研究生: |
陳瑄 Chen, Hsuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
基於混合多準則決策方法之技術藍圖-以工業網通公司為例 The Hybird MCDM Methods Based Technology Roadmap Planning-An Empirical Study Base on A networking Company |
指導教授: |
黃啟祐
Huang, Chi-Yo |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
工業教育學系 Department of Industrial Education |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 141 |
中文關鍵詞: | 技術藍圖 、T-Plan 、修正式德菲法 、決策實驗室分析法 、決策實驗室網路流程法 、VIKOR法 、多準則決策方法 |
英文關鍵詞: | Technology Roadmap, T-Plan, Modified Delphi, DEMATEL, DNP, VIKOR, MCDM (Multi-criteria decision making) |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204229 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:187 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
對企業而言,能掌握產業趨勢、技術評估與產品規劃極為重要,才能推出符合客戶需求的產品以達到永續經營且利潤極大化的經營目的,而技術藍圖(Technology Roadmap, TRMs)為最重要的分析方法,以協助企業掌握市場趨勢,規劃技術策略以進行開發新產品或服務。雖然技術藍圖對於市場、技術與產品之規劃極為重要,部份研究機構也對技術藍圖之規畫提出創新方法,如劍橋大學之T Plan,唯現有之技術藍圖規劃法多基於質性或專家群體法,分析過程較缺乏明確之數字做為決策之基礎,因此,本研究擬結合T-Plan與多準則決策分析方法,整合市場、產品及技術相關資訊,建構技術策略藍圖,作為企業之研發策略、產品創新與技術的開發方向。本研究將導入德菲法(Modified Delphi)、決策實驗室分析法(Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL)、決策實驗室網路流程法(DEMATEL-based Network Process, DNP)及VIKOR做出最佳的決策方案以幫助決策者,於市場層面、產品層面及技術層面上,以專家問卷的方式改善以往專家會議的缺點,針對每個方案上做出優劣次序的排列,整合出一個最符合決策者理想的方案。
For enterprises, the capabilities to grasp industry trends, assess technology, and plan products are extremely important. The Technology Roadmap (TRMs) is one of the most important analytic methods to help enterprises to grasp market trends, define technology strategy for the development of new products or services. The TRMs have played a daily dominant role in research and development (R&D) management during the past three decades since the first introduction by Motorola. Some research institutions continuously innovate technology roadmap for enhancing the feasibility and efficiency of the road mapping process. One typical example is the T-Plan being proposed by Cambridge University. However, such qualitative methods based road mapping technique is intuitive and are short of crisp numbers for serving as the basis of decision making. Therefore, the work aims to combine the T-Plan and the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. The marketing, product and technology related information, will be integrated in the analytic framework. The technology, R&D, product innovation and technology development directions can be defined accordingly. In this study, the modified Delphi method, the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), the decision-making laboratory network flow method (DEMATEL-based Network Process, DNP) and VIKOR will be introduced to summarize experts’ opinions; such summarizations of opinions overcome the shortcomings of previous expert meetings based roadmapping approaches. An empirical study based on an emerging networking firms’ roadmapping of future networking products will serve as the basis for verifying the feasibility of the proposed analytic framework. The verified analytic framework as well as the proposed technology roadmap can serve as the basis for future networking firms’ roadmap definitions.
Adhikary, P., Roy, P. K., & Mazumdar, A. (2015). Optimal Renewable Energy Project Selection: A Multi-Criteria Optimization Technique Approach. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 11(5), 3319-3329.
Anvari, A., Zulkifli, N., & Arghish, O. (2014). Application of a modified VIKOR method for decision-making problems in lean tool selection. The International
Bello, L. L. (2011). The case for ethernet in automotive communications. ACM SIGBED Review, 8(4), 7-15.
Caetano, M., & Amaral, D. C. (2011). Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments. Technovation, 31(7), 320-335.
Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(7), 1418-1437.
Daim, T. U., Amer, M., & Brenden, R. (2012). Technology roadmapping for wind energy: case of the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 27-37.
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.
Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1972). World problems, an invitation to further thought within the framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gaj, P., Jasperneite, J., & Felser, M. (2013). Computer communication within industrial distributed environment—A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 9(1), 182-189.
Galvin, R. (2004). Roadmapping—a practitioner's update. Technological forecasting and social change, 71(1), 101-103.
Govindan, K., Kannan, D., & Shankar, K. M. (2014). Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 214-232.
Huang, C. Y., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Developing e-commerce business models for enabling silicon intellectual property transactions. International journal of information technology and management, 5(2), 114-133.
Huang, C. Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry. Technovation, 27(12), 744-765.
Huang, C. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Ho, W. R. J. (2011). System on chip design service e-business value maximization through a novel MCDM framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 7947-7962.
Hung, H.-L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y.-F. (2008). Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 31(2), 191-198.
Jia, P., Govindan, K., & Kannan, D. (2015). Identification and evaluation of influential criteria for the selection of an environmental shipping carrier using DEMATEL: a case from India. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 7(6), 719-741.
Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7001), 376.
Jun, S.-P., Seo, J. H., & Son, J.-K. (2013). A study of the SME Technology Roadmapping Program to strengthen the R&D planning capability of Korean SMEs. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(5), 1002-1014.
Keller, H. H., McCullough, J., Davidson, B., Vesnaver, E., Laporte, M., Gramlich, L., . . . Jeejeebhoy, K. (2015). The Integrated Nutrition Pathway for Acute Care (INPAC): Building consensus with a modified Delphi. Nutrition journal, 14(1), 1.
Lee, C., Song, B., & Park, Y. (2015). An instrument for scenario-based technology roadmapping: How to assess the impacts of future changes on organisational plans. Technological forecasting and social change, 90, 285-301.
Lee, J. H., Kim, H.-i., & Phaal, R. (2012). An analysis of factors improving technology roadmap credibility: A communications theory assessment of roadmapping processes. Technological forecasting and social change, 79(2), 263-280.
Liao, H., Xu, Z., & Zeng, X.-J. (2015). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 23(5), 1343-1355.
Liu, C. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Lee, M. H. (2012). Improving tourism policy implementation–The use of hybrid MCDM models. Tourism Management, 33(2), 413-426.
Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kharb, R. K., & Mangla, S. K. (2016). Evaluating the enablers in solar power developments in the current scenario using fuzzy DEMATEL: An Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 379-397.
Mets, K., Ojea, J. A., & Develder, C. (2014). Combining power and communication network simulation for cost-effective smart grid analysis. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1771-1796.
Moon, H., Miller, D. R., & Kim, S. H. (2013). Product design innovation and customer value: Cross‐cultural research in the United States and Korea. Journal of product innovation management, 30(1), 31-43.
More, E., Gungor, Z. E., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. (2015). Addressing Resource Over-exploitation Via Cooperative Institutions: Examining How Technology Roadmapping Could Contribute. Procedia CIRP, 26, 173-178.
Nisel, S. (2014). An Extended VIKOR Method for Ranking Online Graduate Business Programs. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 103-107.
Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2(1), 5-21.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., & Probert, D. (2001a). Technology Roadmapping: linking technology resources to business objectives. Centre for Technology Management, University of Cambridge, 1-18.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2001b). Characterisation of technology roadmaps: purpose and format. Paper presented at the Management of Engineering and Technology, 2001. PICMET'01. Portland International Conference on.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping—a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological forecasting and social change, 71(1), 5-26.
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2005). Developing a technology roadmapping system. Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries, 31, 99-111.
Phaal, R., Shehabuddeen, N., & Assakul, P. (2002). Technology roadmapping: charting the route ahead for UK road transport. Paper presented at the Engineering Management Conference, 2002. IEMC'02. 2002 IEEE International.
Phillips-Wren, G. (2010). Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies: Proceedings of the Second KES International Symposium IDT 2010 (Vol. 4): Springer.
Prasad, M., Dey, R. K., Sardar, A., & Goswami, G. (2014). Ethernet as an Emerging Trend in Vehicle Network Technology—Part I. Auto Tech Review, 3(12), 18-23.
Probert, D., Farrukh, C. J., & Phaal, R. (2003). Technology roadmapping—developing a practical approach for linking resources to strategic goals. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(9), 1183-1195.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, 2.
Sasanka, C. T., & Ravindra, K. (2015). Implementation of VIKOR Method for Selection of Magnesium Alloy to Suit Automotive Applications. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 83, 49-58.
Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Preston, J., Popay, J., Britten, N., Collins, M., . . . Wyatt, K. (2014). Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ open, 4(1), e004217.
Sung, W. (2001). Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the healthcare management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2(2), 11-19.
Tamura, M., Nagata, H., & Akazawa, K. (2002). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models.
Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, C. Y. (2012). Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems. Annals of Operations Research, 1-32.
Wall, M., Gausemeier, J., & Peitz, C. (2013). Technology push-based product planning–future markets for emerging technologies. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 8(1), 61-81.
Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Yu, P.-L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936-946.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multi criteria decision making. TIMS Studies in Manage, 31-57.
Zeleny, M., & Cochrane, J. L. (1973). Multiple criteria decision making: University of South Carolina Press.
Zhang, N., & Wei, G. (2013). Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(7), 4938-4947.
Zuloaga, A., Astarloa, A., Jiménez, J., Lázaro, J., & Bidarte, U. (2013). High-avalibility Seamless Redundancy for Train Ethernet Consist Network. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the XVIII Conference on the Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems Donostia-San Sebastián.