簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張賴妙理
Chang Lai Miao-Li
論文名稱: 初任暨資深國中生物教師在運輸作用、遺傳與演化單元的教學表現之個案研究
A Case Study of Teaching Performance of Beginning and Experienced Junior High School Biology Teachers on Transport, Genetics and Evolution Units
指導教授: 李田英
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 科學教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Science Education
論文出版年: 1999
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 195
中文關鍵詞: 初任生物教師資深生物教師運輸作用遺傳學演化教學表現國中
英文關鍵詞: Beginning biology teacher, Experienced biology teacher, Transport, Genetics, Evolution, Teaching performance, Junior high school
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:326下載:40
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討一位初任國中生物教師與一位資深國中生物教師在運輸作用、遺傳與演化三個單元的教學表現,期望以教學實例提供初任生物教師參考,協助其成長。在民國八十六年八月至民國八十七年九月間,本研究透過教室觀察、晤談、文件蒐集及學生問卷等方法收集相關個案教師教學內容概念順序與組織、教學策略與教學表徵等資料,經三角校正、歸納分析資料,提出研究發現。
    研究結果顯示兩位教師的概念組織皆具層次性,資深生物教師的概念組織較複雜,連結較多相關概念,教學中能重複呈現相關概念,提供學生統整概念及應用所學的概念與原理之機會。初任生物教師以講述式教學為主,師生間與學生之間互動較低;資深生物教師以師生問答、問題討論的教學方式為主,師生間及學生之間互動高。初任生物教師採取大綱條列、重複講解或靜態展示的方式呈現學生的學習困難概念;資深生物教師則採
    多重教學表徵呈現學生的學習困難概念,例如師生問答、討論、示範實驗、錄影帶觀賞、模型、實物展示等等。兩位個案教師都能指出教材中學生學習困難的概念,初任生物教師因為不明瞭學生的先前知識或對教學策略所知有限而無法採取合宜的教學策略;資深生物教師理解學生的先前知識,且知道較多類型的教學策略而能採取適切的教學策略。初任生物教師進行討論教學時,因不熟悉引導討論的技巧,而花了很多時間只引導少數學生參與討論,或無法引導學生朝正確思考方向邁進,加上教學進度的壓力,很容易讓初任生物教師回歸原先熟悉的教學策略。初任生物教師較少在每個概念講解階段後即時評量學生的理解程度;資深生物教師則在教學過程中較常以問答、演練題目、討論、作業等方式進行評量。初任生物教師較缺乏對學生迷思概念的理解;資深生物教師較能理解學生的迷思概念並予以處理。初任生物教師在演化單元教學中呈現出對科學本質的理解(演化理論的發展過程);資深生物教師則在運輸作用、遺傳與演化三個單元教學中皆呈現出對科學本質的理解與重視。學校教學設備不足影響了生物教師對實驗活動的安排與對視聽媒體的使用。

    This study explored teaching performance of a beginning and an experienced junior high school biology teachers on transport, genetics and evolution units. Interpretive research method was adopted to investigate the comparison of conceptual structure, instructional strategies and instructional representations between two biology teachers. Data were collected by classroom observations, interviews, documents and student questionnaires.
    The findings showed that the biological conceptual structure of experienced teacher was more complex and more related than that of beginning teacher. The beginning teacher mainly adopted didactic teaching and the experienced teacher mainly adopted discussion teaching. The beginning teacher presented difficult concepts through repeated explanations, however, the experienced teacher presented difficult concepts through multiple instructional representations. Both teachers realized the difficult concepts for students, but, the beginning teacher could not use suitable instructional strategies because she didn’t understand prior knowledge of students and she just knew few instructional strategies. Since the experienced teacher realized prior knowledge of students and knew more instructional strategies, she could use better instructional strategies. The beginning teacher seldom evaluated students’ learning after she taught. The experienced teacher often used multiple methods to evaluate students’ performance after teaching. The beginning teacher didn’t know students’ misconceptions. The experienced teacher realized students’ misconceptions and knew how to help students understand those misconceptions.

    第壹章 緒 論……………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究的重要性…………………………………… 2 第三節 研究目的與研究問題…………………………… 3 第四節 名詞釋義………………………………………… 3 第五節 研究架構………………………………………… 4 第六節 研究界定………………………………………… 6 第七節 研究限制………………………………………… 6 第貳章 文獻探討……………………………………………7 第一節 教學經驗………………………………………… 7 第二節 教師學科知識……………………………………12 第三節 教師專業知識……………………………………14 第四節 教師價值觀和態度………………………………19 第五節 運輸作用﹑遺傳與演化概念的相關研究………21 第六節 詮釋性研究………………………………………30 第參章 研究方法……………………………………………35 第一節 研究流程…………………………………………35 第二節 確立研究對象……………………………………37 第三節 資料收集…………………………………………38 第四節 資料分析…………………………………………45 第五節 研究信度與效度的考量…………………………46 第六節 研究倫理的考量…………………………………47 第肆章 結果與討論…………………………………………48 第一節 研究情境…………………………………………48 第二節 運輸作用單元教學………………………………72 第三節 遺傳單元教學………………………………… 102 第四節 演化單元教學………………………………… 132 第伍章 總結與建議……………………………………… 152 第一節 總結…………………………………………… 152 第二節 結論…………………………………………… 155 第三節 建議…………………………………………… 157 參考文獻……………………………………………………… 161 附錄一 「學生對運輸作用單元教學之意見調查表」 附錄二 「學生對遺傳與演化單元教學之意見調查表(A118班)」 附錄三 「學生對遺傳與演化單元教學之意見調查表(B103班)」

    汪克仁和耿正屏 (1993): 國中學生植物運輸概念的發展。科學教育, 3, 237-259。
    邱美虹和江玉婷 (1997): 初任與資深國中地球科學教師學科教學知識之比較。科學教育學刊,5(4),419-459。
    邱耀德和耿正屏 (1994): 國二學生之人體循環系統另有架構的探究。科學教育,4,53-73。
    高敬文 (1996): 質化研究方法論。 台北市:師大書苑。
    黃台珠 (1990): 中學生遺傳相關概念錯誤類型的探討。科學教育月刊, 133,34-53。
    黃台珠 (1993): 中學生遺傳學習的現況及問題。高雄師大學報, 4, 269-300。
    黃台珠、鄭世暖、林明輝、蘇懿生、張學文和趙大衛 (1994): 國中生物遺傳教學改進研究。高雄師大學報, 5, 113-135。
    國立編譯館 (1997a): 國民中學生物 (上冊)。臺北市: 臺灣書局。
    國立編譯館 (1997b): 國民中學生物教師手冊 (上冊)。臺北市: 臺灣書局。
    國立編譯館 (1998a): 國民中學生物 (下冊)。臺北市: 臺灣書局。
    國立編譯館 (1998b): 國民中學生物教師手冊 (下冊)。臺北市: 臺灣書局。
    楊永華和邱文純 (1994). 實習教師與資深教師在實驗教學上的異同。 教育研究資訊, 2(5),90-110。
    楊坤原和陳進利 (1990): 中學生認知能力與遺傳學概念學習之相關研究。科學教育, 1, 61-75。
    莊崑泉和耿正屏 (1995): 國中生物運輸單元試行學習環教學之研究。科學教育, 5,27-49。
    許朝貴和耿正屏 (1995): 國一學生理解人體血液循環路徑的困難分析。科學教育, 5, 1-25。
    張惠博 (1994): 初任科學教師認知與專業的成長。 行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC83-011-S-018-020F), 未出版。
    黃瑞琴 (1991): 質的教育研究法。 臺北市:心理出版社。
    湯清二 (1990): 迷失概念與科學教學改進研究(I)「以遺傳概念為例」, 彰化師範大學學報, 1, 367-393。
    鄭湧涇 (1996): 中等學校生物師資教育的回顧與前瞻。 科學教育學刊, 4(1), 93-110。
    簡紅珠 (1994): 師範生學科與學科教學的知識基礎。載於師範教育多元化與師資素質。臺北市:師大書苑。
    Abelson, R. (1979). Differences between belief systems and knowledge systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 355-366.
    Adams, R. D. (1982). Teacher development: A look at changes in teacher perceptions and behavior across time. Journal of Teacher Education, 33(4),40-43.
    Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1),29-50.
    Anderson, R. D., & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning: A project of the National Science Teachers Association. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Arnaudin, M. W., & Mintzes, J. J. (1985). Students' alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: a cross-age study. Science Education, 69(5), 721-733.
    Arnaudin, M. W., & Mintzes, J. J. (1986). The cardiovascular system: children's conceptions and misconceptions. Science and Children, 23, 48-51.
    Barnes, H. (1989). Structuring knowledge for beginning teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Baxter, J., Richert, A. & Saylor, C. (1985). Science group: Content and processes of biology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
    Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher,15(7),5-13.
    Berliner, D. C. (1988a). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In J. Pfleiderer(Ed.), New directions for teacher assessment. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
    Berliner, D. C. (1988b). The development of expertise in pedagogy. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 122)
    Benson, G. D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 329-344.
    Bizzo, N. M. V. (1994). From down house landlord to Brazilian high school students: what has happened to evolutionary knowledge on the way? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 537-556.
    Blair, S. M., & Bercik, J. T. (1987). Teacher induction: A survey of experienced teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 455)
    Block, J. H., & Hazelip, K. (1995). Teachers‘ beliefs and belief systems. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Elsevier Science Ltd.
    Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education—An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4),473-498.
    Brickhouse, N. W. (1989). The teaching of the philosophy of science in secondary classrooms: case studies of teachers‘ personal theories. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 437-449.
    Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers‘ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62.
    Brickhouse, N. W., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5),471-485.
    Byrne, C. J. (1983). Teacher knowledge and teacher efectiveness: A literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy. Paper presented at the 14th
    Annual Convention of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.
    Burry, J. A., & Bolland, K. A. (1992). Describing expert science teaching. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5,313-319.
    Calderhead, J. (1983). Research into teachers’ and student teachers’cognitions: Exploring the nature of classroom practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
    Carlsen, W. S. (1987). Why do you ask ? The effects of science teacher subject matter knowledge on teacher questioning and classroom discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
    Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Effects of new biology teachers’ subject-matter knowledge on curricular planning. Science Education, 75(6),631-647.
    Carlsen, W. S. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse control: Quantitative evidence from novice biology teachers’ classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5),471-481.
    Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P., & Carey, D. (1988). Teachers’pedagogical content knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19,385-401.
    Carre, C. (1993). The first year of teaching. In N. Bennett & C. Carre(Eds.), Learning to teach. New York: Routledge.
    Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Carter, K., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. (1988). Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom stimuli. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3),25-31.
    Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, S., & Berliner, D. (1989). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3,147-157.
    Centra, J. A., & Potter, D. A. (1980). School and teacher effects: an interrelational model. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 273-291.
    Chi, M. T. H. (1991). Learning in a non-physical science domain: the human circulatory system. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 629)
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed.) . New York: Macmillan.
    Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4),419-441.
    Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4),263-272.
    Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: narratives of experience. New York: teacher College Press.
    Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13(7),665-674.
    Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C., & Terwillinger, L. (1990). Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of a secondary science teacher. Science Education, 74(5),517-529.
    Cronin-Jones, L. (1991). Interpretive research methods as a tool for educating science teachers. In J. J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive research in science education. NARST monograph, No. 4.
    Crow, N. A. (1991). Personal perspectives on classroom management. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 959)
    Cummins, C. L., Demastes, S. S., & Hafner, M. S. (1994). Evolution: biological education‘s under-researched unifying theme. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 445-448.
    Deadman, J. A., & Kelly, P. J. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7-15.
    DeRose, J. V., Lockard, J. D., & Paldy, L. G. (1979). The teacher is the key: a report on three NSF studies. Science and Children, 16(7),35-41.
    Dobey, D. C. & Schafer, L. E. (1984). The effects of knowledge in elementary science inquiry teaching. Science Education, 68(1),39-51.
    Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers’decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6),467-501.
    Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge. NY: Nichols.
    Elbaz, F. (1991). Research on teacher’s knowledge: the evolution of a discourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(1),1-19.
    Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
    Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. B. (1990). Making subject matter part of the conversation in learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3),32-43.
    Fenstermacher, G. D. (1993). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20,3-56.
    Finley, F. N., Stewart, J., & Yarroch, W. L. (1982). Teachers‘ perceptions of important and difficult science content. Science Education, 66(4), 531-538.
    Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6,207-226.
    Fuller, F. F., & Bown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education (74th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Use of interpretive research in science education. In J. J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive research in science education. NARST monograph, No. 4.
    Garnett, P. J., & Tobin, K. (1988). Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practice in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(1),1-14.
    Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: the role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6),673-683.
    Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6),575-591.
    Gess-Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1),25-45.
    Glasser, R., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
    Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
    Grossman, P. L., & Richert, A. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effect of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4,53-62.
    Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Grossman, P. L. (1995). Teachers’ knowledge. In L. W. Anderson(Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.
    Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Values in pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 44-52.
    Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 197-209.
    Haertel, E. H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17,3-30.
    Hashweh, M. (1985). An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of science teachers’ knowledge of subject-matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International (AAC 8602482),
    46(12),3672A.
    Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
    Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G., & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: From science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9),939-946.
    Haymore, J. (1987). From successful student to frustrated teacher: the case study of Sharon, a beginning math teacher. Standford: Standford University.
    Jimenez Aleixandre, M. P. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: a look at textbook and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 519-535.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2),129-169.
    Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D., & Erikson, G. L. (1980). children's beliefs about inherited characteristics. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 137-146.
    Keeves, J. P., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1995). Science curricular in a changing world. In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
    Lanier, J. E. & Little, J. W. (1986). Research on teacher education. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
    Lantz, O., & Kass, H. (1987). Chemistry teachers‘ functional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1), 117-133.
    Laplante, B. (1997). Teachers‘ beliefs and instructional strategies in science: pushing analysis further. Science Education, 81, 277-294.
    Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733-746.
    LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1),31-60.
    Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert knowledge of individual's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18(3), 165-179.
    Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2),75-95.
    Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. A. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3),247-271.
    Lin, H, S. (1996). Beginning teachers’ and their students’ conceptions of science teaching. Proceedings of the National Science Council. ROC(D), 6(1),16-24.
    Lin, S. W. (1997). Continually expanding content representations: A case study of a junior high school biology teacher. Proceedings of the National Science Council. ROC(D),
    7(2),77-85.
    Lin, S. W., & Yang, J. H. (1998). Biology teachers’ knowledge base of instructional representations. Proceedings of the National Science Council. ROC(D), 8(1),22-32.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Ins.
    Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: a cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40,36-42.
    MacDonald, D. (1996). Making both the nature of science and science subject matter explicit intents of science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(3), 183-196.
    Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3),3-11.
    Marso, R. N., & Pigge, F. L. (1989). The influence of preservice training and teaching experience upon attitude and concerns about teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 5(1),33-42.
    McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn‘t really work: subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds(Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20-30.
    Moll, M. B., & Allen, R. D. (1987). Student difficulties with Mendelian genetics problems. The American Biology Teacher, 49, 229-233.
    National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C.: National Academic Press.
    Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19,317-328.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers‘ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
    Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1987). Relationships between student characteristics and changes in attitudes, concerns, anxieties, and confidence about teaching during teacher preparation. Journal of Educational Research, 81(2),109-115.
    Pigge, F. L., & Marso, R. N. (1997). A seven year longitudinal multi-factor assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and early years of teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13(2),225-235.
    Reynolds, A. (1992). What is competent beginning teaching ? A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 62(1),1-35.
    Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1),63-88.
    Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7),723-736.
    Sanford, J. P. (1988). Conditions for professional development of beginning science teachers. Science Education, 72, 615-624.
    Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449-457.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, February, 4-14.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1),1-22.
    Shulman, L. S., & Sykes, G. (1986). A national board for teaching? in search of a bold standard. Paper presented at the task force on teaching as a profession, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, Stanford, CA.
    Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: the psychological consequences for children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Slack, S. J., & Stewart, J. (1989). Improving student problem solving in genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 23(4), 308-312.
    Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: an attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
    Smith, J. K., & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: the end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers. Educational Researcher, 15(1),
    4-12.
    Smith, M. U. (1988). Successful and unsuccessful problem solving in classical genetic pedigrees. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(6), 411-433.
    Smith, M. U. (1991). Teaching cell division: student difficulties and teaching recommendations. Journal of College Science Teaching, Sep/Oct, 28-33.
    Spector, B., & Glass, M. (1991). What‘s a label? the vocabulary of interpretive research. In J. J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive research in science education. NARST monograph, No. 4.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, August-September,9-17.
    Stewart, J., & Dale, M. (1981). Solutions to genetics problems: are they the same as correct answers? The Austrian Science Teachers Journal, 27(3), 59-64.
    Stewart, J., & Hafner, R. (1994). Research on problem solving: genetics. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(2),99-110.
    Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1989). Case studies of exemplary science and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 89(4),320-334.
    Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher ? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1),3-25.
    Tobin, K., & Garnett, P. (1988). Exemplary practice in science classrooms. Science Education, 72(2),197-208.
    Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In G. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Thomson, N., & Stewart, J. (1985). Secondary school genetics instruction: making problem solving explicit and meaningful. Journal of Biological Education, 19(1),
    53-62.
    Treagust, D. F. (1991). A case study of two exemplary biology teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4),329-342.
    Tuan, H. L., & Kaou, R. C. (1997). Development of a grade eight Taiwanese physical science teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge development. Proceedings of the National Science Council. ROC(D), 7(3),135-154.
    Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2),143-178.
    Walberg, H. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Introduction and overview. In B. J. Fraser, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
    Westerman, D. A. (1990). A study of expert and novice teacher decision making: an integrated approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 128)
    Westerman, D. A. (1991). Teacher decision making by experts and novices across three stages: preactive, interactive and postactive. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330 658)
    Wilson, S. (1977). The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 47(1),245-265.
    Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. (1987). “150 different ways”of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell Educational Limited.
    Wood-robinson, C. (1994). Young people‘s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24, 29-47.
    Yager, R. E., Lutz, M. V., & CravenⅢ, J. A. (1996). Do national standards indicate the need for reform in science teacher education ? Journal of Science Teacher Education,7(2),
    85-94.
    Yager, R. E., & Penick, J. E. (1990). Science teacher education. In W. R. Houston, M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education. NY:Macmillan Publishing Company.
    Yang, J. H., & Wu, I. L. (1997). A beginning biology teacher’s professional development-A case study. Proceedings of the National Science Council. ROC(D), 7(3),164-174.
    Zeidler, D. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1989). The effects of teachers’ language on students’ conceptions of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9),771-783.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE