簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳銹陵
Shiou-Ling Chen
論文名稱: 鷹架類型與先備知識對高職生乙級電腦軟體應用檢定課程之成效探討
指導教授: 陳明溥
Chen, Ming-Puu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 程序鷹架後設認知鷹架先備知識乙級電腦軟體應用檢定
英文關鍵詞: procedural scaffolding, metacognitive scaffolding, prior knowledge, technician certificate of class B skill category of computer software application
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:200下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討鷹架類型與電腦先備知識對學習者在「乙級電腦軟體應用」檢定課程之學習成效與學習態度的影響。教學內容依據行政院勞委會推行之「乙級電腦軟體應用檢定」術科題組,研究樣本為98位北縣某私立高職資料處理科的學生。研究變項包含鷹架類型、電腦先備知識,其中鷹架類型分為「程序鷹架」與「後設認知鷹架」,電腦先備知識分為「高電腦先備知識」與「低電腦先備知識」,分別針對其學習成效及學習態度進行分析。學習成效以學習者在「資料庫應用」、「試算統計應用」及「文書排版應用」之實作成績作為評量依據。學習態度是以「學習者學習動機」、「學習者學習幫助度」及「學習者學習滿意度」三部分來瞭解學習者對於課程的看法。
    研究結果發現:(1)後設認知鷹架組在乙級電腦軟體應用術科檢定課程的學習成效明顯比程序鷹架組佳;(2)高電腦先備知識學習者在乙級電腦軟體應用術科檢定課程的學習成效明顯比低電腦先備知識學習組佳;(3)不論是程序鷹架組或後設認知鷹架組的學習者對乙級電腦軟體應用檢定課程採用鷹架教學均持正向肯定的態度。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate how the scaffolding types and computer prior knowledge will affect vocational high school students’ performance in Technician Certificate Curriculum of Class B skill Category of computer software application. Participants were 98 vocational high school students.
    Research variables are included the types of scaffolding and computer prior knowledge. The types of scaffolding are divided into procedure and metacognitive scaffolding. Computer prior knowledge is divided into high and low computer prior knowledge. What we want to find out and analyze is the differences between groups by their learning performance and attitude. The result of their learning performance is evaluated by participants’ grades on Access, Excel and Word applications. The attitude is based on the opinion of learners on learning motivation, helpfulness and satisfaction.
    The results showed that the metacognitive scaffolding facilitated learners’ project performance, including the applications of Access, Excel and Word software; high computer prior knowledge learners have better learning performance no matter on applications of Access, Excel or Word software; no matter metacognitive or procedure scaffolding, learners have positive attitudes toward learning.

    附表目錄 v 附圖目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與限制 4 第四節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 鷹架理論 7 第二節 先備知識 13 第三節 技能檢定 18 第四節 問題解決 24 第五節 技能學習 32 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究對象 36 第二節 研究設計 37 第三節 研究工具 39 第四節 實驗程序 50 第五節 資料分析 52 第四章 結果與討論 54 第一節 學習成效分析 54 第二節 學習態度分析 63 第五章 結論與建議 69 第一節 結論 69 第二節 建議 71 參考文獻 72 附錄一 先備知識測驗卷 85 附錄二 術科檢定試題 89 附錄三 學習任務之參考答案 91 附錄四 程序鷹架教材-解題秘笈 94 附錄五 術科實作評分表 96 附錄六 學習態度問卷 97

    王克先(1992)。學習心理學。台北:桂冠書局。

    王前龍(2000)。九年一貫課程綱要中「解決問題」課程目標之涵義與理論探討。九年一貫課程的教與學。

    王進成(2002)。應用鷹架學習理論及派翠西網路技術在網路化輔助學習模式之研究—以「電腦硬體裝修丙級學科技能檢定」為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

    吳明雄、陳偉昌(1999)。創造思考性的技藝教育。技藝教育,26,7-9。

    吳培安(1995)。「問題解決」式的科技教育教學模式。教師之友,36(2),12-19。

    吳清山,林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北:高等教育。

    李堅萍(1996),提昇技能教學的練習教學法。技術與職業教育雙月刊,31,40-41。

    李基常(1999)。技能教學創造思考教學模式之探討。泰山職訓學報,2,17-29。

    岳修平(1998)。教育心理學。台北:遠流出版社。

    林育聖(2002)。自我解釋對程式語言IF 敘述學習的影響。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

    林建仲、鄭宗文(2001)。合作式學習與問題解決─培養以問題解決為中心的網路合作學習。資訊與教育,85,55-62。

    柯華葳(1993)。解決問題教學模式之建立-以國小環境教育為例。國立中正大學學報,4(1),1-32。

    徐椿樑(2001)。鷹架學習理論在專業技術教學的成效分析之研究。國立台灣師範大學博士論文,未出版,台北市。

    高培峰(1997),淺談技術士職業證照制度與效用。就業與訓練,15(3),11-14。

    張杏妃(2001)。國小生態問題導向學習行動研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。

    張俊彥(1999)。問題解決為基礎之電腦輔助教材發展研究-中等學校地球科學(二)。國科會專題研究計劃成果報告(NSC88-2520-S-003-004),未出版。

    張春興(1987)。教育的應為與難為。台北:東華書局。

    張春興(1994)。教育心理學。台北:東華書局。

    張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。

    張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。

    張菀珍(1997)。鷹架理論在成人實務教學之應用。成人教育,40。頁數?

    教育部(1995)。高級中學課程標準。台北:正中書局。

    陳定邦(2003)。鷹架教學概念在成人學習歷程上應用之研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。

    陳明溥 (1999)。雙碼理論於遞迴程式設計教學之概念模型設計研究。第八屆電腦輔助教學國際研討會大會論文,臺中市,逢甲大學,3月18-20日。

    陳梅英(2002)。應用網路合作式問題解決教學法於高級中學電腦學科之研究。國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

    黃明信、徐新逸(2001)。國小實施網路專題式教學之成效與發展。研習資訊,18(6),29-44。

    黃政傑(1999)。提昇技職教育品質。技術及職業教育雙月刊,49,6-13。

    黃振盛(1998)。高職機械科學生技能學習影響因素之分析研究。國立彰化 師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。

    黃煌嘉、黃崇金(1999),高級職業學校電子科學生電子技術創新設計能力指標之研究。南港高工學報,19,147-158

    黃耀寬(1999)。問題解決教學對高職電機科學生低壓工業配線學習成效之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。

    溫世頌(1997)。教育心理學。台北:三民書局。

    廖宜瑤(2000)。國小四年級學生運用電腦網路科技進行主題式學習之行動研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。

    鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學-理論與實踐。台北:桂冠圖書。

    鄭麗玉(1993)。認知心理學-理論與應用。台北:五南圖書。

    蕭錫錡(1989)。教學目標與評量。專科學校教師教學評量手冊,教育部技職司。

    蕭錫錡(1997)。高職學校實施技能檢定攸關問題之探討。台灣教育, 556,6-10。

    謝政燿(2006)。Big6 技能融入主題式學習網路化教學研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。

    鍾聖校(1990)。認知心理學。台北:心理。

    職業訓練局(1994):技術士技能檢定工作手冊。行政院勞工委員會職訓練局編印。

    羅漢村(2003)。自我監控活動對高中生If 敘述程式設計學習成效之影響。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。

    Ager, T. (1993). Online placement testing in mathematics and chemistry. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 20, 52-57.

    Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.

    Barba, R. H. (1990). A comparison of expert and novice earth and space science teacher’s problem solving abilities. Dissertation: The Pennsylvania State University.

    Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Bell, H. H. (1997). Training decision makers for complex environments: implications of the naturalistic decision making perspective. In C. Zsambok & Klein, Naturalistic decision making (pp.99-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Chi, M. T., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem-solving ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human ability- An information-processing approach. NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Chi, M., Feltovitch, P. J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.

    Chiappetta, E. L., & Russell, J. M. (1982). The relationship among logical thinking, problem solving instruction, and knowledge and application of earth science subject matter. Science Education, 66(1), 85-93

    Clifton, C. J., & Sowiaczek, M. L. (1981). Integrating new information with old knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 9(2), 142-148.

    Cooper, G. & Sweller, J.(1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation of mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347-362.

    D’Zurila,T. J. & Goldfried M. R.(1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107-126.

    Dewey, J.(1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.

    Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Heath.

    Dochy, F. (1994). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Second edition, pp.4698-4702). Oxford/ New York: Pergamon Press.

    Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1994a). Prior Knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd.). (pp.4698-4702). Oxford/New York: Pergamon.

    Dochy, F. J. R. C., Moerkerke, G., & Marten, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and instruction: assessment of domain-specific and domain-transcending prior knowledge and program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22, 309-339.

    Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145-186.

    Dochy, F., Valcke, M., & Wagemans, L. (1991). Learning economics in higher education: an investigation concerning the quality and impact of expertise. Higher Education in Europe, 4, 123-136.

    Dyson, A. (1990). Special educational needs and the concept of change, Oxford Review of Education, 16(1), 55-66.

    Fitts, P. M.(1962). Factors in complex skill training. Pitts-burgh, PA:University of Pittsuburgh Press.

    Garner, S. (2002). Reducing the cognitive load on novice programmers. Word conference on Educational, 24-29.

    Gee, J. P., Michaels, S., & O’Conner, M. C. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, 227-291. New York: Academic Press.

    Glaser, R., & De Corte, E. (1992). Preface t the assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. In F.J.R.C. Dochy (Ed.), Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning (pp. 1-2). Utrecht/ London; Lemma B.V./ Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Glass, A. L. & Holyoak, K. J.(1986). Cognition. New York : Random House.

    Hagan, D. & Markham, S. (2000). Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning acomputing degree program? Proceedings of Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education Conference ITiCSE-2000, 25-28.

    Hammadou, J. (1998). The effect of analogy on foreign language reading comprehension of advanced and novice readers of French. Ohio State University, Dissertation.

    Harman, G. (1994). Student selection and admission to higher education: Policies and practices in the Asian region. Higher Education, 27, 313-341.

    Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver. Philadelphia, Franklin Institute Press.

    Helgeson, S. L. (1992). Problem solving research in middle junior high school science education. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.

    Helgeson, S. J. (1994). Research on problem solving : Middle school. In D.L. Gabel(Ed), Handbook of res. on sci. teach. and learn. New York : Macmillan Publishing Co.

    Hill, J. R., Hannafin, M. J., (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52

    Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: A Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(289), 33-41.

    Holden, E., & Weeden, E. (2003). The impact of prior experience in an information technology program-ming course sequence. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Information Technology Education (pp, 41-46). New York, NY:ACM Press

    Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B.L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences learning, and instruction. Part VII. Prior knowledge. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Judithann, W.W. (1993). Weekend report: A qualitative study of the scaffolding strategies used by a teacher of children with handicaps during a “sharing time” discourse event, Dissertation: University of Cincinnati.

    Lee, D. M. S., Pliskin, N., & Kahn, B. (1994). The relationship between performance in a computer literacy course and students prior achievement and knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 63-77.

    Lipson, M. Y. (1982). Learning new information from text: The role of prior knowledge and reading ability. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(3), 243-261.

    Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.

    Mayer, R. E. (1981). The psychology of how novices learn computer programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 3(1), 121-141.

    Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). NY: W.H.

    McLoughlin, C., Winnips, J. C., Oliver, R. (2000). Supporting constructivist learning through learner support on-line. Full paper accepted for EDMEDIA 2000.

    Minnaert, A., & Janssen, P. J. (1996). How general are the effects of domain-specific prior knowledge on study expertise as compared to general thinking skills? In M. Birenbaum, & F. Dochy (Eds.), Alternaives in assessment of achievents, learning processes and prior learning (pp. 265-282). Boston: Kluwer.

    Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene:ISTE.

    Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Pahl, C. (2002). An evaluation of scaffolding for virtual interactive tutorials.In G.Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (pp. 740-746). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolding instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1&2), 73-98.

    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

    Palincsar, A. S., & Brown. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118-124.

    Palumbo, D. B. & Reed, W. M. (1991). The effect of BASIC programming language instruction on high school students’ problem solving ability and computer anxiety. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(3), 343-369.

    Palumbo, D. B. & Reed, W. M.(1991). The effect of BASIC programming language instruction on high school students’ problem solving ability and computer anxiety. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(3), 343-369.

    Parnes, S. J.(1967).Creative behavior guidebook. New York: Scribers.

    Pea, R. D. (1983). Logo programming and problem solving. (Technical Report No. 12). New York: Bank Street College, Center for Children and Technology.

    Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Pressley, M., & McCormick, C. B. (1995). Advanced educational psychology for educators, researchers and policymakers. New York: Harper Collins College Pulishers.

    Richard, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). W.H.

    Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave(Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context, 95-116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Russell, B.(1979). A Histrory of Western Philosophy. London: Unwin.

    Russell, J. M., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1981). “The effects of a problem solving strategy on the achievement of earth science students”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(4), 295-301.

    Smith, P. L. & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Spires, H. A. Donley, J., & Penrose, A. M. (1990). Prior knowledge activation: inducing text engagement in reading to learn. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

    Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Sternberg, R. J.(1988). Beyond IQ: Atriarchic theory of human intelligence. Viking Pongain Inc.

    Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 43, 215-266. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Sweller, J. , Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. , & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.

    Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction. 2, 59-89.

    Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, Prior Knowledge and Learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54.

    Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. , & Paas, F. (1990). Automation and schema acquisition in learning elementary computer programming. Computers in Human Behavior, (6), 273-289.

    Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G.Vakar, Eds. And Trans) .Cambridge, MA; The MIT. Press (Original work published 1934).

    Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. ( M.Cole, V.JohnSteiner, S.Scribner, E.Souberman, (Eds.). Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1935)

    Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Weinert, F. (1989). The impact of schooling on cognitive development: one hypothetical assumption, some empirical results, and many theoretical implications. EARLI New, 8, 3-7.

    QR CODE