簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 邱茂城
Chiou,Mao-Cheng
論文名稱: 高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能之研究
A study of school effectiveness, Transformational Leadership and school-based decision making for Senior High and Vocational Schools in Taiwan.
指導教授: 周談輝
Zhou, Tan-Hui
饒達欽
Rau, Dar-Chin
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 393
中文關鍵詞: 學校本位決策轉型領導學校效能
英文關鍵詞: School-based decision making, Transformational leadership, School effectiveness
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:210下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要
    本研究旨在探討高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能的關係,首先進行文獻分析,並經由諮詢二十位校長確認本位決策、轉型領導及學校效能的內含層面,據以發展調查問卷初稿,再經八位學者審查定稿,由二十所學校200位教師預試,再透過項目分析、因素分析等過程,建構「高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能調查問卷」為研究工具。隨後以台灣地區108所高中職1080人為樣本進行問卷調查,回收有效問卷800份,調查資料以變異數分析、複迴歸分析、典型相關分析、徑路分析以建立本研究之整體關係模式,再以線性結構關係檢驗模式之適配度。
    獲得之結論為:高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能現況一般良好;除校長性別與學校規模大小外,其它背景變項對學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能有顯著差異;學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能間有密切關係,總量表及各層面間之積差相關,全部均達顯著正相關。典型相關部分有二至三對典型因素達到顯著相關;學校本位決策與轉型領導均可預測學校效能,其解釋量達53.00%;校長人格特質、本位決策、轉型領導對學校效能的影響徑路均達到顯著水準,本研究所建構之學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能整體模式適配度尚可。
    依據研究所得結論,各提出六項建議,提供教育行政機關、高中職學校參考,另針對後續研究者提出四項建議以供參考。

    關鍵辭:學校本位決策、轉型領導、學校效能

    Abstract
    This research was aimed to explore the correlations among school-based decision making (SBDM), transformational leadership and school effectiveness for senior and vocational high schools. After literature review and consulting with 20 principals and 8 scholars to identify the factors of the SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness, the questionnaire was developed for pilot test. By way of item and factor analysis, the revised questionnaire was conducted for survey.
    Subjects were 800 teachers in 90 schools, The statistic procedures included the means, standard deviation and one-way ANOVA, MONOVA, Besides, Pearson correlation, canonical correlation, & multivariate linear regression analysis were applied in the research to comprehend interrelations as well as predictions among the three aspects of SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness. Then constructing an integrated model with path analysis, finally examining it with LISREL.
    The main findings can be shown as follows: Totally, the SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness were fairly good. There are significant differences between different independent variables for SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness. The SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness were significantly correlated between any two of them. School effectiveness can be strongly predicted by Both SBDM and transformational leadership. There are 7 paths significantly influence on the school effectiveness. The integrated model for SBDM, transformational leadership and school effectiveness build by this research is fairly good.
    Based on the findings, several conclusions and recommendations were made for governmental authorities, principals of elementary schools, schools and further researchers.

    Key words:School-based decision making, transformational leadership,School effectiveness.

    總 目 錄 中文摘……………………………………………………………………i 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… iii 圖目錄……………………………………………………………… viii 表目……………………………………………………………………ix 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………… 1 第一節 研究背景與動………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問………………………………………… 9 第三節 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………10 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………11 第五節 名詞釋義……………………………………………………12 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………15 第一節 學校本位決策理論分析與發展實施………………………15 第二節 轉型領導之理論……………………………………………87 第三節 學校效能之理論………………………………………… 135 第四節 學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能之關係………… 169 第五節 本章結語………………………………………………… 181 第三章 研究設計與實施………………………………………… 183 第一節 研究設計與架構………………………………………… 183 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………… 185 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………… 188 第四節 研究實施………………………………………………… 199 第五節 資料處理與統計分析方法……………………………… 200 第四章 研究結果分析與討論(一)………………………………203 第一節 背景變項資料分析………………………………………203 第二節 高中職學校本位決策分析………………………………207 第三節 高中職學校轉型領導分析………………………………231 第四節 高中職學校效能分析……………………………………257 第五節 本章結語…………………………………………………283 第五章 研究結果分析與討論(二) …………………………… 287 第一節 學校本位決策與轉型領導之關係………………………287 第二節 學校本位決策與學校效能之關係………………………298 第三節 轉型領導與學校效能之關係……………………………309 第四節 學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能之整體關係……321 第五節 綜合討論…………………………………………………330 第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………… 337 第一節 研究發現…………………………………………………337 第二節 結論………………………………………………………343 第三節 建議………………………………………………………347 參考文獻 一、中文部分………………………………………………… 353 二、英文部分………………………………………………… 361 附錄 一、 高中職本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能問卷調查表…377 二、 專家諮詢問卷表………………………… ……………381 三、 正式問卷抽樣學校及問卷回收資料……………………383 四、 預試問卷項目分析………………………………………386 五、 因素分析摘要……………………………………………390 六、 專家學者名………………………………………………393

    參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    王如哲(民87)。教育行政學。臺北:五南。
    王如哲(民89)。中央、地方與學校權限之劃分。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所主編,教育基本法與教育革新研討會,頁71-98。
    王如哲(民92)。英美學校效能研究的回顧與啟示。台灣教育,619,民92.02 頁14-20。
    王順平(民87)。學校本位管理之理論建構與實證研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    王家通和曾燦燈校訂(民80)。W.K.Hoy. & C.G.Miskel 原著。教育行政--理論、研究與實際。高雄:復文圖書出版社。
    王政彥(民83)。團體式教育決策參與。臺北:五南。
    王慧秋(民90)。桃園縣國民小學學校效能之研究。國立濟南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    白麗美(民87)。國民小學校長領導風格與教師工作動機關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    江志正(民89)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、組織發展策略與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育系博士論文。未出版。
    江瑞清(民86)。公共部門之流程改造。研考雙月刊,21(4),頁12-16。
    呂祝義(民83)。國民中學學校環境、社區環境與學校效能關係之研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    余瑞陽(民86)。國民小學校長管理能力與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    李吟、張新仁、潘慧玲、許殷宏(民87)。國民小學學校效能縱貫研究。教育研究資訊,6(3),頁1-25。
    李佳霓(民88)。國民中學組織學習、教師個人學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    李茂興、李慕華、林宗鴻譯(民84)。組織行為。臺北:揚智。
    李皓光(民84)。國民小學學校效能評量指標之研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    吳清山(民78)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
    吳清山(民80)。學校行政。台北:五南。
    吳清山(民87)。學校效能研究。台北:五南。
    吳清山(民88)。跨世紀學校組織再造之重要課題及其策略。教師天地,98,頁4-9。
    吳清基(民76)。教育的功能。教育問題研究(頁24-40)。台北:國立空中大學。
    吳培源(民83)。台灣省高級中學校長領導型態、學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
    吳宗立(民87)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
    吳明隆 (民92)。SPSS 統計應用學習實務。台北:知城數位。
    吳璧如(民79)。國民小學組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    何淑妃(民85)。國小校長轉型領導行為與學校組織氣氛之調查研究。國立新竹師院初等教育研究碩士論文,未出版。
    沈姍姍(民83)。英國進入二十一世紀的教育改革-一九八八年以來之變革與紛擾。比較教育通訊,34,頁32-40。
    林貝絲(民89)。國民小學校長領導行為與學習型學校之研究,台北市立師範學院國民教育教育研究所碩士論文。
    林合懋(民90)。國民小學校長的成就目標、終身學習經驗、轉型領導與其多元智慧學校經營理念之關係。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    林金福(民91)。高中職校長轉型領導、知識管理與學校效能之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    林明地(民89)。學校領導: 理念與校長專業生涯。臺北市: 高等教育。
    林明地、楊振昇、江芳盛譯(民89)。教育組織行為(Owens, R.G.原著)。台北:揚智。
    林逸青(民92)。國中校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係:微觀政治分析。國立台北師範學院博士論文,未出版。
    林碧真(民88)。高職導師領導行為與領導效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
    林偉人(民87)。學校本位組織發展整合模式之研究:以國民小學為例。國立師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    林朝夫(民89)。縣市教育局組織文化與組織效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    林珈夙(民86)。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行為與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    林蕙質(民91)。國民中學校長性別角色、轉換型領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    洪光遠譯 (民81)。組織領導(YUKL原著)。台北:桂冠。
    邵俊豪(民90)。臺北市國民中學校長轉型領導、交易領導與學校本位管理決策類型之關係研究。國立政治大學教育系碩士論文,未出版。
    侯世昌(民91)。國民小學家長教育期望、參與學校教育與學校效能之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文。未出版。
    胡星文(民87)。台灣省原住民地區國民小學學校效能之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    卓秀冬(民84)。台灣省高級中等學校組織文化與學校效能之關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    郭明德(民91)。教師制握信念、參與決定與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所集刊,第一期,頁221-236。
    曹明瑞(民91)。學校決策會議運用教育對話之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    曾榮祥(民89)。有效推動學校行政革新:轉化領導在學校行政應用之歷程與策略。學校行政,6,頁59-70。
    范熾文(民91)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    郁麗君(民93)。個人人格特質與人際網絡對創業意願的影響─以台灣展覽業為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    孫本初(民89)。轉換型領導對台北市政府行政績效影響之研究。台北市: 北市研考會。
    孫志麟(民89)。教育改革的新議題:學校自主管理。學校行政,10,頁34~41。
    秦夢群(民87)。教育行政:理論部分。臺北:五南。
    秦夢群(民90)。教育領導取向之分析。第九次教育行政論壇。嘉義:國立中正大學教育學研究所主辦。
    姜得勝(民87)。英國小學教育實況之研究及其對我國教改之借鏡。國民教育研究學報,4,頁165-194。
    高義展(民87)。國民小學學校教師會組織功能、影響型學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    張永欽(民81)。 台北市立國小校長領導行為塑造學校組織文化與學校效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    張竺雲(民75)。組織社會學。台北:三民書局。
    張奕華(民86)。國民小學組織學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    張銀富譯(民81)。當代教育思潮。臺北:五南。
    張煌熙(民85)。九十年代美國聯邦的教育改革。載於黃政傑主編:各國教育改革動向(頁1-20)。台北:師大書苑
    張潤書(民87)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
    張德銳(民88)。教師在重建學校中應加強的專業角色。教師天地,98,頁17-22。
    張宏毅(民91)。「台北縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究」。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    張明輝(民88)。企業組織的革新對學校組織再造的啟示。教師天地,98,頁10-16。
    張明輝(民91)。學校經營與管理研究:前瞻、整合、學習與革新。台北:學富文化。
    張瑞村(民87)。高級工業職業學校校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
    張毓芳(民91)。台北縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。中國教育管理學會主辦研討會論文集,頁19-22。
    張慶勳(民85)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。高雄師範大學教育系博士論文,未出版。
    程樹德等(民85)。科學革命的結構。台北:遠流出版社。
    彭雅珍(民87)。國小校長領導風格、教師工作價值觀與教師組織承諾關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳長士(民89)。高屏地區國民小學組織氣候與組織決策關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳秉璋(民88)。社會學理論。台北:三民書局。
    陳龍彬(民89)。台灣省中區國小校長轉型領導、互易領導與教師同僚專業互享學習關係之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳燕慧(民91)。國民小學組織文化與學校效能之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳聰浪(民88)。高職校長權力運用與學校行政主管政治行為相關之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    陳鐘金(民92)。國民中小學學校本位管理與學校效能關係之研究。國立花蓮師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    陳譓森(1996)。轉換型領導對警政服務品質之影響研究。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,未出版。
    梁靜如(民91)。國民小學校長人性取向領導與學校效能之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
    喬玉全、陳鋅、錢華譯(民80)。學校行政領導原理。臺北:五南。
    黃嘉雄(民87)。析評英國學校自主管理政策。國教學報,10,頁135-164。
    黃嘉雄(民88)。英、紐學校自主管理政策之比較,載於中華民國比較教育學會主編,教育研究與政策之國際比較,頁195-241。臺北:揚智。
    黃嘉雄(民90)。學校本位管理制度比較研究。台北:五南。
    黃美芳(民91)。美國學校教育績效責任及其在我國實施可行性之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    黃昆輝(民85)。教育行政學,二版。台北:東華書局。
    黃振球(民81)。績優學校。台北:師大書苑。
    黃傳永(民88)。校長轉型領導與家長參與學校教育之研究。東華大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    黃麗美(民92)。國中小組織創新氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    廖裕月(民87)。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究:以北部四縣市為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    廖進安(民91)。國民中小學行政人員運用知識經濟與學校效能關係之研究。國立台北師範學院碩士論文,未出版。
    楊深坑(民86)。溝通理性、生命情懷與教育過程:哈伯瑪斯的溝通理性與教育。臺北:師大書苑。
    楊振昇(民80) 。國民小學教師參與學校行政決定與工作士氣關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    楊樹槿(民80)。國民小學校長的權力類型、教師參與決定與工作士氣關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    裘學賢(民87)。人文主義哲學及其在教育上的意義。高雄:復文。
    劉春榮(民82)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    劉雅菁(民87)。國民小學校長運用轉型領導之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    劉慶仁(民90)。教育績效責任:從美國德州的經驗談起。文發表於中國教育學會等主辦:知識經濟與教育發展國際學術研討會,90年12月14日 至16日。台北:國立台灣師大。
    劉慶中、沈慶楊(民80)。卓越學校行政領導理念研究--文化領導內涵初探。載於台灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會。承辦單位:台灣省立新竹師範學院。
    鄭燕祥 (民90)。學校效能及校本管理。台北:心理出版社。
    鄭燕祥 (民92)。教育領導與改革。台北:高等教育出版社。
    蔡進雄(民89)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文,未出版。
    蔡振生譯(民81)。學校組織行為分析。臺北:五南。
    蔡麟筆(民68)。參與式的領導和管理績效之研究。臺北:幼獅。
    簡成熙譯(民84)。美國教育哲學導論。臺北:五南。
    潘慧玲(民88)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究集刊,43(7),頁77-101。
    謝小芩(民77)。好學校的必備條件。教育資料文摘,126,頁4-13。
    謝文全(民80)。教育行政:理論與實務。臺北:文景。
    謝文全(民91)。學校本位管理實施與困境,教育研究集刊,頁1-36。
    謝金青(民86)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    閻自安(民89)。臺灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式、教師工作滿意之關係研究度。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
    濮世緯(民86)。國小校長轉型領導、教師制握信念與教師職業倦怠關
    係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    濮世緯(民92)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。

    貳、英文部分
    Adams E.NIR(2002).School- based management and its effect on teacher commitment. International Journal of Leadership in Education. DOI: 10.1080/13603120210134616.
    Adams-Rodgers, L. C. (1995). The role of the Kentucky department of education in facilitating systemic change and school-based decision making: A case study. Ann Arbor, MI.: University Microfilms International Dissertation Services, A Bell & Howell Co.
    Ainscow, M. (1991). Effective School for all. Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co. Inc.
    Alberta Dept. of Education (1997). School-based decision making resource guide: Focus on teaching and learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 425 538)
    Anthony, W. P. (1978). Participative management. Reading, MA:
    Addison-Wesley.
    Avolio, B. J. (1999) Full leadership development: building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
    Avolia, B. J. & Gibons, T. C. (1998). Developing transformational leaders: a life span approach, in Conger. J. A.and Kanungo, R. N. (Eds.), harismatic Leadership: the Elusive. Factor in Organizational.
    Bailey, W. J. (1991). First restructure: Then empower. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 730)
    Barberio, Ernest. Organization effectiveness, student alienation, and the high school teacher’s perceived sense of academic freedom, tennis doctoral de la universidad Rutgers. New Jersey. 1990, p.689
    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
    Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for take charge. N.Y: Harper & Row.
    Bolam, R. (1993). School-based management, school improvement and school effectiveness: Overview and implications. In Clive Dimmock (Ed.), School-based management and school effectiveness (pp.219-234). Lodon: Routledge.
    Boyd, W. L. (1999). Environmental pressures, management imperatives, and competing paradigms in educational administration. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), pp.283-297.
    Bredeson, P. V. (1992). Responses to restructuring and empowerment initiatives: A study of teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of organizational leadership, decision-making and climate. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 569)
    Briggs,Kerri L.& Wohlstter,Priscilla(2003) Key elements of a Successful School-Based Management Strategy. School Effectiveness & School Improvement: Sep2003, Vol.14 Issue 3.
    Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage Publications.
    Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York : Harper and Row.
    Caldwell, B. (1990). School-based decision-making and management:International developments. In J. D. Chapman (Ed.), School-based decision making and management (pp.3-26). Lewes: Falmer Press.
    Campbell, R. W. (1987). Change — Into and beyond 2007: Models to keep abreast of change and to implement change. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 290 866
    Case, K. I. (1993). Rural school reform: Teacher decision making and cognitive constraints. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 363 468)
    Chadwick, L. J. (1999). A comparative analysis of transformational and transactional leadership in public school principals and their effect on school culture. Doctoral Dissertation of Regent University, unpublished.
    Chapman, J. (1993). Leadership, management, and the effectiveness of schooling: arespose to Mr. Gradgrind. Journal of educational administration 31(4), pp. 4-18
    Charles, G. S., & Karr. K., PJ. (1995). Effective principals, effective schools: Arriving at site-based decision-making with successful principals and teacher participation. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 382 564)
    Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery, and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 11-40.
    Cheng,Yin Cheong(1997). The Transformational Leadership for School Effectiveness and Development in the New Century.ERIC. ED407 727.
    Chirichello, Michael.(1999).Building Capacity for Change: Transformational Leadership for School Principals. ERIC. ED 432 037.
    Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership. San Franciso:Jossey-Bass.
    Conley, S. C., & Bacharach, S. B. (1990). From school-site management to participatory school-site management. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(7), pp.539-544.
    David, J. J. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), pp. 45-53.
    David, J. L. (1992). School-based decision making: Observations on progress a first-year report to the Prichard Committee. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 141)
    Davis, G. A. & Thomas, M. A.(1989). Effective school and effective teachers. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. Dissertation abstracts international. (AAC 9705981 Pro0-Quest Dissertation Abstract)
    Delaney, J. G. (1997). Principal leadership: A primary factor in school-based management and school improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 81(586), 107-111.
    Dimmock,C.(1990).Managing for quality and accountability In Western Australian education. Education Review, 42 (2), pp.197-206.
    Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in a revolutionary process. New York: Free press.
    Duignan, P. A. (1990). School-based decision making and management: Retrospect and prospect. In J. D. Chapman (Ed.), School-based decision making and management(pp.327-345). Lewes: Falmer Press.
    Duke, D. L., Showers, B. K., & Imber, M. (1980). Teachers and shared decision making: The costs and benefits of involvement.Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, pp.93-106.
    Dunn, William. 1994. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Eden,D.(1998) The paradox of school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 36 (3), pp.249-260.
    Edmonds, R.R.(1978). Effective school for the urban poor. Educational Leadership,37, pp.15-27。
    Etheridge, C. P., & Hall, M. L. (1995). Challenge to change: The Memphis experience with school-based decision making revisited. Interrupted continuity. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 826)
    Farmer, D. W. (1990). Strategies for change. New Directions for Higher Education, 71, pp.7-18.
    Fennell, H. A. (1999). Feminine faces of leadership: Beyond Structural-Functionalism? Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), pp.254-285.
    Fitch, C. (1990). Chicago school reform: Who’s the boss?(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 327 003)
    Fitz, J., Halpin, J., & Power, S. (1994). Grant-maintained status: School autonomy or state control. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 528)
    Forte, B.(2000). The impact of professional development on teacher performance and student achievement. DAI-A, 60/09, P.3256.
    Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., & Van Den Berg, R. (1999). Transformational leadership and the implementation of Large-Scale Innovation. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), pp.309-328.
    Gehrke, N. (1991). Developing teachers’ leadership skill. ERIC digest.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 691)
    Groves, D. E. (1996). The effects of transformational leadership behavior of national blue ribbon secondary schools in Cuyahoga county Ohio UMI Microform 9701816.
    Guskey, T., & Peterson, K. D. (1996). The road to the classroom. Educational Leadership, 53(3), pp.10-14.
    Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), pp.35-48.
    Hall, G., & Galluzzo, G. (1991). Changing policy into practice:School-based decision making. Policy issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 563)
    Hanson, E. M. (1991). Educational administration and organizational behavior. ( 3rd ed. ). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Harrison, J. A. (1998). School culture and school effectiveness in emergenes: Lessons from Israeli experience during the Gulf War. School effectiveness and school improvement, 9(2), pp.192-217
    Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors, evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, pp.695-702.
    Herman, J. J. (1991). Introduction to school-based management. In P. George & E. C. Potter (Eds.), School-based management: Theory and practice(pp.v-viii). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 332)
    Hill, P., & Bonan, J. (1991). Decentralization and accountability in public education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 665)
    Hill, M. S., & Casteel, D. (1994). Perceptions of responsibility for decision making: Hiring a teacher. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 390 146)
    Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G.(1987). Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. N. Y.: Random House.
    Huddleston, J., Claspell, M., & Killion, J. (1991). Participative decision making can capitalize on teacher expertise. NASSP Bulletin, 75(534), pp.80-89.
    Huges, L. W. & Ubben, G.. C. (1989). The elementary principal's hand book: A guide to effective action (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Ideus, J. M. (1993). Teacher willingness to participate in school-based decision-making. (PHD. The University of Texas at Austin). DAI-A 54/04.
    Jantzi,D.& Leithwood,K.(1996).Toward an explanation of variation in teachers' perceptions of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, pp.512-538.
    Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., & Berg, R. van den (1999). Transformational leadership and the implementation of large-scale innovation programs. Journal of Educational Administration, 37 (4), pp.309-328.
    Kotter, J.P.(1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. N.Y.: The Free Press.
    Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B.Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Lee, R. S. (1995). Principals’ perceptions of the success of school-based decision making within a legislated and nonlegislated structure: Kentucky and Georgia. Ann Arbor, MI.: University Microfilms International Dissertation Services, A Bell & Howell Co.
    Leiding, D.A.(2000). Improving school performance of American Indian students of four charter school in Minneapolis, Minnesota: Focus on learning styles. DAI-A 60/07, P.2310.
    Leithwood,K.,Jantzi,D. ,Sillins,H. ,& Dart, B.(1993). Secondary school teacher' s commitment to change: The contributions of transformational leadership. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED360901)
    Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational school leadership, In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), The International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp.785-840). Dordrecht: Kluwer Acadmic.
    Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. ERIC: RIEJUL2000.
    Lester, V. H. (2000). Transformational leadership and developing a professional learning community in Pajarito Elementary School. Doctoral Dissertation of The University of New Mexico, unpublished.
    Levine, D. U. (1992). An Interpretive Review of US Research and Practice Dealing with unusually Effective Schools. In Reynolds, D. & Peter Cuttance(Eds), School Effectiveness Research, Policy and Practice. London: Cassell.
    Lindle, J. C. (1996). Lessons from Kentucky about school-based decision making. Educational Leadership, 53(4), pp.20-23.
    Liontos, L. B. (1993). Shared decision-making. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 363 969)
    Logan, J. P., & Byers, C. W. (1995). School-based decision making:Implications for vocational education and for the decision-making process. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 20(1), pp.35-54.
    Lucas, Stephen Earl, Valentine, Jerry Wayne.(2002).Transformational Leadership:Principal, Leadership Teams, and School Culture.ERIC. 468 519.
    Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. (2nd ed.). CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
    Lutz, F. W., & Iden, R. M. (1994). The political effects of site-based decision making on local school governance. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 378 636)
    Meadows, B. J. (1990). The rewards and risks of shared leadership. Phi Delta Kappa, 71(7), pp.545-548.
    Malone, B. G., & Caddell, T. A. (2000). A crisis in leadership: Where are tomorrow's principals? The Clearing House, 73(3), pp.162-164.
    Marburger, C. L. (1985). One school at a time. School based management: A process for change. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 263 683)
    Mestinsek, R. M. (2000). A comparative study of leadership characteristics of principals in charter schools and traditional schools. Doctoral Dissertation of University of San Diego, unpublished.
    Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R. (1998). Organizational behavior ( 5th. ed. ). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    Mott, P.E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. N.Y. Harper & Row.
    Murphy, J. et al. (1985). School Effectiveness : A Conceptual Framework. The educational forum, 49(3), 361-374.
    Mutchler, S. E., & Duttweiler, P. C. (1990). Implementing shared decision making in school-based management: Barriers to changing traditional behavior. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 286)
    Obolensky, N. (1994). Practical business reengineering. Texas: Gulf.
    O’Connell, C. et al. (1988). Strategies for school renewal: Profiling organizational dynamics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 316 909)
    Ogilvie, D. & Sadler, D.R. (1979). Perception of school effectiveness and its relationship to organizational climate. The Journal of Educational.
    Owens, R. G. (1995). Organizational behavior in education. (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Parents Coalition for Education in New York City. (1993). The “rules” still rule: The failure of school-based management/ shared decision making (SBM/SDM) in the New York City public school system. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367 732)
    Pavan, B. N. (1992). School effectiveness and engraded school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED346608)
    Pease, J.A. (1998). The impact of staffing levels on organizational performance. DAI-A 58/08, P.3304.
    Perry, C. Y., & Evans, W. J. (1991). Implementimg school-based management in urban settings. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 344)
    Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H. (1988). In search in excellence: lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York: Warner Books.
    Peterson, K. D., Marks, H. M., & Warren, V. D. (1996). SBDM in restructured schools: Organizational conditions, pedagogy and student learning. Final deliverable for OERI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 632)
    Pickle, H. & Friendlander, F. (1967). Seven societal criteria of organizational success. Personnel psychology, p. 120.
    Polizzi, K. G., Horgan, D. D., Etheridge, C. P., & Valesky, T. C.(1991). Designing a school-based decision-making training program through real-life experiences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340 129)
    Purkey, S. & Smith, M. (1983). Effective school: A review. The elementary school journal, 83, 427-452.
    Richards, Patricia Hogan(2000).Shared decision making: Principals’facilitative leadership and teacher sense of efficacy. DAI-A 61/06,P2133,Dec 2000.
    Reid,K;Hopkins,D.& Holly,P.(1987).Towards the effective school : the problems and some solutions. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
    Reynolds, D. (1993). School Effctiveness and School Improvement: An Updated Review of the British Literature. In Reyaolds, D. & Peter Cuttance (Ed.), School effctiveness research, policy and practice. London: Cassell.
    Robbins & Cenzo(1998)。現代管理學。(Robbins: Fundamentals of Management)(林建煌編譯,2000年出版)。台北:華泰。
    Rowan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In regional, M. J. (Ed). Researching for excellence an effective schools source book. Washington: U.S. Government printing office.
    Russo, C. J., & Lindle, J. C. (1996). School-based decision making. In Kentucky Univ. (Ed.). A review of research on the Kentucky education reform act 1995 (KERA)(pp.14-30). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 976)
    Sackney, L. E., & Dibski, D. J. (1992). School-based management: Will it fly?(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 716)
    Sandidge, R. F., Russo, C. J., Harris,Ⅲ, J. J., & Ford, H. H. (1996). School-based decision making, American style: Perspectives and practices throughout the United States. Interchange, 27(3&4), pp.313-329.
    Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of School functioning. School effectiveness and school improvement, 1(1), pp.72-80.
    Scheerens J. & Bosker R. ( 1997). The foundation of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon. p.9.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Adding value to leadership gets extraordinary
    result. Educational Leadership, 47 (8), pp.23-27.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (1999). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles, K-College. ERIC:RIEMAY2000.
    Silins, H.C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), pp.272-298.
    Simkins, T. (1993). The consequences of school-based management in England and Wales: A review of some evidence from an economic perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360 740)
    Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, pp.53-66.
    Spaulding, A. M. (1994). The politics of the principal: Influencing teachers’ school based decision making. Draft. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 542)
    Stearns, K. (1996). School reform: Lessons from England. A special report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395 366)
    Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organization commitment. Administrative science quarterly, 22, pp.46-56.
    Storer, R. J. (1997). Leadership characteristics of public high school principals in school-based and non-school-based decision-making schools in Kentucky: Exploring the concept of transformational leadership. (EDD. University of Kentucky). DAI-A 59/03.
    Strusinski, M. (1991). Shared decision-making in school-based management: Characteristics of those who become its leaders. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 183)
    Tam, F.W.M. (1999). A study of multi-models of school education quality from organizational perspectives. DAI-A 60/03, P.614.
    Taylor, B. O., & Levine, D. U. (1991). Effective schools projects and school-based management. Phi Delta Kappa, 72(5), pp.394-397.
    Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
    Townsend, T. (1994). Building school-based decision making partnerships: Toward the core-plus school. Community Education Journal, 21(2), pp. 9-12.
    Tyra, A. A. (1997). Essential components of school decentralization: A study theory to practice in Kentucky’s model of school-based decision-making as viewed by elementary principals. ( EDD. University of Louisville). DAI-A 58/07.
    Van Meter, E. J. (1991). The Kentucky mandate: School-based decision making. NASSP Bulletin, 75(532), pp.52-62.
    Verona,Gail S. Young,John W.(2001). The Influence of principal Transformational Leadership style on High School Proficiency Test Results in New Jersey Comprehensive and Vocational-Technical High schools. ERIC ED454 281.
    Villarreal, A. (1993). The challenge for site-based decision making councils: Making quality preschool education accessible to language minority students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 369 545)
    Vroom(1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
    Walker,Alesa Jan. (2001). One school’s experience with school-based decision making: Perceptions of school climate. DAI-61/09, P.3433, Mar.2001
    Wall, R., & Rinehart, J. S. (1997). School-based decision making and the empowerment of secondary school teachers. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 733)
    Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and Organizations: The Cultural Match. Training and Development Journal, pp.29-36.
    Weaver, E. H. (1997). The self-managing school: A case study of school-based decision-making with regard to curriculum, power, and human resources. (EDD. Immaculata college). DAI-A 58/03.
    Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be thought to read: Four successful school. washington, D. C.: council for basic edu.
    Weiss, C. H., Cambone, J., & Wyeth, A. (1991). Trouble in paradise: Teacher conflicts in shared decision making. NCEL Occasional Paper No.8. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332346)
    Weimer, David L. and Aidan R.Vining. 1994. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Weston, S. P. (1993). School-based decision-making. A guide for school council members and others. Second edition. No. ED 363 913.
    Wheeler, N., & Agruso, R. (1997). Kentucky and Missouri school improvement models. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 416 194)
    Wohlstetter, P., Smyer, R., & Mohrman, S. A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), pp.268-286.
    Wooderson-perzan, Melinda, Lunnenburg,Fred C.(2001). Transformational Leadership, Student Achivement, and School District Financial and Demographic Factors. ERIC. ED458 693.
    Yu, H. (2000). Transformational leadership and Hong Kong teachers’commitment to change. Doctoral Dissertation of University of Toronto, unpublished.
    Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    QR CODE