簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳憬儀
Juliet Ching-i Chen
論文名稱: 現行國民中學閱讀教學之研究:國民中學英語教師如何教授閱讀?
Reading Instruction in Junior High School: How do Junior High School English Teachers Instruct Reading?
指導教授: 謝妙玲
Hsieh, Miao-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 131
中文關鍵詞: 閱讀教學
英文關鍵詞: reading instruction
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:175下載:21
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 摘要
    這份實驗研究的用意是要調查現今國民中學英語教師如何施行閱讀教學。這份研究設計的問卷上面含有各種課堂上可能採取的閱讀活動,然後這些問卷被發送給全台中市353個國民中學英語教師填寫。問卷上面的30個問題分別代表由下而上/以文本為中心、由上而下/以讀者為中心、或雙向式的閱讀活動,以探討各個活動在課堂上被採用的頻率。結果顯示出大部分的受試者不再僅僅是傳統的採用由下而上/以文本為中心之閱讀活動的教師,而是在閱讀教學中呈現出雙重或多重傾向。另一方面,由上而下/以讀者為中心的閱讀活動在課堂上仍然尚未普及。可能影響受試者閱讀教學施行的因素,例如:國民中學基本學力測驗的實施、新版教科書的出版、與受試者的個人背景資料 ─ 性別、任教年資、任教學校(公立或私立)、學歷、以及是否主修英文,都在討論的範圍內。另外,根據所得資料之發現,這份研究不但提出建議給國民中學英語教師,也對師資培育機構、中等教育之有關當局、以及教科書編著者和出版者提出建議,以促使國民中學能具備更有效果和更有效率的閱讀教學。

    ABSTRACT
    This empirical study is intended to investigate how junior high school English teachers instruct reading in their teaching of English. A questionnaire containing a variety of reading activities that might be applied in reading classes was developed in this study and distributed to all the 353 junior high school English teachers in Taichung City. There were thirty questions in the questionnaire which stood for bottom-up/text-based, top-down/reader-based, and interactive applications respectively to elicit the frequency of the adoption of each activity in reading classes. The results revealed that the majority of the subjects in this study were no longer merely traditional bottom-up/text-based teachers. Instead, they had dual or multiple orientations in their reading instructions. On the other hand, top-down/reader-based applications were still not very prevalent in reading classes. Factors that might affect the subjects’ application of their reading instructions were discussed, including the implementation of the Basic Competency Test, the publication of the new versions of textbooks, and the subjects’ demographic information--gender, years of teaching, the kind of school they taught at (public or private), educational background, and whether they had majored in English. Besides, based on these findings, some suggestions were made not only to junior high school English teachers, but also to institutions of teacher education, secondary school authorities, and textbook writers and publishers with the aim of achieving a more effective and efficient reading instruction in junior high school.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………… i CHINESE ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………….. ii ENGLISH ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………………… iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………………………………………….. iv LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………………... viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………... 1 1.1 Background ………………………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Motivation ……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.3 Research questions ……………………………………………………………………….. 7 1.4 Significance and pedagogical implications of this study ………………………………… 8 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW …………………………………………….. 9 2.1 Evolution of models of the reading process--from passive to active …………………….. 9 2.1.1 Psycholinguistic model of reading ………………………………………………... 11 2.1.2 Schema theory …………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.2 The interactive mode of reading process ……………………………………………….. 13 2.2.1 Interaction between the reader and the text ………………………………………. 14 2.2.2 Interaction between higher- and lower-level processes …………………………... 15 2.2.3 Interaction between different reading skills ………………………………………. 17 2.2.4 Different models on the interaction between various component levels and stages …………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 2.2.5 Implications of the interactive mode of reading process for reading pedagogy ….. 24 2.3 Research on reading instructions ……………………………………………………….. 24 2.4 Research on background factors ………………………………………………………... 25 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY ……………………………………………….. 28 3.1 Subjects …………………………………………………………………………………. 28 3.1.1 Target population …………………………………………………………………. 28 3.1.2 Recruitment procedures …………………………………………………………... 28 3.2 Instrument ………………………………………………………………………………. 29 3.2.1 Questionnaire construction ……………………………………………………….. 30 3.2.2 Format of the questionnaire ………………………………………………………. 31 3.2.3 Content of the questionnaire ……………………………………………………... 32 3.2.4 Questionnaire administration ……………………………………………………... 33 3.3 Data analysis …………………………………………………………………………… 35 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS ………………………..…………………………………... 36 4.1 Demographic information ………………………………………………………………. 36 4.2 Questions about reading instruction …………………………………………………….. 39 4.2.1 The average score of each question ………………………..……………………... 39 4.2.2 Bottom-up/text-based, top-down/reader-based, or interactive teachers ………….. 40 4.3 Detailed analyses of each question and the influence of the five background factors ….. 45 4.3.1 The influence of the five background factors on the teachers’ orientations in their reading instructions ………………………………………………………. 45 4.3.2 The influence of the five background factors on the teachers’ responses to each question ……………………………………………………………………... 45 4.3.2.1 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factor “gender (G)” ……………………………………… 46 4.3.2.2 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factors “gender (G)” and “years of teaching (YT)” …….. 46 4.3.2.3 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factors “gender (G)” and “kind of school (KS)” ………... 48 4.3.2.4 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factor “kind of school (KS)” ……………………………. 49 4.3.2.5 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factor “years of teaching (YT)” …………………………. 51 4.3.2.6 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factors “years of teaching (YT),” “educational background (EB)” and “major in English (ME)” ………….. 52 4.3.2.7 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factor “educational background (EB)” ………………….. 53 4.3.2.8 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by the background factor “major in English (ME)” …………………………. 54 4.3.2.9 Findings of the influence of the five background factors on the teachers’ responses to each question ……………….………………………………. 56 4.3.2.10 The questions to which the teachers’ responses were influenced by none of the background factors …………………………………………. 57 CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS …………………………….. 65 5.1 The general reading instruction in junior high school ……………..…………………… 65 5.2 The practice of the three reading modes ………………………………………………... 68 5.2.1 The practice of the bottom-up/text-based applications …………………………… 69 5.2.2 The practice of the top-down/reader-based applications …………………………. 72 5.2.3 The practice of the interactive applications ………………………………………. 75 5.3 The influence of the five background factors …..………………………………………. 78 5.3.1 The implications of the influence of the five background factors on the teachers’ responses to the questions in the questionnaire ………………… 79 5.4 Suggestions for junior high school English teachers and the authorities concerned …… 80 5.4.1 Suggestions for junior high school English teachers ……………………………... 81 5.4.2 Suggestions for the authorities concerned and textbook writers and publishers …. 84 5.5 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………….…………….. 85 5.6 Limitations of this study and suggestions for future studies ……………………………. 86 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………………….. 88 APPENDIX A: QUESTIONNAIRE ……………………………………………………… 98 APPENDIX B: TABLES WITH DETAILED RESULTS ……………………………… 101 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 The number of the answered questionnaires from each junior high school ……… 34 Table 4.1 Subjects’ background information ……………………………………………….. 38 Table 4.2 The average score of each question (activity) ………………………..…………... 40 Table 4.3 The mode with the highest point among the three reading modes for each subject …………………………………………………………………………………….. 42 Table 4.4 The bar chart of the frequencies of the three reading modes …………………….. 42 Table 4.5 The pie chart of the percentages of the three reading modes …………………….. 43 Table 4.6 The mean of each reading mode ……………………………………………….. 44 Table 4.7 Pairwise comparisons ……………………………………………………………. 44 Table 4.8 Tests within-subjects contrasts …………………………………………………… 44 Table 4.9 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q7 (BU3) ……………... 46 Table 4.10 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q4 (TD1) …………… 47 Table 4.11 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q9 (TD3) ……………. 48 Table 4.12 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q15 (IA5) ……………………….. 49 Table 4.13 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q2 (BU1) ……………. 50 Table 4.14 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q14 (BU5) ……………. 50 Table 4.15 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q27 (TD10) ………… 51 Table 4.16 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q20 (IA7) ……………………… 52 Table 4.17 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q12 (TD4) …………. 53 Table 4.18 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q30 (BU10) …………... 54 Table 4.19 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q11 (BU4) ……………. 55 Table 4.20 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q22 (TD8) ………… 55 Table 4.21 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q6 (BU2) ……………. 57 Table 4.22 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q17 (BU6) …………... 58 Table 4.23 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q18 (BU7) …………... 58 Table 4.24 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q23 (BU8) …………... 58 Table 4.25 Frequency of a bottom-up/text-based reading activity: Q26 (BU9) …………... 59 Table 4.26 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q5 (TD2) …………... 59 Table 4.27 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q13 (TD5) …………... 59 Table 4.28 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q19 (TD6) …………. 60 Table 4.29 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q21 (TD7) ………… 60 Table 4.30 Frequency of a top-down/reader-based reading activity: Q25 (TD9) ………… 61 Table 4.31 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q1 (IA1) ………………………… 61 Table 4.32 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q3 (IA2) ……………………….. 61 Table 4.33 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q8 (IA3) ………………………… 62 Table 4.34 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q10 (IA4) ……………………….. 62 Table 4.35 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q16 (IA6) ……………………….. 63 Table 4.36 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q24 (IA8) ……………………….. 63 Table 4.37 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q28 (IA9) ……………………….. 64 Table 4.38 Frequency of an interactive reading activity: Q29 (IA10) ……………………… 64 Table 4.39 Frequency of the three reading modes ………………………………………… 131

    REFERENCES
    國中基本學力測驗推動工作委員會。Available: http://www.bctest.edu.tw/
    Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From reader to reading teacher: Issues and strategies for second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Anderson, L. W., & Burns, R. B. (1989). Research in classroom: The study of teacher, teaching and instruction. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Alvarez, M. C., & Risko, V. J. (1989). Schema activation, construction, and application. ERIC Digest [On-line]. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills (ED 312 611).
    Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 37-55). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Babbie, E. (1990). Survey Research Methods (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
    Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Brousseau, B. A., Book, C., & Byers, J. L. (1988). Teacher beliefs and the culture of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (6), 33-39.
    Brown, D. F., & Rose, T. D. (1995). Self-reported classroom impact of teachers’ theories about learning and obstacles to implementation. Action in Teacher Education, 17 (1), 20-29.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
    Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
    Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 479-488.
    Carrell, P. L. (1984). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications. The Modern Language Journal, 68, 332-343.
    Carrell, P. L. (1987). Written text as communicative interaction. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 23-50). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Carrell, P. L. (1989). Introduction: Interactive approaches to second language reading. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 1-8). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L. (1989). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 101-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L. (1989). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 239-259). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1989). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 73-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Carrell, P. L., & Wallace, B. (1983). Background knowledge: Context and familiarity in reading comprehension. In M. A. Clarke & J. Handscombe (Eds.), On TESOL ‘82 (pp. 295-308). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Chang, P. (2000). 張碧玲。《國民中學英語教師對溝通式教學觀之信念研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Chapman, L. J. (1983). Reading development and cohesion. London: Heinemann.
    Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second-language skills: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Cheng, W. (1985). 程為山。《國中教師專業領導的現況及其影響因素》。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Chern, C. (1994). A review of L1 and L2 reading theories. Tunghai Journal, 35, 127-147.
    Chi, F., & Chern, C. (1998). 紀鳳鳴 & 陳秋蘭。〈高中英語閱讀教學及學習之探討〉。《第五屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集》,頁95-109。台北:文鶴出版社。
    Christen, W. L., & Murphy, T. J. (1991). Increasing comprehension by activating prior knowledge. ERIC Digest [On-line]. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English, and Communication (ED 328 885).
    Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121-150.
    Clarke, M. A., & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic
    principles in the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27, 135-154.
    Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of the ESL reader. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 5-12). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics, 17(3), 301-316.
    Cziko, G. A. (1978). Differences in first- and second-language reading: The use of syntactic, semantic and discourse constraints. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 473-489.
    Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 499-545.
    Devine, J. (1989). The relationship between general language competence and second language reading proficiency: Implications for teaching. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 260-277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Eskey, D. E. (1970). A new technique for the teaching of reading to advanced students. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 315-322.
    Eskey, D. E. (1973). A model program for teaching advanced reading to students of English as a second language. Language Learning, 23, 169-184.
    Eskey, D. E. (1986). Theoretical foundations. In F. Dubin, D. E. Eskey, & W. Grabe (Eds.), Teaching second language reading for academic purposes (pp. 2-23). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Eskey, D. E. (1989). Holding in the bottom: An interactive approach to the language problems of second language readers. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 93-100). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Eskey, D. E., & Grabe, W. (1989). Interactive models for ESL reading: Perspectives on instruction. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 221-239). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Floyd, P., & Carrell, P. L. (1987). Effects on ESL reading of teaching cultural content schemata. Language Learning, 37, 89-108.
    Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (1), 126-135.
    Goodman, K. S. (1971). Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The psychology of second language learning (pp. 135-142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Goodman, K. S. (1973). On the psycholinguistic method of teaching reading. In F. Smith (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and reading (pp. 158-176). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Goodman, K. S. (1985). Unity in reading. In M. R. Ruddell, R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 813-840). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Goodman, K. S., & Goodman, Y. (1978). Reading of American children whose language is a stable rural dialect of English or a language other than English. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
    Gough, P. (1985). One second of reading. In M. R. Ruddell, R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 661-686). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Grabe, W. (1989). Reassessing the term “interactive.” In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 56-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
    Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    Hayes, D. A., & Tierney, R. J. (1982). Developing readers’ knowledge through analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 256-280.
    Hedge, T. (1985). Using readers in language teaching. London: MacMillian Publishers Ltd.
    Huang, H. (1981). 黃鴻文。《學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響》。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Huang, Y. (1995). Developing your students’ communicative competence: Some practical ideas for the classroom teachers. In C. Li et al. (Eds.), Selected papers from the ninth conference on English teaching and learning in the Republic of China (pp. 54-64). Taipei: The Crane Publishing Company.
    Hudson, T. (1989). The effects of induced schemata on the “short-circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 183-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    James, M. O. (1987). ESL reading pedagogy: Implications of schema-theoretical research. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Research in reading in English as a second language (pp. 175-188). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
    Johnson, P. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169-181.
    Johnson, P. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 503-516.
    Kintsch, W., & Greene, E. (1978). The role of culture-specific schemata in the
    comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes, 1, 1-13.
    Kinzer, C. K. (1988a). Instructional frameworks and instructional choices: Comparisons between pre-service and in-service teachers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 357-377.
    Kinzer, C. K. (1988b). Mental models and teachers’ beliefs: Potential relationships between reading teachers’ theoretical beliefs, idealized environments and classroom decision-making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Tucson, AZ.
    LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1985). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. In M. R. Ruddell, R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 689-718). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Levy, B. A. (1981). Interactive processing during reading. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
    Lin, C. (1992). 林清山。《心理與教育統計學》。台北:東華書局。
    Lin. C. (1990). 林清財。《我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究》。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Lin, H. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs and practice of communicative language teaching: A case study of a junior high school English teacher. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Lin, T. (1987). 林彩岫。《國民中學教師專業自主權之研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Lunzer, E., Waite, M., & Dolan, T. (1979). Comprehension and comprehension tests. In E. Lunzer & K. Gardner (Eds.), The effective use of reading (pp. 37-71). London: Heinemann Educational.
    Mackay, R., & Mountford, A. (1979). Reading for information. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 106-141). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    McClelland, J., and Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of the effect of context in letter perception. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
    Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nuttall, C. (2000). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
    Pai, M. (1985). 白美倫。〈The teaching of reading and communication skills〉。《第二屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集》,頁291-304。台北:文鶴出版社。
    Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Longman.
    Plaister, T. (1968). Reading instruction for college level foreign students. TESOL Quarterly, 2, 164-168.
    Rees, A. L. W. (1980). Reading aloud: Suggestions for classroom procedure. English Language Teaching Journal, 34, 112-120.
    Richards, J. C., Gipe, J. P., & Thompson, B. (1987). Teachers’ beliefs about good reading instruction. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 8 (1), 1-6.
    Rivers, W. (1964). The Psychologist and the foreign-language teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    Rivers, W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    Robb, L. (1996). Reading strategies that work: Teaching your students to become better readers. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
    Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text and the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Toward an interactive model of reading. In M. R. Ruddell, R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed.) (pp. 722-750). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Saville-Troike, M. (1973). Reading and the audio-lingual method. TESOL Quarterly, 7, 395-405.
    Silberstein, S. (1987). Let’s take another look at reading: Twenty-five years of reading instruction. English Teaching Forum, 25(4), 28-35.
    Smith, F. (1972). Understanding reading (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Standiford, S. N. (1984). Metacomprehension. ERIC Digest [On-line]. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills (ED 250 670).
    Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
    Steffensen, M. S., Joag-dev, C., & Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10-29.
    Sun, C. (1976). 孫志文。《語文教育改革芻議》。台北:學生書局
    Tang, J. (1993). 湯仁燕。《國民小學教師教學信念與教學行為關係之研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.
    Truscott, J. (1996). Tree experts lost in the forest: English comprehension in Taiwan. English Teaching and Learning, 20 (3), 5-13.
    Tsai, Y. (2002). Culture and English teaching: How do secondary school English teachers conceptualize and instruct reading? Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Tsao, F. (1992). 曹逢甫。〈目前閱讀教學的缺失及其改進之道〉。《第八屆中華民國英語文教學研討會論文集》,頁291-304。台北:文鶴出版社。
    Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. New York: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
    Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. London: Oxford University.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1979). The process and purpose of reading. In H. G. Widdowson (Ed.), Explorations in applied linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 173-181). London: Oxford University Press.
    Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Language purpose and language use. London: Oxford University Press.
    Williams, E. (1983). Communicative reading. In K. Johnson & D. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives in communicative language teaching (pp. 171-186). London: Academic Press.
    William, E., & Moran, C. (1989). Reading in a foreign language at intermediate and advanced levels with particular reference to English. Language Teaching, 22, 217-228.
    Wu, C. (2002). The study on high school trainees’ theoretical orientations toward reading instruction and reading instructional practices. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Yorio, C. A. (1971). Some sources of reading problems for foreign language learners.
    Language Learning, 21, 107-115.

    QR CODE