本研究主要探討在「光學」單元中，輔以科學寫作之資訊融入教學對學生學習成效造成的影響，並藉問卷了解學生對於資訊融入教學的學習態度。
八十八位桃園縣立國民中學國三學生參與本研究，選取其中44人為實驗組，施以資訊融入教學，並實施科學寫作。其他44人為對照組，施以資訊融入教學，並讓學生在課堂中互相討論。
研究工具為光學學習成就測驗卷、學習態度問卷以及科學寫作學習單，收集學生在資訊融入教學時輔以科學寫作的學習成效及科學學習情形。 所得資料以系統功能語法進行及物性分析，以Pearson 相關、t檢定等統計方法分析量化資料。研究結果顯示：
一、 輔以科學寫作之實驗組對於光學的學習效果比沒有輔以科學寫作之對照組效果佳，達顯著差異。
二、 學生對於問卷中之「學習的幫助性」、「學習到課本以外的東西」以及「學習動機」等三向度上，持正面態度。
三、 在科學寫作的分析中，學生的國文背景、自然背景、光學成績與科學寫作的內容、深度及廣度上都有相關，代表科學寫作也可以作為一種評量的工具，及幫助了解學生的想法和概念。

This study aims to explore the effects of applying science writing in information technology teaching model on the optics unit, and to investigate the students’ learning attitude towards the integration of information technology into optics learning.
A Quasi-experimental was designed. Both the experimental and the control group were administered the “learning optics with information technology” teaching, where the former was asked to accomplish science writing during the instruction, while the latter was encouraged to discuss with their classmates only. Students’ performance on optics test and responses of “Attitudes towards the Integration of Information Technology into Teaching” (AIITT) were collected. The texts of science writing were proceeded with of the transitivity analyses in terms of the Systemic Functional Linguistics, and the relations between science writing and learning achievement were analyzed statistically. The major findings were as followings:
1. The experimental group performed better than the control group in the achievement test. The integration of information technology into optics teaching accompanied with science writing was more effective than the counterparts.
2. Regarding to the integration of information technology into optics learning, students responded positively in the following three sub-scales of AIITT: “helpfulness of leaning”, “extra-textbook learning” and “motivation of learning”.
3. The content, width, and depth of students’ science writing correlated significantly with their academic achievement. This implied that science writing could be served as an effective mode for assessing students’ learning.

參考文獻
中文部份
王全世（2000）：資訊科技融入教學之意涵與意義。資訊教育雜誌，80，23~31。
王晉基、郭重吉 (1992)。利用選擇題的方式來探求國中學生對光的迷思概念之研究。
彰師科學教育，73-92。
王信智（2000）。應用資訊檢索技術於科學寫作作品評量之探究。臺南師範學院資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
朱怡霖（2002）.中文斷詞及專有名詞辨識之研究。國立台灣大學資訊工程所碩士論文。台北。
吳武雄、陳瓊森（1992）。有效的科學概念教學：職前科學教師教學能力培養之研究。行政院國家科學委員會。
郭重吉（1990） 。學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學報， 1，279-319
周宣光 (1996) 。教師如何因應多媒體科技所帶來的影響。教學實習輔導季刊，2（1）
溫嘉榮 (1999) 。新時代資訊教育的理論與實務應用。台北：松崗。
施建新 (1999) 。 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
陳慧娟（1998）。科學寫作有效促進概念改變的教學策略。中等教育，49（6 ），123-131。
黃台珠（1984）。概念的研究及其意義。科學教育月刊，66， 45-56 。
黃湘武、黃寶鈿 (1988)。我國學生科學概念與推理能力發展之相關研究：光的性質(第
一年)(國科會專題研究計劃成果報告編號：NSC-77-0111-S-003-19D)。台北：中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
張春興、林清山（1989) 。教育心理學。臺北，東華出版社。
張國恩 (1999) 。資訊融入各科教學之內涵與實施。資訊與教育，72，2-9。
胡壯麟、朱永生、張德彔(1989)。系統功能語法概論。湖南：湖南教育出版社

許佩玲（2004）.從系統功能語言學觀點探討不同圖文整合方式之科學課文對閱讀理解的影響– 以月相單元為例。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
許原嘉（2002）。以科學寫作的方式探究國小學童科學迷斯概念之研究- 以空氣概念為例。國立嘉義師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文。
翁育誠（2004）.以蘊含序列與詞彙密度兩種結構探討科學課文結構與閱讀理解的關係－以溫度與熱為例。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡志賢（2002）。科學寫作融入國小自然科教學的行動研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭昭明（1993）。認知心理學。臺北，桂冠。
劉世雄（2000）。國小教師運用資訊科技融入教學策略之探討。資訊與教育，78。
劉國權（2001）。STS 及科學寫作活動對學童科學概念及科學相關態度之影響研究。台北市立師範學院自然科學教育研究所碩士論文。
鐘聖校（1990）。認知心理學。臺北，心理出版社。

英文部分
Anderson, C., & Smith, E. (1986). Children’s conception of light and color:
Understanding the role of unseen rays. East Lansing: Michigan State University,
Institute for Research on Teaching.
Applebee, A. N. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54,577-596.
Breger, D. C. (1995). The inquiry paper. Science Scope, 19(2), 27-32.
Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. New York: Penguin Books.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s Ideas in Science. Milton
Keynes: Open University Press.
Dyson, A. H. (1989). "Once upon a time" reconsidered: The developmental dialectic between function and form. Written Communication, 6(4), 436-462. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 310 404).
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.
Fether, E. & Rice, K. (1988). Shadows and anti- images: children’s conceptions of light and vision II. Science Education, 72(5), 637-664.
Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, F. D. (1992). Students’ understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science Education, 76(6),653-672.
Fulwiler, T. (1985). Writing and learning, grade three. Language Arts, 65(1), 55-59.
Galili, I., Goldberg, F., & Bendall, S. (1993). Effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teacher. 30, 271-303.
Gant, P. (1990). To learn or to memorize: That is the question. In The science and writing connection (Clearinghouse No. SE052005) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 342 611).
Goldberg, F., & Mc Dermott, L. C. (1986). Student difficulties in understanding image
formation by a plane mirror. The Physics Teacher, 24, 472-480.
Halliday , M.A.K. & Martin , J.R. (1993): Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
Keys, C. W. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: an interpretive study of six ninth-grade students.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1003-1022. Klausmeier, H.J. (1974). Conceptual learning and development. New York Academic Press.
Johnson, D. (1997). Computer skills for information
problem-solving: Learning technology in context. (ED392 463).
Levine, T., & Geldman-Caspar, Z. (1996). Informal science writing produced by boys and girls: Writing preference and quality. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 421-440.
Newell, G. E. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(3), 265-287.
Osborne, J. F., Black, P.J., Meadows, J. M., & Smith, M. (1993). Young children’s (7-11)ideas about light and their development. International of Science Education, 15(1),83-93.
Osborne, R. J.,Shelley, A. C. (1998). The write approach. Science Scope, 22(1), 36-39.
Nussbaum, J. & Gan, R. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: philosophical
Peasley, K. L., Rosean, C. L., & Roth, K. J. (1992). Writing-to-learn in a conceptual change science unit. Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 54. East Lansing, MI : Center for the Learning and teaching of Elementary Subject. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 356 143).
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzon, W. A. (1982).
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1999). Student’s perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83(2), 151-162
Robert, L. S, (2001) Cognitive psychology. Boston.
Smith-Gratto k., & Blackbum, M. A.（1997）The computer as a scientific tool ：Integration spreadsheets into elementary science curriculum. Computerin The Schools,13,125-131.
Tucknott, J. M., & Yore, L. D. (1999). The effects of writing activities on grade 4 children's understanding of simple machines, inventions, and inventors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 428 973).
Unsworth ,L. (2000)︰Researching language in schools and communities :
　 functional linguistic perspectives. London : Cassell.　
Unsworth , L. (2001b)︰Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum︰Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice.