本研究在了解我國教育學門新科博士之就業，並聚焦在大專校院中教職之應徵情況。為回答此問題，依序從四部分切入：首先分析我國高等教育人力市場上，對於教育學門博士的供給與需求；再探索新科博士應徵教職時，其所遭遇之困境；以及遭遇困境時可運用之資源；最後，提出對我國高等教育人才培育政策之建議。

本研究應用質性研究設計，先自政府資訊公開與NPHRST資料庫中蒐集數據以進行描述統計，並經2位個別訪談之前導研究，以及文獻探討之統合，研擬出：就業機會、能力與資源的三向度分析架構。再用此分析架構對24位新科博士與3位擁有徵人經驗之教授，進行半結構式的個別匿名訪談。以NVivo 11及三角檢證法分析質性訪談稿，最後綜合此質性分析與前述的描述統計，撰寫成研究發現。

研究發現，近期我國教育學門人力市場係屬供過於求，因此新科博士若要掌握能幫助就業的促進因素，需從就業能力、資源與機會三者著力。因為我國人力市場上的限制因素，除了少子化下仍將持續減少的就業機會，也存在對於特定人才任用的迷思，進而排除了部份新科博士的就業機會，再加上聘任制度仍存如欠缺專業人事參與的缺陷，使得新科博士若不能審慎處理負面影響的社會網絡關係，則將受此些限制因素影響而降低獲聘教職之機會。

故，本研究提出「就業金字塔理論」，協助分析就業樣態，結合研究實證研擬就業策略：強化個人專業學術、行政、外語能力，以及新科博士個人的學科社群與社會網絡人脈，並以職涯發展的長期觀經營自己，以開創就業機會。

據此，本研究提出以下建議：一、政府端宜保持教育部與勞動部等跨部會合作的畢業生巨量分析，維繫長期的統計資料庫，以證據為本規劃施政。二、大專校院本身一方面要能調整與新科博士間對於就業之認知落差，另方面也要優化所提供的博士教育，以定做人才的概念培育博士為用。三、新科博士自身的就業策略：(一)應用職涯發展能力、(二)掌握社會網絡人脈資源、(三)爭取經濟性資源以厚實待業資本、(四)調整人力市場上聘僱雙方的認知差距。

This paper is intended as an investigation of the doctorate holders in the education field. Four purposes are involved in this paper: (1) To explore the equilibrium where both supply and demand curves met in the higher education labour market in Taiwan. (2) To find out the boosts of assisting the new doctorate holders to obtain the positions of professors in Taiwan. (3) To clarify the problems the new doctorate holders faced while finding the positions of prfessors in Taiwan. (4) To draw the employment plan for the new doctorate holders to implement while applying to the teaching positions in the universities in Taiwan.

For the four purposes to be achieved, this study analysed the statistics from the NPHRST database. Next, the resercher used the unstructured interview to design the later semi-structured interview from two pilot study respondents, two new doctorate holders. Later, the researcher implemented the semi-structured interview to collect further information from 24 new doctorate holders and 3 recruiting professors. These interview information is examined by NVivo and triangulation.

According to the survey, the demand curve is decreasing however the supply curve is increasing in the higher education labour market in Taiwan. Based on the literature review and the pilot study, an analysis structure can be identified by three items including: (1) the personal employability, (2) the resource of employment and (3) the opportunity. The three items implied the boosts of assisting the new doctorate holders to find the professor positions. Therefore, the new doctorate holders need to strengthen their professional abilities in addition to the skill of career-planning and foreign language. Most importantly, the social network is the boost to help the new doctorate holders to connect to the possision opprotunities.

On the contrary, the social network which ruins the relationship between the new doctorate holders and members from the academic clubs decreases the opportunities of being the professors. Besides, without personnel involving in the recruiting process and correct understanding between the new doctorate holders and the recruit members, this leads to an unsuccessful employment result.

This study proposed the “Theory of Employment Pyramid” to explain the three main characters of employment market: (1) the personal employability, (2) the resource of employment and (3) the opportunity. Furthermore, the basement of the pyramid is the new doctorate holders’ curriculum vitae which define the beginning status for them through the employment process.

Finally, this study suggests the new doctorate holders to earn monetary resource and social network to help themselves to obtain the teaching positions. Moreover, the new doctorate holders need to develop their own career ladder and adjust their imagination of the academic work to suit employers’ need. As to the employers themselves, the higher education units, they had better adjust their imagination to the new dotcorate holders and design the new doctorate curriculum to help their students to meet the market need. At last, the government sectors including the educational, the labour department and the relative ones, should cooperate with each other to set up and maintain the database of doctorate human resource.

一、中文部分

大學法（2015）。
车文辉（2007）。市场社会学。取自http://0-www.apabi.com.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/cec/pub.mvc?pid=book.detail&metaid=m.20070927-m008-w011-089&lib=cec&libname=&di=&cult=TW&username=%E4%BE%86%E8%87%AA%20140.122.127.100%20%E7%9A%84%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B6&ug=%E5%9C%8B%E7%AB%8B%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E5%B8%AB%E8%8C%83%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8
中央研究院（2013a）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫。擷取自http://www.teps.sinica.edu.tw/main.htm
中央研究院（2013b）。臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫。後續調查：教育和勞力市場的連結。擷取自http://tepsb.nccu.edu.tw/?page_id=2
公立學校教師暨助教職務等級表（1997）。
王如哲（2002）。談教育領域的知識管理。教育政策論壇，5（1），21-39。
王如哲（2008）。評鑑大學績效的新指標──就業力。評鑑雙月刊，15，20-23。
王如哲（2013）。新加坡人才培育及其對我國的啟示。臺灣教育，680，17-25。
卯靜儒、方永泉、游美惠、王麗雲、林文源（2015）。教育學門研究人才概況、議題趨勢及學術研習營課程介紹。教育研究集刊，61（4），105-130。
行政院主計總處（2017）。政府統計。擷取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
刘泽云（2008）。教育经济学。上海市：华东师范大学。
何希慧（2016）。從外部觀點探討學生就業力發展因素之研究：市場導向與國際化程度之影響。教育政策論壇，19（4），1-35。
吳芝儀、楊育儀、黃財尉、朱樹燊（2016）。取徑志願服務邁向青年，提升核心就業力之路：以臺灣為例。教育學報，43（2），27-50。
吳清山（2016a）。未來教育發展動向之探究。教育研究月刊，270，13-27。
吳清山（2016b）。當前教育專業倫理的思索：挑戰與對策。教育研究月刊，272，4-17。
周文欽（2004）。研究方法：實徵性研究取向。臺北市：心理。
林文達（1984）。教育經濟學。臺北市：三民。
林怡君（2016）。我國教育經濟學學科發展史研究。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（11），145-159。
林曉雲（2012）。博士流浪教師，月薪估僅22K。擷取自http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%8D%9A%E5%A3%AB%E6%B5%81%E6%B5%AA%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB-%E6%9C%88%E8%96%AA%E4%BC%B0%E5%83%8522k-203019401.html
孫志麟（1996）。高等教育人力之供需問題。教育研究月刊，52，44-52。
徐南號（1976）。教育經濟學的展望。師友月刊，114，4-8。
秦夢群、莊清寶（2010）。大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊，94，85-112。
高希均（1976）。教育經濟學導論。幼獅月刊，43（5），5-14。
國立臺灣師範大學（2015）。國內博士人才培育專案：人文、藝術及教育學門。擷取自http://www.cere.ntnu.edu.tw/files/upload_files/cere/files/proj_final_report/2008-present/%E3%80%8C%E5%9C%8B%E5%85%A7%E5%8D%9A%E5%A3%AB%E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E5%9F%B9%E7%81%B6%E5%B0%88%E6%A1%88%E2%80%94%E4%BA%BA%E6%96%87%E3%80%81%E8%97%9D%E8%A1%93%E5%8F%8A%E6%95%99%E7%81%B6%E5%AD%B8%E9%96%80%E3%80%8D_%E8%87%BA%E5%B8%AB%E5%A4%A7%E6%9B%B8%E9%9D%A2%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8AFINAL.pdf
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2015）。國家科技人力資源庫【原始數據】。取自國家科技人力資源庫管理者。
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2017a）。科技人才與研究成果服務平臺。擷取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/index.htm
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2017b）。科技政策研究與資訊中心電子書城。擷取自https://payment.narlabs.org.tw/stpibooks/index
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2017c）。2016年NPHRST博士流動意向調查分析報告。擷取自https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/search/gensciitem/2052
國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心（2018）。男女博士「齊步走」？以2016年NPHRST博士流動意向調查資料為分析樣本。擷取自https://hrst.stpi.narl.org.tw/report/141/%E7%94%B7%E5%A5%B3%E5%8D%9A%E5%A3%AB%E3%80%8C%E9%BD%8A%E6%AD%A5%E8%B5%B0%E3%80%8D%EF%BC%9F.htm
張珍瑋（2013）。我國高等教育人才供需結構之政策分析：以教育類別博士人力就業規劃為個案研究。國家教育研究院院內研究計畫結案報告（NAER-101-24-C-2-04-00-1-20）。新北市：國家教育研究院教育制度及政策研究中心。
張源泉（2012）。德國大學之人事與薪資改革動向。教育政策論壇，15（1），177-204。
教育人員任用條例（2014）。
教育研究與評鑑中心（2013）。臺灣高等教育整合資料庫。擷取自http://www.cere.ntnu.edu.tw/page/hedu_brief
教育部（2010）。大學校院校務資料庫。擷取自https://hedb.moe.edu.tw/pages/default.aspx
教育部（2013）。全國技專校院校務基本資料庫。擷取自https://www.tvedb.yuntech.edu.tw/
教育部（2015）。大專校院校務資訊公開平臺。擷取自https://udb.moe.edu.tw/Home/Index
教育部（2017a）。高等教育校務資訊整合平臺。擷取自https://heip.moe.edu.tw/
教育部（2017b）。中華民國學科標準分類（第五次修正）。擷取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=283412AE33AC4D71
教育部統計處（2015a）。103學年度各級教育統計概況分析。擷取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/Common/HitCount.ashx?p=41EF76E649FDF3EC21079C6F8C4EB9E165EC33B6B9D5ED38CD4FFDF86B4EBCD2704236D85E28FD97F5B0C3C92AA09FB756808EDB8D66295BE8C733A16B297E5A&type=FB01D469347C76A7&s=53FD2F3DC44C84A3
教育部統計處（2015b）。教育統計簡訊：我國博士生概況分析。擷取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/brief/%e6%88%91%e5%9c%8b%e5%8d%9a%e5%a3%ab%e7%94%9f%e6%a6%82%e6%b3%81%e5%88%86%e6%9e%90.pdf
教育部統計處（2016）。99-101學年度大專校院畢業生就業薪資巨量分析。擷取自http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/99-101學年度大專校院畢業生就業薪資巨量分析（完整報告）.pdf
教育部統計處（2017）。教育統計查詢網。擷取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/
教育部統計處（2018）。各級學校基本資料。擷取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/eD4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=2D0E391A40CFC3C4
專科以上學校教師資格審定辦法（2016）。
許筱君、詹郁萱（2014）。學術資本主義下我國頂尖大學計畫之省思。教育政策論壇，17（7），95-116。
陳玉娟（2016）。臺灣報紙社論之高等教育議題報導分析：以《聯合報》與《自由時報》為例。中正教育研究，15（2），169-200。
陳伯璋（2005）。學術資本主義下臺灣教育學門學術評鑑制度的省思。載於陳伯璋與蓋浙生（主編），新世紀高等教育政策與行政（頁559-588）。臺北市：高等教育。
陳佩英、卯靜儒、鄭毓瓊（2014）。履冰行遠：網絡學習社群的課程協作經驗探究。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊，31（5），61-72。
陳佩英、鄭美瑜、黃琪、鄭毓瓊、林雅婷（2016）。教育學想像的促能：跨校網絡學習社群與校本學習社群的共享願景實踐。教育研究月刊，265，91-109。
陳俊宏（2018，5月）。供需失調，王如哲：教師恐將出現斷層。教育人雜誌。擷取自http://www.educatorfocus.com.tw/zh-tw/news_detail/%E4%BE%9B%E9%9C%80%E5%A4%B1%E8%AA%BF%E3%80%80%E7%8E%8B%E5%A6%82%E5%93%B2%EF%BC%9A%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E6%81%90%E5%B0%87%E5%87%BA%E7%8F%BE%E6%96%B7%E5%B1%A4
陳振遠、李國維、許文瑞（2015）。大專校院辦理衍生企業之機會與挑戰。載於楊國賜、胡茹萍（主編），大學衍生企業（頁161-187）。臺北市：高等教育。
陳筠昕（2015）。臺灣高教人力資源供需模型之建構與模擬：以博士學程為例（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
鈕文英（2015）。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
黃虹穎（2015）。博士學歷者之教育特性對薪資及工作滿意度的影響（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
黃惠鈴（2015）。理想與現實的折轉：留學歸國非專職音樂博士生涯發展歷程之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所，高雄市。
詹盛如、楊濟華（2014）。學歷通膨？韓國的發展經驗。臺灣教育評論月刊，3（12），52-55。
圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（2012）。社會網絡理論。擷取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678857
劉世閔（主編）（2017）。NVivo 11與網路質性研究方法論。臺北市：五南。
蕭佳純、涂志賢（2012）。大學生就業力發展之縱貫性分析。教育研究集刊，58（1），1-37。
戴伯芬（編）（2015）。高教崩壞：市場化、官僚化、與少子女化的危機。新北市：群學。
謝淯翔（2014）。臺灣高等教育博士生就業問題之探討（碩士論文）。取自臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
關秉寅（2014）。TEPS-B Panel-1/2 CP 2013年電訪調查執行報告。中華民國科技部補助計畫報告（NSC 102-2420-H-004-026-SS4）。臺北市：國立政治大學社會學系。
關秉寅（2017）。從學校到勞力市場：簡介「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」及其後續追蹤調查。中國統計學報，55（1），25-41。
嚴文廷、鄭國樑（2011，2月16日）。全臺反霸凌，不能像放煙火。聯合晚報，A5。

二、英文部分
Auriol, L. (2007). Labour market characteristics and international mobility of doctorate holders: Results for seven countries. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/310254328811
Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmh8phxvvf5-en
Auriol, L., Misu, M., & Freeman, R. A. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders: Analysis of labour market and mobility indicators. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxgs289w-en
Auriol, L., Schaaper, M., & Felix, B. (2012). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft guidelines, model questionnaire and indicators – Third edition. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4dnq2h4n5c-en
Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2015). Antecedents and outcomes: Theories of fit and the study of doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 296-310.
Bound, D., & Tennant, M. (2006). Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(3), 293-306.
Brennan, M. (1998). Struggles over the definition of the education doctorate in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 25(1), 71-89.
Bridges, D. (2006). The Disciplines and Discipline of Education Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 259-272.
Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31-44.
Bullard, D. B. (2007). Academic capitalism in the social sciences: Faculty responses to the entrepreneurial university (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
Burt, R. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3), 543-591.
Chan, S.-J., & Lin, J.-W. (2016). Aiming for employment: A holistic analysis from admission to labour market. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(3), 282-296.
Chan, S.-J., & Lin, L.-W. (2015). Massification of higher education in Taiwan: Shifting pressure from admission to employment. Higher Education Policy, 28, 17-33.
Chang, C.-W., & Shaw, W.-C. (2016). Expanding higher education in Taiwan: The case of doctoral education. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 1-14.
Chen, P.-Y., & Hsieh, H.-C. (2018). Women’s academic leadership under competing higher education policies in Taiwan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2018.1454826
Chowdhury, T. A., & Miah, M. K. (2016). Employability skills for entry-level human resources management positions: Perceptions of students and employers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 25(2), 55-68.
Cuthbert, D., & Molla, T. (2015). PhD crisis discourse: A critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’. Higher Education, 69(1), 33-53.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2011). The global talent index report: The outlook to 2015. Retrieved from http://www.economistinsights.com/sites/default/files/downloads/GTI%20FINAL%20REPORT%205.4.11.pdf
Edwards, D. (2010). The future of the research workforce: Estimating demand for PhDs in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 199-210.
Furlong, J. (2013). Education, a discipline? In J. Furlong (ed.), Education—An anatomy of the discipline: Rescuing the university project? (pp. 3-13). London, UK: Routledge.
Gert, B. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the Field. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(2), 175-192.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Harris, K. (1982). Teachers and classes. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hennemann, S., & Liefner, I. (2010). Employability of German geography graduates: The mismatch between knowledge acquired and competences required. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(2), 215-230.
Hsung, Y.-J., Lin, N., & Breiger, R. L. (Eds.). (2012). Contexts of social capital: Social networks in markets, communities and families. New York, NY: Routledge.
Husserl, E. (1965). Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy: Philosophy as a rigorous science, and Philosophy and the crisis of European man (Q. Lauer, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1954)
Kemp, S. (2004). Professional doctorates and doctoral education. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 7(4), 401-410.
Lee, A., Brennan, M., & Green, B. (2009). Re-imaging doctoral education: Professional doctorates and beyond. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 275-287.
Lee, L., & Chen, P. (2014). Empowering indigenous youth: perspectives from a national service learning program in Taiwan. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(3), 1–19.
Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: The Princeton University Press.
Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of economics (7th ed.). Manson, OH: South-Western College Pub.
Marginson, S. (2014). Higher education as a public good in a marketized East Asian environment. In A. Yonezawa, Y. Kitamura, A. Meerman, & K. Kuroda (Eds.), Emerging international dimensions in East Asian higher education (pp. 15-33). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 3-17.
McQuaid, R. W., & Lindsay, C. (2005). The concept of employability. Urban Studies, 42(2), 197-219.
Miettinen, R. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Toward an enabling welfare state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Monk, D. H., Dooris, M. J., & Erickson, R. A. (2009). In Search of a new equilibrium: Economic aspects of higher education’s changing faculty composition. Education Finance and Policy, 4(3), 300-318.
Morley, D. A. (Eds.). (2018). Enhancing employability in higher education through work based learning. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
National Science Foundation. (2016). Survey of earned doctorates. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/#sd&qs&tabs-3&rSR&rWP
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). OECD/UNESCO Institute for statistics/Eurostat careers of doctorate holders (CDH) project. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sti/cdh
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2013. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en
Pan, Y.-J., & Lee, L.-S. (2011). Academic performance and perceived employability of graduate students in business and management: An analysis of nationwide graduate destination survey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 91-103.
Pearson, M. (2005). Framing research on doctoral education in Australia in a global context. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 119-134.
Pitt, R., & Mewburn, I. (2016). Academic superheroes? A critical analysis of academic job descriptions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(1), 88-101.
Roobol, C., & Oonk, V. (2011). Global talent mobility survey 2011: What attracts the world's workforce? Retrieved from http://www.the-network.com/recruitment/recruitment-expertise/global-talent-mobility-survey/upload/GTMS_Wave3.pdf
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). Worldwide expansion of higher education. American Sociological Review, 70, 898-920.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2011). Markets in higher education: Trends in academic capitalism. In P. G. Altabch, P. J. Gumport & R. O. Berdahl (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century (pp. 433-463). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Solimano, A. (2002). Globalizing talent and human capital: Implications for developing countries. Retrieved from: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/5376/S028567_en.pdf?sequence=1
Solimano, A. (2008). Causes and consequences of talent mobility. In A. Solimano (Ed.), The International mobility of talent: Types, causes, and development impact. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532605.003.0001
Suleman, F. (2016). Employability skills of higher education graduates: Little consensus on a much-discussed subject. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 169-174.
Wang, R.-J. (2003). From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: The problems faced. Higher Education, 46(3), 261-287.
Wellington, J., & Sikes, P. (2006). ‘A doctorate in a tight compartment’: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 723-734.
White, H. C. (2004). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
World Economic Forum. (2015). The Global competitiveness report: 2015-2016. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global risks report 2016 (11th Edition). Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GRR/WEF_GRR16.pdf