華語的標音文字（也就是注音符號）看起來像是一種符號，對於以華語為第二語言學習的學習者來說，可能會遇到認知上的問題，無法識別和使用注音符號，而這將會影響華語的學習效果。為了解決這個問題，本研究基於學業情緒理論，透過OTouch這款遊戲來探討以華語為二語學習者在學習注音符號時的遊戲興趣、遊戲焦慮和心流。在這個遊戲中，本研究使用注音符號、漢語拼音和其他與該發音相關的圖片，以便學生連結這三種要素。

本研究採用實驗研究法和問卷調查法來觀察以華語為二語學習者的學習情緒變化。在實驗研究中，教師講解完注音符號之後，利用OTouch進行複習活動。本研究之華語學習者共計33名學生，皆住在日本，在上課前從未學過注音符號，也沒有在台灣居住過的經驗，學習華語時數七百小時至一千四百小時不等，中級華語學習者。在每次使用完OTouch之後進行問卷調查，共計三次，藉以了解華語學習者在三個月內學習情緒的變化以及探索因性别差異所產生的影響。其研究結果歸納出以下結論。

一、 OTouch能幫助華語學習者降低注音符號的難度。
二、 華語學習者在使用OTouch學習注音符號時的焦慮感，無論學習者練習幾次，女性與男性皆無差異。
三、 華語學習者在使用OTouch學習注音符號時，隨著練習時間的增加，學習者的心流體驗也越多，而此影響和性別沒有關聯。
四、 華語學習者在使用OTouch學習注音符號時對此遊戲感興趣；並且男女之間無顯著差異，但是在第二次調查中，女性比男性更感興趣。

綜合以上之研究結果，本研究為今後以華語為二語學習者提出未來可透過此款遊戲進行注音符號教學發展之研究建議。

To learn traditional Chinese characters, leaners are usually encounter cognitive problem to recognize and use those Ju-Yin symbols, that will hinder the Chinese learning effect consequently. To address this issue, the present study used an App, OTouch which is a game and requires players to practice categorical reasoning by finding three items with same category (e.g., go, goes, went in tense learning) and touch three items from screen as process-based learning. In this game, the present study implemented Mandarin phonetic symbols with Pin-Yin and pictures related to that phonetic symbol for students to practice the linkage among three elements. To understand the role of gender, the present study based on achievement emotion theory and to explore participants’ gameplay interest, gameplay anxiety and flow experience while they engage a game.
The present study adapted experimental study and questionnaire survey to examine participants’ emotional change. In experiment study, this present study took the tutoring classes which taught by the researchers in Japan, a total of 33 students who have not studied Mandarin phonetic symbols before and have not lived in Taiwan. The study hours range from about 700 hours to 1,400 hours, for intermediate level learners. After using OTouch for learners to learn Mandarin phonetic symbols three times, questionnaires were delivered after each time to understand students' learning emotion changes within three months and explore their gender differences. After statistical analysis, the results of this study indicated that 1. OTouch can help Chinese learners to increase their interest in learning Mandarin phonetic symbols. 2. The anxiety of Chinese learners when using OTouch to learn Mandarin phonetic symbols is the same for women and men no matter how many time they practiced. 3. Learners experienced the increasing of flow experience when using OTouch to learn Mandarin phonetic symbols as long with the practice time increased; moreover, there is no difference in flow experience between women and men. 4. Learners are interested in gaming when using OTouch to learn Mandarin phonetic symbols; furthermore, there is no significant difference between women and men, but women are more interest than men in the second try.
Based on the above research results, the present study put forward a practical implication for Japanese students to learn Mandarin phonetic symbols as they taking Chinese language learning as secondary language.

壹、 中文文獻
(一) 書籍類
朱敬先（1997）。教育心理學──教學取向。臺北：五南出版社。
江惜美（2010）。華語文教學研究。臺北：新學林出版社。
宋躍廷、廖楷民（2012）。數位學習研究的變遷:學習理論、科技工具與研究方法的互動。宋躍廷（主編）。數位學習研究法(頁1-28)。臺北市：高等教育。
沈俊毅、黃雅晴（2013）數位原生悅趣式學習的教學。載於高熏芳（主編）。數位原生的學習與教學（頁 178-198）。臺北市：高等教育。
周慶華（2011）。華語文教學方法論。台北市:新學林。
林金錫、舒兆民（2010）。華語文數位教學-理論與實務。台北市:新學林。
林德揚（2005）。幼兒語文教材教法。台北市: 心理出版社股份有限公司。
信世昌等合著（2014）。漢語標音的里程碑：注音符號百年的回顧與發展。台北市：五南。
孫春在（2013）。遊戲式數位學習。台北市：高等教育文化事業有限公司。
張芳全（2010）。多層次模型在學習成就之研究。臺北市：心理。
張春興（2000）。教育心理學 （重定版十六刷）。台北：東華。
舒兆民（2010）。數位科技運用於華語文教學之研究。台北市:新學林。
黃國禎、蘇俊銘、陳年興（2015）。數位學習導論與實務（第二版）。新北市：博碩文化股份有限公司。
黃國禎等合著（2018）。未來教室、行動與無所不在學習。 台北市：高等教育文化事業有限公司。
楊接期（2013） 遊戲為基礎的語言學習。載於柯華葳（主編）。語文與數位學習（頁 107-118）。臺北市：高等教育。
董妍（2012）。學業情緒與發展。合肥市：安徽教育出版社。
廖瑞民（1993）。談理想的中文輸入法。第三波，126，61-65。
廖遠光（2012）。後設分析及其在數位學習上的應用。宋躍廷（主編）。數位學習研究法(頁109-130)。臺北市：高等教育。
蔡蓉之、舒兆民（2017）。華語文教材編寫實務。台北市:新學林。
羅秋昭（2015）。國小語文科教材教法。台北：五南。
饒見維（1996）。國小數學遊戲教學法。臺北市：五南。

(二) 期刊與雜誌類
白亦方、劉芳蓉譯（2001）。Huber, B. R.＆Schofield, J. W.原著。「我喜歡電腦，但許多女生不喜歡」：性別及電腦應用的社會文化脈絡。載於白亦方主譯，教育、科技、權力：視資訊教育為一種教育實踐，141‒176。臺北：高教。
李介至、陳泉源、梁滄郎（2010，6月）。防禦悲觀者的動機分析及在成就評價後之情緒適應：以潛在成長模式分析為例。教育心理學報，41。
李存智（1998，3月）從語言學理論與語言教學論音標符號的價值－兼論國語注音符號的存廢與外語學習。聲韻論叢，7期，415-435
孟瑛如、張淑蘋、鍾曉芬、邱佳寧（2003）。資源班語文科教學設計/拼音、識字、寫作，特殊教育輔導叢書，七十六集，1-44。新竹：國立新竹師範學院特教中心。
岳修平、劉伊霖、胡秋帆（2004，4月）數位學習中的性別差異，婦研縱橫，71，35-43。
林宇玲（2004，1月）。數位機會？數位落差？從性別觀點反省資訊推廣與訓練計畫。婦研縱橫，69，82-87。
林怡呈（2008）。從知識表徵探討注音符號教學策略之運用。東海教育評論，1，99-114
姚蘭（2014，12月）。華語教學錦囊：華語數位教學概念。華文世界，114，39 - 50。
郝景新（2018）教學輔具與遊戲教學於零起點之運用。台北市:語象年表，102，8-13。
張于忻（2010，4月）。華語文數位教材之模組設計探討。中原華語文學報，5，179-198。
張芳全（2011）。家長教育程度、文化資本、自我抱負、學習興趣與數學成就之關係研究。臺中教育大學學報，25（1），29-56。
張映芬（2017）。探索學習興趣的世界。科學發展月刊，頁26-29。
張基成 ; 林冠佑（2016）。從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習－學習成效、心流體驗與認知負荷。科學教育月刊，24-3，221-248。
許慧如（2019）。後國語運動的語言態度—台灣年輕人對五種華語口音的態度調查。台灣語文研究，14，218-254。
陳怡安（2002）。線上遊戲中的助人行為。網路社會學通訊期刊，25，24-25。
程剛，袁桂平（2005）。學習焦慮初探。 瀋陽師範大學學報（社會科學版），29（6），21-23。
黃于庭、崔夢萍（2010，3月）。探討數位遊戲類型對於注音符號學習成效之影響。數位教學暨資訊實務研討會，第五屆，904-917。
黃永和（2012）。激發學習活力—遊戲在教學上的應用。教師天地，179，23-28。
黃秀雯、王采薇（2019）。男女有別，學習表現也有別？國際素養評量結果再思性別刻板印象威脅。學校行政雙月刊，122，154-170。
劉瑞圓（2012）。全球教育中之性別差異。教育科學期刊，11（1），79-104。
歐德芬(2011，7月)。論華語文教學標音工具－以注音符號與漢語拼音為例。清雲學報，31卷3期，101-116。
譚華德、郝永崴、黃明月( 2019/09)。泰文學習拼字系統之創新教學：泰語學習自我效能、學習興趣、學習焦慮及學習成就之相關研究。教育科學研究期刊，64:3，001-029。
蘇育任（1993）。課程與教學－漫談遊戲導向的教學設計。國教輔導，33（2），4-6。

(三) 其他研究報告或論文
王俊智（2015）。以時間序列及相關性來分析學生過度自信的特質、後設認知、學習態度及學習成效：以思辨雲的校正學習為例。臺北市：，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育系碩士論文。
王春菊（2012）。新住民華語學習班教師選用教材考量因素研究。屏東縣:屏東教育大學華語文教學碩士學位學程碩士論文。
李品蓁（2013）。學生的認知風格、遊戲興趣、競爭焦慮、校正準確度對數學遊戲學習成效之相關分析。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班碩士論文。
施力瑋（2013）。遊戲式學習研究的現況、成果與課題。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文。
洪玉玲（2008）。 國小一年級注音符號教學現況研究。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學語文教育學系碩士班碩士論文。
洪智瑋(2012)。互動式電子白板融入注音符號教學之學習成效研究---以高雄市快樂國小成教班為例。國立屏東教育大學，華語文教學碩士學位學程碩士論文。
張瑜芬（2007）。新移民識字班教師選用教材考量因素之研究。台東縣:台東教育大學教育研究所碩士論文。
莊佳穎（2018）國小特教班自閉症學生應用數位遊戲在自我照顧分類能力的學習效果之研究。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳宛儂（2017）。對外華語文混成式教學初級數位教材之設計與研究。桃園市:中原大學應用華語文研究所碩士論文。
陳輔軒（2019）。中國創造・臺灣變造：注音符號的接合與實踐斷裂。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學台灣語文學系碩士論文。
曾筱喻（2016）。物件藏找遊戲對於國立學童英語字彙學習之效益。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學創造力發展碩士在職專班碩士論文。
黃淑敏(2007)。資訊科技應用於注音符號教學。彰化縣，私立大葉大學工業工程與科技管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
楊詠婷（2010）。數位遊戲式英語教學之學習成效與滿意度研究-以國小二年級學生為例。桃園市: 開南大學資訊傳播學系碩士論文。
趙苑伶(2009)。注音符號之遊戲教學法與傳統綜合教學法的比較。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學回流中文碩士班碩士論文。
劉仙莉（2017）。對外華語文初級教材教學設計研究。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學語文教育學系華語文教學碩士論文
蔡明蒼（2002）。高中學生電腦素養之研究。彰化縣:彰化師範大學工業教育系碩士論文。
鄧巧如（2007）。「遊戲中學習」-7~12歲兒童華語遊戲教學之活動設計。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。
蕭天祐（2015）。遊戲式翻轉教學數位遊戲之動機激發與問題導引對科學概念建構之影響以國中理化科為例。新竹市，國立交通大學理學院科技與數位學習學程碩士論文。
蕭景岳（2006）。低位語與低味語：網路使用者對注音文態度之初探。嘉義縣，國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
鮑世萍（2017）。運用遊戲式學習於國小一年級注音符號補救教學之行動研究。新北市:淡江大學教育科技學系數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文。
謝靜慧（2000）。國民中小學教師之電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素養之相關研究，國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。
羅仟雅（2017）。聲韻覺識理論融入數位遊戲輔助幼童注音符號學習成效之研究。臺中市:國立臺中教育大學數位內容科技學系碩士論文。
 
貳、 日文文獻
町田守弘（2001）サブカルチャー教材による国語科授業開発論 ――学習者の興味・関心喚起の方略を探る――。博士論文。早稲田大学教育学部。
橫山裕（1994） 台湾に於ける対外国人中国語教育を通して――「注音府号」と台湾国語。中国哲学論集 （20）, p90-96
 
參、 英文文獻
Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C., & Pensgaard, A.M. (2008). Achievement goals and gender effects on multidimensional anxiety in national elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 449-464.
Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement 283-302. Singapore: Springer.
All, A., Castellar, E. P. N., & Van Looy, J. (2015). Towards a conceptual framework for assessing the effectiveness of digital game-based learning. Computers and education, 88, 29-37.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Bown, J., & White, C. J. (2010). Affect in a self-regulatory framework for language learning. System, 38, 432-443.
Brooks, A. W. & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011). Can nervous nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 43-54.
Brull, S., & Finlayson, S. (2016). Importance of gamification in increasing learning. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(8), 372–375. https://doi.org/10 .3928/00220124-20160715-09
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 53-61.
Burn, A. (2006). Reworking the text: Online fandom. In D. Carr, D. Buckingham, A. Burn, & G. Schott (Eds.). Computer games: Text, narrative and play. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cameron, D. (1996). The language-gender interface: Challenging cooptation. In V. Bergvall, J. Bing, & A. Freed. (Eds.). Rethinking language and gender research. London: Longman.
Chen, N. S. & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Transforming the classrooms: Innovative digital game-based learning designs and applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 125-128.
Cliburn, D. (2006). The effectiveness of games as assignments in an introductory programming course. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 6–10). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.
Cliburn, D.C., & Miller, S.M. (2008). Games, stories, or something more traditional: The types of assignments college students prefer. In Proceedings of the 39th annual SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education ,138–142. New York: ACM Press.
Cockburn, C. (1981). The material of male power. Feminist Review, 9, 41-58.
Colley, A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Impact of the internet on our lives: Male and female personal perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2005-2013.
Cota, T. T., Ishitani, L., & Vieira, N. (2015). Mobile game design for the elderly: A study with focus on the motivation to play. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104-118. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi: 10. 1146/ annurev. psych. 53. 100901. 135153
Fassbender, E.A., Richards, D.B., Bilgin, A.C., Thompson, W.F., & Heiden, W. (2012). VirSchool: The effect of background music and immersive display systems on memory for facts learned in an educational virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 490-500.
Fastrich, G. M., Kerr, T., Castel, A. D., & Murayama, K. (2018). The role of interest in memory for trivia questions: An investigation with a large-scale database. Motivation Science, 4(3), 227-250.
Fryer, L. K., & Ainley, M. (2019). Supporting interest in a study domain: A longitudinal test of the interplay between interest, utility-value, and competence beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 60, 252-262.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibb, G. D., Bailey, J. R., Lambirth, T. T., & Wilson, W. P. (1983). Personality differences between high and low electronic video games users. Journal of Psychology, 114,159-165.
Gomila, T., & Calvo, P. (2008). Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Toward an integrated approach. In P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach ,1-25. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of game-based learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 23-38.
Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M. H., & Boyle, E. A. (2011). The differences in motivations of online game players and offline game players: a combined analysis of three studies at higher education level. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2197-2211.
Hidi, S. (2001). Interest, reading, and learning: Theoretical and practical considerations. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 191-209. doi:10.1023/A:1016667621114
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Liu, M.-C., Ho, H.-Y., & Chen, Y.- L. (2014). Using a “prediction–observation–explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110-120. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004.
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Tai, K.-H., & Lin, P.-C. (2015). Self-efficacy relevant to competitive anxiety and gameplay interest in the one-on-one competition setting. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 791-807.
Hwang, G. J., Hsu, T. C., Lai, C. L., & Hsueh, C. J. (2017). Interaction of problem-based gaming and learning anxiety in language students' English listening performance and progressive behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 106, 26-42.
Hwang, G.j. and Wu, P.H.(2012). Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001-2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43,(1), 6-10.
Hwang, M.-Y., Hong, J.-C., Cheng, H.-Y., Peng, Y.-C., & Wu, N.-C. (2013). Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students’ attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game. Computers & Education, 60(1), 254-263. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.014
Joiner, R., Gavin, J., Duffield, J., Brosnan, M., Crook, C., Durndell, A., Maras, P., Miller, J., Scott, A. J., & Lovatt, P. (2005). Gender, internet identification, and internet anxiety: Correlates of internet use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8(4), 371-378.
Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865-885. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9590-2
Karadag, R. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on game based learning scenarios in primary reading and writing instruction courses. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp .2015.1.2634
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2014). The role of interest in learning and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Lan, Y.-J., Chen, N.-S., Li, P., & Grant, S. (2015). Embodied cognition and language learning in virtual environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 639-644.
Lee, C. L., & Hsu, H. T. (2011). A survey study on students' anxiety and beliefs about English learning in a University of Technology. K.U.A.S. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 85-104.
Losh, S.C. (2009). Generation versus aging, and education, occupation, gender and ethnicity effects in U.S. digital divide. Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, October2-3, Retrieved 25, May, 2010, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~slosh/LoshGenerationVsAging.doc
Macayan, J. V., Quinto, E. J. M., Otsuka, J. C., & Cueto, A. B. S. (2018). Influence of language learning anxiety on L2 speaking and writing of Filipino engineering students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(1), 40-55. doi:10.17576/3L-2018-2401-04
Marcos‐Llinás, M., & Garau, M. J. (2009). Effects of language anxiety on three proficiency‐level courses of Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 94-111.
Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the competitive state anxiety inventory-2. In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport 117-190. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
Mayer, R. E. (2005), Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning , 31-48, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Meluso, A., Zheng, M., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2012). Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Computers & Education, 59(2), 497-504. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.019.
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., & Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 541-555.
Numan, D. (1995). Language teaching methodology. New York, NY: Phoenix ELT.
Oxford, R. (1995). When emotion meets (meta) cognition in language learning histories. International Journal of Educational Research, 23(7), 581-594.
Pivec, M. (2007). Editorial: Play and learning: potentials of game based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 387 393.
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184.
Richter, K. (2018). Factors affecting the pronunciation abilities of adult learners of English. A longitudinal group study. In S. M. Reiterer (Ed.), Exploring language aptitude: Views from psychology, the language sciences, and cognitive neuroscience ,339-361. Cham, CH: Springer. doi :10.1007/978-3-319-91917-1_18
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50.
Sax, L. (2006). Why Gender Matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York, NY: Random House.
Schraw, G. & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and discussions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23-52.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303.
Shao, K., Pekrun, R., & Nicholson, L. J. (2019). Emotions in classroom language learning: What can we learn from achievement emotion research? System, 86, 102121
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest: The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57-60.
Squire, K. (2005). Game-based learning: Present and future of state of the field. Retrieved August 20, 2007 from http://www.masie.com/xlearn/Game-Based_Learning.pdf
Su, C.-H. (2016). The effects of students' motivation, cognitive load and learning anxiety in gamification software engineering education: A structural equation modeling study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75(16), 10013-10036
Sullivan, C., & Bryce, J. (2001). The internet and masculinity: Gender, technology and identity. Paper presented to the British Psychological Society Wessex and Wight Branch Psychology and Internet Conference, Farnborough, 7-9 November.
Trudi, J., & Valerie, A.C. (1995). Diversity as a determinant of attitudes: A possible explanation of the apparent advantage of single-sex settings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(1), 51-64.
Van Der Slik, F. W. P., Van Hout, R. W. N. M., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 countries with 49 mother tongues. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142056. doi: 10.1371 / journal. pone. 0142056.
Van Gog, T., & Pass, F. (2008). Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 16-26. doi: 10.1080/00461520701756248
Wallace, S. A., & Nierman, A. (2006). Addressing the need for a Java based game curriculum. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 22(2), 20–26.
Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39-52.
Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 414-426.
Watson, W. R., Mong, C. J., & Harris, C. A. (2011). A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers & Education, 56(2), 466-474.
Wright, A. G., Hansen, L., & McEachen, D. (2011). Flow experience and mood states while playing body movement-controlled video games. Games and Culture, 6, 414-428.
Yang, J. C., Lin, M. Y. D., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). Effects of anxiety levels on learning performance and gaming performance in digital game-based learning. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 34(3), 324-334. doi:10.1111/jcal.12245
Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., & Chen, N. S. (2016). Effects of the badge mechanism on self-efficacy and learning performance in a game-based English learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 371-394.
Yang, Y. T. (2012). Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital 113 games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Computers & Education, 59(2), 365-377.
Yip, F. W., & Kwan, A. C. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational Media International, 43(3), 233-249.
Youngblood, M. (2007). Using XNA-GSE game segments to engage students in advanced computer science education. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Game Development in Computer Science Education ,70-74.

 
肆、 網路資料
民族語言網（Ethnologue: Languages of the World）。2020.04取自https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/ethnologue200。
日本入國管理局，人口統計。2020.04取自https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00250012&tstat=000001018034&cycle=1&year=20190&month=12040606&tclass1=000001060399。
教育部統計處。2020.04取自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=596D9D77281BE257。