研究生: |
羅宥恩 Lo, You-An |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
從行動者網絡理論觀點探討獨立策展之研究-以中央研究院公共藝術為例 Exploring Independent Curating from the Perspective of Actor-Network Theory:A Case Study of Public Art at Academia Sinica |
指導教授: |
董澤平
Dong, Tse-Ping |
口試委員: |
董澤平
Dong, Tse-Ping 林詠能 Lin, Yung-Neng 朱盈樺 Chu, Yin-Hua |
口試日期: | 2025/01/09 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
美術學系藝術行政暨管理碩士在職專班 Department of Fine Arts_Continuing Education Master's Program of Arts Administration and Management |
論文出版年: | 2025 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 168 |
中文關鍵詞: | 獨立策展 、公共藝術 、行動者網絡理論(ANT) 、強制通行點(OPP) 、利益賦予(Interessement) 、策展機制 |
英文關鍵詞: | Independent curating, public art, Actor-Network Theory (ANT), Obligatory Passage Points (OPP), Interessement, curatorial mechanisms |
研究方法: | 個案研究法 、 紮根理論法 、 文件分析法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著公共藝術的發展趨勢從靜態展示轉向強調社會參與與互動,策展人在公共藝術中的角色日益多元化,特別是獨立策展人(Independent Curator)在藝術創作、行政協調與公共政策之間扮演關鍵橋樑。然而,同時也需面臨多方利益的協商與整合,特別是在公共藝術政策規範與創作自由之間尋求平衡。本研究運用行動者網絡理論(Actor-Network Theory, ANT),探討獨立策展人在公共藝術策展實踐中的角色與機制,特別關注強制通行點(Obligatory Passage Points, OPP)與利益賦予(Interessement)等概念,以理解策展人如何在多元行動者間促進協作與資源整合。
本研究旨在中央研究院北部與南部院區的兩項公共藝術案例(個案A與個案B)為對象,透過質性研究方法(半結構訪談、文件分析),系統性解析策展過程中的網絡形成、利益協商與行動動員機制。研究發現,策展人透過強制通行點機制,將異質行動者(如藝術家、行政機構、社區參與者、技術專家等)納入公共藝術網絡,並運用利益賦予策略,在創作自由與政策規範之間進行協調,以維持策展網絡的穩定。然而,研究亦發現,隨著公共藝術政策的調整、數位技術的應用與機構內部管理機制的影響,獨立策展人面臨行政協商、資源分配與行動者動員等多重挑戰。
再者,研究預期貢獻如下:理論層面以深化行動者網絡理論於公共藝術策展實踐中的應用,特別針對強制通行點與利益賦予機制的作用進行探討。實務層面提出獨立策展人應對公共藝術策展挑戰的策略,並針對資源整合與政策協商提供優化方案。政策層面則透過案例分析,檢視當前公共藝術政策對獨立策展與青年藝術家參與的影響,並提出建議,以促進公共藝術生態的永續發展。
As contemporary public art evolves from static displays to socially engaged and interactive practices, the role of independent curators has become increasingly complex. Independent curators must navigate the complex interplay of artistic creation, administrative coordination, and public policy, balancing creative autonomy with institutional constraints. This study applies Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to examine the role and mechanisms of independent curators in public art curation, particularly examining key ANT concepts such as Obligatory Passage Points (OPP) and Interessement to understand how curators foster collaboration among diverse actors and integrate resources.
This study investigates two public art cases at Academia Sinica’s Northern and Southern campuses (Case A and Case B) using a qualitative research approach, incorporating semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Findings indicate that independent curators utilize OPP mechanisms to bring together heterogeneous actors—including artists, governmental institutions, community participants, and technical experts—into a dynamic public art network. Furthermore, curators implement Interessement strategies to negotiate between artistic freedom and policy constraints, thereby ensuring curatorial stability. However, as public art policies evolve, the increasing integration of digital technology and shifts in institutional governance further intensify the challenges independent curators face in administrative negotiations, resource allocation, and participant mobilization.
By advancing the application of ANT in public art curation, this research deepens the understanding of OPP and Interessement mechanisms and their roles in shaping curatorial networks. At a practical level, it offers strategic insights for independent curators to navigate challenges in stakeholder engagement and policy negotiation. From a policy perspective, the study examines the impact of contemporary public art policies on independent curatorship and the participation of emerging artists, proposing strategies to foster a more sustainable public art ecosystem.
一、中文部分(依筆畫排序)
王佳煌、潘中道、蘇文賢、江吟梓(譯)(2014)。當代社會研究法(第二版)。 (W. Lawrence Neuman 原著)。台北市:學富。(原著出版於 2011 年)。
朱峰(2012)。政府型論壇現象的案例研究:行動者網絡理論的視角。知識產權出版社。
朱柔若(譯)(2000)。社會研究方法:質化與量化取向。(Neuman, W. L. 原著)。台北市:揚智。(原著出版於 1997 年)。
印順(1981)。中觀今論。正聞出版社。
印順(1998)。佛法概論。正聞出版社。
印順(2001)。緣起與中道。正聞出版社。
印順(2003)。空之探究。正聞出版社。
印順(2007)。印度佛教思想史。正聞出版社。
印順(2010)。般若經講記。正聞出版社。
周佩璇(2008)。九〇年代以來臺灣視覺藝術機構與獨立策展人興起之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北藝術大學〕。
周雅菁、曾啟雄(2011)。從法令層面探討公共藝術制度的差異性。《科技學刊 人文社會類》,20(2),107-118。
李宜修(2011)。臺灣當代美術社會發展 1980-2000。臺灣商務。
林宏璋(2018)。策展詩學:教育、諸眾與民主之後。典藏藝術家庭。
林平(2020)。讓美術館成為生活日常:2020 台北雙年展催生者林平專訪。《台北市立美術館館刊》,21(3),1-35。
林文源(2014)。看不見的行動能力:從行動者網絡到位移理論。中央研究院社會所。
呂佩怡(2011)。新類型公共藝術的轉譯與在地變異。《藝術觀點》,76-86。
呂佩怡(2015)。臺灣當代藝術策展二十年。典藏藝術家庭。
布魯諾·拉圖(2001)。我們從未現代過(陳瑞麟 譯)。立緒文化。(原著出版於 1993 年)。
布魯諾·拉圖(2003)。科學在行動:科學家與工程師的社會研究(李尚仁 譯)。群學出版社。(原著出版於 1987 年)。
布魯諾·拉圖(2017)。面對蓋婭:九堂新氣候政體課(陳榮泰 譯)。群學出版社。(原著出版於 2015 年)。
布魯諾·拉圖(2024)。何處安居?法國哲學大師布魯諾·拉圖最後十二堂課(江灝 譯)。臉譜出版社。(原著出版於 2021 年)。
潘中道(主譯)(2016)。怎麼做研究:社會科學研究方法。(Gary Thomas 原著)。臺北市:學富。(原著出版於 2009 年)。
賴瑛瑛(2007)。展覽反思與論述實踐──台北市立美術館歷任展覽方針與策略之研究(1983-2007)〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。
鈕文英(2023)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(四版)。雙葉書廊。
鈕文英(2024)。正向行為支持的理論與實務(第 4 版)。心理。
鈕文英、吳裕益(2024)。單一個案研究法:設計與實施(第 2 版)。心理。
陳育含(譯)(2010)。訪談研究法。台北市:韋伯。(原著出版於 1995 年)。
二、英文部分(按字母排序)
Bendel, P.(2014).Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany: Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels. Migration Policy Institute Europe.
Bennett, T.(1995). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.
Bennett, T.(1998). Culture: A reformer’s science. SAGE Publications.
Bishop, C.(2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso. Bloomfield, P.(2006). The challenging business of long-term public-private partnerships: Reflections on local experience. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 400-411.
Bourdieu, P.(1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.
Bourriaud, N.(2002). Relational aesthetics. Les Presses du Réel.
Bowen, G. A.(2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Brown, P., & Green, T.(2015). Curating contemporary art: Methods and practice. Sage Publications.
Bryman, A.(2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Callon, M.(1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223). Routledge.
Farquharson, A.(2003). Curator and context: The evolution of independent curating. In Curating in the 21st century (pp. 17-31). Whitechapel.
Flyvbjerg, B.(2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Garcia, L.(2014). Independent curators and the expansion of exhibition spaces. Curatorial Press.
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A.(2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365.
Graham, B.(2014). Digital public art and the politics of participation. Routledge.
Graham, B.(2016). New media art and curating. Routledge.
Graham, B., & Cook, S.(2010). Rethinking curating: Art after new media. MIT Press.
Groys, B.(2008). Art power. MIT Press.
Harman, G.(2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. re.press.
Harris, R.(2017). Institutional curators: Roles and responsibilities. Museum Studies Review.
Hetherington, K.(2016). Museums and the social construction of knowledge. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hui, D.(2016). Curating in Asia: The rise of the independent curator. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jackson, S.(2011). Social works: Performing art, supporting publics. Routledge.
Johnson, M.(2019). Diversity in curatorial practices. Art Journal Review.
Jones, R.(2008). Museum origins and the rise of public display. Museum Heritage.
Kanter, B.(2017). Curating as branding: The evolution of market-driven curation. Harvard Business Review.
Kester, G. H.(2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press.
Klein, N.(2000). No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. Picador.
Krauss, R.(1979). Sculpture in the expanded field. October, 8, 30-44.
Kwon, M.(2002). One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity. MIT Press.
Lacy, S.(1995). Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. Bay Press.
Latour, B.(1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B.(1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B.(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Latour, B.(2016). Reset modernity!. MIT Press.
Latour, B., & Weibel, P.(2020). Critical zones: The science and politics of landing on Earth. MIT Press.
Law, J.(1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 5(4), 379-393.
Law, J., & Hassard, J.(1999). Actor-network theory and after. Blackwell Publishers.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Marschall, S.(2013). Curating architecture and the city. Routledge.
Martinon, J. P.(2013). The curatorial: A philosophy of curating. Bloomsbury Academic.
Miller, D.(2018). The modern curator: Public interaction and fundraising. Arts and Community.
O’Neill, P.(2012). Curating subjects. Open Editions.
O’Neill, P., & Wilson, M.(2015). Curating research. Open Editions.
Obrist, H. U.(2014). Ways of curating. Penguin Books.
Parikka, J.(2012). What is media archaeology?. Polity Press.
Paul, C.(2020). A companion to digital art. Wiley-Blackwell.
Reckitt, H.(2013). Curatorial activism and the transformation of exhibitions. MIT Press.
Schneider, C.(2012). Curating and the cultural turn. Third Text, 26(3), 329-343.
Scott, J.(1990). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. Polity Press.
Sheikh, S.(2009). Towards the exhibition as research. In M. Hannula, J. Suoranta, & T. Vadén (Eds.), Artistic research: Theories, methods and practices (pp. 156-165). Academy of Fine Arts.
Stake, R. E.(1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Thomas, G.(2009). How to do your research project: A guide for students in education and applied social sciences. Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K.(2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
三、網路資源(中文部分)
內政部 & 文化部(2023)。社宅藝享計畫啟動新聞稿。https://www.moi.gov.tw/
中央通訊社(2024)。修法後公共藝術新機制 [New Mechanism of Public Art after Regulation Amendment]。中央通訊社網路。
文化部(1992)。文化藝術獎助條例。https://www.moc.gov.tw/
文化部(2023)。公共藝術官方網站。https://www.moc.gov.tw/
行政院文化部(2022)。公共藝術設置辦法 [Public Art Installation Regulations]。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0170012
監察院(2021)。公共藝術推動 25 年成果報告。https://www.cy.gov.tw/
布魯諾·拉圖爾(2017)。重置現代性!上海站工作坊。Philosophy and Technology Network https://philosophyandtechnology-network.translate.goog/411/latour-
shanghai-workshop-cn/?_x_tr_sl=zh-CN&_x_tr_tl=zh-TW&_x_tr_hl=zh-TW&_x_tr_pto=sc
Artouch(2023)。白晝之夜的發展歷程與社會意涵。https://artouch.com/art-views/cultural-policy/content-48101.html
臺北市立美術館(2021)。讓美術館成為生活日常:2020 台北雙年展催生者林平專訪。https://www.tfam.museum/Content.aspx
聯合新聞網(2024, October 18)。文化部修法 公共藝術設置辦法改革 10 方向 [Ministry of Culture Amends Public Art Installation Regulations in 10 Directions]。https://udn.com/news/story/7266/7832475
四、網路資源英文部分(依字母排序)
Johnson, A.(2015). The Cultural Cold War: Art as Weapon. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, S.(2021). L’Arc de Triomphe Wrapped: Art in a Time of Crisis. Art Review, 78(2), 34-45.
National Endowment for the Arts.(2020). NEA Annual Report. https://www.nea.gov
National Endowment for the Arts.(2020). National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965. https://www.arts.gov/
National Park Service.(2023). Beyond Granite Initiative. https://www.nps.gov/
National Park Service.(2023). Beyond Granite Project Overview. https://www.nps.gov
Smith, R.(2010). Federal Arts Projects of the New Deal: Art for the Masses. Journal of American History, 96(1), 112-123.
Valdur, M.(2016). Book review: Reset Modernity! edited by Bruno Latour. LSE Review of Books. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2016/12/05/book-review-reset-modernity-edited-by-bruno-latour/