本研究旨在探討Foucault主體觀及其在教育上的蘊義，為深入了解Foucault主體觀立論的基點，本文先就Foucault的生平及其學術背景探討Foucault主體觀的形成脈絡；其次，探討主體、知識與權力三者的關係；再次，針對知識與權力建構下之主體自主開展的問題，進一步探討Foucault所預示的可能出路；最後，根據主體與知識及權力之關係，分析三者在教育中的關係，並探討Foucault所預示之可能出路在教育上的蘊義。
根據前述之探討，本研究之結論如下：
一、Foucault經由對時代、文化、道德之反省及本身經驗體認到個人自
主性與開創性有所局限。
二、Foucault認為主體是在知識與權力的運作中建構而成的，主體的形
成來自於兩個方向的建構過程，首先是直接受到權力的塑造；其次
則是藉由對主體內在真理的認知來建構對自我的認識，但這些真理
則是來自權力的運作。
三、現代主體面對知識與權力運作所可能引發的支配作用，從Foucault
對現代性的批評中可歸結出兩條可行的方向，分別是對知識／權力
的批判與自主的自我塑造。
四、以Foucault對主體、知識與權力三者關係的闡述來分析教育中學
生主體、知識及權力的關係，可發現學生主體即是在知識／權力的
運作中被建構而成的，且其中可能蘊含支配作用。
五、根據Foucault對現代性的批評，教育工作者除了需對知識／權
力之運作加以省思外，還應培養學生積極主動塑造自我的生活態
度。
根據以上之結論，爰提以下建議作為教育革新參考：
一、培養學生積極的主動性應由親職教育做起；
二、教育改革應回歸學生主體；
三、加強學生自我倫理的建構；
四、重視教育理論與實踐間的彈性調整；
五、落實小班小校以協助學生充分開展自我；
六、打破使用教科書的迷思；
七、重視教育中知識／權力的研究。

The purpose of this study is to explore Foucault’s view on subject and it’s implication on education. In order to understand his theoretical framework thoroughly, this study begins with a brief sketch of his background and the intellectual climate in France. Then, this study discusses how the subject is constituted and dominated by the interaction of power and knowledge. Next, this study focuses on the solutions predicted by Foucault to free from the domination of power-knowledge. Based on the above discussion, this study attempts to expound its implication on education.
The conclusions of the study are as follows:
1. Through the reflection on the contemporary culture and individual experience, Foucault recognized the restrictions of personal autonomy.
2. The individual is constituted by the interaction between knowledge and power. On the one hand, we are trained directly by the discipline power; on the other, we know ourselves by the truth that arises from the operation of power-knowledge.
3. From Foucault’s criticism of modernity, there are two solutions for the domination of power-knowledge. One is to discover the relation of power-knowledge in the ordinary life and transgress its confinement. The other is to create the individual styles of living by ourselves.
4. If we take Foucault's account of the relation between subject, knowledge and power as a framework to analyze students in the context of education, we may find that students are constituted by the interplay of power and knowledge and the interplay probably results in the unreasonable domination.
5. According to Foucault's criticism of modernity, what educators should do is to reflect on the operation of power-knowledge, to avoid its domination, and to encourage students to develop an attitude for actively creating their living styles.
According to conclusions above, suggestions for future education in Taiwan would be offered as follows:
1. In order to cultivate students’ active attitude, the importance of parent’s education should be emphasized.
2. Education reform should be based on students' privilege of learning.
3. Moral education should mainly make students culture themselves to be ethic subjects.
4. Educational theory and practice should be referential to each other.
5. We should reduce the number of students in classes or schools to help them develop adequately.
6. Teachers should recognize that textbooks are not the only teaching material.
7. The research of power-knowledge in education should be promoted.

壹、中文著作
于奇智(民88)。傅柯。台北市：東大。
王治河(民88)。福柯。湖南：湖南教育出版社。
王俊斌(民87)。論郭耳堡、哈伯馬斯以及傅柯倫理立場的辯證－轉向後
現代的多元論述與道德教育。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所
碩士論文。未出版。
但昭偉(民86)。教育研究的三部曲及其可能的謬誤。載於簡成熙（主
編），哲學與教育－二十世紀末的教育哲學，頁289-303。高雄市：
高雄復文。
李新民(民86)。傅柯的哲學思想及其對教育的啟示。國立台南師範學
院初等教育學報，第10期，299-324頁。
阮小芳(民87)。社會重建的起點、市民社會的基地－社區大學之理念、
特色與課程規劃簡介。台北市立圖書館館訊。16卷1期，68-82。
周祝瑛、陳威任(民85)。國中日常教學活動之生態研究。台北市：行
政院教育改革審議委員會。
柯華葳、幸曼玲、林秀地(民85)。國小日常教學活動之生態研究。台
北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
姚人多(民89)。論傅柯的《主體與權力》－一個批判性的導讀（上）
（下）。當代，第150、151期，頁126-33、108-33。
徐宗林(民77)。現代教育思潮。台北市：五南。
徐宗林(民81)。西洋教育思想史。台北市：文景。
徐宗林、周愚文(民86)。教育史。台北市：五南。
高宣揚(民79）。結構主義。台北市：遠流。
陳伯璋(民79)。教育思想與教育研究。台北市：師大書苑。
陳榮華(民81)。海德格哲學：思考與存有。台北縣：輔仁大學。
黃俊傑、陳昭瑛、吳展良(民85)。分流教育的改革：理論、實務與對
策。台北市：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
黃炳煌(民85)。教育改革－理念、策略與措施。台北市：心理。
黃武雄(民88)。我們要辦什麼樣的社區大學？－台北縣五所社區大學
設置企劃。教育研究資訊。7卷3期，59-77。
游家政(民87)。教科書選用的問題與改進。北縣教育。21期，75-83。
張澤乾(民88)。法國文明史。台北市：中央圖書。
張鍠焜(民88)。傅柯與哈伯瑪斯啟蒙觀點及其教育蘊義。國立台灣師
範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。
湯志民(民81)。學校建築與校園規劃。台北市：五南。
湯志民(民86)。台灣學校建築的發展和方向。初等教育學刊。第6期，
143-96。
楊深坑(民77)。理論、詮釋與實踐。台北市：師大書苑。
楊大春(民84)。傅柯。台北市：生智。
趙衛民(民84)。尼采的生命哲學。台北市：幼獅。
歐用生(民88)。請教科書出版業者共同參與教育改革。出版界。57期，
26-28。
歐崇敬(民87)。從結構主義到解構主義。台北市：揚智文化。
滕守堯(民85)。海德格。台北市：生智。
蘇永明(民86)。都是教科書惹的禍。國教世紀。178期，8-12。
蘇永明(民87)。傅柯的規訓權力與現代教育的興起。八十七學年度教
育學術研討會，台北市立師範學院。
蘇永明(民89)。垂直多元與水平多元的思考模式。載於但昭偉、蘇永
明（主編），文化、多元文化與教育，頁133-79。台北市：五南。
羅芃、馮棠、孟華(民86)。法國文化史。北京：北京大學。
貳、翻譯著作
Althusser, L. (民79)。列寧和哲學(杜章智譯)。台北市：遠流。
Brugger, W.(民78)。西洋哲學詞典（項退結譯）。華香園出版社。
Copleston, F.(民80)。西洋哲學史（七）－菲希特到尼采（林如心）。
台北市：黎明。
Deleuze, G.(民89)。德勒茲論傅柯（楊凱麟譯）。台北市：麥田。
Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P.(民81)。傅柯－超越結構主義與詮釋（錢
俊譯）。台北市：桂冠。
Foucault, M.(民77)。論何謂啟蒙(薛興國譯)。載於李明輝等(譯)，想， 頁13-35。台北：聯經。
Foucault, M.(民79a)。性意識史：導論（尚衡譯)。台北市：久大、桂
冠。
Foucault, M.(民79b)。性史(沈力、謝石譯)。台北市：結構群。
Foucault, M.(民81)。規訓與懲罰(劉北城、楊遠嬰譯)。台北市：桂冠。
Foucault, M.(民82)。知識的考掘(王德威譯)。台北市：麥田。
Foucault, M.(民83)。臨床醫學的誕生(劉絮愷譯)。台北市：時報文化。
Foucault, M.(民87)。古典時代瘋狂史(林志明譯)。台北市：時報文化。
Gibson, R(民84）。結構主義與教育(石偉平等譯）。台北市：五南。
Illich, I. (民83)。非學校化社會(吳康寧譯)。台北市：桂冠。
Merquior, J. G.(民87)。傅柯（陳瑞麟譯）。台北市：桂冠。
Miller, J. E.(民84)。傅柯的生死愛慾（高毅譯）。台北市：時報文
化。
Nietzsche, F.(民80)。權力意志－重估一切價值的嘗試（張念東、凌素
心譯）。北京：商務。
Nietzsche, F.(民88)。善惡的彼岸（朱泱譯）。台北市：水牛。
參、英文著作
Ball, S.J.(1990). Introducing monsieur Foucault. In S. J. Ball
(Ed.), Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge.
(pp.1-8)London: Routledge.
Biesta, G.J.J.(1995). From Manipulation to Communication:
Communicative Pedagogy and the Postmodern Crisis of the
Subject. ERIC Digest.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. ED 385 522)
Blanchot, M.(1987). Michel Foucault as I imagine him. In J.
Mehlman(Trans.), Foucault/ Blanchot. (pp.63-109). New York:
Zone Books.
Dearden, R. F.(1968). The Philosphy of Primary Education: An
Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond
Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of
Chicago.
Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P. (1986). What is maturity? Habermas
and Foucault on ‘What is enlightenment?’. In D. C. Hoy
(Ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader. (pp.109-121). New York:
Basil Blackwell.
Eribon, D(1989). Michel Foucault. (trans. by B. Wing).
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fendler, L.(1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy
of the educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan
(Eds.). Foucault’s Challenge—Discourse, Knowledge, and
Power in Education(pp.64-90). New York: Teachers College
Press.
Foucault, M.(1970). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the
Human Sciences. Unidentified collective translation.
London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M.(1972a). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. by A.
M. S. Smith New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M.(1972b). The discourse on language. (Trans. by R.
Swyer) In The Archaeology of Knowledge. (pp.215-37). New
York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M.(1975). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of
Medical Perception. Trans. by A. M. S. Smith. New York:
Vintage.
Foucault, M.(1977a). What is an author? In D. Bouchard.(Ed.),
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and
Interviews.(pp.113-8). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
_______________ Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. Bouchard.
(Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays
and Interviews.(pp.139-64). Ithaca: Cornell University
Press.
______________ Intellectuals and power. In D. Bouchard.(Ed.),
Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and
Interviews.(pp.205-17). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M.(1977b). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the
Prison. Trans. by A. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1978). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction.
Trans. by R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1980). Body/power. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.55-62). New York: Pantheon.
_______________ Questions on geography. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.63-77). New York: Pantheon.
_______________ Two lectures. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge:Selected Interviews and Other Writings,1972-
1977.(pp.78-108). New York: Pantheon.
_______________ Truth and power. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.109-133). New York: Pantheon.
______________ The eye of power. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.146-65). New York: Pantheon.
_______________ The history of sexuality. In C. Gordon.(Ed.),
Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.183-93). New York: Pantheon.
_______________ The confession of the flesh. In C. Gordon.
(Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other
Writings,1972-1977.(pp.194-228). New York:Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1982). The subject and power. In H.L. Dreyfus & P.
Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and
Hermeneutics.(pp.208-26). Chicago: The University of
Chicago.
Foucault, M.(1984). Space, knowledge, and power. In P. Rabinow
(Ed.), The Foucault Reader.(pp.239-56). New York: Pantheon
Books.
Foucault, M.(1985). The Use of Pleasure. Trans. by R. Hurley.
New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1986). The Care of The Self. Trans. by R. Hurley.
New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M.(1988a). The minimalist self. In L. D. Kritzman
(Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.3-
16). New York: Routledge.
_______________ Critical theory/ Intellectual history. In L. D.
Kritzman(Ed.), Michel Foucault:
politics,Philosophy,Culture. (pp.17-46). New York:
Routledge.
_______________ An aesthetics of existence. In L. D. Kritzman
(Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.
(pp.47-55). New York: Routledge.
_______________ Politics and reason. In L. D. Kritzman(Ed.),
Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.57-85).
New York: Routledge.
_______________ On power. In L. D. Kritzman(Ed.), Michel
Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.96-109). New
York: Routledge.
_______________ Power and sex. In L. D. Kritzman(Ed.), Michel
Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.110-24). New
York: Routledge.
_______________ The return of morality. In L. D. Kritzman(Ed.),
Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.242-
254). New York:Routledge.
_______________ The masked philosopher. In L. D. Kritzman(Ed.),
Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture.(pp.323-30).
New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M.(1988b). Truth, power, self: an interview with
Michel Foucault.In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman & P. H. Hutton
(Eds.), Technologies of the Self.(pp.9-15). London:
Tavistock Publications.
_______________ Technologies of the self.In L. H. Martin, H.
Gutman & P. H. Hutton(Eds.), Technologies of the Self.
(pp.16-49). London:
Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M.(1991a). Remarks on Marx. (trans. by R. J.
Goldstein & J. Cascaito). New York: Columbia University.
Foucault, M.(1991b). Govermmentality. In G. Burchell, C.
Gordon, and P. Miller(Eds.), The Foucault effect : studies
in governmentality. (pp87-104). Chicago : University of
Chicago.
Foucault, M.(1997). The hermeneutic of subject. In P. Rabinow.
(Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth.(pp.93-108). New
York: The New Press.
_______________. Self writing. In P. Rabinow.(Ed.), Ethics:
Subjectivity and Truth.(pp.207-22). New York: The New Press.
_______________ On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work
in progress. In P. Rabinow.(Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and
Truth.(pp.253-80). New York: The New Press.
_______________The ethics of care of the self as a practice of
freedom.In P. Rabinow.(Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and
Truth.(pp.281-302). New York: The New Press.
_______________ What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow.(Ed.),
Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth.(pp.303-20). New York: The
New Press.
Foucault, M.(1998). Foucault. In J. D. Faubion.(Ed.),
Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology.(pp.459-63). New York:
The New Press.（本文Foucault以Maurice Florence之筆名發表）
Fraser, N.(1995). Foucault on modern power : Empirical insights
and normative confusions. In B. Smart (Ed.), Michel
Foucault: Critical Assessment. (vol. V) (pp.133-48).
London: Routledge.
Goodson, I. & Dowbiggin, I.(1990). Docile bodies: commonalities
in the history of psychiatry and schooling. In S. J. Ball
(Ed.), Foucault and Education: Disciplines and
Knowledge.(pp.105-29) London: Routledge.
Grant, B.(1997). Disciplining students: the construction of
student subjectivities. British Journal of Sociology of
Education,18(1),101-14.
Green, B.(1998). Born-again teaching? Governmentality,
“Grammar”, and public schooling. In T. S. Popkewitz & M.
Brennan(Eds.). Foucault’s Challenge—Discourse, Knowledge,
and Power in Education(pp.173-204). New York: Teachers
college Press.
Gore, J.M.(1998). Disciplining bodies: on the continuity of
power relations in pedagogy. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan
(Eds.). Foucault’s Challenge—Discourse, Knowledge, and
Power in Education(pp.231-51). New York: Teachers College
Press.
Habermas, J.(1987). Some questions concerning the theory of
power: Foucault again. In F. G. Lawrence(Trans.). The
Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. (pp. 266-93).
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hall, S.(1997). Representing the social: France and Frenchness
in post-war humanist photography. In S. Hall(Ed.).
Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying
Practices. (pp.13-74). Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Henning, T.(1995). Resisting Ethical Paralysis: A Postmodern
Critique of Ethics. ERIC Digest.(ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 346 615)
Hoskin K.(1990). Foucault under examination: the crypto-
educationalist unmasked. In S. J. Ball(Ed.), Foucault and
Education: Disciplines and Knowledge.(pp.29-53) London:
Routledge.
Jones R.(1990). Educational practices and scientific knowledge:
a genealogical reinterpretation of the emergence of
physiology in post-Revolutionary France. In S. J. Ball
(Ed.), Foucault and Education: Disciplines and
Knowledge.(pp.78-104) London: Routledge.
Kant, I.(1971). Education.(Trans. by A. Churton). Ann Arbor,
Mich: ersity of Michigan Press.
Kazmi, Y.(1997). Foucault’s genealogy and teaching
multiculturalism as a subversive activity. Philosophy and
Education, 16, pp.331-45.
Marshall, J. D.(1996). Michel Foucault: Personal Autonomy and
Education. Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McNay, L.(1994). Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge:
Polity.
Patton, P.(1998). Foucault’s subject of power. In M. Jeremy
(Ed), The Later Foucault : Politics and Philosophy.(pp.64-
77) London: Sage Publications.
Popkewitz, T. S.(1997). Restructuring of social and political
theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of
school practices. Educational Theory,47(3),287-313.
Rorty, R.(1995). Beyond Nietzsche and Marx. In B. Smart (Ed.),
Michel Foucault: Critical Assessment. (vol. V) (pp.126-32).
London: Routledge.
Rusch, E.A.(1992). Strategic Planning: Looking through the Lens
of Foucault. ERIC Digest.(ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED 346 615)
Ryan, J.(1991). Observing and normalizing: Foucault,
discipline, and inequality in schooling. The Journal of
Educational Thought, 25(2), pp.104-9.
Sawicki, J.(1994). Heidegger and Foucault: Escaping
Technological Nihilism. In B. Smart (Ed.), Michel Foucault:
Critical Assessment. (vol. III) (pp.33-47). London:
Routledge.
Sawicki, J.(1998). Feminism, Foucault and ‘subjects’ of power
and freedom. In M. Jeremy(Ed), The Later Foucault :
Politics and Philosophy.(pp.64-77) London:Sage Publications.
Smart, B.(1985). Michel Foucault. London:Routledge.
Taylor, C.(1986). Foucault on freedom and truth. In D. C. Hoy
(Ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader. (pp.69-102). New York:
Basil Blackwell.
Wain, K.(1996). Foucault, education, the self and modernity.
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 30(3), pp.345-60.
Walkerdine, V.(1984). Developmental psychology and the child-
centred pedagogy: the insertion of Piaget into early
education. In Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social
Regulation and Subjectivity,(pp.153-202). London: Methuen.
Webb, S.(1996). Forgetting ourselves? Social work values,
liberal education and modernity. Studies in the Education of
Adults,28(2),pp.224-40.