國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文全文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	柯瑪蒂 Marquelda Ruiz Cortez
論文名稱：	組織多樣化、價值、極大值及組織能力:以巴拿馬蔗糖工業為例 Corporate Diversification, Value, Maximization and Organizational Capabilities: Sugar Cane Industry in Panama
指導教授：	林世華 Lin, Sieh-Hwa
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	國際人力資源發展研究所 Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年：	2009
畢業學年度：	97
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	113
中文關鍵詞：	多樣化、極大值、價值、組織能力
英文關鍵詞：	Diversification, Maximization, Values, Organizational Capabilities
論文種類：	學術論文
相關次數：	點閱：196 下載：5
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

This study applies Matsusaka’s Model which is a dynamic model to the Panama sugar industry. In this model diversification can be a value-maximizing strategy even if specialization is generally efficient. The central idea is that firms are composed of organizational capabilities that can be profitable in multiple businesses and that diversification is a search process by which firms seek businesses that are good matches for their capabilities.
Two major sugar cane industries in Panama with their diversified pattern were analyzed to provide concrete and reliable information about their achievements. By the application of the equations content in the model; this study attempt to determinate whether or not this model could explain Sugar Cane industry in Panama. This model would be oriented to determinate diversification pattern on first; following that it would provide corporate and organizational capabilities by mixing internal and external input.
Twenty years of production had been provided for those organizations. Diversification patter differs by firm. Two kind of diversification pattern had been showed up. Concentric diversification, where the new business produces products that are technically similar to the company's current product but that appeal to a new consumer group and Conglomerate diversification, where the new business produces products that are totally unrelated to the company's current product and that appeal to an entirely new consumer group.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT    I
TABLE OF CONTENTS    II
LIST OF FIGURES    IV
LIST OF TABLES    V

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION    1
Sugar Industry Diversification’s Bases    1
Current Trends for Panama Sugar Market    4
The Model    9
Time Serial of Top and Middle Managers    9
Statement of the Problem    10
Purposes of the Study    10
Expected Alternatives    12
Significance of the Study    13
Delimitations and Limitation of the Study    13
Definitions of Terms    15

CHAPTER II.  LITERATURE REVIEW    19
Organizational Capabilities    19
Diversification Managerial Explanation    22
Dark Side of Corporate Diversification    28
Product Diversification and Profitability    31
Corporate Value    33
Overview of Panama Agriculture, GDP and Sugar Cane Crop Product    36
Panama Economic Activities    36
Best Practice    37

CHAPTER III.  RESEACH METHODOLOGY    42
Research Framework    42
Research Procedure    45
Data Analysis    55

CHAPTER  IV.  FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS    57
Chapter Overview    57
Empirical Result    57
Company example B overall’s production reflects fluctuations by twenty years                           of production.    66
Revenue and indirect values    78

CHAPTER  V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS    82
Conclusions    82
Discussions    83
Recommendations    85

REFERENCES    87

APPENDICES    90
APPENDIX A:  Organizational capability collection data format – Marketing    91
APPENDIX B:  Organizational capability collection data format – Management    92
APPENDIX C:  Organizational capability collection data format – Production distribution    93
APPENDIX D:  Company A - External input matrix –G1 to G5 94
APPENDIX E:  Company B - External input matrix –G1 to G6 98
APPENDIX F:  Companies productions values    103
APPENDIX G:  Companies diversificied values    104
APPENDIX H:  Time distribution values    106

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure1.1. Availability of product diversification of sugar cane industry    3
Figure1.2.  Company A - Organizational Structure    6
Figure1.3. Company B - Organizational structure    8
Figure1.4.  Matsusaka’s diversification model framework    11
Figure 3.1. Methodology flow chart    46
Figure 4.1. Company A - Production and price behavior    61
Figure 4.2. Company A - Diversified product (g1, g2,) trends by the last twenty years    64
Figure 4.3. Company A - Diversified product (g4, g5,) trends by the last twenty years    65
Figure 4.4. Company B - Production and price behavior    66
Figure 4.5. Diversified product (g1, g2) trends by the last twenty years    69
Figure 4.6. Diversified product (g3, g4) trends by the last twenty years    70
Figure 4.7. Diversified product (g5, g6) trends by the last twenty years    71
Figure 4.8. Company A - Diversification values    72
Figure 4.9. Company A - Diversification values (g1, g2)    73
Figure 4.10. Company A - Diversification values(g4, g5)74
Figure 4.11. Company B - Diversification values    75
Figure 4.12.Company B - Diversification values (g1, g2)    76
Figure 4.13. Company A - Diversification values (g2, g3)77
Figure 4.14. Company A - Diversification values (g5, g6)77
Figure 4.15. Diversification values  - company A and company B 78
Figure 4.16. Single and multiple business value    79
Figure 4.17. Complemented values of companies examples    81
Figure 5.1. Organizational values results    84

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1  Diversification economic results for different sugar product    13
Table 2.1. Crop production, harvest and yield in Panama    37
Table 3.1.  Time distribution format – Marketing    48
Table 3.2.  Time distribution format - Management    49
Table 3.3.  Time distribution format – Operation and distribution    49
Table 3.4.  Top and middle managers example format (Organizational capabilities                         examples 1)    50
Table 3.5.  Top and middle manager target for the study (Organizational capabilities example 2)    52
Table 3.6.  Organizational capabilities matrix (Time ditribution matrix)    53
Table 3.7.  External input matrix    54
Table 4.1.  Company A - Time distribution of top and middle managers    58
Table 4.2.  Company B - Time distribution of top and middle managers    60
Table 4.3.  Company A - Production value by twenty year production    63
Table 4.4.  Company B - Production behavior by twenty years of production    67
Table 4.5.  Company A - General’s values    72
Table 4.6.  Company B - General’s values    75
Table 4.7.  Company A and B - Complemented values    80
                                

REFERENCES

Amit, R., & Livnat, J. (1988). "A Concept of Conglomerate Diversification." Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 28, 593–604.
Barghouti, S., Kane, S., Sorby, K., & Ali, M. (2003). Agricultural Diversification for the Poor, Guidelines for Practitioners. Agriculture and Rural Development. Discussion Paper 1, World Bank.
Buzzanell, P. J. (2004). Brazil’s Domination of the World Sugar Market. Agribusiness and Resource Management, Faculty Working Paper Series.
Conforti, P. & Rapsomanikis, G. (2005). The impact of the European Union sugar policy reform on developing and least developed countries. FAO CORPORATE DOCUMENT REPOSITORY, originated by: Economic and Social Department.
Dan, M., Lamont, B. T., & Geiger. S. W. (2004). "Diversification Strategy and Top Management Team Fit." Journal of Managerial. p. 361.
Encyclopedia, A Forbed Media Company. Diversification . URL - Retrieved 2007, from http://www.investopedia.com/term/d/diversification .asp
Elbehri, A. (2003). USDA/ERS, Washington DC, USA, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, Indiana, USA, Merlinda Ingco, The World Bank, Washington DC, USA, K.R. Person Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Partial liberation of the World Sugar Market: General Equilibrium of Tariff-Rate Quota Regimens.
God, S. C. (2002). Learning Capabilities, Organization Factors and Firm Performance. Third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Athens Greece, April 5-6.
Homburg, C., Krohmer, H., & Workman, J. (1999)."Strategic Consensus and Performance: The Role of Strategy Type and Market-Related Dynamism." Strategic Management Journal. 20, 339–358.
Instituto de Mercadeo Agropecuario - Republica de Panama. Indicadores Economicos. URL - Retrieved 2007, from www.imagob.pa/index.php
Jovanovic, B. (1993). The Diversification of Production. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 1. ABI/INFORM Global. New York University.
Kanivichaporn, P. (2003). Is the Planned Export Potential Sustainable in Thailand? FAO CORPORATE DOCUMENT REPOSITORY. Originated by: Economic and Social Department.
Koller, T. (1994). What is value-based management? Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of companies. 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, R. V., Fabish, L., & McGaw, N. (2004.). The value of Corporate Values. A Booz Allen Hamilton / Aspen Institute survey of corporate behavior finds that leading companies are crafting a purpose-driven identity.
Lyon, D.W., Ferrier, W.J. (2002). "Enhancing Performance With Product-Market Innovation: The Influence of the Top Management Team." Journal of Managerial. Vol. 14, pp. 452–469.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2001). Corporate Diversification, Value Maximization and Organizational Capabilities. Journal of Business. 74 (3). University of Chicago.
Montgomery, C. A. (1994). Corporate Diversification. The Journal of Economic Perspective 8(3) 163-178. . Published by American Economic.
Moreira, J. R. (2006). Bio energy and Agriculture Promises and Challenges – Brazil’s experience with Bio energy – www. Teriin.or - International Food Policy Research Institute.
Nogueira, L. H., Caballero, J. M. G., Lora, E. S., Arrieta, F. P., & Carrasco, R. C. (2000). Alternative’s Study on Sugar Cane as nutritional and energetic resources. DS dimensions.
Nogueira, L. A. H., Caballero, J. M. G., Lora, E. S., Arrieta, Carrasco, F. P., & Ricardo, C. E. (2000). Alternative de cana de azucar como recurso alimenticio y energetic-un modelo integrado. Nucleo de Estudios Sistematicos Termicos-NEST, Departamento de Ingenieria Mecanica – DEM. Escuela Federal de Ingenieria de ITajuba-EFEI Itajuba-MG-Brasil.
Particular, J. (2005). Nature of the World Sugar market. Simon Harris, Former Director for Corporate Affairs, British Sugar.
Paturau, M. (2005). Alternative uses of Sugarcane and its Byproducts in Agro Industry. FAO CORPORATE DOCUMENT REPOSITORY. Originated by: Agriculture and Consumer Protection.
Reuters, T. (2008). UPDATE 1-Brazil eyes Panama ethanol, canal alliance-Torrijos. URL - Retrieved Date, from http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKN2441869420070524?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel-Thomson
Stan, L. (2004). "Diversification Strategy Raises Doubts." National Real Estate Investor.
Teece, D. J., (1982). Toward an Economic Theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol. 3, 39-56.
The World Bank (1986). Agro-Industry Profiles Ethanol. Sectoral Library International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. FAU 6.
The World Bank (1986). Agro-Industry Profiles Sugar. Sectoral Library International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. FAU 5.
U.S. Library of Congress, Fact about Panama. URL - Retrieved 2006, from http://countrystudies.us/panama/41.htm
World Bank Institute (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility Program for the Sugar and Ethanol Industry in Sao Pualo, Brazil. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington DC, Activity Report.
Zollo, M. (2000). Corporative Diversification, INSEAD Ph.D. Program.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文