簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 簡子均
Chien, Tzu-Chun
論文名稱: 台商遊牧式的國際化
Nomadic Internationalization of Taiwanese Businessman
指導教授: 康敏平
Kang, Min-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 76
中文關鍵詞: 中小企業國際化企業成長
英文關鍵詞: SMEs, Internationalization, Corporate growth
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000047
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:191下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台商為了獲得某種利益,而將國際化作為策略使其達成目標。而根據Uppsala理論認為漸進式成長之企業,涉入國際經營活動乃是一個逐步發展的過程。隨著累積的經營知識與經驗的增加,致使廠商對國際經營所認知的風險與不確定性逐漸降低,促使廠商欲控制其經營成果而投入更多的資源,導致進一步的國際涉入。此乃企業國際化漸進程序之本質。(Johanson & Vahlne,1990)且認為國際化成長是自發且持續的,這個過程一但開始便擁有持續進行的動力,隱含資源投入不可轉移性。
    而實務上觀察中發現到,台商隨著累積的國際化經營知識與經驗的增加雖移動至不同國家,大多維持一國至兩國的國際化,像是遇到什麼瓶頸而無法如漸進式理論中提到會不停的成長。故常以遊牧民族描述台商,逐水草而居。其特色就是透過找尋可以生存的水草而單點式的移動,哪裡有水草就移居到另一處,甚少定居於一地。以前是西進,現在卻轉移至南進。根據Penrose(1959)之主張,企業成長是一連串發掘剩餘資源與利用資源的歷程,由於資源具不可分割性,唯有當企業擁有剩餘資源時,在不願浪費資源的前提下,才會採行擴張策略以利用剩餘資源,使企業達到成長的目的。故企業是否因具缺乏某些資源而無法漸進式國際化成長,使台商逐水草而居之原因到底為何?使學生好奇而投入研究。

    藉由個案研究的方式,探討台灣中小企業「遊牧式國際化」其決策背後之因素。發現非所有製造業都有逐水草而居之特徵。逐水草之企業多為勞力密集或土地需求大之產業,而產業特性為影響投資動因之主要影響因素。並且透過遊牧式與漸進式國際化企業資源之比較得出遊牧式國際化之台商較缺乏具有管理經驗、國際化經驗與資金,造就國際化成長之困難。

    According to Uppsala's theory, companies that are gradually growing up are involved in international business activities and are a process of gradual development. With the increase of accumulated business knowledge and experience, the risks and uncertainties that manufacturers are aware of in international operations are gradually reduced, prompting manufacturers to control their business results and invest more resources, leading to further international involvement. This is the essence of the company's internationalization process. (Johanson & Vahlne, 1990) Once this process begins, it has the motivation to continue.
    But it has been found that Taiwanese businessmen have moved to different countries with the increase of accumulated international management knowledge and experience, and most of them maintain the internationalization of one country to two countries. It cannot be said that it will continue to grow as mentioned in the progressive theory. Therefore, Taiwanese businessmen are often described as nomads. It unique feature is to move through a single point by looking for resources that can survive. When there are resources, it moves to another place, and rarely settles in one place. It used to be westward, but now it has moved to the south.
    According to Penrose (1959), because resources are indivisible, only when enterprises have surplus resources, will they adopt expansion strategies to utilize surplus resources to make enterprises to achieve the purpose of growth. Therefore, is it because the company is unable to gradually grow internationally because of the lack of certain resources, so what is the reason for Taiwanese businessmen? Make students curious and invest in research.
    This study focuses on the SMEs of Taiwanese businessmen in Vietnam, and explores the factors behind the decision-making of “Nomadic internationalization” through case studies. It is found that not all manufacturing industries are characterized by “water and grass”. The “Nomadic internationalization” companies are mostly labor-intensive or land-demanding industries. Industrial characteristics are the main influencing factors affecting investment drivers. The comparison of nomadic and progressive internationalized enterprise resources, the nomadic internationalization of Taiwanese businessmen companies lack management experience, international experience and funds. Create difficulties in growing up.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的 7 第四節 研究架構 8 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 國際化文獻 10 第二節 企業成長之資源定義 14 第三章 研究方法 19 第一節 研究架構 19 第二節 研究方法 19 第三節 研究對象與範圍 21 第四節 研究流程 26 第五節 訪談題綱 28 第四章 個案討論 33 第一節 資料分析-國際化動因 33 第二節 綜合個案資料分析 55 第三節 遊牧式國際化與漸進式國際化之企業分析 58 第五章 結論與建議 68 第一節 研究發現 68 第二節 管理建議 69 第三節 研究貢獻 70 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議方向 71 參考文獻 72

    中文文獻
    司徒達賢,「策略管理新論─觀念架構與分析方法」,智勝文化事業有限公司,民國90年。

    劉任(2018年5月)。 東協台商500強排行,中華徵信所。取自 https://www.ettoday.net/news/20180531/1181425.htm#ixzz5h70XBkL1 

    王國順(2008年)。鄭准,企業國際化研究的基本問題:理論演進視角。中南大學商學院中南大學學報社會科學版。

    沈大白、柯瓊鳳,「各國因應中小企業信用風險評估發展之比較分析」,第139頁,2007聯徵中心委外研究專案。

    洪世章、譚丹琪、廖曉青,「企業成長、策略選擇與策略改變」,中山管理評論,第十五卷第一期 2007 年p.11-35

    康敏平、陳雯虹、陳柏元,「管理限制對企業成長之影響:管理者心力限制觀點」,臺大管理論叢,第二十二卷第二期。2012年6月

    李文瑞,「廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究-台商赴東南亞投資 
之實證研究分析」,管理評論,第十九卷,第三期,民國八十九年九月, 
pp.25-49

    經濟部國際貿易局(2017)。中華民國貿易統計參考指標。

    經濟部國際貿易局(2018)。中華民國貿易統計參考指標。

    駐胡志明市辦事處經濟組(2018)。越南經貿暨投資環境參考資料。

    經濟部(2018)。2018中小企業白皮書。

    林倢如(2014)。集團企業核心人物之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立臺灣師範大學,台北市

    金勻庭 (2018)。探討台灣家族企業國際化意願─以環境不確定性為干擾變數(未出版之碩士論文)國立高雄科技大學,高雄市

    林昱良(2007)臺灣中小企業高層經理人遴選模式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)國立臺灣海洋大學,基隆市

    吳思華(1994) ,<策略九說─資源說>,《世界經理文摘》。

    吳思華(1998),《策略九說》。台北:臉譜文化。

    英文文獻
    Alex Mohr,
Georgios Batsakis and Zita Stone(2018), “Explaining the effect of rapid internationalization on horizontal foreign divestment in the retail sector: An extended Penrosean perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies,p779–808

    Alavi, and Carlson. (1992). A Review of MIS Research and Discipline Development. Journal of Management Information System 8 (4):45-62 


    Buckley P J, Casson M C. The Future of The Multinational Enterprise[M]. The Macmillan Press LTD, 1976.

    Bilkey, G Tesar. The export behavior of smaller-sized wisconsin manufacturing firms[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1977.

    Cavusgil. On the internationalization process of firms[M]. European Research, 1980.

    Dunning, J H. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: an update and some possible extensions[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, (19): 1−30.

    Dunning J H. The location of foreign direct investment activity, country characteristics and experience effects[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1980, (11): 9−23.

    D’Souza, D. E., & McDougall, P. P. (1989). Third world joint venturing: a 
strategic option for the smaller firm. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 14(4), 
19-33. 


    Eisenhardt. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74. 


    Grant, R. M.(1991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, Vol.33 Iss.3, Spring, pp.114-135。

    Grant, Robert M(1991).The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, 33, 3, 114.
    Graves, C., & Thomas, J. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2), 151-167. 


    Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Hymer, S H. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment[C]// PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Published in 1976, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Johanson J, Mattsson L G, Internationalization in industrial systems. A network approach.In: Hood, N., Vahlne, J.-E. (Eds.), 
Strategies in Global Competition. Croom Helm, New York, 1988: 


    Johanson J, Mattsson L G, Internationalization in industrial systems. A network approach.In: Hood, N., Vahlne, J.-E. (Eds.), 
Strategies in Global Competition. Croom Helm, New York, 1988: 
287–314. 


    Johanson J, Vahlne J E. The mechanisms of internationaliz- ation[J]. International Marketing Review, 1990, 7(4). 


    Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary 
theory of the multinational corporation[J]. Journal of 
International Business Studies, 1993, (4): 625−645. 


    Madhok A. Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm[J]. strategic management Journal, 1997, 
(18): 39−61. 


    McDougall P P, Shane S, Oviatt. Explainingt he formation of international new ventures:the limit s of theories from international business research[J]. Journal of Business Venturing , 1994, 9: 469−487.

    Otto Andersen. Internationalization and market entry mode: A review of theories and conceptual frameworks[J]. Management International Review, 1997.
    Penrose(1959),“The theory of the growth of the firm, in Foss, N.J.(Eds.)”, Resources Firms and Strategic.

    Rugman, A. M. (1986). NEW THEORIES OF THE MULTXNATIONAL ENTERPRISE: AN ASSESSMENT OF INTERNALIZATION THEORY. Bulletin of Economic Research, 38(2), 101-118.


    Schramm, W. (1971). Note on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects. Working paper, at the Academy for Education Development, Washington, DC.


    “ SMEs in Europe, including a first glance at EU candidate countries,”Observatory of European SMEs, No. 2, 2002”.

    Vernon R. The Location of Economic Activity, in Economic Analysis and the Multinational Enterprise[M]. Edited by Dunning J H. London, 1974.

    Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976, (80): 190−207.

    Williams M. (1997) Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May(Ed).Social 
Research Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press. 


    Yin. Robert K (2003), Case Study Research Design and Methods, Sage Publications, 
London.
    Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of business venturing, 18(4), 495-512.

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE