簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊博智
Bo-chih, Yang
論文名稱: 保爾˙呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)的自我詮釋學之教育蘊義
The educational implications of Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics of Self
指導教授: 楊深坑
Yang, Shen-Keng
林逢祺
Lin, Feng-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2001
畢業學年度: 89
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 100
中文關鍵詞: 保爾˙呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)(1913- )自我詮釋學教育哲學行動道德
英文關鍵詞: Paul Ricoeur(1913-), self, Hermeneutics, Philosophy of education, action, morality
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:402下載:52
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討Ricoeur之自我詮釋學之教育蘊義。為深入了解Ricoeur自我詮釋學立論的基礎,本文先就Ricoeur的生平、著述及學術背景;其次,以對人類行動的解釋及自我的倫理道德的兩個論點來分析Ricoeur的自我詮釋學;最後根據分析的結果,探討Ricoeur自我詮釋學在教育上之蘊義。
    根據以上探討,本研究之結論如下:
    一、 Ricoeur的哲學論點所關懷的,一直都集中在自我這個面向。
    二、 Ricoeur認為對人類活動的理解,應從對行動者本身來探討為起點。
    三、 Ricoeur認為,人的道德行為必須經由對Kant的形式主義道德觀及Aristotle的目的論道德觀的詮釋
    四、 從Ricoeur對自我的分析當中,可以得知教育活動的分析應兼及肉體、他人、良心與教育間的關係。
    五、 從Ricoeur對人的道德面向的探討中可以得知,道德教育的實施應兼及情性的層面。
    根據以上的結論,本研究提出以下建議:
    一、 對教育活動的研究應以教育活動者本身為中心。
    二、 教育相關領域的研究應更注意人類活動當中非理性層面的研究。
    三、 道德教育應更注重道德實踐能力的培養。
    四、 敘事文的反省有助於道德教育的實施。

    The purpose of this essay is on the educational implications of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self. For understand deeply the foundations of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self, this essay first concerns the life, works and academic background of Ricoeur. Secondly, this essay analyzes Ricoeur’s Hermeneutic of Self by his interpretation of human actions and ethic and moral dimensions of human self. Lastly, this essay finds the educational implication of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self by the consequence of analysis above.
    According to the analysis above, the conclusions of this essay is:
    1. What Ricoeur’s philosophical concerns is focus on the dimension of human self.
    2. It is Ricoeur’s view that the interpretations of human actions must be on agent himself.
    3. On Ricoeur point, human moral actions must realize by Kant’s moral views of formalism and Aristotle’s moral views of teleology.
    4. From Ricoeur’s analysis of human self, we can understand the analysis of educational actions must on the relations of education between flesh, other and conscience.
    5. From Ricoeur’s analysis of human moral actions, we can understand the practice of moral education must be inclusive of human emotion.
    According the conclusions above, this essay gives the suggestions below:
    1. The research of educational action must be on agent of educational action.
    2. Educational research must be focus on emotional dimensions of human actions
    3. Moral education must emphasize on development of moral practice.
    4. The reflections to narration benefit for practices of moral education.

    目 錄 第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………1 第一節 研究問題與背景………………………………1 第二節 研究動機與目的………………………………5 第三節 研究方法及步驟………………………………7 第二章 Ricoeur的自我詮釋學之思想背景………………11 第一節 Ricoeur的生平與著述………………………12 第二節 Ricoeur自我詮釋學的主要思想淵源………20 第三章 Ricoeur的行動解釋之分析………………………27 第一節 Ricoeur對分析哲學方法的批判……………28 第二節 從敘事文的詮釋分析行動自我……………37 第三節 以行動者之自我為中心的解釋模式………41 第四節 對Rioceur行動解釋之反省…………………48 第四章 Ricoeur對自我之道德面向的詮釋………………53 第一節 對Aristotle道德觀的詮釋…………………53 第二節 對Kant形式主義道德觀之反省…………59 第三節 Ricoeur對「實踐智慧」之討論……………69 第五章 Ricoeur的自我詮釋學在教育上的意蘊…………81 第一節 對教育活動的理解方面…………………82 第二節 在道德教育上之意蘊……………………85 第六章 結論與建議………………………………………93 第一節 結論………………………………………93 第二節 建議………………………………………97

    高宣揚(民79)。李克爾的解釋學。台北:遠流。
    沈清松(民83)。現代哲學論衡。台北:黎明。
    沈清松(民89)。呂格爾。台北:東大。
    潘德榮(民88)。詮釋學導論。台北:五南。
    廖炳惠(民80)。里柯。台北:東大。
    楊深坑(民77)。理論、詮釋與實踐。台北:師苑。
    Aristotle(1984). The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by W. D. Ross, revised by J. O. Urmson, Princeyon. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Charles E. Reagon(1996). Paul Ricoeur: his life and his work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Clark S. H. (1990). Paul Ricoeur. London and New York: Routelegde.
    Davidson, D.(1980).Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Erben, M.(2000). “Ethics, Education, Narrative Communication and Biography”. Education Studies, Sep2000, Vol.26 Issue 3, pp.379- 391.
    Hoy, D. C.(1982). The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
    G. E. M. Anscombe(1979).Intention. London: Basil Blackwell.
    Heidegger, M.(1962). Being and Time, trans. by J. Macquarrie& R. Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.
    Kant, I.(1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. by H. J. Paton. New York: Harper&Row.
    Ricoeur, P.(1967). Husserl. An Analysis of His Phenomenology, trans. by E. G. Ballard& L. E. Embree. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    Ricoeur, P.(1967). The Symbolism of Evil, trans. by E. Buchanan. Evanston: Harper and Row.
    Ricoeur, P.(1970). Freud and Philosophy, trans. by Dennis Savage. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Ricoeur, P.(1974). The Conflict of Interpretation. Essays in Hermeneutics I, trans.& ed. by Don Ihde. Evaston: Northwestern University Press.
    Ricoeur, P.(1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, Texas: The Texas Christian University.
    Ricoeur, P.(1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences-Essays on language, action and interpretation, trans. by John B. Thompson. London: Cambridge University Press.
    Ricoeur, P.(1988). Time and Narrative III, trans. by K. Blamey and P. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Ricoeur, P.(1992). Oneself as Another, trans. by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Ricoeur P.(1996). “From metaphysics to moral philosophy”. Philosophy Today, Winter 1996, 443-458.
    Ricoeur, P.(1998). Critique and Conviction-- Conversation with François Azouvi and Marc de Launay, trans. by Kathleen Blamey. London: Polity Press.
    Thompson, J. B.(1981). Critical Hermeneutics: A study in the thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    QR CODE