研究生: |
何勇智 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
教師教學溝通技巧對學生學習情況的影響 |
指導教授: | 陳文典 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
物理學系 Department of Physics |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 82 |
中文關鍵詞: | 溝通能力 、教學溝通 、教師溝通能力 |
英文關鍵詞: | communication ability, communication of teaching, teachers' communication competence |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:227 下載:53 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
教學是一種溝通傳達的歷程,教師溝通能力在教學中扮演著重要的角色。本研究在於探求教師的溝通能力對於國中學生自然科學習上的影響、以及影響的方式。
本研究將教師的教學溝通能力解析分成:「引起動機」、「結構清晰」、「加強訊息」、「雙向互動」以及「教師態度」五大項,而學生的學習狀態則以「專心度」、「理解度」與「興趣度」三個面向來觀察,採取問卷調查及學生晤談的方式,試圖從學生的觀點去評量教師的溝通能力及了解學生學習狀況。
研究結果顯示,教師的教學溝通能力對學生學習確實具有影響;「引起動機」將對學生「專心度」和「興趣度」影響最大,其次是「結構清晰」、「加強訊息」兩因素亦然。而在教師各種溝通技巧中,又以教師的「幽默感」、「解說清晰度」為最重要。
Because teaching is a process of communication, the ability of commnication plays an important role in it. Therefore, the major purpose of this study is to discuss whether the teacher's communicative competence is influe-ntial to high school students on physical sciences and to figure out how the communicative competence influences.
In this study I classify the teacher's communicative competence into five groups: "Prompting motivation", "clarifying the structure of the context", "strengthen message", "bilateral interaction" and "the attitude of teacher". In addition, the learning condition of student s also observed on three dimensions: "concentration", "understanding" and "interest". We can criticize the teacher's communicative competence from students' viewpoint and underst and the students' learning condition by questionnaires and interviews with students.
The study is proved that the teacher's communicative competence truly influences the students' learning condition. Especially "prompting motivation" influences "concentration" and "interest" most, then "clarifying the structure of the context" and "strengthen message "come second. Besides,"humor" and"explaining clearly" are most important at the teacher's communicative skills
中文部分
王淑俐(2000)。人際關係與溝通。台北:三民書局。
王怡雰(2004)。電腦溝通媒介與任務型態對媒介認知之影響。中華大學
資訊管理學系碩士論文。
李燕、李浦群譯注,Trenholm,S.&Jesen,A.(1998)。人際溝通。台北:
揚智。
李南賢(1991)。企業管理。台北:華泰書局。
吳清山(民80)。學校效能。台北:五南。
林欽榮(1996)。「人際關係與溝通技巧」。人事管理,23. 2. ,4-11。
施純協(2001)。數位邏輯生活化的。台北:行文化事業有限公司。
徐木蘭(1994)。行為與科學管理。台北:三民書局。
涂崇俊(1977)。國民中學校長-教師溝通問題研究。國立台灣師範大學教
育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
許士軍(1994)。管理學,台北:東華書局。
陳皎眉、鄭美芳(2002)。人際關係溝通。中國圖書股份有限公司。
陳昭薇(2001)。花蓮縣國民中學校長口語溝通型態與領導行為之相關研
究。東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
張正平(2004)。教師溝通傳達能力對學生學習的影響。台灣師範大學碩士
論文。(未出版)
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。
馮久玲譯,Allan Pease(1992)。身體語言。台北:雅登。
游麗卿(1998)。Vygotsky對研究概念發展的啟示。幼教天地。15,227-239。
舒緒緯(1990)。國民小學教師溝通滿意與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台
灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。(未出版)
葉乃靜(1992)。參考晤談中溝通的理論與應用之探討。圖書館學刊(輔
大),21,19-37。(未出版)
葉蜚聲、徐通鏘(1993)。語言學綱要。台北:書林。
廖華芳(1997):非口語溝通。當代醫學,24卷2期,71-79頁。
謝安田(1982)。企業管理。台北:五南圖書公司。218-220頁。
謝文全(1988)。教育行政:理論與實務。台北:文景。
謝康基(民78)。語意學--------理論與實際。台北:台灣商務印書館。
嚴竹華(1998)。溝通能力與溝通態度對溝通效能影響之研究。中原大學
企業管理學系碩士論文。(未出版)
鐘聖校(1990)。認知心理學。台北:心理。
英文部分
Barnard, C.I. (1968). The functions of executive. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Brown, L. (1961), Communication Facts and Ideas in Bussiness. Englewood cliffs, N: Prentice-Hall.
Cooper,H.M.,& Smith,R.A.(1990).Reconsidering the unit of analysis:A model ofstudent ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology ,82,p20
7-212.
Dance, E.X. & Larson. C.E. (1976). The function of human communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston,Appendix. A.
Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T., & Crowder, R. G. (1972). An auditory analogueof the Sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditorystorage. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 255-267.
Driscoll,J.B.(1979). The Effects of a teacher’s eye contact, gestures, and voice intonation on student retention of factual material. Doctoral dissertation, Univeristy of Southern Mississippi.
Emery,E.,(1960). Introduction to Mass Communication. New York:Doss, Medical, & Education,47,85-92.
Edwar T. Hall(1969). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.:Doubleday.
Gafner, S.(1977). Nonverbal cues of teacher warmth as perceived by students, unpublished doctoral dissertation,Houston:University of Houston, Disssertaion Abstracts International 38,212-A .
Gage, Belgard, Dell, Hiller, Rosenshine, Unruh(1968). Explorations of teacher’s effectiveness in explaining. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 028147.
George Herbert Mead (1934), Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago:University of Chicago press.
Hansford, B.C.(1988). self-reports and observations of dominant communicator style and communication apprehension. Communication Research Reports,5,44-51.
Judee Burgoon and Thomas Saine (1978) The Unspoken Dialogue:An Introduction to Nonverbal Communication,pp.6-10
James E. Maddux and Ronald W. Rogers(1980). Effects of source Expertness, Physicaal Attractiveness,and supporting Arguments on Persuasion: A Case of Brainover Beauty. Journal of personality and Social Psychology 39:235-44.
Katz & Kahn(1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
Lasswell, H.D.(1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society, In L.Bryson(ed), The communication of Ideas, N.Y.:Harper and Bros.
Maletzke, G. (1983). Psychologic der Massenkommunikation. Hamburg: Verlag Hans Bredow-Jnstitut.
McCloskey, G. (1967). Education and Pubic understanding (2nd ed). New York: Harper & Row.
McCroskey, J.C Anderson. J.F. Richmond, V.P. & Wheeless,L.R.(1981). Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and teachers. Communication Education.30. 122-132.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nuthall, G., Snook,. I.(1973).Contemporary models of teaching. In R.M. Travers(Ed).Second Handbook of Research on teaching:A project of the American Educational Research Association. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois.
Roubicek, H. L., Collins, M. E. & Wanguri, D. Mc. (1986). Communication:A contemporary approach, Kendall/Hunt.
Ross Buck (1984). The communication of Emotion, New York:Guilford Press
Rowe,M.(1969).Science,silence and sanctions. Science and Children 5. 237-245.
Shannon, C.E. & Weaver, W. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Univ. of Illinois Press.
Schramm, W. (1949). The process and Effects of Mass Communication. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
Schramm, W. (1971). How communication works. In J.A. Devito(ed). Communiation:Concepts and process. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey:prentice-Hall. 12-21.
Shakel, D. (1977). Teachers unintentional cues to answering questions correctly . Perceptual and Motor skills. 44. 766-772.
Simon, H.a. (1976). Adiminstrative Behavior, N.Y.: The Free Press.
Stevens, R.(1912). The question as a Measure of efficacy in Instruction. New York:Teachers’ College.
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary. (1986).Springfield.:Merriam -Webster. Inc