簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江書葳
Chiang, Su-Wei
論文名稱: STEM 與非 STEM 領域的非對稱勞動市場情境:以 1978 至 2021 的臺灣為例
The Asymmetrical Labor Market Scenarios for STEM and Non-STEM Fields in Taiwan: 1978 to 2021
指導教授: 張宜君
Chang, Yi-Chun
口試委員: 張宜君
Chang, Yi-Chun
林宗弘
Lin, Thung-Hong
郭貞蘭
Kuo, Chen-Lan
口試日期: 2024/07/10
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 世代差異勞動市場情境STEM 與Non-STEM 薪資不均等高等教育青年勞動者
英文關鍵詞: cohort differences, labor market scenario, STEM and Non-STEM inequality, young college labor
研究方法: 次級資料分析
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202401068
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:94下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 青年勞動者的轉銜經驗與社會脈絡相互交織,深刻影響著日後的生命軌跡,尤其在後高等教育擴張時代,愈發平等的高等教育機會非但未能弭平生命機會的歧異,反而促成了水平領域的階層化,初職薪資的不均已從原先的教育年限之差轉為STEM(科學、技術、工程和數學)和非STEM之間的領域之別;是以本文假探詢高等教育勞動者內部的領域階層,回應當代依舊僵化的薪資階層化命題。

    本文採人力資源調查,以臺灣1978年至2021年間30歲以下的高等教育勞動者樣本進行分析。臺灣於1990年代經歷了第二次高等教育擴張,非 STEM 大學畢業生成為擴張的主要來源,然而在勞動市場職業結構則呈現相反的成長趨勢,STEM 領域職業所佔的比例逐漸增長,如是勞動力輸入與職位變化,形塑了高等教育勞動者內部的異質性,深化了領域間的階層化。

    研究結果顯示,擁有STEM學位者在勞動市場中確實擁有薪資優勢,並透過進入具有證照系統的工作實踐職業封閉。若勞動市場是由更高比例的STEM勞動力投入和STEM職業所組成,則對所有青年勞動者的薪資皆有所助益。然在勞動市場世代層次亦發現高密度的STEM職業結構如同雙面刃,一方面高等教育勞動者得雨露均霑,另一方面也加劇了勞動者內部的薪資不均。隨著世代推移,STEM職業的比例日漸上升,高等教育青年勞動者的內部異質性或將日益擴大。

    綜言之,即便皆為高等教育勞動者,實際上他們所面臨的勞動市場殊異,尋職情境大相逕庭,儘管教育端常為輿論針砭的對象,職業結構的影響不容忽視。此外,鑑於STEM和非STEM領域之間日漸彰顯的處境差異,政府當作為教育與勞動市場兩面的調和者,平衡經濟成長所致的矛盾。

    In the post-expansion era, rising wage inequality can no longer be fully explained by years of schooling alone and has intensified along the lines of the field of study. STEM and non-STEM young college entrants face dynamic and heterogeneous transition scenarios, and their college degrees pay off to a divergent extent.

    To disentangle the current stratification puzzle, I explore the wage disparity within the asymmetrical labor market scenarios for STEM and non-STEM young entrants using evidence from Taiwan. In the 1990s, Taiwan experienced the second wave of higher education expansion. This expansion was non-STEM-leaning; however, the occupation structure has grown biased toward STEM, leaving STEM entrants with a promising future but imposing profound disadvantages on those in non-STEM fields. The dataset derived from the Manpower Utilization Survey provides a comprehensive 44-year snapshot of college-educated (and above) entrants aged below 30, allowing me to construct variables at the occupational level (i.e., Linkage Strength and Licensed Occupation) and the labor-market cohort level (i.e., Relative STEM Worker Input and Relative STEM Occupation). Based on these variables, I employ multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models weighted by inverse propensity scores to investigate the wage payoff.

    Mirroring prior literature, the empirical results indicate that, at the individual and occupational levels, STEM degree holders earn more than their non-STEM counterparts due to four rationales: the selectivity of return expectations and academic aptitude, gendered devaluation bias, specific human capital, and occupational closure through licensure. At the labor-market cohort level, both higher compositions of STEM college labor and occupations are beneficial for all. Nevertheless, a trade-off emerges—a higher composition of STEM occupations will deepen the wage inequality within the college workforce. Further inferring from a temporal perspective, I suggest that this heterogeneity may continue to widen due to the rising tendency of STEM occupations.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i CHINESE ABSTRACT ii ENGLISH ABSTRACT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii INTRODUCTION 1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND 3 2.1 THE CONTEXT OF TAIWAN 3 2.1.1 The Second Wave of Higher Education Expansion 3 2.1.2 The Asymmetrical Expansion of Fields of Study 4 2.2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 7 2.2.1 Horizontal Stratification in the Post-Expansion Era: Field of Study 7 2.2.2 Different Wage Payoff of Majors and Rationales Behind 10 2.2.2.1 Individual-Level Rationales: Selectivity of Earning Expectations and Academic Aptitude, and Gendered Devaluation Bias 10 2.2.2.2 Occupational-Level Rationales: Specific Human Capital, and Occupational Closure through Licensure 13 2.2.3 Under Labor-Market Cohorts: Dual Aspects of Educational Expansion and Technological Development 15 2.2.3.1 Labor Market Upgrade: Higher STEM Supply, Larger Wage Payoff for All 16 2.2.3.2 Heterogeneity within Labor Market: Higher STEM Demand, Deeper Wage Inequality 17 METHODOLOGY 19 3.1 DATA SOURCES AND SAMPLES 19 3.2 VARIABLES 19 3.2.1 Variables of Interest at the Individual and Occupational Levels 19 3.2.2 Variables of Interest at the Labor-Market Cohort Level 21 3.2.3 Variables Controlled 24 3.3 DIFFERENT WORLDS BETWEEN STEM AND NON-STEM 26 3.4 ANALYTICAL MODELS 27 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 31 4.1 AT THE INDIVIDUAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LEVELS: SIGNIFICANT WAGE ADVANTAGES OF STEM COLLEGE ENTRANTS 31 4.2 AT THE LABOR-MARKET COHORT LEVEL: EXTERNALITIES AND TRADE-OFFS OF STEM OCCUPATION PROPORTION 32 DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS 37 5.1 AT THE INDIVIDUAL AND OCCUPATIONAL LEVELS: DISADVANTAGES FOR NON-STEM GRADUATES AND THE DOUBLE DISADVANTAGE FOR FEMALES 37 5.2 AT THE LABOR-MARKET COHORT LEVEL 38 5.2.1 On the Educational Side: An Expected and Anticipated Complementary Relationship Between College Labor and Technological Advancement 38 5.2.2 On the Occupational Side: Governmental Roles in Reconciling Economic Growth and Inequality 39 5.2.3 In the Temporal Lens: Growing Heterogeneity across Fields 40 LIMITATION AND FURTHER RESEARCH 41 REFERENCES 43 APPENDIX A 51

    Abbott, A. (2002). The aims of education. University of Chicago Record, 37(Nov. 21), 4-8.
    Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why do new technologies complement skills: Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1055-1089.
    Arcidiacono, P. (2004). Ability sorting and the returns to college major. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2), 343-375.
    Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. (2010). Refueling The U.S. Innovation Economy: Fresh Approaches To Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics (STEM) Education. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Report. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521735.pdf
    Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998). Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1169-1213.
    Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
    Autor, D., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2020, May). Extending the race between education and technology (Working Paper No. 110). American Economic Association. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26705
    Baker, D. P. (2009). The educational transformation of work: Towards a new synthesis. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 163-191.
    Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Columbia University Press.
    Beffy, M., Fougere, D., & Maurel, A. (2012). Choosing the field of study in postsecondary education: Do expected earnings matter?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 334-347.
    Berger, M. C. (1988). Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41(3), 418-429.
    Berman, E., Bound, J., & Griliches, Z. (1994). Changes in the demand for skilled labor within US manufacturing: Evidence from the annual survey of manufactures. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 367-397.
    Binder, A. J., Davis, D. B., & Bloom, N. (2016). Career funneling: How elite students learn to define and desire “Prestigious” jobs. Sociology of Education, 89(1), 20–39.
    Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. Wiley.
    Blossfeld, H. P., & Shavit, Y. (2010). Persisting barriers. In R. Arum, I. R. Beattie, & K. Ford (Eds.), The structure of schooling: Readings in the sociology of education (pp. 214). Greenwood Press.
    Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
    Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339-376.
    Buchmann, M. C., & Kriesi, I. (2011). Transition to adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 481-503.
    Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002). Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 733-783.
    Carneiro, P., Hansen, K. T., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Estimating distributions of treatment effects with an application to the returns to schooling and measurement of the effects of uncertainty on college (Working Paper No. 9546). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w9546
    Chang, Y.-C. (2017). Cohort differences in returns to higher education: The role of labor market transformation. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(1), 87.
    Chang, Y.-C. (2020). The cultivation and labor market outcomes of STEM: From gender, class, to field horizontal expansion of higher education. National Science and Technology Council. https://www.grb.gov.tw/search/planDetail?id=13548419
    Chang, Y.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2015). How does the expansion of higher education reproduce class inequality? The case of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 85-129.
    Chen, W.-C., & Syu, Y.-L. (2011). Accounting for sex segregation in Taiwan higher education: Differences between vocational and academic sectors. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 48, 151-199.
    Choi, K. (1996). The impact of shifts in supply of college graduates: Repercussions of educational reform in Korea. Economics of Education Review, 15(1), 1-9.
    Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691-1730.
    Chuang, Y.-C., & Lai, W.-W. (2011). A cohort analysis of returns to education with heterogeneous ability: The case of Taiwan. Taiwan Economic Review, 39(1), 81-113.
    Chun, H. (2003). Information technology and the demand for educated workers: Disentangling the impacts of adoption versus use. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 1-8.
    Clark, B. R. (1978). Academic differentiation in national systems of higher education. Comparative Education Review, 22(2), 242-258.
    Croce, G., & Ghignoni, E. (2020). The evolution of wage gaps between STEM and non-STEM graduates in a technological following economy. Applied Economics, 52(23), 2427-2442.
    Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social Forces, 75(4), 1417-1438.
    Deming, D. J., & Noray, K. (2020). Earnings dynamics, changing job skills, and STEM careers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(4), 1965-2005.
    DiPrete, T. A., Bol, T., Eller, C. C., & van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). School-to-work linkages in the United States, Germany, and France. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 1869-1938.
    Dwyer, R. E. (2013). The care economy? Gender, economic restructuring, and job polarization in the U.S. labor market. American Sociological Review, 78, 390-416
    Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare. University of Chicago Press.
    Eide, E. R., Hilmer, M. J., & Showalter, M. H. (2016). Is it where you go or what you study? The relative influence of college selectivity and college major on earnings. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(1), 37-46.
    Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). Life course and human development. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 939–991). Wiley.
    England, P. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. DeGruyter.
    England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149-166.
    England, P., Allison, P., Li, S., Mark, N., Thompson, J., Budig, M. J., & Sun, H. (2007). Why are some academic fields tipping toward female? The sex composition of US fields of doctoral degree receipt, 1971–2002. Sociology of Education, 80(1), 23-42.
    Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books.
    Forster, A. G., & Bol, T. (2018). Vocational education and employment over the life course using a new measure of occupational specificity. Social Science Research, 70, 176-197.
    Freeman, R. B. (1975). Overinvestment in college training? The Journal of Human Resources, 10(3), 287-311.
    Freeman, R. B. (1977). The decline in the economic rewards to college education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(1), 18-29.
    Gerber, T. P., & Cheung, S. Y. (2008). Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: Forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 229-318.
    Gerber, T. P., & Schaefer, D. R. (2004). Horizontal stratification of higher education in Russia: Trends, gender differences, and labor market outcomes. Sociology of Education, 77, 32-59.
    Gindling, T. H., & Sun, W. (2002). Higher education planning and the wages of workers with higher education in Taiwan. Economics of Education Review, 21, 153-169.
    Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (1998). The origins of technology-skill complementarity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 693-732.
    Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard university press.
    Grogger, J., & Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. The Journal of Human Resources, 30(2), 280-310.
    Hamilton, G. G., & Biggart, N. W. (1988). Market, culture, and authority: A comparative analysis of management and organization in the Far East. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S52-S94.
    Ho, M. (2011). Policy responses to the education reform movement. In M. Ho & H. Lin (Eds.), The age of social movements: Activism in Taiwan over the past two decades (pp. 172-211). Qunxue.
    Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
    Horan, P. M. (1978). Is status attainment research atheoretical? American Sociological Review, 43, 534-541.
    Horowitz, J. (2018). Relative education and the advantage of a college degree. American Sociological Review, 83(4), 771-801.
    Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 379-400.
    Huang, H.-W., & Wang, H.-Y. (2010). Tracking and student cultures: An ethnographic research of two classes of senior high school girls in north Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 10(1), 127-174.
    Hwang, Y.-J. (2011). The educational tracking, labor market structure and status attainment in Taiwan. Psychology.
    James, E., Alsalam, N., Conaty, J. C., & To, D. L. (1989). College quality and future earnings: Where should you send your child to college?. The American Economic Review, 79(2), 247-252.
    Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s–2000s. Russell Sage Foundation.
    Kim, C., Tamborini, C. R., & Sakamoto, A. (2015). Field of study in college and lifetime earnings in the United States. Sociology of Education, 88(4), 320-339.
    Kirkeboen, L. J., Leuven, E., & Mogstad, M. (2016). Field of study, earnings, and self-selection. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1057-1111.
    Krueger, A. B. (1993). How computers have changed the wage structure: Evidence from microdata, 1984–1989. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 33-60.
    Kuan, P. Y., & Peng, S. C. (2021). Time will tell: Revisiting the impact of college expansion on income and occupational prestige mobility of young adults in Taiwan. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(3), 468-486.
    Lin, C. H. A. (2007). Education expansion, educational inequality, and income inequality: Evidence from Taiwan, 1976–2003. Social Indicators Research, 80, 601-615.
    Lin, T. H. (2009). Post-industrializing Taiwan: changing class structure and social inequality, 1992–2007. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 43, 93-158.
    Liu, Y., & Grusky, D. B. (2013). The payoff to skill in the third industrial revolution. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1330-1374.
    Loury, L. D., & Garman, D. (1995). College selectivity and earnings. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(2), 289-308.
    Ministry of Education. (1995). Republic of China education report: Educational vision towards the 21st century. Ministry of Education.
    Ochsenfeld, F. (2014). Why do women’s fields of study pay less? A test of devaluation, human capital, and gender role theory. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 536-548.
    Paglin, M., & Rufolo, A. M. (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123-144.
    Parkin, F. (1983). Marxism and class theory: A bourgeois critique. Columbia University Press.
    Pfister, C., Sartore, S. T., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2015). Earnings Returns to Different Educational Careers: The Relative Importance of Type vs. Field of Education (No. 107). Leading House Working Paper. https://2015.economicsofeducation.com/user/pdfsesiones/091.pdf
    Quadlin, N., Cohen, E. D., & VanHeuvelen, T. (2021). Same major, same economic returns? College selectivity and earnings inequality in young adulthood. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 75, 100647.
    Reimer, D., & Thomsen, J.-P. (2019). Vertical and horizontal stratification in higher education. In R. Becker (Ed.), Research Handbook on Sociology of Education (pp. 308-328). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Reimer, D., Noelke, C., & Kucel, A. (2008). Labor market effects of field of study in comparative perspective: An analysis of 22 European countries. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49(4-5), 233-256.
    Rivera, L. A. (2015). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton University Press.
    Robbins, D., & Zveglich, J. (1996). Trade liberalization and wage structure in Taiwan: 1978-1992. Mimeo: Harvard University.
    Roksa, J., & Levey, T. (2010). What can you do with that degree? College major and occupational status of college graduates over time. Social Forces, 89(2), 389-415.
    Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843-861.
    Schultheiss, T., Pfister, C., Gnehm, A. S., & Backes-Gellner, U. (2023). Education expansion and high-skill job opportunities for workers: Does a rising tide lift all boats? Labour Economics, 82, 102354.
    Simpson, R. L. (1956). A modification of the functional theory of social stratification. Social Forces, 35(2), 132-137.
    Smith, C., Crosnoe, R., & Chao, S. Y. (2016). Family background and contemporary changes in young adults’ school-work transitions and family formation in the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 46, 3-10.
    Steinberg, R. J. (1990). Social construction of skill: Gender, power, and comparable worth. Work and Occupations, 17(4), 449-482.
    Teitelbaum, M. S. (2014). Falling behind? Boom, bust, and the global race for scientific talent. Princeton University Press.
    Tinbergen, J. (1975). Income Differences: Recent Research. North-Holland Publishing Company.
    Torche, F. (2011). Is a college degree still the great equalizer? Intergenerational mobility across levels of schooling in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 763-807.
    Tsai, M.-C., Chen, L.-W., Chan, C.-H., & Tsai, M.-S. (2022). Happiness, self-conception, and college majors: Effects on occupational status and income among young adults in Taiwan. Journal of Population Studies, 64, 51-100.
    Tsai, S. L. (1998). The transition from school to work in Taiwan. In Y. Shavit & W. Müller (Eds.), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations (pp. 443-470). Clarendon Press.
    Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2002). Fields of study, acquired skills and the wage benefit from a matching job. Acta Sociologica, 45(4), 286-303.
    Weeden, K. A. (2002). Why do some occupations pay more than others? Social closure and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 55-101.
    Winters, J. V. (2014). STEM graduates, human capital externalities, and wages in the US. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 190-198.
    Wiswall, M., & Zafar, B. (2015). Determinants of college major choice: Identification using an information experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 82(2), 791-824.
    World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/
    Wright, R., Ellis, M., & Townley, M. (2017). The matching of STEM degree holders with STEM occupations in large metropolitan labor markets in the United States. Economic Geography, 93(2), 185-201.
    Wu, C. S. (Ed.). (2008). Interpreting Taiwan's education reform (Vol. 29). Psychology Publishing Co.
    Wu, X.-Y. (2023). The cultivation of STEM human resources in the post-pandemic era. Human Resource Planning and Development Research Report, https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/0/15175/9f5344ce-f728-4f27-a724-9110027cf7e4.pdf
    Xia, X. (2016). Forming wage expectations through learning: Evidence from college major choices. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 132, 176-196.
    Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331-357.
    Yang, C. -L. (2005). Gendered interest and ability: An inquiry into subject choice of senior high school students. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(2), 113-153.
    Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2008). Age–period–cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys: fixed or random effects?. Sociological methods & research, 36(3), 297-326.
    Yu, P., & Hsieh, T. L. (2022). Social stratification in higher education investment: An analysis of students’ choices of college majors and pathways to future labor-market outcomes in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101953.
    Zheng, H., & Weeden, K. A. (2023). How gender segregation in higher education contributes to gender segregation in the US labor market. Demography, 60(3), 761-784.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE