簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 劉蔡權
Liu, Tsai-Chuan
論文名稱： 基於可重組平台之公共運輸組員資源管理系統
A Configurable Platform Based Crew Resource Management System for Public Transportations
指導教授： 洪翊軒
Hung, Yi-Hsuan
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年： 2014
畢業學年度： 102
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 114
中文關鍵詞： 組員資源管理 、人為因素 、風險管理 、組員備援機制
英文關鍵詞： Crew Resource Management, Human Factors, Risk Management, Backup Support Mechanism
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：356  下載：7 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 「組員資源管理」(Crew Resource Management, CRM)為源自民航體系為減少人為因素所導致危險的應用管理概念，至今已被視為改善飛航安全，以及促進整體運作效率的一大利器，並推廣至醫療、消防救災、核能發電廠等多種高風險行業。雖民航公司已普遍採用組員資源管理概念，但在陸上及海上公共運輸系統尚無完整的「組員資源管理系統」，如能將民航公司所採用的組員資源管理概念導入至陸上及海上公共運輸系統，不失為可降低行銷時間及研發成本的最為可行方法之一。然而，此種將運用於飛機系統的組員資源管理概念移植至陸上及海上公共運輸系統的作法，仍有待進一步探討。本文即嘗試以德菲法(Delphi Method)以及基於決策實驗室分析法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL)之網路流程(DEMATEL based Network Process, DNP)，邀集來自陸軍航空、民航、高速鐵路及空中搜救等單位之資深從業人員擔任專家，從管理階層上對下支援、組員團隊建立、狀況覺知與緊急事件管控等層面著手，確立管理階層決策指導、營運指揮與管制、組員互動、備援機制、環境效應、資訊分享、風險管理與危機應對等八項準則，針對空用、陸用及海用等三種公共運輸系統載台不同之特性與需求進行評估，並運用VIKOR方法決定妥協之解決方案。最後，以平台為基礎之設計方法，建立一個基於不同系統需求，可重組平台之組員資源管理模組。
    經過本研究結果顯示，高速鐵路運輸系統可以組員備援系統、資訊分享、風險管理、行控中心管控作為、危機處理及團隊人際關係互動為基本組員資源管理面向；海運運輸系統可以組員備援系統、資訊分享、團隊人際關係互動、危機處理及周邊環境影響為基本組員資源管理面向；而低空操作航空器運輸系統可以資訊分享、組員備援系統、團隊人際關係互動及危機處理為基本組員資源管理面向。

    The Crew Resource Management (CRM) system is an applied logical management system initially developed by civil aviation. The aim of the CRM system development is to minimize the risks being caused by human factors. The CRM concept has been widely deployed in many transportation systems being operated in the environment with risks and uncertainties. Although the CRM systems have been widely adopted in airlines, such systems are still rare in the land and sea based transportation systems. Meanwhile, porting the CRM system for the civic aviation vehicles to the land and sea based systems is one of the most feasible ways to minimize both the time to market and the R&D cost. However, how the CRM systems being used in the airplanes can be ported to the land and sea transportation systems is still to be explored. Therefore, this research aims to adopt the Delphi method with DEMATEL based Network Process (DNP) Technique to summarize opinions being provided by experts in the related fields of army aviation, commercial aviation, high-speed rail, and air rescue from the dimensions of top-down support, teamwork building, situational awareness, and emergency control perspectives. From the survey results, the evaluation criterion will consist of four dimensions and eight elements, including leadership guidance, operation command & control, crew interaction, backup support, environment effects, information sharing, risk management, and crisis response for consideration. Then the VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method is used to determine the alternatives ranking for a compromise solution. Finally, the platform based design method is used to serve as the basis for establishing a configurable platform based CRM system for all public transportations, based on different requirements of various transportation systems.
    From the results of this research, it is found that the final key factors will be selected for the constructing of basic CRM model of high-speed rail transportation system including crew backup support, information sharing, risk management, operation command & control, crisis response, and crew interaction; for sea transportation CRM, there are crew backup support, information sharing, crew interaction, crisis response, and environment effects by sequence; finally, for low elevation operated air carrier (LEOAC) CRM, there are information sharing, crew backup support, crew interaction, and crisis response.

    Abstracts ii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Research Background and Motives 1 1.2. Research Purposes 3 1.3. Research Method 3 1.4. Research Scope and Limitation 4 1.5. Expected Results 5 1.6. Thesis Structure 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1. Public Transportation 7 2.1.1. Land-based Public Transportation 8 2.1.2. Air Transportation 9 2.1.3. Sea Transportation 10 2.1.4. Security and Safety Concerns for Public Transportations 11 2.2. Risk Management in Public Transportations 12 2.3. Crew Resource Management 12 2.3.1. The Concept and Definition of Crew Resource Management 13 2.3.2. The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Theories 14 2.4. Platform Based Design 16 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 19 3.1. The Analytical Process 19 3.2. Delphi Method 19 3.3. The DEMATEL Method 20 3.4. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method 24 3.5. DEMATEL Based Network Process (DNP) Technique 29 3.6. VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) 34 3.7. Criteria Definitions 37 3.7.1. CRM 37 3.7.2. Public Transportation System 38 Chapter 4 Empirical Study 40 4.1. Decision Structure Derivations by Delphi Process 40 4.2. Causal Relationship by DNP Process 45 4.3. High-speed Rail Causal Relationship by DNP Process 49 4.4. Sea Transport Causal Relationship by DNP Process 53 4.5. LEOAC Causal Relationship by DNP Process 56 4.6. Compromise Ranking by VIKOR for Various Transportations 60 4.6.1. High-speed Rail 60 4.6.2. Sea Transportation 62 4.6.3. Air Transportation / LEOAC 64 4.7. Model Development Process 66 Chapter 5 Discussion 68 5.1. A New Look at the CRM Concept 68 5.2. CRM Requirements for Various Transportation Platforms 68 5.3. Relationship between Criteria and Accident Factor on CRM 69 5.4. Basic CRM Model Design 71 5.5. System Inputs and Outputs 72 5.5.1. Leadership Guidance 72 5.5.2. Operation Command and Control 73 5.5.3. Crew Interaction 74 5.5.4. Backup Support 74 5.5.5. Environment Effects 75 5.5.6. Information Sharing 76 5.5.7. Risk Management 76 5.5.8. Crisis Response 77 5.6. Different CRM Model Designs for Various Platforms 78 Chapter 6 Conclusion 80 References 81 Annex 1 List of experts 89 Annex 2 The survey questionnaire for factors involving CRM 90

    1. Aviation Safety Network. (2014, March 8). MH 370 Accident Description. Retrieved on 2 June 2014.
    2. Brewig, Weismantel, et al. (2004). The high-speed train disaster in Eschede (Germany). Engineering Design, Group Project (Group 1), Level 2, North East Wales Institute of Higher Education; Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschede_train_disaster, retrieved on 25 May 2013.
    3. Bailey, Brian, Martin, Grant & Anderson, Thomas. (2005). Taxonomies for the Development and Verification of Digital Systems, Springer.
    4. Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives (B3A). Aircraft Accidents Statistics, retrieved from http://www.baaa-acro.com/category/archives/ on 10 January 2014.
    5. Cantrill JA, Sibbald B, & Buetow S. (1996). The Delphi and Nominal Group Techniques in Health Services Research. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 67-74.
    6. China State Council. (2011. December 28). Official Report on the Cause of the Accident and Recommendations Regarding Accident Prevention and Corrective Measures.
    7. Chiu, Y.J., Chen, H.C., Shyu, J.Z., & Tzeng, G.H. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer behavior for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making 7(2/3), 143–165.
    8. Choe, Sang-Hun, Lee, Su-Hyun, & Ham, Jiha. (2014, April 17). Human Error Suspected as Hope Fades in Korean Ferry Sinking. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com on 2 June 2014.
    9. Cooper, G. E., White, M. D., & Lauber, J. K. (1980). Resource Management on the Flightdeck: Proceedings of a NASA/Industry Workshop. (NASA CP-2120), Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
    10. Curtis, Joyce A., et al. (2012, August). Transportation Risk Management: International Practices for Program Development and Project Delivery, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
    11. Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World Problems, an Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL, Batelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
    12. Gonzales-Zugasti, Javier P. (2000, June). Models for Platform-Based Product Family Design, Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    13. Guo, Rui. (2011, April 2). High-speed rail cuts into airlines’ success. China Daily.
    14. Gumrnaraju, K. (2005). Landed Cost Optimization (LCD): The next wave in supply chain cost reduction, Infosys Technologies Ltd. 1-4.
    15. Haughey, Duncan. (2010). Delphi Technique a Step-by-Step Guide, Project Manager Program.
    16. Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C., & Wilhelm, J.A. (1999). The Evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), PP. 19-32.
    17. Huang, Chi-Yo, Lin, Yi-Fan, & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung. (2011). A DEMATEL Based Network Process for Deriving Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Tablet Personal Computers, Intelligent Decision Technologies, SIST 10, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 355–365.
    18. Huang C.-Y., & Shyu, J.Z. (2006). Developing e-commerce business models for enabling silicon intellectual property transactions, International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 5, 114-133.
    19. Huang, C.Y., Tzeng, G.H., & Ho, W.R. (2010). System on Chip Design Service e-Business Value Maximization through a Novel MCDM Framework, Expert Systems with Applications (Forthcoming).
    20. Huang, C.Y., Shyu, J.Z., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Reconfiguring the Innovation Policy Portfolios for Taiwan’s SIP Mall Industry, Technovation, 27, 744-765.
    21. Huang, J.-J., Tzeng, G.-H, & Ong, C.-S. (2005). Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process, Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 755-767.
    22. International Union of Railways (UIC), High Speed Department, High Speed lines in the World, updated 1 November 2013.
    23. Japan Ministry of Transport. (1987, June 19). Aircraft Accident Investigation Report.
    24. Kanki, Barbara, Helmreich, Robert, & Anca, José. (2010). Crew Resource Management, 2nd Edition, Elsevier Inc.
    25. LeSage, Paul, Dyar, Jeff T., & Evans, Bruce. (2011). Crew Resource Management – Principles and Practice, Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
    26. Li, Lauly. (2013, April 13). Explosives found on High Speed Rail train. The China Post.
    27. Linstone, Harold A., & Turoff, Murray. (2002). The Delphi Method-Techniques and Applications, Portland State University, PP. 1-6.
    28. Litman, Todd. (2014, May 22). Safer Than You Think! Revising the Transit Safety Narrative, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
    29. Liu, C., Tzeng, G.-H., Lee, & M.-H. (2012). Improving tourism policy implementation – The use of hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Management, 33, 413-426.
    30. Malaysia Ministry of Transport. (2014, April 9). “MH 370 Preliminary Report,” Serial 03/2014. Released publicly on 1 May 2014.
    31. Neuman, Scott. (2014, March 7). Search For Flight MH370 Reportedly Largest in History. The Two-way, NPR.
    32. Opricovic, Serafim. (1998). Multicriteria Optimization in Civil Engineering (in Serbian), Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
    33. Opricovic, Serafim, and Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung. (2004). The Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
    34. Phillips-Wren, G., Jain, L.C., Nakamatsu, K., & Howlett, R.J. (2010). Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies: Proceedings of the Second Kes International Symposium Idt, Springer.
    35. Polzin, Steven E. (2002, January 1). Security considerations in transportation planning: A white paper.
    36. Railway Gazette International. (2011, July 25). First Fatal Crash on Chinese High Speed Line.
    37. Randall, Craig V. (2013). Crew Resource Management (CRM) – A Guide for Professional Pilots, 5th Edition, the Rexford Penn Group, Inc.
    38. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill International Book Co.
    39. Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh.
    40. Saaty, T.L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process, in Proceedings of International Symposium on Analytical Hierarchy Process, Kobe, Japan.
    41. Saaty, T.L. (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process - Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks, RWS Publications, Pittsburg, PA.
    42. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Alberto. (2002, February 5). Defining platform-based design. News & Analysis, EE Times, retrieved on 22 June 2014.
    43. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Alberto, et al. (2004, June 7-11). Benefits and Challenges for Platform Based Design, San Diego, California.
    44. Sastrasinh, Sith. (2000, January 21). Electrical Train Marienfelde–Zossen in 1901. WorldRailFans.
    45. Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. Communication Yearbook 21: 231–275.
    46. Shan, Shelley. (2013, April 27). Signal failure may cost NT$30m. Taipei Times.
    47. Simpson, Timothy W., et al. (2006, September 10-13). Platform-Based Design and Development: Current Trends and Needs in Industry, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    48. Sumrit, Detcharat, & Anuntavoranich, Pongpun. (2013). Using DEMATEL Method to Analyze the Causal Relations on Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Factors in Thai Technology-Based Firms, International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 81-103.
    49. Tamura, M., Nagata, H., & Akazawa, K. (2002, Japan). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models, in Proceedings of the 41st SICE Annual Conference, Volume 3, Osaka, pp. 1752-1759.
    50. The Sunday Times. (2014, May 4). South Korea ferry disaster: Divers struggle to open blocked ferry cabins.
    51. Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1028-1044.
    52. Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2011). Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems, Annals of Operations Research, 1-32.
    53. Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1028-1044.
    54. UK Civil Aviation Authority. (2006). Safety Regulation Group (SRG), CAP 737: Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training.
    55. Ulrich, Karl T., & Eppinger, Steven D. (2012). Product Design and Development, 5th Edition, McGraw Hill International Edition.
    56. US Airways, (2009, January 15). US Airways Flight 1549 Update # 3 (Press release). Retrieved January 15, 2009.
    57. US Code Title 49 Transportation, §26105, 1 February 2010.
    58. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2008). The Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge, FAA-H-8083-25A.
    59. US FAA. (2004, January 22). Advisory Circular (AC) 120-51E: Crew Resource Management Training.
    60. US Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). (2007 February). Rail Crew Resource Management (CRM): Pilot Rail CRM Training Development and Implementation, Final Report, U.S. Department of Transportation.
    61. US Federal Railroad Administration. (2002). Guidelines for Rail Resource Management, National Rail Resource Management Project.
    62. US Federal Transit Act, Chapter 53 of Title 49, US Federal Codes.
    63. US General Accounting Office (GAO). (1997, Nov 24). Human Factors: FAA's Guidance and Oversight of Pilot Crew Resource Management Training Can Be Improved, GAO/RCED-98-7.
    64. US National Transportation Safety Board. (2004). 1999b, Office of Transport Safety Investigation.
    65. Weintrit, Adam, & Neumann, Tomasz. (2013 June). Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: Maritime Transport & Shipping, CRC Press.
    66. Xavier, Adrian J. (2005 March). Managing Human Factors in Aircraft Maintenance through a Performance Excellence Framework, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Extended Campus Hill AFB Resident Center, PP. 3-5.
    67. Yu, Po Lung. (1973). A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936-946.
    68. Zelrny, Milan. (1982). Compromise Programming, in Cochrane J.L. and M.Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE