透過藝術作品的推廣，使得線上觀賞雕塑作品也逐漸增加，為方便在網站上觀賞每件雕塑作品，就需經由不同的瀏覽操作與項目帶來不同的觀賞效果，讓雕塑作品呈現整體及不同面向觀賞，最後引發作品評價。儘管目前瀏覽仍以自由選擇觀賞方式，及縮放大小為主，但還是無法觀賞雕塑作品的不同面向。因此，本研究以線上雕塑展覽藝術作品，探討瀏覽操作自由度與項目對其評價的影響。
本研究以準實驗法，使用二因子實驗設計2（瀏覽操作自由度：限制操作、自由選擇）x 2（瀏覽操作項目：角度項目、大小項目）四種組合進行實驗。而依變數為線上雕塑展覽藝術作品評價。
研究結果顯示：不同瀏覽操作自由度對評價、不同瀏覽操作項目對評價，以及瀏覽操作自由度與項目的組合對評價，均無顯著影響。實驗過程發現，也許觀賞雕塑作品的經驗較少、及對線上操作方式有點不太瞭解等因素，使得線上雕塑展覽藝術作品評價無影響。因此，建議線上雕塑展覽藝術作品應以符合線上瀏覽的操作方式、又或者以改善操作項目的設計為更好的觀賞作品方式，其他延伸相關議題進而繼續探究。

Through the promotion of artwork, makes the artwork of online to watch sculpture gradually increased. For the convenience of view every piece of sculpture work on the website, need different browse operation and items to produce not the same of view effects. Make the sculpture work to present whole and the different face to watch it. Finally, initiate artwork evaluation. Although at present still to use the free choice of view mode, zoom in and zoom out the main items. However, still unable to watch the different face of sculpture work. Thus, this study to sculpture exhibition artwork on the online, probe to browse operation freedom and items to affect the evaluation of the sculpture exhibition artwork.
This study to use a quasi-experiment, and to use a two-factor experiment design. Two (browse operation freedom: limit operation and free choice) multiply by two (browse operation items: angle item and zoom in and zoom out items), four combinations to conduct the experiments. The dependent variable, online sculpture exhibition of artwork evaluation.
The study results show that different browse operation freedom the evaluation. And different browse operation items the evaluation. And browse operation freedom and items combinations the evaluation. Have no significant effect. The experimental process found that may be less experience to watch sculpture work that online operation mode of a little less not understand and other factors. Make the online sculpture exhibition artworks evaluation without effect. Thus, to suggest online sculpture exhibition artworks should be in line with the online browse mode of operation. Or to improve the design of the browse operation items for the better ornamental mode. Other extension related issues to continue to explore.

一、中文部分
吳明隆（2014）。論文寫作與量化研究4版。臺北市：五南圖書。
陳正昌（2017）。SPSS與統計分析2版。臺北市：五南圖書。
蕭惠君（2013）。美術館展示空間之牆面色彩設計研究。設計學報，18（4），87-108頁。
吳水丕、林岳勳（2010）。放大鏡倍率、鏡面傾斜角度與作業面高度對於女性人員偵檢績效、視覺與肌肉疲勞之效應。技術學刊，25（4），285-292頁。

二、西文部分
Abbey, H. N. (2012). Does a decade make a difference? comparing the web presence of North American art museum libraries and archives in 1999 and 2011. Art Libraries Journal, 37(3), 34-40.
Allison, B. N., & Rehm, M. L. (2016). Accommodating students' sensory learning modalities in online formats. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 108(2), 48-53. doi: 10.14307/JFCS108.2.48
Altaboli, A., & Lin, Y. (2011). Investigating effects of screen layout elements on interface and screen design aesthetics. Advances in Human - Computer Interaction, 1, 1-10. doi: 10.1155/2011/659758
Andrelchik, H. (2015). Reconsidering literacy in the art classroom. Art Education, 68(1), 6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.009
Anonymous. (2013). Web designer. Tech Directions, 72(6), 24-25.
Anthes, G. (2012). Zoom in, zoom out. Communications of the ACM, 55(12), 18-19. doi: 10.1145/2380656.2380663
Blyth, T. (2016). Exhibiting information: developing the information age gallery at the science museum. Information & Culture, 51(1), 1-28. doi: 10.7560/IC51101
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014). Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time. PLoS One, 9(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099019
Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Interaction in art and technology. Crossings: Electronic Journal of Art & Technology, 2(1).
Carneiro, F., Quintas, M. R., Abreu, P., & Restivo, M. T. (2016). Design and test of a 1 DOF haptic device for online experimentation. International Journal of Online Engineering, 12(4), 55-57. doi:10.3991/ijoe.v12i04.5152
Castaño, J., Duart, J. M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2015). Determinants of internet use for interactive learning: an exploratory study. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(1), 25-34.
CécileScailliérez (2018, July 22). Mona Lisa. Retrieved from Musée du Louvre Web site: http: //www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/mona-lisa-portrait-lisa-gherardini-wife-francesco-del-giocondo
Çildir, Z. (2015). Discussion on the concept of visual culture at museum within postmodern art education. Journal of Education and Future, (8), 67-83.
Ciurea, C., & Filip, F. G. (2016). New researches on the role of virtual exhibitions in digitization, preservation and valorization of cultural heritage. Informatica Economica, 20(4), 26-33. doi: 10.12948/issn14531305/20.4.2016.03
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Burke, C., Hsu, A., & Swami, V. (2010). Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 196-204. doi: 10.1037/a0019211
Cucos, C. (2014). News arguments for aesthetic education and the educational dimensions of the art museum. Review of Artistic Education,(7/8), 228-233.
Duh, M. (2015). The function of museum pedagogy in the development of artistic appreciation / Muzejska pedagogika v funkciji razvijanja likovne apreciacije. Revija za Elementarno Izobrazevanje, 8(4), 87-101.
Duh, M. (2016). Art appreciation for developing communication skills among preschool children. CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(1), 71-94.
Duncum, P. (2014). Revisioning premodern fine art as popular visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 55(3), 203-213.
Esponda-Argüero, M., & Rojas, R. (2014). An adaptive interactive multimedia system for intelligent environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 54-58. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2014.V4.368
Friedman, N. (2011). An introduction to hyper seeing and hyper sculptures. Kybernetes, 40(7), 1015-1020. doi: 10.1108/03684921111160241
Gates, L. (2017). Assessment: Embracing subjective assessment practices: recommendations for art educators. Art Education, 70(1), 23-28.
Gül, S. N., & Akmehmet, K. T. (2015). Interactive spaces in art museums: a landscape of exhibition strategies/Interaktivni prostori v muzejih umetnosti: pokrajina razstavnih strategij. Solsko Polje, 26(5/6), 141-155.
Hamzah, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Virtual art education: is it possible? Distance Learning, 9(1), 29-35.
Hoeber, O. (2013). A longitudinal study of hotmap web search. Online Information Review, 37(2), 252-267. doi: 10.1108/OIR-09-2011-0153
Hume, M., & Mills, M. (2011). Building the sustainable imuseum: is the virtual museum leaving our museums virtually empty? International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(3), 275-289. doi: 10.1002/nvsm.425
Jin, X., & Kim, J. (2017). Artwork identification for 360-degree panoramic images using polyhedron-based rectilinear projection and keypoint shapes. Applied Sciences, 7(5), 528. doi: 10.3390/app7050528
Johnson, T. M. (2016). Let's get virtual: examination of best practices to provide public access to digital versions of three-dimensional objects. Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 35(2), 39-55.
Kalyuga, S. (2012). Interactive distance education: a cognitive load perspective. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(3), 182-208. doi: 10.1007/s12528-012-9060-4
Kaula, R. (2011). Modeling web page layout: a tutorial. Global Education Journal(3), 63-77.
Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2010). Divergent convergence part 1: cross-genre, multi-platform, transmedia experiences in school libraries. Teacher Librarian, 37(5), 76-81,88.
Lauring, J. O., Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Gondan, M., Ptito, M., & Kupers, R. (2016). Well, if they like it ...effects of social groups' ratings and price information on the appreciation of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & the Arts, 10(3), 344-359. doi: 10.1037/aca0000063
Lepkowska-White, E., & Imboden, K. (2013). Effective design for usability and interaction: the case of art museum websites. Journal of Internet Commerce, 12(3), 284-305. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2013.859040
Lister, M. (2014). Trends in the design of E-learning and online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(4), 671-680.
Liu, Y., Zhao, J., Apple, J., Frank, T., Saylor, M., & Siegel, T. (2010). An autonomous omnidirectional robot. Journal of Robotics, 2010.
Locher, P., Krupinski, E., & Schaefer, A. (2015). Art and authenticity: behavioral and eye-movement analyses. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 356-367. doi: 10.1037/aca0000026
Marek, K. (2011). Web analytics overview. Library Technology Reports, 47(5), 5-10.
Menzel, C., Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U., Langner, O., Wiese, H., & Redies, C. (2015). Fourier power spectrum characteristics of face photographs: attractiveness perception depends on low-level image properties. PLoS One, 10(4). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122801
Midtbø, T., & Nordvik, T. (2007). Effects of animations in zooming and panning operations on web maps: a web-based experiment. Cartographic Journal, 44(4), 292-303. doi: 10.1179/000870407X241845
Paasschen, J. v., Bacci, F., & Melcher, D. P. (2015). The influence of art expertise and training on emotion and preference ratings for representational and abstract artworks. PLoS One, 10(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134241
Peterson, M. O. (2014). The integration of text and image in media and its impact on reader interest. Visible Language, 48(1), 23-39.
Pulh, M., & Mencarelli, R. (2015). Web 2.0: is the museum-visitor relationship being redefined? International Journal of Arts Management, 18(1), 43-51.
Rocha, Á. (2012). Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Information Review, 36(3), 374-382. doi: 10.1108/14684521211241404
Roth-Katz, E. (2012). Access and availability: a study of use policies on art museum library websites. Art Documentation: Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 31(1), 123-140.
Rusu, M. (2017). 2. Empathy and communication through art. Review of Artistic Education, 14(1), 139-146.
Sachau, L. L., & Hutchinson, S. R. (2012). Trends in culturally relevant interface design features for Latino web site users. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 60(6), 1033-1050. doi: 10.1007/s11423-012-9270-5
Samah, A. A., Hussin, Z., & Putih, A. T. (2016). Connoisseurship evaluation in digital painting among art teachers in malaysian secondary school. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 14-26.
Samanian, K., Nedaeifar, H., & Karimi, M. s. (2016). A survey on the influence of titles on the visitor's interpretation and learning in art galleries: an Iranian context. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56(1), 29-51.
Sankey, M. D., Birch, D., & Gardiner, M. W. (2011). The impact of multiple representations of content using multimedia on learning outcomes across learning styles and modal preferences. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 7(3), 18-35.
Savazzi, F., Massaro, D., Dio, C. D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2014). Exploring responses to art in adolescence: a behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS One, 9(7), 1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102888
Schindler, I., Hosoya, G., Menninghaus, W., Beermann, U., Wagner, V., Eid, M., & Scherer, K. R. (2017). Measuring aesthetic emotions: a review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLoS One, 12(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178899
Silvia, P. J. (2014). Review of the museum effect. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 514-515. doi: 10.1037/a0037740
Smith, J. K. (2014). Art as mirror: creativity and communication in aesthetics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 110-118. doi: 10.1037/a0035691
Smiraglia, C. (2014). Artworks at work: the impacts of workplace art. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(5), 284-295.
Sova, R. B. (2015). Art appreciation as a learned competence: a museum-based qualitative study of adult art specialist and art non-specialist visitors. CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(4), 141-157.
Swami, V. (2013). Context matters: investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 285-295. doi: 10.1037/a0030965
Tavcar, A., Antonya, C., & Butila, E. V. (2016). Recommender system for virtual assistant supported museum tours. Informatica, 40(3), 279-284.
Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., & King, D. W. (2013). Social media and scholarly reading. Online Information Review, 37(2), 193-216. doi: 10.1108/OIR-04-2012-0062
Thyagaraju, G. S., & Kulkarni, U. P. (2012). Static context model and metrics for assessing the completeness and understandability of static context model. IUP Journal of Computer Sciences, 6(3), 35-69.
Tschacher, W., Greenwood, S., Kirchberg, V., Wintzerith, S., van den Berg, K., & Tröndle, M. (2012). Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception of artworks in a museum. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 96-103. doi: 10.1037/a0023845
Walker, F., Bucker, B., Anderson, N. C., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2017). Looking at paintings in the Vincent Van Gogh museum: eye movement patterns of children and adults. PLoS One, 12(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178912
White, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Riggs, M. (2014). How “outsider” do we like our art?: influence of artist background on perceptions of warmth, creativity, and likeability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 144-151. doi: 10.1037/a0036115
Wilks, J., Cutcher, A., & Wilks, S. (2012). Digital technology in the visual arts classroom: an [un]easy partnership. Studies in Art Education, 54(1), 54-65.
Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass media research: an introduction (10nd ed.). Wadsworth, Ohio: Cengage Learning.
Yang, G. M., Peck, M., Mozdzierz, J., & Waugh-Fleischmann, C. (2010). The journey of four art educators: investigating the educational potential of podcasts. Art Education, 63(4), 33-39.
Yang, G. M., Suchan, T., & Kundu, R. (2011). Teachart wiki: a collaborative, interactive, and dialogic platform for teaching and learning art. Art Education, 64(4), 48-53.
Zdravkova, K., Ivanović, M., & Putnik, Z. (2012). Experience of integrating web 2.0 technologies. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 60(2), 361-381. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9228-z
Zhu, J., Xie, Q., Yu, S.-i., & Wong, W. H. (2016). Exploiting link structure for web page genre identification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 30(3), 550-575. doi: 10.1007/s10618-015-0428-8