隨著STEM領域人才的需求增加，發掘學生對STEM的興趣並培養其投入相關領域已成為國際趨勢。然而，目前尚缺乏用於評估STEM職涯興趣的工具，因此本研究旨在發展一份「高中生STEM職涯興趣量表」，據此了解高中學生對科學、科技、工程、數學領域之職涯興趣。在量表發展過程中，本研究參考先前相關研究以社會認知生涯理論（Social Cognitive Theory, SCT）為基礎，試題內容包含「自我效能評估」、「學習興趣與動機」和「職業興趣」等面向。研究對象為臺灣地區普通高中一至三年級的學生，採用立意取樣分區抽取研究樣本，有效樣本數共329人。考量受試者的學習經驗，本研究所發展之「高中生STEM職涯興趣量表」將科學、科技、工程及數學領域依學科進行分類供學生選填，並在職業興趣的部分添加相關職業工作內容介紹。研究結果顯示：(1)高中生對於科技、工程、數學相關專業工作內容了解程度低；(2)高中男生在科學學習興趣、科技學習興趣、科技職涯興趣、工程學習興趣、工程職涯興趣、數學學習興趣、及數學職涯興趣表現出的興趣程度皆高於女生；(3)自然組的學生在科學學習興趣、科學職涯興趣、工程學習興趣、數學學習興趣、及數學職涯興趣表現上皆高於尚未分組及選擇社會組的學生，且在工程職涯興趣上高於社會組學生。

Internationally, the need for STEM talent is increasing, and so does developing of STEM interdisciplinary education that would cultivate STEM talents. However, there is no valid and reliable scale specifically measuring for high school students’ interest in STEM-related careers. The purposes of this research were to develop a STEM career interest scale for high school students, and further to analyze students’ STEM career interest. By referencing previous studies, this scale was developed based on social cognitive theory (SCT). The content of the STEM career interest scale includes self-efficacy assessment, learning interest and motivation and career interest. A questionnaire survey was conducted and sent to the tenth to twelfth graders of public high school in Taiwan, selected by intentional sampling. The research samples were selected by convenient sampling, and 329 valid questionnaires were obtained for further analysis. Consider the learning experience of high school students, the career related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics in this search were classified by subject with job description on each category. The following conclusions were made: (1) High school students have low understanding of the work content of science, engineering, mathematics and related majors. (2) Male students’ interest is higher than female students’ on science learning, technology learning, technology career, engineering learning, engineering career, mathematics learning, and mathematics career in high school. (3) The students in the science track were more likely to be interested in science learning, scientific career, engineering learning, engineering career, mathematics learning, and mathematics career than the students in social sciences track and those who haven’t selected a group except engineering career.

一、中文部分
行政院主計總處（2010a）。職業標準分類總說明(第6次修訂版)。2018年7月20日，取自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/05320393571.pdf
行政院主計總處（2010b）。職業名稱及定義：第2大類－專業人員。2018年7月20日，取自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/042516433071.pdf
行政院主計總處（2010c）。職業名稱及定義：第3大類－技術員及助理專業人員。2018年7月20日，取自：https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/042916182671.pdf
宋曜廷、田秀蘭、鄭育文（2012）。國中與高中職階段生涯測驗使用現況之分析研究。教育心理學報，43（4），875-898。
金樹人（2001）。職業興趣組合卡。臺北市：心理。
金樹人、田秀蘭、林世華（2000）。國中生涯興趣量表。台北：心理。
金樹人、林幸台、陳清平、區雅倫（2005）。大學入學考試中心興趣量表（修訂版）。台北：財團法人大學入學考試中心。
區雅倫、張郁雯、劉兆明（1998）。大學學系探索量表使用手冊。台北：財團法人大學入學考試中心。
黃厚堅、林一真、范德鑫（1987）。我喜歡做的事指導手冊。台北：中華民國內政部職業訓練局。
路君約、吳武典、簡明建（2001）。國中學業性向測驗。臺北市：心理。
路君约、爐欽銘、歐滄和（1994）。多因素性向測驗。台北：中國行為科學社。
郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉（2003）。高中資優班畢業女性之角色刻板知覺、生涯阻礙因素與潛能發揮自評。資優教育研究，3（2），1-36。
國家發展委員會（2018）。107-109年「5+2產業」所需人才分析。2018年7月20日，取自：https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/18/relfile/6037/8286/9cefce83-1be7-46ac-b694-a4d2681377af.pdf
臺灣PISA國家研究中心（2011）。科學素養評量手冊。2017年5月11日，取自：http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/sample_papers/other/Taiwan2011SciencePDF.zip
簡茂發、吳鐵雄、吳清基、劉奕權、邱美玉、王俊明、... 與何榮桂（1994）。高一性向測驗。臺北市：中國行為科學社。
蕭錫錡、張仁家、周保男（2016）。臺灣與美國工程及技術教育課程之比較研究。教育研究與發展期刊，12(2)，1-30。

二、外文部分
American College Testing (2011). The condition of college and career readiness 2011. Retrieved January 3, 2015 from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr11/
Anderson, J. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implication. NY: Worth Publishers.
Betsworth, D. G., & Fouad, N. A. (1997). Vocational interests: A look at the past 70 years and a glance at the future. The Career Development Quarterly, 46(1), 23–47.
Broadley, K. (2015). Entrenched gendered pathways in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Engaging girls through collaborative career development. Australian Journal of Career Development, 24(1), 27–38.
Bowdich, S. (2009). Analysis of research exploring culturally responsive curriculum Hawaii. Paper presented to the Hawaii Educational Research Association Annual Conference, February 7, 2009.
Cantrell, P., & Ewing‐Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 295-303.
Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Garg, R., Kauppi, C., Urajnik, D., & Lewko, J. (2007). A longitudinal study of the effects of context and experience on the scientific career choices of Canadian adolescents. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 9(1), 15-24.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hansen, J. C. (1984). The measurement of vocational interests: Issues and future directions. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 99–136). New York, NY: Wiley.
Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2018). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,16(4), 655-675.
İzzet Kurbanoğlu, N., & Arslan, S. (2015). High school students’ educational and career interest (science–technology–mathematics) and career adaptabilities. Australian Journal of Career Development, 24(3), 166-172.
Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481.
Kitts, K. (2009). The paradox of middle and high school students' attitudes towards science versus their attitudes about science as a career. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(2), 159–164.
O'brien, V., Martinez-Pons, M., & Kopala, M. (1999). Mathematics self-efficacy, ethnic identity, gender, and career interests related to mathematics and science. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(4), 231-235.
Oh, Y. J., Jia, Y., Lorentson, M., & Labanca, F. (2013). Development of the educational and career interest scale in science, technology, and mathematics for high school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 780-790.
Pa¨ßler, K., & Hell, B. (2012). Do interests and cognitive abilities help explain college major choice equally well for women and men? Journal of Career Assessment, 20(4), 479-496. doi:10.1177/1069072712450009
Rena, D., Meghan, E. B., Christian D. S. & Matthew A. C. (2018) When I grow up: the relationship of science learning activation to STEM career preferences, International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 1034-1057, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1360532
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411-427.
Schoon, I. (2001). Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: a 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers. International Journal of Behavioral Development 25(2), 124-132.
Skamp, K. (2007). Conceptual learning in the primary and middle years: The interplay of heads, hearts, and hands-on science. Teaching Science, 53(3), 18–22.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581-593. doi: 10.1177/0956797617741719
Tuijl, C. & Molen, J. H. (2015). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183.
Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 345-368.
U.S. Department of Commerce (2017). STEM jobs: 2017 update. Retrieved January 3, 2015 from https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/reports/stem-jobs-2017-update.pdf
Wang, M., Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33, 304–340.
Whitfield, E. A., Feller, R., & Wood, C. T. (Eds.). (2009). A counselor's guide to career assessment instruments. Broken Arrow: National Career Development Association.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310.
Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self‐efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036-1058.