簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳孟德
論文名稱: 以學習環之教學法探討國中學生對於伏打電池相關概念的學習成效
指導教授: 黃寶鈿
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 化學系
Department of Chemistry
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 伏打電池概念示範式群測兩段式診斷測驗錯誤概念學習環教學
英文關鍵詞: Galvanic cell, group demonstration test, two-tier diagnostic test, misconception, learning cycle instruction
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:101下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的主旨在探討學生對於伏打電池相關概念的認知情況,以及經過學習環教學後學生的學習情形。研究進行時,藉由面談及開放式問卷等方式來瞭解學生對於伏打電池相關概念的想法,再以示範式群測的測試工具收集資料,並根據學習環之教學策略,針對相關概念設計教學活動,藉以幫助學生學習與導正學生既有的錯誤概念。本研究的對象為國中二年級與三年級學生,分成實驗組與控制組,共計466人。主要的研究結果說明如下:
    一、學生對於「離子導電概念」、「電流概念」、「電子流概念」的基本定義不清楚,而互相混淆,習慣用日常生活經驗來解釋現象,並以導電的巨觀現象,來判斷其在導體與溶液中的微觀情況。多數學生也不瞭解鋅銅電池的原理,而對「鋅銅電池正、負極反應的粒子觀點」、「鋅銅電池鹽橋導電的粒子概念」、「鋅銅電池鹽橋導電的粒子概念」產生許多錯誤的想法。
    二、比較八年級(國二)與九年級(國三)的認知差異方面,研究主要發現學生在「離子概念」、「電子概念」、「伏打電池正負極選擇概念」、「伏打電池正負極反應的粒子概念」、「伏打電池產生電子流的概念」、「伏打電池鹽橋導電與離子移動的概念」、「伏打電池原理應用的概念(水果電池)」、「電解硫酸銅水溶液與電煉純銅的概念」等主題概念方面的答對率,隨著年級的增加而成長,這顯示在伏打電池相關概念的理解上,需要學生在抽象推理思考能力上的成熟。
    三、本教學模式對於實驗組學生伏打電池相關概念的學習具有正面的幫助,尤其在「電子概念」、「伏打電池概念」與「伏打電池原理應用的概念(水果電池)」的進步幅度最大。另外,本研究中所取樣的九年級學生整體的答對率比八年級高,但是八年級學生的學習效果則略高於九年級學生,顯示學習環教學活動比較適合八年級(九年一貫新課程)學生,學生學習成效較高。筆者認為這與新、舊課程的概念順序安排不相同有相關。

    The research aimed at exploring junior high school students’ recognition of correlated concepts of Galvanic cell, and the learning situations of all students through the learning cycle instruction. Interviews and open-ended questions were applied to know students’ understanding, and then data was collected through group demonstration test. In order to help students to change their prior thinking, we designed teaching activities according to the learning cycle strategy. The subjects of this study were junior high school students in grade 8 and 9. They were divided into the experimental group and the control group according to whether they received the learning cycle instruction. The total numbers of students were 466. The main findings in this research were as the followings:
    1. The definitions of “ionic conduction”、”electric current”、and ”flow of electrons” were confused by students. They tended to explain these phenomenon by their own daily life experiences, and explain the microscopic concepts of particle by means of macroscopic points of view. Most students were unclear about the definition of Galvanic cell, so they have wrong recognition of the correlated concepts of Galvanic cell.
    2. Comparing the difference in the recognition of the concepts of Galvanic cell in grade 8 and 9, students’ recognition of most concepts was progressed with their grades. It implies that the comprehension of Galvanic cell needs students’ mature ability of abstract inference.
    3. Comparing the improvement between the experimental and the control group after the instruction, it proved that the learning cycle instruction is significantly effective in understanding the process of conductivity and particle concept of Galvanic cell. Moreover, this research found that it has better effectiveness for the eighth grade students. It means that the three-phases of learning cycle instruction is more suitable for the eighth grade students. It is correlated with the different concept arrangement sequence in the new and old textbooks in the curriculum reform.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的 ………………………………….. 1 第二節 名詞解釋與界定 ………………………………….. 3 第三節 研究的限制 ……………………………………….. 5 第二章 文獻探討與理論背景 第一節 皮亞傑認知發展理論背景 ………………………. 6 第二節 文獻探討 …………………………………………. 10 第三節 學生的錯誤概念與診斷概念之方法 …………… 16 第四節 伏打電池的相關錯誤概念 ……………………… 26 第五節 學習環教學理論 ………………………………… 31 第六節 課程分析 ………………………………………… 41 第七節 影片教學媒體的運用與製作 ………………….. 46 第三章 研究步驟與方法 第一節 研究對象 ………………………………………… 50 第二節 研究工具 ………………………………………… 53 第三節 研究方法與設計 ………………………………… 57 第四節 研究步驟與流程 ………………………………… 60 第五節 學習環教學活動的內容與設計 ………………… 65 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 面談與開放式問卷之結果分析………………… 81 第二節 國中學生對於電池相關概念的認知情況 …….. 93 第三節 八、九年級國中生對電池相關概念 的認知差異…………………………………….. 104 第四節 學習環教學活動對於電池相關概念 的教學成效 ……………………………………. 120 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 ……………………………………………. 136 第二節 建議 ……………………………………………. 141 參考文獻 中文部分 ………………………………………………… 144 英文部分 …………………………………………………. 147 附錄 附錄一 面談問卷 ………………………………………. 152 附錄二 預試問卷 ………………………………………. 162 附錄三 後測問卷 …………………………………… 173

    中文部分
    王文科(民87):教育研究法(增訂新版)。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    王文科譯(民85):皮亞傑式兒童心理學與應用。台北市:心理出版社。
    王念慈(民88):國小一、二、三年級學童液體量與重量守恆概念發展之教學效果的研究。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    王美芬等(民91):國民小學自然與生活科技(1 ~ 8冊)。台北縣:康軒出版社。
    王澄霞、洪志明(民79):教學錄影帶對化學實驗技能教學的影響。中國化學會民國七十九年度年會論文。
    毛松霖等(民89):國民小學自然科教科書(1~12冊)。台北市,國立編譯館。
    余民寧(民91):教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量。台北市:心理出版社。
    沈亞梵(民78):教學媒體研究。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    李金慧(民91):以凱利方格法探究國三學生電化學迷思概念。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    李武勳(民89):國中學生氣體壓力概念之教學成效探討。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    邱上峰(民91):以個別化電腦輔助教學探討學生對於氣體粒子概念之學習成效。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    邱美子(民91):國中電化學電腦動畫輔助教學之學習成就研究。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    吳惠平譯(民84):大學化學,下冊。台北:科技圖書公司。
    林榮俊(民91):以示範實驗式群測與模型模擬教學探討國中學生的擴散概念。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    張秀澄(民91):電腦動畫融入教學對國中生電化學學習成就影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    張霄亭(民77):視聽教育與教學媒體。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    葉重新(民90):教育研究法。台北:心理出版社。
    曾國輝(民82):化學,上冊。台北:藝軒圖書出版社。
    黃湘武、江新合、劉謹輔、陳忠志、杜鴻模、陸業堯(民74):國中學生質量守恆,重量守恆,外體積概念,與比例推理能力之抽樣調查與研究。中等教育,36(1),44-65。
    黃湘武、黃寶鈿(民75b):以示範群測法對我國學生重量與體積守恆推理能力發展之研究。中華民國七十四年度科學教育學術研討會論文彙編,19-33。
    黃瑞仁(民91):以示範實驗式群測與粒子模型模擬教學探討國中學生對於化學變化的相關概念:以氣體之產生為例。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    黃慧琳(民84):學習環在國小自然科教學之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃寶鈿(民76a):以示範式群測法研究學生的排水體積守恆概念。測驗年刊,34,137-146。
    黃寶鈿(民76b):以示範實驗法探究學生的比例理能力。測驗年刊,41,207-220。
    黃寶鈿(民77):邏輯思考能力評量工具的編製。師大學報,33,485-505。
    黃寶鈿(民78):我國學生邏輯思考能力發展的研究。測驗年刊,36,31-46。
    黃寶鈿(民83):以示範實驗法探究學生的比例推理能力。測驗年刊,41,207-202。
    楊勝安(民92):以學習環之教學策略探討國中學生溶液相關概念的學習成效。國立台灣師範大學師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
    郭生玉(民85):心理與教育研究法。中和市:精華書局。
    郭重吉(民79):學生科學知識認知結構的評估與描述。彰化師範大學學報,1,279-320。
    陳瓊森(民85):類比和模型:電學迷思概念轉變的研究。發表於國立中正大學認知科學研究中心主辦之『認知與學習』專題研究計畫成果與學術研討會結果報告。
    陳瓊森(民85):國中學生電學概念發展之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    鍾聖校(民83):不同教學法對錯誤概念修正的影響。臺北師院學報,7,169-204。
    鍾聖校(民88):自然與科技課程教材教法。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。
    謝輝龍等(民91):國民中學自然與生活科技(1 ~ 5冊)。台北縣:康軒出版社。
    鄭昭明(民86):認知心理學:理論與實踐(修訂版)。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
    鄭麗玉(民82):認知心理學:理論與應用。台北:五南圖書出版公司。

    英文部分
    Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1986). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 121-143.
    Abraham, M. R., & Williamson, V. M. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147-165.
    Andersson, B. (1986b). Pupil’s explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
    Batt, R. H. (1980) . A Piagetian learning cycle for introductory chemical kinetics. Journal of Chemical Education, 57(9), 634 – 635.
    Blank, L. M.(2000). A metacognitive learning cycle:a better warranty for student understanding?Science teacher education, 84, 486 – 506.
    Burke, K. A. , Greenbowe, T. J. , and Windschitl, M. A. (1998) . Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(12), 1658 - 1661.
    Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101.
    Dexter, L. A. (1970). Elite and specialized interveiwing. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    Eisenkraft , A.(2003) . Expanding the 5E model:a proposed 7E model emphasizes transfer of learning and the importance of eliciting prior understanding. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 57 – 59.
    Fortus, D. , Reddy, S. , and Dershimer, R. C. (2004). Design-based science:a problem-solving experiment compares different bands of batteries. The Science Teacher, 70(3), 38 –41.
    Gilber, J. K., Osborne, R. L., & Fensham, P. L. (1982). Children’s science and it’s consequence for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 632-633.
    Gunstone, R. F. (1988). Learners in science education.. London: The Falmer Press.
    Garnett, P. J. , & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099.
    Heywood, D. & Paqrker, F. (1997) . Confronting the analogy: primary teachers exploring the usefulness of analogies in the teaching and learning of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 869-885.
    Huddle, P. A. & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An in-depth of misconceptions in stoichiometry and chemical equilibrium at a South African University. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 66-77.
    Huddle, P. A. & White, M. D.(2000) . Using a teaching model to correct known misconceptions in electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1) , 104 – 110.
    Johnson, P. (2000). Children’s understanding of substances, part1: recognizing chemical change International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 719-737.
    James, H. J., & Nelson, S. L. (1981). A classroom learning cycle: using diagrams to classify matter. Journal of chemical Education, 58(6), 476-477.
    Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(2), 169-175.
    Lawson, A. E. (2000). A learning cycle approach to introducing osmosis. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 189-196.
    Lawson, A. E. (2001). Using the learning cycle to teaching biology concepts and reasoning patterns. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 165-169.
    Lawson, A. E. & Renner, J. W. (1975) Relationships of science subject matter and developmental levels of learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(4), 347-358.
    Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988) Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733-746.
    Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multidmedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 611-623.
    Marek, E. K., Askey, D. M. and Abraham, M. R. (2000). Student absence during learning cycle phase:a technological alternative for make-up work in laboratory based high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 22(10), 1055-1068.
    Michael , F. S. (2000) . Addressing student misconceptions concering electron flow in aqueous solution with instruction including computer animation and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education , 22(5), 521 – 537
    Niaz, M., and Chacon, E.(2003). A conceptual change teaching strategy to facilitate high school students’ understanding of electrochemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(2), 129 – 134.
    Nussbaum, J. & Novick, J. (1982). An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing interviews. Scinece Education, 61(4), 535-550.
    Novak, J. D. (1977). An Alternative to Piagetian Psychology for Science and Mathematics Education. Science Education, 61(4), 453-477.
    Odom, A. L., & Barrow L. H. (1995) Development of a two –tier diagnostic test measurement college biology students understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 32(1), 45-61.
    Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffusion and Osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Science Education, 85(6), 615-635.
    Ogude, N. A. , and Bradley, J. D. (1998). A simple explanation of salt bridges for post-16 students. School Science Review, 80(290), p116-119.
    Ozkaya, A. R. (2002) . Conceptual difficulties experienced by prospective teachers in electrochemistry : half-cell potential, cell potential, and chemical and electrochemical equilibrium in galvanic cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6) , 735 – 738.
    Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Trans. H. Weaver, New York: Basic Books.
    Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66,221-227.
    Renner, J. W., Abraham, M. R., & Birnie, H. H. (1988). The necessity of each phase of the learning cycle in teaching high school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 25(1), 39-58.
    Sanger, M. J. and Greenbowe, T. J. (1997) . Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic, and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377 – 398.
    Sanger, M. F. , and Greenbowe, T. F. (2000) . Addressing student misconceptions concering electron flow in aqueous solution with instruction including computer animation and conceptual change strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 521 – 537.
    Scharmann, L. C. (1991). Teaching angiosperm reproduction by means of the learning cycle. School Science and Mathematics, 91(3), 100-104.
    Shepardson, D. P. , & Moje, E. B. (1994) . The nature of fourth grader’s understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 14(2) , 157-162.
    Sprode, T. (1997). Nobody really knows : the structure and analysis of social constructivist whole class discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 19(8), 911-924.
    Strobel, G.. G.. , & Myers, S. A. (1998) . Teaching electricity effectively in primary school: a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2) , 153-172.
    Stoddart, T., Arams, R., Gasper, E. & Canaday, D. (2000) Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning – a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1221-1246.
    Thomas, E. L. (2003) . Conceptualizing ecology: a learning cycle approach. American Biology Teacher, 65(7), 518 – 522.
    Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
    Treagust, D. F. (1995) Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 327-345.
    Yang, E., Andre, T., and Greenbowe, T. J. (2003). Spatial ability and impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International journal of science education, 25(3), 329-349.

    無法下載圖示
    QR CODE