Hong Kong primary 4 pupils in PIRLS2001. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and Problem-Based Learning. London: Information Science.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Walther-Thomas, C. S., Bryant, M., & Land, S. (1996). Planning for effective co-teaching: The key to successful inclusion. Remedial and Special Education, 17(4), 255-264. EJ 527 660

    Ward, Lisa S. and David H. Lee, 2002, “Practical Application of the Risk-Adjusted Return on Capital Framework”, CAS Forum Summer 2002, Dynamic Financial Analysis Discussion Papers; Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/02sforum/02sftoc.htm.

    Welch, M., & Sheridan, S. M. (1995). Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

    Wenger, Etienne; McDermott, Richard; Snyder, William M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice (Hardcover)

    Wepner, S. B., Ziomek, N., & Tao L. (2003). Three teacher educators’ perspectives about the shifting responsibilities of infusing technology into the curriculum. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 53-63.

    Wertsch, J. V.(1984). The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. In B. Rogoff & J.V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 7-18). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Wild, M. (1996). Technology refusal: Rationalizing the failure of student and beginning teachers to use computers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 134–143.

    Wilson, E. K. (2003). Preservice secondary social studies teachers and technology integration: what do they think and do in their field experiences. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(1), 29–39

    Wood, D. (1995). Theory, training, and technology: Part I. Education and Training, 37(1), 12–16.

    Woolfolk, A. (2004). Educational Psychology, 9th edn., Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.

    Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 365–382.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE