本研究旨在自無形學院擴散網絡探討海洋漁業科學家合作行為之研究，分析的面向包含智識競爭、資訊使用環境、非正式學術傳播、社會關係以及合作管理等五個構面。
本研究取徑於質性研究，訪談對象為服務於水產試驗所、中央研究院、國立海洋生物博物館、國立臺灣大學以及國立海洋大學的海洋漁業科學家，共計有27人，訪談時間自2016年1月至2017年4月，平均訪談時間是一個小時，採用質性研究分析軟體MAXQDA 12輔助分析訪談結果，據以提出五項結論：（一）智識遷徙、學術通勤、學術搜尋以及挑戰解決問題的特性，說明智識競爭是形塑海洋漁業科學家無形學院的專業實踐行為；（二）出版發表是學術資訊使用的主要目的，影響資訊使用環境的變動；（三）海洋漁業具備做中學的學科特性，偏好面對面討論解決問題，非正式傳播是科學進展的基礎；（四）師承關係是延續學術社交圈的重要角色，社會關係是支撐學術合作的核心脈絡；（五）以口頭承諾分配貢獻度，在無形學院的社交網絡裡，信任非正式的合作管理文化。
基於研究結果，提出建議如下：（一）與辦國際研討會或邀請訪問學者以增進國際交流；（二）建構組織溝通網絡；（三）建立非正式學習環境促進社交網絡的擴散；（四）建置海洋漁業科學家專家知識庫。

This study aims at exploring the collaboration behaviors among fishery scientists with perspectives of invisible college diffusion networks. This study adopts a qualitative approach to analyze multiple dimensions including intellectual competition, information use environment, informal communication, social relationship and collaboration governance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 fishery scientists at Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute, Academia Sinica, National Taiwan University, National Taiwan Ocean University and National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium during 2016 and 2017. Each interview lasted for one hour on average. Qualitative data collected are analyzed with MAXQDA software.
My research results are summarized in the following: 1) The essential components of intellectual competition include intellectual migration, scientific commuter, academic search and solutions for research problems. These components reveal that intellectual competition is shaping the invisible college and professional practice. 2) Fishery scientists increasingly publish scientific reports in digital database. In term of the information use environment, they shift from using printed reports to digital copies. 3) Informal communication is the basis of scientific progress. Fisheries scientists prefer face-to-face communication; learning-by-doing is their common and core characteristic. 4) Master/apprentice relationship plays an important role in enlarging academic circles, maintaining social relationships that support scientific collaboration. 5) Fishery scientists used verbal communication as a way to assign academic credits among themselves. Therefore, they need to build trust relationships based on informal collaborative governance in invisible college networks.
I have four suggestions based on my research results. First, research institutions can host more international conferences or invite more visiting scholars to create research visibility. Second, fishery scientists can establish their own organizations or networks to facilitate mutual communication. Third, they can establish an informal learning environment to enhance the diffusion of such social networks. Fourth, research institutions can create a fishery expert knowledge database.

參考文獻
一、中文
孔紅梅、劉天星、段靖（2010）。同行評議初探。生態環境學報，19（4）：1004-1007。
王鑫（2013）。科學社群的影響。科學發展，481，66-70。
皮埃爾． 布爾迪厄著（2005）。科學的社會用途（劉成富，張艷譯）。中國南京：南京大學出版社，頁35-42。
坎尼葛爾（Kanigel, R）（1998）。天才的學徒：建構叱吒風雲的科學王朝（Apprentice to genius: the making of a scientific dynasty）（朱業修、潘震澤譯）。臺北市：天下。（原著出版年：1986）
李民（1988）。互動的科學網絡—科學共同體與無形學院。文星，118:135-140.
沈大焜、洪柏懿（2011）。耕耘臺灣農業大事記：海洋漁業風華。臺北市：行政院農業委員會。
拉圖爾（Latour, B.）、伍爾加 （Woolgar, S.） （2004）。實驗室生活 （Laboratory life）， （張伯霖、刁小英譯）。中國北京：東方出版社。（原著出版年：1979）。
林娟娟（1997）。學術期刊之同儕審查。大學圖書館，1（3）：127-140。
科技部，「101年版中華民國科學技術年鑑」。檢自http://yearbook.stpi.org.tw/index.html
胡智慧（2016）。世界主要國立科研機構管理模式研究。中國北京：科學出版社。
胡興華（2003）。臺灣的海洋漁業。新北市：遠足文化。
袁大鈺、林奇秀（2009）。資訊傳播科技與非正式學術傳播：社會取向的實證研究。圖書與資訊學刊，1（2）：52-77。
袁大鈺、唐牧群（2010）。跨領域學術社群之智識網絡結構初探：以臺灣科技與社會研究為例。圖書資訊學刊，8 （2），125-163。
馬克．歐傑（Auge, M.）（2014）。巴黎地鐵上的人類學家（Un Ethnologue Dans Le Metro）（周伶芝和郭亮廷譯）。臺北市：行人文化實驗室。（原著出版年：1986）。
張奕華、許正妹（2008）。研究方法與軟體應用。臺北市：心理出版社。
張奕華、許正妹（2010）。MAXQDA軟體的應用。臺北市：心理出版社。
許玲瑋（2016）。踏浪千行：跨越200浬，臺灣漁業征服世界。臺北市：遠見雜誌。
陳明莉（2003）。台灣學術場域的知識生產、傳播與消費：人文社會 科學的學術出版分析。教育與研究，5: 1-46。
傅雅秀（1996）。從科學傳播觀點探討中央研究院生命科學專家的資訊尋求行為。圖書館學刊，11，133-163。
傅雅秀（1998）。科學社群與無形學院。資訊傳播與圖書館學，5（2）:77-85。
傅雅秀（2002）。從生命科學期刊論文作者數探討科學合作。圖書資訊學刊，17：71-80。
曾萬年、韓玉山、塚本勝已、黑木真理（2012）。鰻魚傳奇。宜蘭縣：蘭陽博物館。
曾萬年。水產學-談漁業資源的永續利用。檢自國立臺灣大學seed.agron.ntu.edu.tw/cropprod/IAmis/fishery.pps
戴昌鳳（2003）。臺灣的海洋。臺北市：遠足文化。
邁可．博藍尼（Michael Polanyi）（2004）。個人知識（Personal Knowledge：toward a post-critical philosophy），（許澤民譯）。臺北市：商周：2004年。（原作著出版年：1958年出版）。
蘇國賢（2004）。社會學知識的社會生產：台灣社會學者的隱形學群。台灣社會學，8，133-192。
蘇諼（2002）。電子資訊資源、電子出版、學術傳播。圖書與資訊學刊，40，18-28。
二、英文
Aad, G., et al. (2015). Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at =7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Physical Review Letters, 114, Article 191803(33). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.191803arXiv:1503.07589
Abelson, P. H. (1980). Scientific communication. Science. 209, 60-62.
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Costa, F. Di. & Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29 (6): 498-507
Acord, S. K. & Harley, D. (2012). Credit, time and personality: the human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0. New Media & Society, 1-19.
Aidoo, D. C., & Freeman, C. K. (2016). Agricultural informational flow in informal communication networks of farmers in Ghana. Journal of Development and Communication Studies, 4(2), 443-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jdcs.v4i2.4
Allen, T. J., & Cohen, S. D. (1969). Information flows in research and development laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1), 12-19.
Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
Aquisap, A. C., Carigma, M. A., Carino, P. B., Castrillo, V. M. J., Gayanilo, F. C. Jr., Guzman, M. E. S., Janagap, C. C., Maclean, J. L., Pauly, D., Tech E.T., & Temprosa R.M. (1996). Asian fisheries science: a profile. In S.S. De Silva (Ed.), Perspectives in Asian Fisheries (pp. 457–488). Manila, PH: Asian Fisheries Society.
Arunachalam, S & Doss, M. J. (2000). Science in a small country at a time of globalisation: domestic and international collaboration in new biology research in Israel. Journal of Information Science, 26(1), 39-49.
Asiwal, K., Suresh, B.K., & Reddy, G.R.M. (2016). Analysis of Academic Research Networks to Find Collaboration Partners. In: Stephanidis C.（Ed.）HCI International 2016 – Posters' Extended Abstracts. HCI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol 618. Springer, Cham.
Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, 57(10), 350-1367.
Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration: part 1. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65-84.
Beaver, D.D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (Eds.) (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Blashfield, R.K. (1982). Feighner et al., invisible colleges, and the Matthew effect. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8(1), 1-12.
Borgman, C. L. (Ed.) (1990). Scholarly communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Sociology of science. 14 (6), 19-47.
Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resources exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (1), 50-65
Bozeman, B. & Boardman, C. (Eds.）(2014). Research Collaboration and team science: a state-of-the-art review and agenda. Springer.
Bozeman, B. & Youtie, J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and engineering ethics, 22, 1717-1743. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599-616.
Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., Slade, C. P. & Gaughan, M. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 1-67.
Braun, D. (2012). Why do scientists migrate? A diffusion model. Minerva, 50, 471-491.
Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120 (2), 189-208.
Brogatti, S. P. & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
Brown, C.M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (10), 929–943.
Burke, P. (2000). A social history of knowledge: from Gutenberg to Diderot. Malden, MA : Blackwell.
Byatt, A., Fothergill, A., & Holmes, M. (2001). The blue planet a natural history of the oceans. DK publishing: New York.
Cabrajec, L. & Zvjezdana, D. (1991). Communication practices of Croatian Scientists. International Library Review, 23 (3), 237-253.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In. J. Law, Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? (pp.196-223). London, Routledge.
Carey, J. (2011). Faculty of 1000 and VIVO: invisible colleges and teams science. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 65, Spring.http://www.istl.org/11-spring/article1.htmlDOI: 10.5062/F4F769GT
Carson, R. (1961). The sea around us. New York: Oxford University Press.
Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
Castelvecchi, D. (2015). Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors, Nature, 15 May 2015. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17567.
Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (1999). Institutional collaboration in science: A typology of technological practice, Science Technology and Human Values, 24(3), 338-372.
Chubin, D. E. & Hackett, E. J. (1990). Peerless science: peer review and U. S. science policy (pp.2-3). New York: State University of New York Press.
Chung, E., Kwon, N., & Lee, J. (2016). Understanding scientific collaboration in the research life cycle: Bio- and nanoscientists' motivations, information-sharing and communication practices, and barriers to collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 836-1848. doi:10.1002/asi.23520
Claxton, L. D. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research, 589, 31–45.
Cohen, M. B., Tarnow, E., & De Young, B. R. (2004). Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survey-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. MedGenMed, 63(1), 1-5.
Cole, J. R. & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collette, B.B. et al, (2011). High value and long life: double jeopardy for tunas and billfishes. Science, 333 (2011), 291–292.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crawford, S. (1971). Informal communication among scientists in sleep research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22(5), 301-310.
Cronin, B. (1982). Invisible colleges and information transfer: a review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences. Journal of documentation. 38 (3), 212-236.
Cronin, B. (1996). Rates of return to citation. Journal of Documentation, 52, 188–197.
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558–569.
Cumming, J., & Kiesler S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research policy. 36,1620-1634.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.) (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 1-17). London: Sage.
Devine, E. B., Beney, J., Lisa, A., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Equity, accountability, transparency: implementation of the contributorship concept in a multi-site study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69 (4), 455-459.
Fang, F.C., & Casadevall, A. (2015). Competitive science: is competition ruining science? Infection and Immunity, 83, 1229–33.
Flickr, U. (2007)。質性研究導論 (Qualitative sozialforschung) (李正賢、廖志恆、林靜如譯)。臺北市：五南。(原著出版年：2002)
Frank , R. C. (1987). Agricultural information systems and services. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 22, 293-334.
Frenth, J. P. H. (1998). Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors, JAMA, 280 (3), 219-221.
Fuchs, S. (1992). The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. New York: SUNY Press.
Fuchs, S. (1993). A Sociological Theory of Scientific Change. Social Forces 71, 933-953.
Ganzi, A., &Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87 (2), 251-265.
Garvey, W. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1971). Scientific communication: its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge. American Psychologise, 26 (4), 349-362.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). Reconfiguring Institutions. In The New Production of Knowledge (pp137-154). London: SAGE publications.
Groboljšek, B., Ferligoj, A., Mali, F., Kronegger, I., & Iglič, H. (2014). The role and significance of scientific collaboration for the new emerging sciences: The case of Slovenia. Teorija in praksa 51(5), 864–883. http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/db/pdfs/TiP2014_5_Groboljseketal.pdf
Haeussler, C., Jiang, L., Thursby, J. & Thursby, M. (2009). Specific and General Information Sharing Among Academic Scientists. (NBER working paper series No. 15315). MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L. & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54, 952–965.
Havemann, F. (2001). Collaboration behaviour of berlin life science researchers in the last two decades of the twentieth century as reflected in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 52 (3), 435-443.
Heffner, A. G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four discipline. Scientometrics, 3 (1), 5-12.
Hsu, Y. K., Chen, S.C., Lin, C.Y., Tseng, C.T., & Chen, K.C. (2012, September). Development of Fisheries Information Systems for the Fisheries Research Institute of Taiwan. In W. Fang (Chair), The 8th Asian conference for information technology in agriculture. AFITA/WCCA 2012 Taipei, Taiwan.
Hurwitz, J., Zander, A., & Hymovitch, B. (1960). Some effects of power on the relations among group members. In D. Cart- wright and A. Zander (Eds.）, Group Dynamics, 2nd Ed. New York: Harper & Row.
Jeffrey, p. (2003). Smoothing the waters: observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social studies of science, 33(4), 539-562.
Jucan, M. S., & Jucan, C. N. (2014). The power of science communication. Procedia, 149, 461-466.
Katz, J.S. & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research policy. 26, 1-18.
Keller, E. (1983). A feeling for the organism: the life and work of Barbara McClintock. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
King, C. (2012). Multiauthor papers: onward and upward. ScienceWatch Newsletter. http://archive.sciencewatch.com/newsletter/2012/201207/ multiauthor_papers/
Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1993). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In I. S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.), Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applies Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 145-199.
Kraut, R. R., Galegher, J. &Edido, C. (1987). Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (1), 31-58.
Kreiner, K & Schultz, M. (1983). Informal collaboration in R &D. The formation of networks across organization. Organization Studies. 14(2), 189-209.
Lacy, W. B. & Busch, L. (1983). Informal scientific communication in the agricultural science. Information processing & Management. 19(4), 193-202.
Lagnado, M. (2003). Professional writing assistance: effects on bibliomedical publishing. Learned Publishing, 16 (1), 21-27.
Largo, D. B., Diola, A. G. & Marababol, M.S. (2016). Development of an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system for tropical marine species in southern Cebu, Central Philippines. Aquaculture Reports, 67–76.
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193.
Liao, I. C. (2002). Roles and contributions of fisheries science in Asia in the 21th century. Fisheries Science, 68 (Suppl.1), 3–13.
Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In. Borgman, C. L. (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp.59-69), Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Lievrouw, L., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
Lievrouw, L.A. (1988). Four programs of research in science communication. Knowledge in society, 1 (2), 6-22.
Lievrouw, L.A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16: 615-628
Lorimer, R. (1993). The socioeconomy of scholarly and cultural book publishing. Media, culture, and society, 14, 203-216.
Luo, A. (2006). Informal communication in collaboratories.Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 43(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504301187.
Luo, A. (2008). The Challenges of Distributed Scientific Collaboration among Top Scientists-A Case Study. 2008 IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience, 468-469, DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2008.54
Maglaughlin, K. & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2005). Factors that impact interdisciplinary scientific research collaboration: Focus on the natural sciences in academia. In. Ingwersen, P. & Larsen, B., (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2005-The 10th International conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp.499-508). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.
Majid, S., Anwar, M.A., & Eisenschitz, T.S. (2000). Information needs and information seeking behavior of agricultural scientists in Malaysia. Library & information Science Research, 22(2), 145–163.
McClain, C., & Neeley, L. (2014). A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists. F1000Research 2014, 3: 300 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.5918.1)
Melin, G. & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36 (3), 363-377.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159 (3810), 56-63. DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mikhailov, A. I., Chernyi, A. I., & Giliarevskii, R.S. (1984). Scientific communication and informatics, (translated by RH Burger), Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press.
Moreno, A., Bourillón, L., Flores, E., &Fulton, S. (2017). Fostering fisheries management efficiency through collaboration networks: the case of the Kanan Kay Alliance in the Mexican Caribbean. Bulletin of Marine Science, 93 (1), 233-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2015.1085
Morris, S.A. & der Veer Martens, B.V. (2008). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42 (1), 213-295.
Mulkay, M. J. (1974). Methodology in the sociology of science: Some reflections on the study of radio astronomy. Social Science Information, 13(2), 107-119.
Mulkay, M. J. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. Boston: G. Allen & Unwin.
Mullin, N. C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42, 552-562.
Mullins, N. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva. 10 (1), 51-82.
Newcombe, T. M. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science. 2006 314 (5805), 1560–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.1133755
Nweke, K. M.C. (1995). Information methods of human and veterinary medical scientists (HVMS) in Borno State, Nigeria. Library & Information Science research, 17, 41-48.
O’Brien, T. L. (2012). Change in academic authorship, 1953–2003. Science Technology & Human Values, 37(3), 210–234.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2015). Converging on theory from four sides. In D. Sonnenwald (Ed.), Theory Development in Information Science: Reflecting on the Process. University of Texas Press.
Paisley, W. J. (Ed.) (1968). Information needs and uses. (Vol.3, p.4). Chicago: American Society for Information Science and Encyclopedia Britannica.
Parsram, K. (2008). A preliminary analysis of fisheries science networks in the eastern Caribbean. Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 60, 88-96.
Parsram, K., & McConney, P. (2011). A Network Approach to Understanding Coastal Management and Governance of Small-Scale Fisheries in the Eastern Caribbean. In R. E. Ommer, R. I. Perry, K. Cochrane & P. Cury (Eds.), World Fisheries: A Social-Ecological Analysis (pp.334-350). Oxford, UK.: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444392241.ch20
Payne, A. Cotter J. & Potter. T. (2008). Advances in fisheries science: 50years on from Beverton and Holt (pp.78-81). Oxford, Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub./Cefas.
Pile, G. (Ed.) (2001). Science is what scientists do. In The age of science（pp.1-44）. New York: Basic Books.
Poland, J. (1991). Informal communication among scientists and engineers: a review of the literature. Science & Technology Libraries, 11(3), 61-73.
Price, D. & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an Invisible College. American Psychologist, 21, 1011–58.
Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Price, D. (1975). Science since Babylon. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Price, D. (1986). Invisible colleges and the affluent scientific commuter. In Little science, big science and beyond (Chap.3, pp.56-81). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rocha, L. A. et al, (2014). Speciman collection: An essential tool. Science, 344 (2014), 814–816.
Rosenbaum, H. (1996). Structure and action: Towards a new concept of the information use environment. In Proceedings of the ASIS 1996 Annual Meeting Global Complexity: Information, Chaos, and Control October 19 - 26, 1996, Baltimore, MD, ASIS.
Sargent, L. D. & Waters, L.E. (2004). Careers and academic research collaborations: an inductive process framework for understanding successful collaboration. Journal of vocational behavior, 64, 308-319.
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration: a synthesis of challenges and strategies. In: Cronin B, ed. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 41. Medford NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2007.
Standage, T. (2013). Writing on the wall: social media, the first two thousand years. New York: Bloomsbury.
Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R., Hall, K. I., & Taylor, B. K. (2008). The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S96-S115.
Studer, K. E., & Chubin, D. E. (1980). The cancer mission: social contexts of biomedical research. Beverly Hills & London: Sage.
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information Use Environments. In Dervin, B. & Voigt, M. J. (Eds.), Progress in Communication Science (pp. 217-225). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Taylor, R.S. (1982). Value-Added process in the information life cycle. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(5), 341-345.
UNESCO (2003). Science in the information society. http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/12852/10704633955science.pdf/science.pdf
White, M. (2001). Acid tongues and tranquil dreamers: tales of bitter rivalry that fueled the advancement of science and technology. New York : Morrow.
Wilkinson, C., & Weitkamp E. (2013). A case study in serendipity: environmental researchers use of traditional and social media for dissemination. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (12), e84339.
Wilson, E. O. (2014). The meaning of human existence. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, a Division of W.W. Norton & Company.
Zaltman, G. (1974). A note on an international invisible college for information exchange. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25(2), 113-117.
Zenzen, M., & Restivo, S. (1982). The Mysterious Morphology of immiscible Liquids: A study of scientific practice. Social Science Information, 21(3), 447-473.
Ziman, J. (1999). Postacademic science: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, 9 (1), 67-80
Zuccala (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2), 152-168.
Zuckerman, H. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32 (3), 391-403.
Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.