簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許雅貞
Hsu-Ya-Jen
論文名稱: 教師團隊的對話,反思與行動歷程
The Team of Teachers on the Process of Dialogue,Reflection and Action
指導教授: 李明芬
Li, Ming-Fen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會教育學系
Department of Adult and Continuing Education
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 221
中文關鍵詞: 建構經驗學習團隊對話行動中的反思
英文關鍵詞: construction, experience learning, team, dialogue, reflection-in-action
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:199下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘      要
    本研究主要針對教師專業議,以一個從事九年一貫自編教材的教師團隊為研究個案,探究其在專業對話、反思與行動上的表現,從成人經驗學習與建構學習的觀點,分析個案教師團隊形成、運作的歷程,並且探討此歷程的種種因素及其關聯。本研究採歷史回溯法,記錄教師團隊的形成過程,並以參與觀察和深入訪談的方式,探討團隊成員之間的專業對話、反思與行動內涵,並進一步檢視此歷程中的價值選擇、價值釐清與專業概念的建構結果。本研究發現:
    一、教師自然形成的團隊,可以促進教師專業的對話、反思與行動,理性和感性因素有關,其中人格特質、學習傾向、關注議題、環境文化,皆是教師專業對話、反思與行動的主要探討層面與層次。
    二、教師團隊透過終身學習與非正式學習的途徑,在關鍵議題與特殊情境中,可以幫助教師連結其經驗與思想,促使教師專業的整體發展。
    三、教師團隊經由對話、反思與行動的深化歷程,不但可以擴充教師專業的整體經驗,更可以加深對話與反思的層次。
    四、教師透過團隊參與的型態,加深自我的生活與生命意義與教師專業學習的關聯,將教師工作與專業學習視為生活整體中不可分割的部份,並以此作為探尋生命意義的基礎。

    The focus of this research is on the issue of teachers’ ability about dialogue, reflection and action. By the case study, there is a team composed of elementary school teachers who are editing the teaching materials by themselves. And the most research purpose is on the dialogue, reflection and action included work and life context. The theory background of this research is standing on the experiential learning of adult and by the method of construction. The researcher wills inquiry the process of formation, participation and operation to find out the elements, reasons and its relation. There are two parts of this research, one is the history--recalling way to record the process of formation, and the other way is on the process of operation to understand its actual contract of dialogue, reflection and action by participating observation and deep interview. To further know the process of this team case by rechecking the choice of the value and the representation of the exiting meaning. Therefore, this research have these conclusion:
    1、Teachers will naturally develop the team by daily life experience. The team also can inspire the dialogue, reflection and action. The reasons of formation are related with the whole rational and sensational key-points. Besides, the personality, learning orientation, concerned issue will affect the level or the range of the dialogue, reflection and action especially the culture of the environment included the reality of society and nature.
    2、The team can help everyone relate their experience and thought by the way of lifelong and informal learning to improve the whole development of teacher work.
    3、The team not only expands the whole experience of the teacher profession, but also digs the reflectional level by the translation of dialogue issue.
    4、At last, Teachers concern the meaning of self and learning. By different kinds of activities, they become conscious of the style of participation on their work and learning. Most importance is that this kind of process will be the angle for exploring the meaning of life.

    目        次 中文摘要 英文摘要 第一章 緒論 第一節 問題背景-----------------------------------------------1 第二節 研究目的----------------------------------------------10 第三節 名詞釋義----------------------------------------------11 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 成人學習與建構主義------------------------------------15 第二節 「對話、反思與行動」的建構與學習----------------------32 第三節 團隊實踐與學習----------------------------------------45 第三章 研究方法與實施 第一節 研究架構----------------------------------------------56 第二節 研究對象----------------------------------------------59 第三節 質性研究方法與實施------------------------------------66 第四節 研究倫理----------------------------------------------73 第五節 資料蒐集與分析--------------------------------------- 75 第四章 個案團隊的形成歷程 第一節 教師團隊形成的發展歷程--------------------------------79 第二節 教師團隊的學習經驗------------------------------------96 第三節 綜合分析---------------------------------------------110 第五章 「對話、反思與行動歷程」之分析與討論 第一節 「對話、反思與行動」的建構內涵-----------------------113 第二節 「對話、反思與行動」的跨越層面------------------------146 第六章 教師的專業認知與價值 第一節 「教師專業發展」的意義認知---------------------------180 第二節 「教師專業發展」的實踐價值-------------------------- 186 第三節 建構「教師專業發展」的能力---------------------------193 第七章 結論與反思 第一節 研究結論---------------------------------------------200 第二節 研究反思-------------------------------------------- 202 參考書目 中文部份-----------------------------------------------------204 英文部份-----------------------------------------------------208 附錄 附錄一:「教師專業」概念的整理表-----------------------------215 附錄二:團隊概念的整理表-------------------------------------216 附錄三:教育統計概況分配表-----------------------------------217 附錄四:研究者與研究對象之間的關係---------------------------218 附錄五:研究目標檢視-----------------------------------------219 附錄六:研究的關注層面與層次---------------------------------220 表 目 次 表2-1 整理自饒見維(1996)對「專業內涵」之範疇界定 -------------------------------------------------------36 表2-2 整理自歐用生(1996)與陳美玉(1996)對「教師專業發展」之範疇界定 -------------------------------------------------------38 表2-3 整理自Marsick V. J. & Watkins K. E. (1990) -------------------------------------------------------43 表2-4 整理自Marsick V. J.(1991) -------------------------------------------------------52 表3-1 團隊成員簡介 -------------------------------------------------------61 表3-2 研究檢證分析表 -------------------------------------------------------78 表4-1 形成教師團隊的主要影響事件 -------------------------------------------------------80 表4-2 個案教師團隊前期的背景分析 -------------------------------------------------------87 表4-3 個案教師團隊形成期的背景分析 -------------------------------------------------------90 表4-4 個案教師團隊運作期的背景分析 -------------------------------------------------------93 表4-5 教師參與團隊歷程的個別分析 ------------------------------------------------------101 表4-6 教師參與團隊學習的專業發展歷程 ------------------------------------------------------107 表5-1 教師團隊各階段的「對話、反思與行動」展現 ------------------------------------------------------112 表5-2 教師團隊成員的「對話、反思與行動」跨越層面 ------------------------------------------------------178 圖 目 次 圖2-1 Kolb(1984)的經驗學習循環模式 -------------------------------------------------------25 圖2-2 Jarvis(1987)的學習歷程模式 -------------------------------------------------------26 圖2-3 Bound & Walker(1990)促進經驗學習的模式 -------------------------------------------------------27 圖2-4 Usher, Bryant & Johnston(1997)經驗學習地圖 -------------------------------------------------------27 圖3-1 個案教師團隊的專業反思與行動過程概念圖 -------------------------------------------------------57 圖3-2 教師團隊的對話、反思與行動歷程之研究架構 -------------------------------------------------------58 圖3-3 教師團隊的對話、反思與行動歷程的研究實施程序 -------------------------------------------------------71 圖4-1 教師團隊形成的經驗分析 -------------------------------------------------------80 圖4-2 教師個體的學習經驗分析 -------------------------------------------------------96 圖5-1 教師團隊的「對話、反思與行動」內涵 ------------------------------------------------------113 圖5-2 教師團隊的專業對話情境因素 ------------------------------------------------------125 圖5-3 「對話、反思與行動」的跨越層面 ------------------------------------------------------146 圖6-1 教師專業的「對話、反思與行動」歷程 ------------------------------------------------------180 圖6-2 反思教師專業發展的整體面向 ------------------------------------------------------191

    壹、中文部份
    丹森(N. K. Denzin)著,張君玫譯。(1999)。解釋性互動論。台北:智。頁6,28,49-54,195.
    王雅玄(1998)。建構主義理論與教學實證研究。人文及社會學科教學通訊。9卷。1期。頁152-154。
    白穗儀(1999)。國民中學組織學習與教師專業成長關係之研究。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。頁65-75。
    成人教育辭典(1995)。中華民國成人教育學會主編。中華民國成人教育學會出版。
    行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教改會。
    沈清松(1985)。詮釋學的變遷與發展。現代哲學論衡。
    何福田、羅瑞玉(1992)。教育改革與教師專業化。中華民國師範教育學會主編的教育專業。台北:師大書苑。頁20。
    杜威(J. Dewey)著,林玉體譯(1996)。民主與教育。台北:師大書苑。
    李佳霓(1998)。國民中學組織學習、教師個人學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    杜紹萍(1999)。合作學習對成人英語學習成就、行為、及滿意度影響之實驗研究。國立中正大學成人教育研究所碩士論文。頁29,164-167。
    李源順(1999)。數學教師在校內互動促進自我專業發展的個案研究。國立台灣師範大學數學研究所博士論文。
    吳和堂(2000)。國民中學實習教師教學反思與專業成長關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    阮新邦(2001)。知識與實踐:儒家學說、哲學詮釋學及社會工作之可能契合。社會理論學報。四卷。二期。頁263-269。
    林清江(1986)。教育社會學。台北:國立編譯館。
    彼得.柏格(P. L. Berger & T. Luckmann)著, 鄒理民譯(1991)。知識社會學:社會實體的建構。台北:巨流。頁65,87-92。
    彼得.聖吉(Senge, P. M. et al.)著,郭進隆譯(1994)。第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下。頁287,356,361-368。
    阿蓋爾(Argyle M.)著,陸洛譯(1995)。日常生活社會心理學。台北:巨流。105-107。
    阿蓋爾(Argyle M.)著,李茂興譯(1996)。合作。台北:巨流。頁172-183。
    林秋風,張益仁,黃有富,趙榮景合著(1997)。學校教師會與教師專業自主權關係之研究。台北縣政府。
    彼得.聖吉(Senge, P. M. et al.)著,齊若蘭譯(1999)。第五項修練Ⅱ-實踐篇。台北:天下。頁583。
    周淑瓊(1999)。國中專家/新手導師班級經營的信念、認知、行動策略與其班級經營效果之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    林秀玲(2000)。基德成人教育思想之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育研究所碩士論文。
    胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
    威那(Wallner, F.)著,王榮麟 & 王超群譯(1997). 建構實在論。台北:五南。
    孫本初、呂育誠(1996)。從分析單元論團隊的意義及其對公共管理之影響。國立政治大學學報。73卷。頁145-177。
    泰森等(Tyson S. & Jackson T.)著,蔡承志譯(1996)。組織行為。台北:桂冠。頁167。
    紐曼(Neuman W.L.)著,朱柔若譯 (2000)。社會研究方法-質化與量化取向。台北:揚智。頁613-614,頁662-665。
    倪士峰(2001)。國民小學團隊學習之個案研究──以花師實小為例。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    馬克斯威爾(Maxwell J. A.)著,高薰芳、林盈助、王向葵譯(2001)。質化研究設計──一種互動取向的方法。台北:心理。頁6-7。頁109-112。
    張苙雲(1990)。組織社會學。台北:三民。頁173,177-178,104-105。
    陳李綢(1992)。認知發展與輔導。台北:心理。
    張承漢(1994)。社會組織與社會關係。台北:幼獅文化。頁46。
    張奕華(1997)。國民小學組織學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃筱慧(1998)。詮釋整體與解構歷程。東吳社會理論學報。1卷。2期。頁258-259。
    張易書(1999)。國中校長轉型領導、教師開放/封閉型人格與學習型組織關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。頁149。
    陳美玉(1999)。教師專業學習與發展。台北:師大書苑。頁3-5,272-275。
    陳聖謨(1999)。國民小學教師教學反省之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    教育大辭書(2000)。教育大辭書編纂委員會。台北:文景。
    陳延興(2000)。國小教師教學倫理之個案研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    張春興(2000)。心理學思想的流變。台北:東華。頁29。
    陳淑娟(2000)。從學校組織變革談學習型組織與團隊學習。公教資訊季刊。四卷。一期。頁26。
    陳奕安(2002)。基隆市國民中小學教師文化與教師專業成長態度之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    單文經(1990)。教育專業知識的性質初探。中華民國師範教育學會主編:師範教育政策與問題。台北:師大書苑。
    黃富順(1989)。成人心理與學習。台北:師大書苑。頁113-124。
    舒茲(A. )著,盧嵐蘭譯(1991)。社會世界的現象學。台北:桂冠。頁53-92。
    馮朝霖(1996)。建構主義之哲學觀點與啟示。教育研究雙月刊。49期。頁9。
    彭淑珍(1998)。學習型組織理論在國民中學行政應用之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃光國(1999)。多元典範的研究取向──社會心理學的本土化。社會理論學報。2卷。1期。頁1-5。
    彭筠芝(1999)。國民小學教師課程設計專業內涵之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。頁181-182。
    黃明月(2000)。成人經驗學習理論之探討。社會教育學刊。29期。頁37-39,51。
    黃富順(2000)。成人的經驗學習。成人學習革命。台北:師大書苑。頁6,11。
    黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。台北:心理。頁249,314。
    賈春琦(1999)。團隊型組織在國民中學學校行政應用之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。頁209-210。
    詹志禹(2002)。認知的主動性。建構論:基礎與教育應用。台北:正中。頁53-64。
    維果茨基(Vygotsky, L. S.)著,李維譯(2000)。思維和語言。台北:昭明。頁188-191,201-207.
    齊宗豫(2001)。男性身份、自我探索與教育實踐──一位國小準校長的成長之路。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。台北:師大書苑。頁94-96,87。
    歐崇敬(1998)。從結構主義到解構主義。台北:揚智。頁29。
    鄧優君(1998)。師院實習生數學教學實踐之省思與成長。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    蔡明昌(1999)。中學教師繼續專業教育學習成效及其相關因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
    鄭長河(2000)。一位國中數學教師專業成長個案研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系研究所碩士論文。
    劉鳳英(2000)。家庭、工作與女性主體:五位國小女性主任追尋自我的生命史研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    謝宜君(2001)。尋找一個出口:幼教師自我突破工作困境之機制。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展──理論與實務。台北:五南。頁15-16,152-173。
    嚴祥鸞(1996)。參與觀察法。質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。胡幼慧主編。台北:巨流。頁195-201。
    蘇育任(1998)。建構與解構──掙脫建構主義的桎梏。台中師院學報。12期。頁374,389。
    饒見維(1999)。九年一貫課程與教師專業發展之配套實施策略。九年一貫課程研討會論文集(下)──邁向課程新紀元。中華民國教材研究發展學會。頁307-312。
    貳、西文部份
    Argyris, C.(1964). Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York, London, Sydney:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.8-11.
    Argyris, C. & , D.(1974).Theory in Practice:Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. 3-9.
    Argyris, C. & , D.(1978).Organizational Learning :A Theory of Action Perspective Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley.
    Anderson, W. T.(1990). Reality isn’t What it Used to Be. San Francisco:Harper and Row.
    Azzaretto, J. F.(1990).’Power, Responsibility, and Accountability in Continuing Professional Education’ in Cervero R. M., Azzaretto J. F. and Associates. Visions for the Future of Continuing Professional Education. Athens, GA:Georgia Center for Continuing Education, The University of Georgia,45,21-23.
    Andresen L., Bound D. & Coben R. (1995). Experience-Based Learning. In Foley, G.(Ed.)Understanding Adult Education and Training. Austria:Allen & Unwin. 213-215.
    Bakke, E. W.(1951).The Individual and the Organization, Labor and Management Center, Yale University.
    Berger P. L. & Hansfried Kellner(1981). The Act of Interpretation. In Sociology Reinterpreted:An Essay on Method and Vocation. Anchor Press/Doubleday. 17.
    Bolles, R.(1982). The Three Boxes of Life and How to get out of Them. Berkeley:Ten Speed Press.
    Berger P. L. & Hansfried Kellner(1985). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth:Penguin.
    Brookfield S.(1987). The Position of Discussion on the Process of Learning(1935). In Learning Democracy:Edward Lindeman on adult education and social change. London:Croom Helm.
    Bound, D.(1989). Some Competing Traditions in Experiential Learning. In Weil S. W. & McGill Ian(Ed.).Making Sense of Experiential Learning:Diversity in Theory and Practice. SRHE and Open University Press. 42,45-46.
    Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.(1989).Situated cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher,18(1),32-34.
    Bound, D. & Walker, D.(1990). Making the Most of Experience. Studies in Continuing Education. 12(2). 61-80.
    Carkhuff, R. R.(1969). Helping and Human Relations, vol.1:Selection and Training; vol.2:Theory and Research . New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Cropley A. J. & UNESCO Institute for Education, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany(1977). Lifelong Education:A Psychological Analysis. Toronto:Pergamon Press.
    Collins, M.(1984). Phenomenological Perspectives:Some Implications for Adult Education. In S. B. Merriam(Ed.)Selected Writings on Philosophy and Adult Education. 179-189.
    Capron, A. M.(1988).Collaboration in action: Innovative problem solving. In R. T. McLaughlin(Ed.).Proceedings of the First National Leadership Symposium on Interprofessional Education and Practice. Columbus: Ohio State University Press,6-7.
    Cervero R. M.(1990). A Model of Professional as Learners. In Cervero R. M., Azzaretto J. F. and Associates. Visions for the Future of Continuing Professional Education. Athens, GA:Georgia Center for Continuing Education, The University of Georgia.175-177.
    Cobb, P.(1991). Restructing elementary school mathematics. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics. 13(2).3-22.
    Connelly B.(1998). Lifelong Learning Through the Habermasian Lens:Providing a Theoretical Grounding to Adult Education Practice. In J. Holford(Ed.). International Perspectives on Lifelong Learning. 97.
    Cervero R. M. & Wilson A. L.(2001). A New Foundation for Adult Education. In Cervero et al (Eds.) Power in Practice :Adult Education and the Struggle for Knowledge and Power in Society. San Francisco:Jossey Bass.269.
    Denzin, N. K.(1970). The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.
    Denzin, N. K.(1984). On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. 137.182-184.
    Duke, D. L.(1990). Teaching An Introduction. New York: McGraq- Hill Publishing Company.
    Delos, J. et al(1996). Learning:The Treasure within. Paris:UNESCO.
    Darling-Hammond, Linda & McLaughlin M. W.(1999). Investing in Teaching as a Learning Profession:Policy Problems and Prospects. In Linda Darling-Hammond, Gary Sykes (Ed.). Teaching as the Learning Profession:Handbook of Policy and Practice. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. 376.
    Eccles(Parsons),J.(1983). Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors. In J.T. Spence(Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives:Psychological and Sociological Approaches. San Francisco:W.H. Freeman. 75-146.
    Eccles(Parsons),J.(1984). Self-Perceptions, Task Perceptions, Socializing Influences, and the Decision to Enroll in Mathematics. In M. W. Steinkamp & M.L. Maehr(Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement:Women in Science. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press. Vol. 2. 95-121.
    Friedrichs, J. & Ludtke, H.(1974). Participant Observation: Theory and Practice. Westmead, UK:Saxon House.
    Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. E.(1986). The Cultures of Teaching. In M. C. Wittrock(Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.).New York:Macmillan. 505-526.
    Fosnot C. T.(1989). Enquiring Teachers, Enquiring Learners. New York:Teachers College Press.
    Fosnot C. T.(1996). Constructivism: A Psychological Theory of Learning. In Constructivism:Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.10-30.
    Fenwick, T. J.(2000).’ Putting Meaning into Workplace Learning’in Wilson, A. L. and Hays, E. R. (eds.). Handbook of adult and continuing education.296,300-301.
    Goncalves, O.(1995). Hermeneutics, Constructivism and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapies:From the Object to the Project. In R. Neimeyer & M. Mahoney(Eds.). Constructivism in Psychotherapy. Washington, DC:American psychological Association.195-220.
    Haberman M. & Stinnett T. M.(1973). Elements of the New Profession. In Teacher Education and the New Profession of Teaching. California:Berkeley. 2,9-12.
    Heron, J.(1974). The Concept of a Peer Learning Community. Guildford:Human Potential Research Project, University of Surrey.
    Harter(1986). The Relationship Between Perceived Competence, Affect, and Motivation:Processes and Patterns of Change. In A. K. Boggiano & T. Pittman(Eds.), Achievement and Motivation:A Social-Development Perspectives
    Henry J.(1989). Meaning and Practice in Experiential Learning. In Weil S. W. & McGill Ian(Ed.).Making Sense of Experiential Learning:Diversity in Theory and Practice. SRHE and Open University Press.26-28.
    Holly, M. L.(1989).Teacher professional Development. In M. L. Holly, C. S. McLoughlin, MA: Bergins and Garvey.
    Howard, G. S.(1991).Cultural Tales:A Narrative Approach to Thinking Cross-Cultural Psychology, and Psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46 , 187-197
    Hage, J., & Powers, C.(1992).Post-Industrial Lives:Roles and Relationships in the 21st Century. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
    Jarvis, P.(1987).Adult Learning in the Social Context. London: Croom Helm Publishing.
    James, H.(1991). Jung’s Self Psychology:A Constructivist Perspective. London:The Guilford Press.21-22.
    Jarvis, P. et al.(1999). The Theory and Practice of Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.46-50,118-122.
    Kelley, N. E.(1976). A Comparative Study of Professionally Related Learning Projects of Secondary School Teachers Unpulished master’s thesis. Department of Adult Education, Cornell University.
    Knowles, M. S.(1984 a). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. (Third Edition) Huston: Gult.
    Knowles, M. S.(1984 b). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Kolb, D.(1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Kirk, J. & Miller, M.(1988). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. London:Sage.
    Katzenbach, J. R. and Smith D. K.(1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. New York:Harper Collins.
    Kasl, E., Marsick, V. J., & Dechant, K.(1997).Teams as Learners : A Research-Based Model of Team Learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.229.
    Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.(1984). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park:Sage.
    Lave J. & Wenger E.(1991). Situated Learning:Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. 33-40,94-105,110-117.
    Lumsden, G. and Lumsden, D.(1993). Communicating in groups and teams: Sharing leadership. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Pub.
    Millar, C., Morphet, T. and Saddington, T.(1986)Curriculum Negotiation in Professional Adult Education. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 18(4). 429-443.
    Markus, H., & Wurf, E.(1987). The Dynamic Self-Concept:A Social Psychological Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,299-337.
    Mahoney, M. F., & Lyddon, W. J.(1988).Recent Developments in Cognitive Approaches to Counseling and Psychotherapy. Counseling Psychologist, 16 , 190-234.
    McCombs, B. L.(1989). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement:A Phenomenological View. In Barry J. Zimmerman & Dale H. Schunk(Ed.).Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement:Theory, Research, and Practice. New York:Springer-Verlag.55-60.
    McGill, I., Segal-Horn, S., Bourner T. & Frost, P.(1989). Action Learning:A Vehicle for Personal and Group Experiential Learning. In Weil S. W. & McGill Ian(Ed.).Making Sense of Experiential Learning:Diversity in Theory and Practice. SRHE and Open University Press. 119.
    Minick, N.(1989).L. S. Vygotsky and Soviet Activity Theory:Perspectives on the Relationship Between Mind and Society. Literacies Institute, Special Monograph Series No.1. Newton, MA:Educational Development Center, Inc.
    Marsick, T.V. and Watkins K. E.(1990).Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London and New York:Routledge.3-11,40,103.
    Mahoney, M. J.(1991).Human Change Process:The Scientific Foundations of Psychotherapy. New York:Basic Books
    Marsick, T.V. (1991).Action Learning and Reflection in the Workplace In Mezirow J. ed Associates .Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood. Oxford: Jossey-Bass publishers.37-39.
    Marsick T.V. and Watkins K. E.(1993).Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.14.
    Maxwell, J. A.(1996). Diversity, Solidarity, and Community. Manuscript Accepted for Publication in Educational Theory.
    Nowlen, P. M.(1990). New Expectations, New Roles:A Holistic Approach to Continuing Education for the Professions. In Cervero R. M., Azzaretto J. F. and Associates. Visions for the Future of Continuing Professional Education. Athens, GA:Georgia Center for Continuing Education, The University of Georgia.17.
    Nadler, D. A. and Spencer J. L.(1997). Executive teams. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
    Oatley, K. (1985). Representations of the Physical and Social World. In D. A. Oakley(Ed.).Brain and Mind(32-58).London:Methuen.32.
    Piaget, J.(1970). Structuralism. New York:Basic Books.114,140.
    Popper, K. R.(1972). Of Clouds and Clocks. In K. R. Popper(Ed.), Objective Knowledge:An Evolutionary Approach. London:Oxford University Press.
    Pile, S., & Thrift, N.(1995). Mapping the Subject. In S. Pile & N. Thrift(Eds.). Mapping the Subject:Geographies of Cultural Transformation. New York:Routledge.
    Peavy, R. V. (1992). A Constructivist Model of Training for Career Counselors. Journal of Career Development, 18, 215-228.
    Paul, T. (1999).The learning organization. In Jarvis P., et al. The theory and practice of learning . 125-135.
    Revans, R. W.(1982).The Origin and Growth of Action Learning. London: Chartwell Bratt.
    Selznick, P.(1957).Leadership in Administration, Row, Peterson , Evanston,Ⅲ.,5-22.
    Scott, W. G.(1961).Organizational Theory:An Overview and an Appraisal. Journal of the Academy of Management, April , 7-26.
    Shepard, H.(1965). Planning for Living Workshop. Unpublished Manuscript.
    Schmitz, E.(1983). Erwachsenenbildung als Lebensweltbezogener Erkenntinsprozess. In Schmitz, E. AND Tietgens, H.(Eds), Enzyklopadie der Erziehungswissenschaften. Stuttgart:Klett Cotta.95-123.
    The Reflective Practitioner—How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.21-26.
    Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Shulman, L. S.(1987). Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education review, 57(1), 1-23。
    Senge, P. et al.(2000)。Schools That Learn—A Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone Who Cares About Education. New York:Doubleday. 10,73-74.
    Sexton Thomas L.(1997). Constructivist Thinking Within the History of Ideas:The Challenge of A New Paradigm. In Thomas L. Sexton & Barbara L. Griffin. Constructivist Thinking in Counseling Practice Research, and Training. New York:Teachers College Press, Columbia University. 4-11.
    Tiedeman, A.(1988). Life Career:The Quantum Leap into a Process Theory of Career.Vista,CA:Life Career Foundation.
    Usher, R., Bryant, I. & Johnston, R.(1997). Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge:Learning Beyond the Limits. New York:Routledge.
    Von Glasersfeld, E.(1989). Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching. Synthese, 80, 121-140.
    Von Glasersfeld, E.(1992). Constructivism reconstructed:A Reply to Suchting. Science and Education, 1,379-384
    Werner, O. & G. M. Schoepfle(1987). Systematic Fieldwork vol.1. Newbury Park:Sage.
    Widden, M. F.(1987).Perspectives on Staff Development in M. F. Widden(Ed.).Staff Development for School Improvement, New York: The Falmer Press.
    Wildemeersch, D.(1989). The Principal Meaning of Dialogue for the Construction and Transformation of Reality. In Weil S. W. & McGill Ian(Ed.).Making Sense of Experiential Learning:Diversity in Theory and Practice. SRHE and Open University Press. 63-65.
    Weil S. W. & McGill, I.(1989). A Framework for Making Sense of Experiential Learning. In Weil S. W. & McGill Ian(Ed.).Making Sense of Experiential Learning:Diversity in Theory and Practice. SRHE and Open University Press. 3-4.
    Wertsch, J. V.(1991). Voices of the Mind:A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
    Wilson, A. L. (1993). The Promise of Situated Cognition. In S. Merriam(Ed.). An Update on Adult Learning Theory. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
    Wilson, A. L. & Cervero, R. M.(2001). A New Foundation for Adult Education. In Wilson et al(Ed.). Power in Practice:Adult Education and the Struggle for Knowledge and Power in Society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 269.
    Yorks, L. & Marsick V. J.(2000). Organizational learning and Transformation. In Mezirow et al. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress.251-252, 255-261.
    Zunker, V.(1994). Career Counseling:Applied Concepts of Life Planning(4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/ Cole.

    QR CODE