本研究旨在探討國小教師在學校結構與社會文化脈絡中形成的身分認同意義，研究目的為瞭解不同師資培育背景的國小教師身分認同樣貌，分析影響國小教師身分認同的結構限制，並發掘透過教師身分認同的意義覺察而能開展的實踐潛能。研究方法採敘事取徑，以訪談法蒐集八位國小教師的經驗資料，依據師資培育制度的變革，分為師資培育一元化時期與多元化時期來組織教師經驗敘事的再現，其中一元化時期包括師專、師院與學士後師資班背景的教師，多元化時期主要是師院和一般大學修畢教育學程的教師。
師資培育一元化的時代，早期師專的公費制度提供穩定的經濟補助，吸引優秀的貧寒學生選擇就讀，保守封閉的師範教育體系依規格化的標準，意圖將師範生訓練為素質整齊的忠誠服從者，而教師關愛學生的傳統形象也內化到師專生的自我認同。改制師院之後，隨著政治民主化與社會開放多元，教師開始反思批判學校薪資分配和學科分化模糊等問題，學士後師資班出身的教師則明顯體會到學校整體文化與個人信念之間的拉鋸與衝突。師資培育多元化的時代，教師面臨頻繁的改革要求，學生特殊需求與家長的不信任帶來莫大壓力，教師承擔的角色和責任比過去更為多重複雜。而在時代變遷中仍存續不變的教師身分認同樣貌，則是教師一致認同自身的道德使命，以及保持省思與不斷追求成長的自我期許。
教師身分認同在結構條件的影響下，受到權力規訓與專業主義的控制，過去被操控其執行任務的角色功能，今日被賦予專業人員的角色期望，卻未真正擁有相對的專業地位，績效導向的政策與改革運作模式和教師身分認同之間的不一致，限制了教師能動性的開展。教師尋求突破結構限制的契機，在於身分認同建構歷程中的意識覺醒與批判反思，並透過日常生活的教學實踐和師生關係達成實際的行動與影響力。

This study aimed to explore primary school teachers’ professional identities and related contributive structural and social-cultural factors in Taiwan education context. The purposes of this study were to gain a better understanding of the formation of primary school teachers’ identities through their teacher education backgrounds; to analyze how structural constraints affected teachers’ identities; and to discover the potential of teachers while they become aware of the meaning of professional identities. A narrative research approach was applied in this study based on the interviews with eight primary school teachers. To reflect the change of teacher education policy indeed has impact on teachers’ professional identities, the discussions of the findings are divided into two parts: teachers received their training before the 1995 Teacher Education Act when teacher education was offered by 9 teacher colleges only; and teachers had their training since the new Teacher Education Act was implemented that teacher education programs has opened up to all comprehensive universities.
Before the 1995 Teacher Education Act was promulgated, government financial aid supported many elite students with a financial need to enroll in junior teachers colleges. However, in line with the standardized criteria, these students were trained to become loyal followers with coherent quality under the conservative and closed teacher education system. Moreover, the traditional image of caring-teachers internalized junior teachers college students with their self-identity accordingly. Along with the teacher education reformed, the changes in political democracy and the diversity development in our society, teachers had started to critically reflect on issues of school’s salary allocation model and the ambiguity of academic subjects’ differentiation. In particular, teachers with an education post-baccalaureate background had evidently encountered conflicts and struggles between the school’s overall culture and their personal beliefs. After the 1995 Teacher Education Act been put into practice, teachers experienced overwhelming pressure because of frequent education reforms, special needs requested from students and questioning by parents. The roles and the responsibilities of teachers had become much more complicated than the past. Fascinatingly, though time changed and policies varied, many teachers had still retained their self-identity unaffected by maintaining and demonstrating their consistent moral mission, constant self-reflection, and self-expectation in the pursuit of professional development and growth as a teacher.
Under the structural conditions, teachers’ identities have been restrained by the power of disciplinary and professionalism. A teacher who was used to function as an executive in school is now given expectations to be a professional, but without having a equivalent professional status. The inconsistency of accountability-oriented reform policies and teachers’ identities has constrained the teachers’ agency to carry out their initiatives. However, teachers still seek after opportunities to break through structural restrictions, the prospect lies in their consciousness awakening and critical reflection via the course of identity construction, the actions and true impacts through pedagogical praxis and teachers-students relationships in their daily lives.

中文部分
方永泉（譯）（2003）。P. Freire著。受壓迫者教育學（Pedagogy of the oppressed）。臺北市：巨流。
王勇智、鄧明宇（譯）（2003）。C. K. Riessman著。敘說分析（Narrative analysis）。臺北市：五南。
王秋絨（1991）。教師專業社會化理論在教育實習設計上的蘊義。臺北市：師大書苑。
王瑞賢（譯）（2005）。B. Bernstein著。教育、象徵控制與認同：理論、研究與批判（Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique）。臺北市：學富文化。
王儷靜、邱淑玫（2002）。成為教師：師院生的專業認同。教育研究月刊，99，58-72。
卯靜儒（2004）。理論化女性教師的性別意識與認同建構過程。通識教育季刊，11（1/2），147-170。
成令方、林鶴玲、吳嘉苓（譯）（2003）。A. G. Johnson著。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾（The forest and the trees: sociology as life, practice, and promise）。臺北市：群學。
江宜樺（1998）。自由主義、民族主義與國家認同。臺北市：揚智文化。
何美鈴、湯梅英（1991）。師院生與師專生教學態度、意願與能力之比較。教育部委託專案報告。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院初等教育系。
吳慎慎（2003）。教師專業認同與終身學習：生命史敘說研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
宋文里（譯）（2001）。J. Bruner著。教育的文化（The culture of education）。臺北市：遠流。
李保玉（1991）。臺東師院師院生角色認同與自我期許研究報告。臺東師院學報，3，1-59。
李園會（2001）。臺灣師範教育史。臺北市：南天。
李新鄉、黃振恭（2009）。不同世代國民小學教師專業表現之相關研究。南台人文社會學報，1，1-30。
汪耀文（2015）。我國國民中小學教師薪資結構之探討：以級任教師導師費為中心。教育政策論壇，18（1），139-166。
沈翠蓮（2004）。臺灣小學師資培育史。臺北市：五南。
沈翠蓮、謝文英（2000）。臺灣小學師資培育課程、教學與實習制度之研究：從師專到師院時期（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC89-2413-H017-031）。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
周珮儀（2000，12月）。當代教師角色的認同：傳統、現代、後現代的多聲部組曲。載於國立花蓮師範學院、臺灣教育社會學學會聯合舉辦之「多元文化、身分認同與教育」學術研討會論文集（頁177-199），花蓮市。
周淑卿（2004）。課程發展與教師專業。臺北市：高等教育。
林清江（1991）。教育社會學。臺北市：國立編譯館。
邱誌勇、許夢芸（譯）（2005）。J. Lewis著。文化硏究的基礎 （Cultural studies : the basics）。新北市：韋伯文化。
侯務葵、王慧婉（1999）。我們是一群女教師：集體認同與教育實踐的故事。應用心理研究，1，99-128。
姜添輝（2000）。論教師專業意識、社會控制與保守文化。教育與社會研究，1，1-24。
姜添輝（2002）。九年一貫課程政策影響教師專業自主權之研究。教育研究集刊，48（2），157-197。
姜添輝（2003）。教師是專業或是觀念簡單性的忠誠執行者？文化再製理論的檢證。教育研究集刊，49（4），93-126。
姜添輝（2008）。從學校教師會功能與小學教師專業認同的關聯性省思教師組織的屬性。教育研究集刊，54（3），65-97。
柯禧慧（2006）。擺盪、跨越、與承認：一位小學教師自我身分認定的對話與探尋。國立中正大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。
洪瑞璇（2008）。國中教師專業認同之研究：游走在「結構─能動」之間。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
胡紹嘉（2008）。敘事、自我與認同：從文本考察到課程探究。臺北市：秀威資訊科技。
范信賢（2006）。教師身分認同與課程改革：後殖民論述的探討。國教學報，12，275-287。
夏林清（1999）。制度變革中教育實踐的空間：一個行動研究的實例與概念。應用心理研究，1，33-68。
夏鑄九、黃麗玲、黃肇新、楊長苓、黃慧琦、劉昭吟（譯）（2002）。M. Castells著。認同的力量（The power of identity）。臺北市：唐山。
孫志麟（2001）。師資培育制度變革下職前教師的專業認同。臺灣教育社會學研究，1（2），59-89。
高敬文（1996）。質化研究方法論。臺北市：師大書苑。
康瀚文（2011）。臺灣教師專業論述發展之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張芬芬（譯）（2005）。M. B. Miles, & A. M. Huberman著。質性研究資料分析（Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。
張建成（2002）。批判的教育社會學研究。臺北市：學富文化。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學 : 現代人硏究自身問題的科學。臺北市：臺灣東華。
張源泉（2006）。J. Habermas：批判理論之集大成者。載於譚光鼎、王麗雲（主編），教育社會學：人物與思想（頁339-366）。臺北市：高等教育。
張瀞文（2014）。六個教育開放，卡關在哪裡？親子天下，60，188-189。
符碧真（1999）。誰來當老師？我國教師組成結構變化之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，9（3），377-397。
許夢芸（譯）（2007）。C. Barker 著。文化硏究智典 （The sage dictionary of cultural studies）。新北市：韋伯文化。
許誌庭（2008）。師資培育制度改革中教師主體類別的重構與想像—從道德認同到職業認同。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC96-2413-H-168-002）。臺南市：崑山科技大學共同學科。
郭丁熒（1995）。小學教師角色相關實證研究的回顧與分析。臺南師院學報，28，197-224。
郭丁熒（1997）。師院學生的社會流動之研究。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，7（2），181-197。
郭丁熒（2001）。「盲、忙、尨、茫」讓老師有志難伸？臺灣小學教師理想與實際角色知覺差距來源及相關因素之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，1（1），133-180。
郭丁熒（2006）。是「連續」還是「斷裂」？臺灣小學教師角色變遷知覺之研究。師大學報：教育類，51（1），41-62。
陳伯璋（2001）。新世紀課程改革的省思與挑戰。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳美玉（1996）。教師專業實踐理論與應用。臺北市：師大書苑。
陳美玉（1997）。教師專業 : 教學理念與實踐。高雄市：麗文。
陳美玉（2002）。教師個人知識管理與專業發展。臺北市：學富文化。
陳美玉（2003）。教師個人知識管理在專業發展上之應用。中等教育，54（6），170-183。
陳俊生（2010）。教育改革論述中的教師主體建構及其身分認同之探究─後結構主義取向。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
單文經（2000）。析論抗拒課程改革的原因及其對策—以國民中小學九年一貫課程為例。教育研究集刊，45，15-34。
黃志順（2000，12月）。教師身分認同的追尋：一個國小教師/博士生的自傳式研究。載於國立花蓮師範學院、臺灣教育社會學學會聯合舉辦之「多元文化、身分認同與教育」學術研討會論文集（頁545-580），花蓮市。
黃志順（2001）。邁向教師作為實踐主體的身分認同：「後殖民論述」的反省。國民教育研究集刊，7，311-342。
黃政傑（1996）。質的教育研究：方法與實例。臺北市：漢文。
黃政傑（2004）。課程改革的師資配合措施。教育研究月刊，122，73-85。
黃毅志（2003）。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估：社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊，49（4），1-31。
楊瑩（1983）。我國大學院校學雜費徵收標準及助學貸款等措施之研究—兼論我國大專院校學生家庭社經背景，國立編譯館館刊，12（1），275-340。
甄曉蘭（1996）。從典範轉移的再思論質的研究崛起的意義。嘉義師院學報，10 ，119-146。
甄曉蘭（2000）。新世紀課程改革的挑戰與課程實踐理論的重建。教育研究集刊，44，61-90。
甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務—解構與重建。臺北市：高等教育。
歐用生（1996）。教師專業成長。臺北市：師大書苑。
歐用生（2003）。誰能不在乎課程理論？教師課程理論的覺醒。教育資料集刊，28，373-387。
歐用生（2004）。課程領導：議題與展望。臺北市：高等教育。
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11（1），115-143。
蕭阿勤（2005）。世代認同與歷史敘事：臺灣一九七Ο年代「回歸現實」世代的形成。臺灣社會學，9，1-58。
謝卓君（2005）。對師資培育政策中市場化論述的批判反省。臺灣教育社會學研究，5（1），119-157。
謝蕙蓮（2005，8月1日）。師院今改名教育大學，將降低師培生。聯合晚報。2011年9月2日，取自http://career11.mac.nthu.edu.tw/edu/road/940802c.html
饒見維（1996）。教師專業發展－理論與實務。臺北市：五南。
西文部分
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and teacher education, 27, 308-319.
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses : negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Andrews, M. (2002). Generational consciousness, dialogue, and political engagement. In J. Edmunds & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Generational consciousness, narrative, and politics (pp. 75-87). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Angrosino, M. V. & Mays de Perez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). (pp. 673-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Anthias, F. (1999). Beyond unities of identity in high modernity. Identities, 6(1), 121-144.
Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, Agency and the internal conversation. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ball, S. J., & Goodson, I. (1985). Understanding teachers: Concepts and contexts. In S. J. Ball & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), Teachers’ lives and careers (pp. 1-26). London and Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Beijaard, D. (1995). Teachers’ prior experiences and actual perceptions of professional identity. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(2), 281-294.
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and teacher education, 16, 749-764.
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128.
Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and teacher education, 19, 277-290.
Bertaux, D. (1981). Biography and society: the life history approach in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Borich, G. D. (1999). Dimensions of self that influence effective teaching. In R. P. Lipka & T. M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development ( pp. 92-117). New York: SUNY Press.
Bosk, C. (1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Britzman, D. P. (1991). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. New York: SUNY Press.
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1992). Making sense of teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Clark, C. (2005). The structure of educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 289-308.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363-401). New York: Macmillan.
Clindinin, D., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
Cooper, K., & Olson, M. R. (1996). The multiple ‘I’s’ of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp.78-89). London: Falmer Press.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York : Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Etzioni, A. (1969), Preface. In A. Etzioni (Eds.), The semi-professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, and social workers (pp. 5-18). New York: The Free Press.
Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219-232.
Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 645-672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Freeman, M. (1992). Self as narrative: The place of life history in studying the life span. In T. M. Brinthaupt & R. P. Lipka (Eds.), The self: Definitional and methodological issues (pp. 15-43). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What’s worth fighting for in your school? New York : Teachers College Press.
Fuller, F. F., & Bown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education: seventy-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 25-52). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Philadelphia: Falmer.
Geijsel, F., & Meijers, F. (2005). Identity learning: the core process of educational change. Educational Studies, 31(4), 419-430.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
Giroux, H. A.（1988）. Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying identity: A semantic history. Journal of American History, 6, 910-931.
Goodson, I. (Ed.). (1992). Studying teachers’ lives. New York : Teachers College Press.
Goodson, I. (2000). Professional knowledge and the teacher’s life and work. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge & J. Mollerb (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 13-25). London: The Falmer Press.
Greene, M. (1967). Existential encounters for teachers. New York : Random House.
Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger: educational philosophy for the modern age. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Greenberg, H. M. (1969). Teaching with feeling: compassion and self-awareness in the classroom today. New York: Macmillan.
Guba, E. C. (1990). The Alternative paradigm dialog. In E. C. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm Dialog (pp. 17-27). CA: Sage.
Hall, S. (1996). The questions of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held, D. Hubert & K. Thompson (Eds.), Modernity: An introduction to modern societies (pp. 595-634). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Hansen, D. T. (2001). Teaching as a moral activity. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 826-857). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Hargreaves, A. (1993). Individualism and individuality: reinterpreting the teacher culture. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 51-76). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times : teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. London : Cassell.
Heck, S. F., & Williams, C. R. (1984). The complex roles of the teacher : an ecological perspective. New York : Teachers College Press.
Hoffman-Kipp, P. (2008). Actualizing democracy: the praxis of teacher identity construction. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 151-164.
Hoyle, E. (1969). The role of the teacher. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hoyle, E. (1995). Social status of teaching. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 58-61). New York: Elsevier Science.
Infinito, J. (2003). Ethical self-formation: a look at the later Foucault. Educational Theory, 53(2), 155-171.
Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. New York : Routledge.
Jersild, A. T. (1955). When teachers face themselves. New York: Teachers College Press.
Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. London : Macmillan.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129-169.
Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31-44). Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916.
Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1992). Teachers—their world and their work: implications for school improvement. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for yourself: Identity as an organizing principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British educational research journal, 19(4), 311-322.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on sociology of knowledge (pp. 276-320). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. The University of Chicago Press.
Medley, D. M. (1979). The effectiveness of teachers. In P. L. Peterson & J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: concepts, finding, and implications (pp. 11-27). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Mitchell, A. (1997). Teacher identity: A key to increased collaboration. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 1-14.
Morse, J. M. (1998). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 56-85). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nias, J. (1985). A more distant drummer: Teacher development as the development of self. In L. Barton & S. Walker (Eds.), Social change and education. London: Croom Helm.
Nias, J. (1989). Teaching and the self. In M. L. Holly & C. S. Mcloughlin (Eds.), Perspectives on teacher professional development (pp. 155-171). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Olson, M. (1996). Becoming a trained professional. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge ( pp. 33-47). London: The Falmer Press.
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Parsons, T. (1968). The position of identity in the general theory of action. In C. Gorden & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction (pp. 11-23). New York: Wiley.
Peshkin, A.（1982）.The researcher and subjectivity: Reflections on an Ethnography of School and Community. In G. D. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action (pp. 48-67). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Reynolds, C. (1996). Cultural scripts for teachers: Identities and their relation to workplace landscapes. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet, & R. T. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice: Teachers’ professionalism, identities and knowledge (pp. 69-77). London: Falmer Press.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Sage.
Ritchie, J. S. & Wilson, D. E. (2000). Teacher narrative as critical inquiry: rewriting the script. New York: Teachers College.
Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith., S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed) (pp. 732-755). New York: Routledge/Association of Teacher Educators.
Rosenholtz, S. (1988). Teachers’workplace. New York: Longman.
Schempp, P. G., Sparkes, A. C., & Templin, T. J. (1999). Identity and induction: establishing the self in the first years of teaching. In R. P. Lipka & T. M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development ( pp. 142-161). New York: SUNY Press.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. SF: Jossey-Bass.
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Tisdell, E. J. (2000). Feminist perspectives on adult education: constantly shifting identities in constantly changing times. In V. Sheared & P. A. Sissel (Eds.), Making space: merging theory and practice in adult education (pp. 271-286). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
Vogt, F. (2002). A caring teacher: Explorations into primary school teachers’ professional identity and ethic of care. Gender and Education, 14(3). 251-264.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). Using drawings to interrogate professional identity and the popular culture of teaching. In I. F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves ( Eds.), Teachers’ professional lives (pp. 109-126). London: Falmer Press.
Weigert, A. J., Teitge, J. S., & Teitge, D. W. (1986). Society and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. In A. Forman, N. Minick, & A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 336–357). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, K. G., & Daviss, B. (1996). Redesigning education. New York : Teachers College Press.