簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李維光
Wei-Kuang Lee
論文名稱: 幽默訓練課程對國小高年級學童幽默感、社交技巧與自尊影響效果之研究
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Humor Training Curriculum for SeniorStudents in Elementary School on Sense of Humor, Social Skills and Self-Esteem
指導教授: 陳學志
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 285
中文關鍵詞: 幽默訓練課程幽默感社交技巧自尊
英文關鍵詞: humor training curriculum, sense of humor, social skills, self-esteem
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:487下載:257
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

摘要
本研究主要目的在設計一套適合國小高年級學生學習的幽默訓練課程教學方案,並探討該教學方案對國小高年級學生幽默感、社交技巧以及自尊的影響效果。本研究之「幽默訓練課程」是整合知情意行四層面目標的全方位課程,採「課程教學」、「情境教學」以及「互動教學」三個管道進行教學介入,其中「課程教學」共分為十五個單元,上學期十一個單元,下學期四個單元,主要在培養學生之幽默理解、幽默創造、社交情境中的幽默、幽默因應、幽默態度以及笑的傾向六大能力。

本研究採不等組前後測準實驗設計,研究對象為台北縣某國小高年級學生共71位,分為兩組,實驗組共36位學生,控制組共35位學生。實驗組學生進行本研究之「幽默訓練課程」,控制組學生則進行原班級例行性活動,不予以任何實驗處理。在實驗效果評估方面,以「多向度幽默感量表」、「新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗」、「兒童社交技巧量表」及「兒童自尊問卷」為測量工具,以瞭解幽默訓練課程對學生幽默感、社交技巧與自尊的影響。在資料分析方面,本研究以「組別」做為自變項,學生在上述四個測驗的「前測分數」為共變項,「後測分數」為依變項,以單因子多變量共變數分析法考驗研究假設。另輔以「課程回饋問卷」、「學生訪談問卷」以及「教師省思札記」上所得之訊息作質性資料分析,以深入瞭解教學實驗之效果。綜合各項結果,獲得以下研究結論:
一、幽默訓練課程能有效提升國小高年級學生之「幽默創造能力」與「社交情境中的幽默能力」。
二、幽默訓練課程無法有效提升國小高年級學生之「幽默理解能力」、「幽默因應能力」、「幽默的態度」與「笑的傾向」。
三、幽默訓練課程無法有效提升國小高年級學生之社交技巧。
四、幽默訓練課程無法有效提升國小高年級學生之自尊。
五、從實驗組學生「課程回饋問卷」中的反應發現:1.學生普遍喜愛幽默訓練課程並覺得非常有價值。2. 學生普遍對能夠讓班級充滿笑聲與歡樂氣氛、能夠創作出幽默成品、能夠感受到自我成長或自我突破以及價值性高的課程有較高的認同與較深的印象。3. 部分學生認為對幽默課程存有負向感受的原因包括:幽默作業負擔過重、部分課程的學習不知該如何進行、各組在競爭活動時機會不均等以及擔憂自己表現不好或不敢嘗試。
六、從實驗組學生在「學生訪談問卷」中的反應發現:1.學生普遍非常喜愛幽默訓練課程。2.學生較能夠分辨正負向幽默的差異並對幽默概念有更深一層瞭解。3. 幽默訓練課程對學生的幽默因應以及社交幽默的表現有所幫助。4. 幽默訓練課程對班級有正向以及負向兩方面的影響。5. 學生所觀察到的幽默事蹟包括肢體表情類的幽默以及因應的幽默。

最後,研究者將根據研究結果,提出在未來教學以及研究上的具體建議,以做為後續研究與教學之參考。

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study were (1) to design a humor training curriculum for senior students in elementary school; (2) to investigate the effect of the curriculum on students’ sense of humor, social skills, and self-esteem. The curriculum in this study which combined goals from four aspects can be realized through curriculum-based teaching, context-based teaching, and interactive way of teaching. The part of curriculum-based teaching was consist of 15 units, the aims of which was to cultivate students’ understanding of humor, creativity on humor, ability to use humor in social context, humor coping, the attitude toward humor, and the tendency to laugh.
The design of nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group, as quasi-experiment design, was applied to the study. There were totally 71 senior students in elementary school participated in, including 36 and 35 students in the experiment and comparison groups respectively. The instruments utilized to examine the effect of the curriculum were “multidimensional sense of humor scale”, “new creativity test”, “children’s social skill scale”, and “children’s self-esteem questionnaire”. The collected data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. The researcher also conducted the analysis of the instructional process by collecting “feedback questionnaire”, “interview data from students”, and “teacher’s reflective journal”. The findings were presented as the following.
1. The humor training curriculum effectively elevated senior students’ creativity on humor and ability of using humor in social context.
2. The humor training curriculum cannot efficiently improve students’ understanding of humor, humor coping, the attitude toward humor, the tendency to laugh, social skill, or self-esteem.
3. The feedback questionnaire showed that
(1) Generally speaking, students enjoyed the humor training curriculum and considered it valuable.
(2) Students were impressed by and willing to identify them with the curriculum that created a joyous atmosphere in class, that allowed them to create humor products, and that helped them realize their development.
(3) The reasons for some students to show negative feeling toward the humor training curriculum included that the projects assigned were overloading and that it was unfair during classroom competitions. There were also some students who didn’t know how to follow up the learning process or were afraid of performing badly in front of the class.
4. The interview data from students showed that
(1) Generally speaking, students liked the humor training curriculum very much.
(2) Students did better on distinguishing the differences between positive and negative humor and knew more knowledge about humor.
(3) The humor training curriculum did improve students’ performance on humor coping and social humor.
(4) The humor training curriculum posed both positive and negative effects in the classroom.
(5) The humor evidence that students observed in class included both physical humor and coping humor.
Based on the result of this study, the researcher also provided several suggestions for further development of humor schooling and research.

中文摘要 ………………………………………………………… Ⅰ 英文摘要 ………………………………………………………… Ⅲ 目錄 ……………………………………………………………… Ⅴ 附錄目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅵ 附表目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅶ 附圖目次 ………………………………………………………… Ⅸ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的 ……………………………………… 1 第二節 研究問題與研究假設 ………………………………… 6 第三節 名詞釋義 ……………………………………………… 9 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 幽默 ………………………………………………… 11 第二節 社交技巧 ……………………………………………… 43 第三節 自尊 …………………………………………………… 52 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構與設計 ……………………………………… 63 第二節 研究對象 ……………………………………………… 66 第三節 研究工具 ……………………………………………… 66 第四節 研究程序 ……………………………………………… 73 第五節 資料處理的方法 ……………………………………… 77 第六節 幽默訓練課程方案設計 ……………………………… 79 第四章 研究結果與討論 第一節 量化資料分析 ………………………………………… 130 第二節 質化資料分析 ………………………………………… 148 第三節 綜合討論 …………………………………………… 191 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 ……………………………………………… 212 第二節 建議 ……………………………………………… 217 參考文獻 中文文獻 ……………………………………………………… 225 西文文獻 ……………………………………………………… 228 附錄目次 附錄一 多向度幽默感量表 ………………………………… 234 附錄二 新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗 …………………… 239 附錄三 兒童社交技巧量表…………………………………… 253 附錄四 國小學童自尊問卷 ………………………………… 255 附錄五 學生訪談問卷 ……………………………………… 258 附錄六 課程回饋問卷 ……………………………………… 260 附錄七 教師省思札記 ……………………………………… 262 附錄八 教師省思札記舉隅 ………………………………… 263 附錄九 幽默課程教學方案學習單 ………………………… 264 附表目次 表2-1-1 刺激觀點的幽默定義 ……………………………… 12 表2-1-2 反應觀點的幽默定義 ……………………………… 12 表2-1-3 功能觀點的幽默定義 ……………………………… 13 表2-1-4 能力特質觀點的幽默定義 ………………………… 14 表2-1-5 歷程或多向度觀點的幽默定義 …………………… 15 表2-2-1 社會技巧的語言與非語言要素 …………………… 47 表2-2-2 社交技巧與情感社交幽默功能內涵之比較………… 51 表2-3-1 青少年自尊促進方案架構…………………………… 59 表3-1-1 本研究實驗設計 …………………………………… 64 表3-6-1 本研究目標屬性與能力目標 ……………………… 86 表3-6-2 幽默訓練課程「歡喜來見面」單元課程方案 …… 96 表3-6-3 幽默訓練課程「小小漫畫家」單元課程方案……… 98 表3-6-4 幽默訓練課程「幽默聖誕卡」單元課程方案 …… 100 表3-6-5 幽默訓練課程「照片修改大師」單元課程方案 …… 102 表3-6-6 幽默訓練課程「鬼臉拳」單元課程方案 ………… 104 表3-6-7 幽默訓練課程「親愛的,我把成語變好笑了」單元課程方案 … 106 表3-6-8 幽默訓練課程「今天,你笑過了嗎?」單元課程方案 ………… 108 表3-6-9 幽默訓練課程「坐而笑不如起而行笑」單元課程方案 ………… 110 表3-6-10 幽默訓練課程「糗事大聲說」單元課程方案 ………………… 112 表3-6-11 幽默訓練課程「缺點大改造」單元課程方案 …………………… 114 表3-6-12 幽默訓練課程「幽默推銷員」單元課程方案 …………………… 117 表3-6-13 幽默訓練課程「有沒有這麼誇張啊?」單元課程方案 ………… 118 表3-6-14 幽默訓練課程「光明燈」單元課程方案 ………… 121 表3-6-15 幽默訓練課程「滋味在心頭」單元課程方案 …… 123 表3-6-16 幽默訓練課程「幽默泯恩仇」單元課程方案 …… 127 表4-1-1 「多成分幽默感量表」前後測的平均數、標準差和調整後平均數 131 表4-1-2 「多向度幽默感量表」各組迴歸線平行假設考驗結果 …………… 132 表4-1-3 「多向度幽默感量表」多變量共變數分析摘要表 ……………… 133 表4-1-4 「多向度幽默感量表」兩組平均數差異之事後比較結果表 …… 134 表4-1-5 本研究「新編幽默創造與幽默理解測驗」之評分者間信度 …… 136 表4-1-6 「新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗」前後測的平均數、標準差和調 整後平均數 …………………………… 136 表4-1-7 「新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗」各組迴歸線平行假設考驗結果 137 表4-1-8 「新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗」多變量共變數分析摘要表 … 138 表4-1-9 「新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗」兩組平均數差異之事後比較結果 …………………………………………………… 139 表4-1-10 「兒童社交技巧量表」前後測的平均數、標準差和調整後平均數 141 表4-1-11 「兒童社交技巧量表」各組迴歸線平行假設考驗結果 ………… 141 表4-1-12 「兒童社交技巧量表」多變量共變數分析摘要表 ………………. 142 表4-1-13 「國小學童自尊問卷」前後測的平均數、標準差和調整後平均數 144 表4-1-14 「國小學童自尊問卷」各組迴歸線平行假設考驗結果 ………… 144 表4-1-15 「國小學童自尊問卷」多變量共變數分析摘要表 ……………… 146 表4-1-16 「課程回饋問卷」喜好度與價值感填答人數百分比 …………… 147 附圖目次 圖2-2-1 培養自尊心的流程圖 ……………………………… 58 圖3-1-1 本研究研究架構圖 ………………………………… 63 圖3-4-1 本研究研究程序圖 ………………………………… 73 圖3-6-1 本研究幽默訓練課程教學架構 …………………… 91 圖3-6-2 『幽默泯恩仇』課程架構圖 ………………………… 126

一、中文文獻
何茉如 (民87)。國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康調節作用之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
何茉如 (民87)。國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康調節作用之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
余仲安 (民76)。小學生的成長與生活輔導。台北:益群書店。
吳宇昌 (民91)。人際互動中的幽默對績效影響之研究。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
吳宇昌 (民92)。人際互動中的幽默對績效影響之研究。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
吳國淳 (民78)。教導中重度智能不足兒童社會技巧成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳淑敏 (民91)。同儕媒介暨社交技巧教學對增進自閉症兒童社會能力之研究。
國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
吳鈺婷 (民92)。兒童失諧幽默理解之研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭研究所碩士論文。
吳靜宜 (民93)。新編幽默理解與幽默創造測驗的發展研究暨其相關因素之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳櫻菁 (民76)。合理情緒教育對國小高年級學生之應用效果。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
李嘉雯 (民88)。幽默創造過程中後設認知與遠距連結歷程之研究。中原大學心理研究所碩士論文。
李翠月 (民91)。自我肯定訓練對國小人際關係困擾學生之輔導成效。國立嘉義大學特殊教育學系碩士班碩士論文。
沈如瑩 (民91)。國中小學生自尊與自我概念、生活適應關係之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
沈鈺珍 (民90)。「理情U型自尊」團體方案對國小低自尊兒童自尊、理性思考、情緒智力之輔導效果研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林小麗 (民92)。幽默融入國中綜合活動對學生幽默感、情緒適應和幽默人際因應之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
林杏足 (民86)。諮商中當事人自尊改變歷程之分析研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系博士論文。
林佩琪 (民89)。社會技巧訓練對國小「退縮—被拒絕」兒童之社會技巧、同儕接納與社會自尊影響之實驗研究。國立東華大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林燕玲 (民89)。直接教學模式對青春期嚴重情緒障礙學生社交技巧教學成效之研究,國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
邱發忠 (民88)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計及效果評估研究。輔仁大學應用心理研究所碩士論文。
邱發忠、陳學志、卓淑玲 (民92)。幽默創造訓練之課程設計暨實徵效果評估。教育心理學報,34卷,2期,179-198頁。
邱滿豔 (民71)。中、重度智能不足者社會技巧訓練效果之評量。台大心理研究所碩士論文。
邱瓊瑩 (民91)。社交技巧訓練團體對國小兒童社交技巧與人際關係之影響研究。國立新竹師範學院輔導教學碩士班碩士論文。
姚子樑 (民78)。提昇青少年自尊感-青少年工作新路向。香港社會服務聯合會兒童及青年部編:踏入新紀元青少年服務的挑戰、蛻變與發展。香港:集賢社,51-60。
姚子樑 (民78)。提昇青少年自尊感-青少年工作新路向。香港社會服務聯合會兒童及青年部編:踏入新紀元青少年服務的挑戰、蛻變與發展。香港:集賢社,51-60。
孫允寬譯。自尊心。Branden, N. (1996). The six pillars of self-esteen.。台北:遠流。
孫曉如 (民91)。國中生的幽默偏好與行為困擾之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
翁燕然 (民87)。活用幽默-你的幽默會轉彎。台北:漢宇。
高月好 (民92)。幼稚園實施幽默取向教學之行動研究-以一所台北縣公立幼稚園為例。國立台北師範學院幼兒教育學系碩士論文。
張如鈞 (民78)。兒童幽默的發展—對幽默漫畫的欣賞與理解。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
張惟亮 (民91)。人際關係之班級輔導活動實施效果研究。國立新竹師範學院輔導教學碩士班碩士論文。
張景媛、陳學志、黃譯瑩 (2004)。幽默訓練融入綜合活動對國一學生創造思考與人際關係之影響。2004年第二屆創新與創造力研討會,國立台灣科學教育館士林新館。
張椿敏(民88)。培養孩子的幽默感。師友,86-87。
許建民(民88)。以休閒活動類型及型式規化休閒活動之探討。大專體育,42,158-164。
許慧如 (民88)。人際溝通自我調整訓練課程對增進國小資優生人際溝通能力之成效研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
陳美伶 (民93)。生命教育融入英文教學對高中生自尊、自我概念、英語學習動機之影響研究。國立高雄師範學院教育學系碩士論文。
陳根旺 (民91)。阿德勒取向探索活動對國小低自尊學生輔導效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳淑蓉 (民92)。幽默感對可能壓力事件及負面生活事的認知評估、情緒反應之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳皎眉、鐘思嘉 (民85)。人際關係。台北市:幼獅文化事業公司。
陳慧青 (民94)。幽默融入的數學創意教學對國中生數學學習成效與創造力之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
陳學志 (民80)。幽默理解的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理研究所博士論文。
陳學志(民93)。「幽默的訊息整合歷程暨幽默課程對學生創造力及人際因應的影響」論文集。
陳學志、黃國彥、楊孝、江煜坤 (民81)。幽默—自娛娛人,當代青年,3(1),4-19。
陳錫銘 (民80)。認知行為取向團體諮商對國小憂鬱兒童輔導效果的研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
程紋貞 (民85)。國小學童自我概念、社會技巧與攻擊行為關係之研究。嘉義師範學院教育研究所碩士論文。
黃玲蘭 (民86)。青少年行為改變策略。台北:五南。
黃德祥 (民79)。國中學生社會技巧相關因素研究。中國測驗學測驗年刊,37輯,p195- 210。
楊麗英 (民80)。社會技巧與認真行為取向訓練團體對高社會焦慮大學生輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
管秋雄 (民91)。幽默諮商,台北:心理。
劉佩雲 (民79)。性別、創造力、自我檢校與幽默之間的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
劉莉芬 (民91)。以認知理論探討兒童對幽默笑話觀點之研究。國立台灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。
蔡明若 (民83)。國小學童人際衝突因應策略之研究。台北市立師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。
鄭夙雅 (民90)。國中生社會技巧、認知曲解與校園暴力行為相關之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
鄭慧玲譯 (民83)。幽默就是力量。台北:遠流。
蕭颯、王文欽、徐智策 (民88)。幽默心理分析。台北:智慧大學。
謝淑玲 (民79)。理情團體諮商對國小高焦慮兒童理性思考、焦慮反應、自我概念及內外控信念的影響。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
謝慧珍 (民84)。兒童幽默感、同儕聲望與行為能力關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蘇培人 (民88)。社會技巧訓練對唇顎裂兒童的影響。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系碩士論文。

二、西文文獻
Anderson, J. (1988). Thinking, chinging,rearranging :Improving self-esteem in yorng people. Portland: Metamorphous Press.
Apter, M. J., & Smith, K. C. P. (1977). Humour and the theory of psychological reversals. In A. J. Chapman, & H. Foot (Eds.), Its a funny thing, humour (pp. 95-100). Oxford: Pergamon.
Argyle, M. (1967). The psychology of interpersonal behavior. Harmondsworth, UK:Penguin Books.
Bergen, D. (1998). Development of the sense of humor. In Ruch. W(Eds.), The sense of humor (pp. 329-358). New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
Berk, R. A. (1998). Professors are from Mars, students are from snickers: How to write and deliver humor in the classroom and in professional presentations. Madison, WI: Mendota Press.
Berk, R. A. (1999). Does humor in course tests reduce anxiety and improve performance? College Teaching, 48(4), 151-158.
Berk, R. A., & Nanda, J. P. (1998). Effects of jocular instructional methods on attitudes of anxiety and achievement in statistics courses. Humor, 11(4), 383-409
Berkowitz, G. (1987). Social skills training. In C. R. Reynolds & L. Mann(Eds.) Encychopedia of special education(pp. 1457-1458). New York.:John Wiley & Sons.
Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein., & McGhee, P. E. (Eds.), The sychology of humor (pp. 33-60). New York: Academic press.
Blake, P. C., & Slate, J. R. (1993). A preliminary investigation into the
relationship between adolescent self-esteem and parental verbalinteraction. School Counselor, 14 (2), 81-85.
Boerman-Cornell, W. (1999). The five humors. The English Journal, 84 (4), 66-69.
Bolognini, M., Plancherel, B., & Halfon, O. (1996). Self-esteem and mental health in early adolescence: Development and gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 233-245.
Borba, M. (1989). Esteem builder: A K-8 self-esteem curriculum for improving
student achievement , behavior and school climate. Torrance, CA: Jalmar Press.
Bryant, J., Comisky, P. W. & Zillman, D. (1979). Teachers' humor in the college classroom. Communication Education, 28, 110-118.
Bryant, J., Comisky, P. W., Crane, J. S., & Zillmann, D. (1980). Relationship between college teachers' use of humor in the classroom and students' evaluations of their teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 511-519.
Clyde, P. D., & Scott, A.D.(1988). A review of social skills training with chronic mental patients. In M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, & P. M. Miller(Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (pp.131-164). Newbury Park, California:SAGE Publications, Inc.
Combs, M. & Slaby, D. (1977). Social-skills training with children. In B. Lahey & A.Kazdin(Eds.). Advance in Clinical Child Psychology. New York:Plenum.
Conger, J.C. & Conger, A. J. (1986). Assessment of Social Skills.In:A.R. Ciminero, K.S. Calhoun & H. E. Adams (Eds.). Handbook of Behavioral Assessmen (pp. 526-560). John Wiley & Sons.
Corey, G. (1991). Theory and practice of counseling and psychology (2nd ed.). California:Brooks/Cole.
Cornett, C. E. (1986). Why get serious about humor? In Learning through laughter: Humor in the classroom. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Cotton, N. S. (1983). The development of self-esteem and self-esteem regulation. In J. E. Mack & S. L. Ablon (Eds.), The development and sustenance of self-esteem in childhood (pp. 145-148). New York: International University Press.
Daniel, L. G., & King, D. A. (1995). Relationships among various dimensions of self-esteem and academic achievement in elementary students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED403008)
Eisler, R., & Frederiksen L. (1980). Perfecting social skills: A guide to interpersonal behavior development. New York:Plenum Press.
Elliott, G. (1986). Self-esteem and self-presentation among the young as a function of age and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 135-153.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
Faust, V. (1980). Self-esteem in the classroom. San Diego, CA: Thomas Paine Press.
Friedman, H. H., Halpern, N. & Salb, D. (1999). Teaching statistics using humorous anecdotes. Mathematics Teacher, 92(4), 305-308.
Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
Gordon, J. D. (1992). Humor in legal education. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1992(2), 313-324.
Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39, 46-62.
Hallett, R. D., & Derks, P. (1998). Humor theory and rabelais. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 135-160.
Herber, M. (1986). Social skills training with children. In C. R. Hollin & P. Trower (Eds.), Handbook of social skills training. London:Pergaman Press.
Hiilman, S. M. (1995). Laugh and learn: humor in nursing education, Journal of Nursing Jocularity, 5, 32-34.
Hill, D. J. (1988). Humor in the classroom. A handbook for teachers and other entertainers(and other entertainers). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kane, T. R., Suls, J. & Tedeschi, J. T. (1977). Humour as a tool of social interaction. In A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humour (pp.16). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enchance teaching effectiveness in dread course. College Student Journal. 33, issue 3.
Klavir, R., & Gorodetsky, M. (2001). The processing of analogous problems in the verbal and visual-humorous (cartoons) modalities by gifted/average children. Gifted Children Quarterly, 45(3), 205-215.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation, London: Hutchinson.
Korobkin, D. (1988). Humor in the classroom. Considerations and strategies. College Teaching, 36, 154-158.
Korobkin, D. (1989). Humor in the Classroom. College Teaching, 36(4), 154-158.
Kuchner, J. F. (1991). The humor of young children. Paper presented at the National Association for the Education of Young Children Uniondale, NY.(ERIC No. ED348 139)
Kuhrik, Marilee & others (1997). Facilitating learning with humor. Journal of Nursing Education, 36(3), 332-334.
Kuiper, N. A., & Martin, R. A. (1993). Humor and self-concept. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6 (4), 251-270.
Ladd, G.W. & Mize, J. (1983). A cognitive-social learning model of social skill   training. Psychological Review, 90, 127-157.
Lefcourt, H. M. & Martin . R. A. (1986). Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Liberman, P.R., DeRisi, W.J., & Mueser, K.T.(1989). Social skill training for psychiatric patients.New York:Pergamon Press.
Libert, J., & Lewinsohn, P. M.(1973). The concept of social skill with special references to the behavior of depressed persons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 304-312.
Long, D., & Graesser, A. C. (1988). Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 11, 35-60.
Martin, F. (2002). Coping humor in early adolescence. Humor, 15 (3), 283-304.
Martin, R. A., & Dobbins, J. P. (1988). Sense of humor, hassles, and immunoglobulin-A: Evidence for a stress moderating effect of humor. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 18, 93-105
Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1313-1324.
Martin, R. A., Kuiper, N. A., Olinger, L. J., & Dance, K. A. (1993). Humor, coping with stress, self-concept, and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 6, 89-104.
Martin, R.A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1984). Situational Humour Response Questionnaire: Quantitative measure of sense of humour. Journal of Persnoality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 145-155.
Masten, A. S. (1986). Humor and competence in school-aged children. Children Development, 57, 461-473.
McGhee, P. E. (1976). Children’s appreciation of humor: A test of cognitive congruency principle. Children Development, 47, 420-426.
McGinnis, E., & Goldstein, A. P. (1997). Skill-streaming the elementary schoolchild: New strategies and perspectives for teaching prosocial skills(Rev. ed.). Champaign, IL:Research Press.
McMahon, M. (1999). Are we having fun yet? Humor in the English class. The English Journal, 88 (4), 70-72
McMorris, R. F., Boothroyd, R. A., & Pietrangelo, D. J. (1997). Humor in educational testing: A review and discussion. Applied Measurement in Education, 10 (3), 269-297.
McMorris, R. F., Kim, Y., & Li, X. (2001). International students' experiences with and reactions to humor in university classroom instruction and testing. Paper presented at the conference of the Northeastern Educational Research Association.
Merrill.Jarolimek, J. & Foster, C.(1993) The teaching & learning in the elementary school. 5EMacMillan, New York.
Milton, L., Berne, L., Peppard, J., Patton, W., Hunt, L., & Wright, S.(2001) Teaching sexuality education in high schools: what qualities do Australian
teachers value? Sex Education, 1 (2), 175-186.
Nave, B. (1990). Self-esteem: The key to student success. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 919.
Newton, G. R., & Dowd, E. T. (1990). Effect of client sense of humor and paradoxical interventions on test anxiety. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68, 668-672.
Nezlek, J. B., & Derks, P. (2001). Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction. Humor, 14(4), 395-413.
Nilsen, A. P., & Nilsen, D. F. (1999). The straw man meets his match: six arguments for studying humor in English classes. The English Journal, 88 (4), 34-42.
O’connell, W. E. (1962). An item analysis of the wit and humor appreciation test. Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 271-276.
Overholser, J. C. (1992). Sense of humor when coping with life stress. Personality and Individual Difference, 13, 799-804.
Perlini, A. H., Nenonen, R. G., & Lind, D. L. (1999). Effects of humor on test anxiety and performance. Psychological Reports, 84, 1203-1213.
Ruggieri, C. A. (1999). Laugh and learn: using humor to teach tragedy. The English Journal, 88 (4), 53-59.
Sarah, E. T., Robert, F. M., & Lin W. C. (2004). Is humor an appreciated teaching tool? Perceptions of professors’ teaching styles and use of humor. College Teaching, 52(1), 14-20.
Shade, R. A. (1996). A license to laugh: Humor in the classroom. Englewood, NJ: Libraries Unlimited.
Shultz, J. J., Forio, S., & Erickson, F. (1982): Where’s the floor? A spects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. In P.Gilmore & A. A. Glattorn(Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education. Washington, DC.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Sobstad, F. (1998). Humor, loneliness and peer acceptance in children. Paper presented at the ISHS 98 Conference, Bergen.
Trower, P., Bryant, B., & Argyle, M. (1978). Social skills and mental health. In:  A. S. Bellack(1979). Behavior Assessment of Social Skills. In: A.S. Bellack & M.Hersen (Eds.), Research and Practice Social Skills Training. New York:Plenum Press.
Tuttle, D.W. (1984). Self-esteem and adjusting with blindness: The process of responding to life’s demands. U.S.A.: Charles Thomas.
Vance, C. M. (1987). A comparative study on the use of humor in the design of instruction. Instructional Science, 16, 79-100.
Wandersee, J. H. (1982). Humor as a teaching strategy. The American Biology Teacher, 44, 212-218.
Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and student's reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48-62.
Warnars-KleVerlaan, N., Oppenheimer, L. & Sherman, L. (1996). To be or not to be humorous: Does it make differents? Humor : International Journal of Humor Research, 9(2) , 117-141.
Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (2001). Ten specific techniques for developing humor in the classroom. Education, 108, 167-179.
Wells, M. (1997). Japanese Humor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
White, G. W. (2001). Teacher's report of how they used humor with students perceived use of such humor. Education, 122, 337-347.
Wilson, M.P. (1979). Jokes form, content, use and function. New York: Academic Press.
Wolff, H. S., Smith, C. E., & Murry, H. A. (1934). The psychology of humor: A study of response to race-disparagement jokes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 341-365.
Wyer, Jr. R. S., & CollinsⅡ ,J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99, 663-688.
Zigler, E., Levine, J., & Gould, L. (1966). Cognitive processes in the development of children’s appreciation of humor. Children development, 37, 508-518.
Zigler, E., Levine, J., & Gould, L. (1967). Cognitive challenge as a factor in children’s humor appreciation. Jurnal of Personality and Social psychology, 6, 332-336.
Zillman, D. (1983). Disparagement humor. In P. E. McGhee. & J. N. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Humor Research (pp. 85-108). New York: Spring-Verlag.
Ziv, A. (1976). Facilitation effects of humor on creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 318-322.
Ziv, A. (1980). Humor and Creativity. The Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 5(3), 159-170.
Ziv, A. (1984). Personality and sense of humor. New York: Spring.
Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 5-15.

QR CODE