近年來政府機關或其他非營利組織單位主要以績效評估作為衡量機關組織成效的工具。其中利用平衡計分卡的績效評估模式導入各類型機關組織，已獲得不錯成效。我國環境教育法開始施行至今已進入第六個年度，自環境教育機構認證施行以來，目前尚未有一套構面較為完整且使用平衡計分卡的績效衡量系統來建立指標。若能將其引入環境教育機構實施成效檢視當中，不僅有助於瞭解我國環境教育之推廣落實現況，更可以幫助現行策略的執行及續後的檢討。
本研究利用平衡計分卡法來建立大專院校型環境教育機構的績效指標。透過文獻內容分析及實務工作者之訪談意見來建構出我國大專院校型環境教育機構績效指標初稿再利用德菲法小組專家審查對指標的回饋及意見修正，共建立(一)財務構面；(二)顧客構面；(三)內部流程構面；(四)創新與學習構面，四大構面，並包含了十一個向度及三十三條我國大專院校型環境教育機構績效指標。研究者亦發現專家學者普遍高度關切機構首要功能為給予學員完善的師資及充實、符合其所需之課程並且願將其納入環境教育機構績效指標中，而環境教育機構營運收入問題、組織工作類型、職場環境、人員管理，相對之下其重要性評等稍低。
本研究最後彙整出的大專院校型環境教育機構績效指標績效指標，能夠作為評估我國大專院校型環境教育機構的現況、找出問題的癥結點並提供未來相關機構績效衡量之參考。

In recent years, government agencies or other Non-profit organizations mainly use performance indicators as a tool to measure the effectiveness of the organization. Among evaluation tools, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) has been successfully introduced into many types of public sectors. While the Environmental Education Act has been placed for six years but now it still doesn’t has a program which construct completely to use BSC to build the evaluation indicators since the environmental education institutions certification be implemented.
Therefore, if we could introduce BSC into environmental education institutions certification it will help to realize the status for environmental eduation implemention in Taiwan but also to help us review and have a discuss into the implementation of the current strategy.
In this study the author used the BSC to build performance indicators for assessing domestic Colleges environmental education institutions. Through content analysis of past literature and interviews with practitioners in the field the author drafted preliminary performance indicators and modified based on the feedbacks provided by experts review panel as per the Delphi technique comes out 4 prime dimensions, 11 sub-dimension, and 33 performance indicators. The 4 prime dimensions include “Financial”, “Customer”, “Internal Processes”, “Innovation&Learning”. During the research process, it was also found that most experts put a great concern in Environmental Education Institutions subjects such as providing students a complete instructor to enrich the curriculum. However, regarding to the profit shortage, the group combination surroundings of the work space and the management of the employees in Environmental Education Institutions the importance is lower than others.
In this study, Performance Indicators of the College-based Environmental Education Institutions can have the potential to evaluate the current conditions of these institutions and thereby aid in their improvement.

中文文獻

王文科、王智弘（2012）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南出版社。
王鑫、呂光洋、周昌弘、晏涵文、郭允文、楊國賜（1987）。環境保護教育理念架構之規劃報告。行政院國家科學委員會科學教育發展處，臺北市。
司徒達賢（2001）。策略管理新論－觀念架構與分析方法。臺北市：智勝文化出版社。
朱道凱 (1999)。平衡計分卡-化策略為行動的績效管理工具。臺北市：臉譜出版。
行政院環境保護署（2011）。環境教育設施場所認證及管理辦法。中華民國100年6月2日行政院環境保護署環署綜字第1000046543C號令訂定發布。
行政院環境保護署 (2015)。104年度環境教育機構及設施場所評鑑作業專案工作計畫(104年2月至104年12月)。臺北市。
李宗穆（2011）。平衡計分卡觀點應用於國立大學績效評估之研究。私立東吳大學會計學系，碩士論文。私立東吳大學，臺北市。
汪靜明、張春莉（1996）。河川環境教育概念階層建構之研究。師大學報，41，541-572。
汪漢英,黃文聰,黃開義,畢威寧 (2007)。應用AHP、DEA之大學學系績效評估實證之研究。人文暨社會科學期刊。3，2。
胡蘇澄（1992）。英國主要環境教育機構簡介。環境教育季刊，第12期，30-36。
柯承恩（2000）。我國公司治理體系之問題與改進建議（上）。會計研究月刊。173，75-81。
柯慧貞（2012）。追求卓越與績效責任之高等教育自我評鑑：自我改善機制？績效責任機制？評鑑雙月刊，37，23-27。
凌于雯（2013）。大學校院績效指標之重要性探索──平衡計分卡之應用。私立輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所，碩士論文。私立輔仁大學，臺北市。
郭平欣、盧迺園、胡孝年 (2015)。評估臺灣地區大學商學院辦學績效-學生表現歸因拆解法之應用。經濟研究期刊。51：1，43-87。
高新發 (2006)。 設計研究方法 。台北：全華科技圖書股份有限公司。
孫志麟 (1998)。國民教育指標體系的建構與運用。國立政治大學教育研究所，未出版博士論文。國立政治大學，臺北市。
晏涵文、馮嘉玉、劉潔心（2006）。我國學校環境教育指標之研究。師大學報：教育類，51，85-102。
張明輝（2004）。平衡計分卡在學校績效管理之應用。教育研究月刊，123，19-25。
朱道凱 (1999)。平衡計分卡-化策略為行動的績效管理工具。臺北市：臉譜出版。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵 (2003)。多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用。臺北市：五南圖書。
陳美菁、陳建勝、吳幸娥 (2009)。我國科技大學辦學績效評估之研究。朝陽學報。14。341-362。
國家發展委員會 (2015)。績效評估。2015年6月9日，取自
http://www.ndc.gov.tw/ml.aspx?sNo=0052098
曾金雀（2007）。以策略管理觀點探討平衡計分卡於學校管理之運用已高雄地區大學為例。國立屏東科技大學企業管理系，碩士論文。國立屏東科技大學，屏東市。
游家政（1996）。德懷術及其在課程研究上的應用，花蓮學報，6，1-24。
黃正傑、李隆盛（1996）。中小學基本學歷指標之綜合規劃研究。臺北：教育部。
黃柏勳（2010）。學校環境績效評估之建構與實證研究：以平衡計分卡為依據。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，博士論文。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
黃良志、程蓓芬、林淑慧、周彥佚 (2011)。組織變革環境中成就動機與工作績效間之關係：組織變革承諾與組織自尊的影響。2011管理理論與實務研討會。
楊冠政（1988）。臺灣地區推行環境教育之規劃研究。環境保護政策分析叢書(一)。臺北市：行政院環境保護署。
楊冠政（1997）。環境教育。臺北市：明文書局。
楊冠政（2003）。環境教育。臺北市：明文書局。
楊朝祥、徐明珠（2008）。台灣高等教育指標國際化之比較研究。財團法人國家政策研究基金會國改研究報告。臺北市，教育文化組。
溫明麗（2008）。教育101：教育理論與實踐。臺北市：高等教育。
劉潔心、邱詩揚、晏涵文、李恆華、潘瓊如、馮嘉玉（2004）。大學院校環境教育指標系統之發展與建構研究。衛生教育學報，第21期，97-122。
潘慧玲（2006）。教育研究的取逕概念與應用。臺北市：高等教育出版。
蔡秀華（2002）。大學體育館營運績效指標之個案研究－以國立臺灣大學綜合體育館為例，未出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
賴素純、李俊民、陳裔專 (2010)。多準則決策應用於學生課程規劃效率之研究。管理與資訊學報。15，131-182。
鐘光賜（2005）。平衡計分卡在學校績效管理績效衡量指標之應用。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
葉欣誠、莊育禎 (2004)。綠色大學評量指標系統建構之研究。教育研究月刊，第128期，81-95。
葉欣誠 (2012)。全國環境教育的推動與展望。環境工程會刊。中華民國環境工程學會編印，2012 年11 月，頁1-13
羅愛雁 (2013)，「科技計畫績效指標之訂定概念」國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。
環境教育法 (2010)。環境教育法。中華民國99年6月5日華總一義字第09900137311號公布。

日文文獻

日本環境省(2008)。持続可能なアジアに向けた大学における環境人材育成ビジョン(平成20
年3月)。日本。
岩手大學(2010)。ISO14001と産学官民連携を活用した「π字型」環境人材育成プログラム。
日本。
松田美幸(2011)。BSCと大学での活用事例。研究会発表「グローバルな競争環境下における
大学国際化評価に関する研究の研究会」。日本。
日本環境省(2012)。環境保全活動、環境保全の意欲の増進及び環境教育並びに協働取組の
推進に関する基本的な方針。日本。
大阪府立大學(2012)。環境人材育成マニュアル。日本。取自：
www.eco-lead.jp/img/report/report00_02/11.pdf
德崎進(2015 )マネジメントにおける KPI の意義を再考する-文献研究を基礎として。日本。

英文文獻

Adler, M.& Ziglio, E.(Eds).(1996). Gazing into the oracle:The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Anthony, R.N. and Young, D.W. (2003). Management Control in Non-Profit Organization. 7 Edition, McGraw-Hill.
Arizona State University.(2004). Standards and quality indicators for accreditation of schools. Retrieved form http://www.citaschools.org/cita/files/lotus_stamdards_with_checklist%20.doc
Barnu, D.T., S. Tandon, and S. McNeil., (2008). Comparing the performance of bus routes after adjusting for the environment using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Transporttation Engineering,134(2),77-85.
Beauchesne, I., Blais JF, Mercier ., (2008). Multicriteria Optimization of a Chemical Leaching Process for Sewage Sludge Decontamination, Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, Vol.12, NO.3, pp.150-188.
Chang, EE., Chiang, P. C., Lin, Y. L., and Tsai, H. P.., (2007). Development and Implementation of Performance Evaluation System for a water Treatment Plant: Case Study of Taipei Water Treatment Plant, Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, Vol.11, NO.1,pp.36-47.
Chalmers University of technology. (2010). Retrieved from
http://www.chalmers.se/en/Pages/default.aspx
Duqrette,D.J.&A.M.Stowe,（1993）.“A Performance Measurement Measurement Model forthe Office Of Inspector General,＂Government Accountants,Summer,27-50.
Dale, R. (2004). Evaluating development programmes and projects (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
Fien, J., Scott, W. & Tilbury, D.(2001) .Education and conservation:Lessons from an evaluation. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 379-395.
Fischer, M. J., & Morris, T.W. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step:maximizing performance and mainataining results. The CPA Journal, 22(7), 17.
Fachhichschule Munster. (2010). Hochschulentwicklungsplan Fachhochschule Muster.Retrieved from http://www.fh-muenster.de/hochschule/organisation/hochschulentwicklungsplan.php
Goteborgs Universitet. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.gu.se/
Gimbert, X Bisbe,J & Madoza,X (2010). The role of performance measurement systems in strategy formulation processes. Long Range Planning 43(4) 477-497
H.P.Harry(1978). The Status of Productivity Measurement in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review.38(1),pp.28
Hungerford, H., Peyton, R. B., & Wilke, R. J. (1980). Goals for curriculum development in environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education,11(3): 42-47.
Hemlich, J. E. (1993) .Nonformal environmental education toward a workingdefinition. ERIC/CSMEE Information Bulletin.U.S.:Ohio.(Ed 360154).
Haugland,S. A., (2007).Market Orientation and Performance in the Service Industry: A Data Envelopment Anzlysis, Journal of Business Research, Vol.60,PP.1191-1197.
Heimlich, J.E. (2010). Environmental education evaluation: Reinterpreting education as a strategy for meeting mission. Evaluation and Program planning 33 (2), 180-185.
Janic, (2003). Multicriteria Evaluarion of High-speed Rail, Transrapid Maglev and Air Passenger Transport In Europe, Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol.26, NO.6, pp.491-512.
Kast, F. E., and Rosenzweig, J. E., (1974), Organization and Management: A Systems and Contingency Approach, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.
Kaplan, R. S. & D. P. Norton.(1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 134-147.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard- Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, NO. 1, pp.71-79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. In Harvard Business School(Ed.). Harvard Business Review on measuring corporate performance (pp.183-211). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy focused organization. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P.(1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Kaningo,T.,Mount,D.M.,Netanyahu,N.S.,Piatko,C.D.,Silverman,R.,& Wu,A.Y.(2002). An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 24(7),881-892
Kluvers.R.(2005). "Performance measurement in a non-for profit organization." Paper presented at The Beyond Fragmented Government: Governance in the Public Sector Conference, Victoria University,August15-17.
Kaplan, R. S. and Dylan N. Miyake “The balance Scorecard”,”School Administrator 67,no.2 (Feb. 2010)
Lu, C. C.(1993). General foci and content elements for a new scouting education curriculum of the republic of china on Taiwan: A delphi study. Doctoral dissertation, Illinois University.
Leskinen, P. and J. Kangas. (2005). Mulit-criteria natural resource management with preferentially dependent decision criteria. J. Environ. Manage. 77(3):244-251.
Milani,A.S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., Nemes, J.A., (2005). The Effect of Normalization Norms in Multiple Attribute Decission Marking Models: A Case study in Gear Materialo Selection, Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol.29, NO.4, PP.312-318.
Miller, H, J. & Han, J.(2009).Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery.CRC Press.
Martin, M.,& Sauvageot, C. (2011). Constructing an indicator system or scorecard for higher education. Paris, France: Unite Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, International Institute for Education planning.
Martha C. Monroe.(2011). FNR 4070C and 5072C: Environmental Education Program Development
University of Florida.
Montanunversitat Leoben. (2012). Enteicklungsplan der Montanuniversitat Leoben. Retrieved from http://www.unileoben.ac.at/component/option.com_wrapper/Itemid.717/lang,en/
Mother Nature Network.(2016). 10 of the best college environmental programs in the U.S. Retrieved
from http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/stories/10-of-the-best-college-
environmental-programs-in-the-us
National Environmental Education Advisory Council(1996). Report Assessing Enironmental Education in the UNITED STATES and The Implementation of the National Enironmental Education Act of 1990. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/education/forms/contact-us-about-environmental-education-0
Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. London: Routledge
Prozzi, J. A., Hong, F., (2008).Transportation Infrastructure Performance Modeling Through Seemingly Unrelated Egression Systems, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol.14, NO.2, pp.129-137.
Posavac, E. (2011). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Education Inc
Ramírez-Correa, Patricio and Jesús C., Peña-Vinces and Jorge Alfaro-Pérez. (2012).”Evaluating the
efficiency of the higher education system in emerging economies: Empirical evidences from
Chilean universities”, African Journal of Business Management 6(4), 1441-1449
Robbins, S. P.,& Decenzo, D. A.(2008).Fundamentals od managemaent: Essential concepts and applications (sixth ed.), Pretice Hall.
Ruf. M. (2008). Die balanced scorecard als Controllingsinsrument im Hochschuleebereich. Retrieved fromhttp://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus55032/Publikation_BSC_als_Controllinginstrument.pdf
Rollings, A. M.(2011). A case study: Application of the balanced scorecard in higher education.
Retrieved from http://sdsudspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.10/1382/Rollins_Andrea
.pdf
Schmieder, A. A. (1977). The nature and philosophy of environmental education Goals and
objectives. In UNESCO (Ed.), Trends in environmental education (pp.23-34). Paris,
France :United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
Stretton, P. and C. Finnimore (1993). Black Fellow Citizens: Aborigines and the Commonwealth Franchise. Australian Historical Studies 25(101): 521-35.
Srdjevic, B., Medeiros. YDP., Faria AS., (2004). An Objective Multi-criteria Evaluation of Water Management Scenarios, Water Resources Management, Vol.18 , pp.35-54.
Steinert, Y. (2009). Learning together to teach together: Interprofessional education and faculty development. Journal of Interprofessional Care,19(1), 60-75.
Short, P. C. (2010). Responsible Environmental Action: Its Role and Status in Environmental Education and Environmental Quality, The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 7-21.
Sav, G Thomas. (2012).”Productivity, Efficiency, and Managerial Performance Regress and Gains in
United States Universities: A Data Envelopment Analysis” ,Advances in Management and
Applied Economics 2 (3),13-32.
Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M.,Kumar, V.(2005).Introduction to Data Mining.Person Education India.
UNESCO.(1977). Thinking ahead: UNESCO and the challenges of today and tomorrow. UNESCO,Paris.
University Mainz. (2011). Strategy concept Johannes Gutenberg. Retrieved from
http://www.uni-mainz.de/universitaet/Dateien/JGU_strategy_concept.pdf
Van Esch (2000). Performance Indicators of Environmental Policy. Background Document to
Indicators in the National Environmental Program 1972-2000, RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Ziegele, F. (2005). Balanced Scorecard als Instrument der Hochschulenteicklung Retrieved from
http://www.wiso.hsosnabrueck.de/fleadmin/groups/592/Tagungen/Betraege_2005/Vortrag_Ziegele.pdf