研究生: |
龍筱芬 Lung, Hsiao-Fen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
研發費用與獲利之關聯-以台灣化學產業為例 The Relationship Between R&D Expense and Profit –A Case Study of The Taiwanese Chemical industry |
指導教授: |
印永翔
Ying, Yung-Hsiang |
口試委員: |
楊淑珺
Yang, Shu-Chun S. 何宗武 Ho, Tsung-Wu 印永翔 Ying, Yung-Hsiang |
口試日期: | 2022/05/31 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 46 |
中文關鍵詞: | 研發費用 、每股盈餘 、追蹤資料 、化學產業 |
英文關鍵詞: | R&D expending, EPS, Panel Data, chemical industry |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200634 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:106 下載:8 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
為探討組織每年研究發展支出與營業績效之關聯性,本研究選取化學產業台灣45家原始樣本公司,其中有效樣本公司為29家;包括上市工業化學、上櫃公開化學、公開發行化學工業,以及一間興櫃化學C公司。研究樣本公司之營業期間為2008年至2020年,初始觀察值共377筆,以建構多個解釋公司績效的模型,方法選用Panel Data 迴歸方法分析,被解釋變數「每股盈餘」的定義為稅後淨利與在外流通股數之比率,並以資本額、從業員工、營業收入、本期淨利、當期研發支出、前期研發支出、前二期研發支出等作為解釋變數。除此之外,也額外增加了外部因素,包括經濟成長率以及通貨膨脹率來探討研究結果。實證結果發現:(1)當期的研發支出費用無法對該公司營業額產生顯著影響。(2)變數前二期研發支出對每股盈餘有顯著正相關。(3) 在只考慮時間因素的 Panel Data模型中,解釋能力最佳,證實化學產業是一個高度整合上中下游的產業,產業間彼此互相影響,該年度外部經濟的景氣好壞也對盈餘高低有所影響。
To explore the relationship between research and development (R&D) expenses and financial performance, this study selects Taiwanese companies in chemical industry with the observation window from 2008 to 2020. The 29 valid sample companies include chemical firms that are TWSE listed, OTC listed, publicly issued, and ongoing listed and the resulting dataset has 377 observations. This study adopts Panel data regression analysis to examine how R&D influences company performance. The determinant variable, earning per share, is measured by the ratio of net income to the number of outstanding shares. The explanatory variables include the capital size, number of employees, operating income, net profit, R&D expenditure for current year, one-year lag, two-year lag, etc. External factors, such as economic growth rates and inflation rates are also added to explore their effects. The empirical results show that (1) the current year R&D expenditure does not have a significant impact on the company’srevenue, (2) the two-year-lag R&D expenditure has a significant and positive correlation with earnings per share, and (3) the Panel Data model with time as its sole factor presents the best explanatory power. Such result confirms that the chemical industry has high degree of vertical integration and companies within the industry impact each other. The external economy also affects profitability.
Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (2000). Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. The journal of Finance, 55(6), 2747-2766.
Apergis, N., & Sorros, J. (2014). The role of R&D expenses for profitability:Evidence from US fossil and renewable energy firms. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(3), 8-15.
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Firm profitability, growth, and innovation. Review of Industrial Organization, 10(5), 579-588.
Bange, M. M., & De Bondt, W. F. (1998). R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4(2), 153-184.
Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, A. (2013). Innovation and firm value: An investigation of the changing role of patents, 1985–2007. Research Policy, 42(8), 1496-1510.
Branch, B. (1974). Research and development activity and profitability: a distributed lag analysis. Journal of political economy, 82(5), 999-1011.
Brenner, M. S., & Rushton, B. M. (1989). Sales growth and R&D in the chemical industry. Research-Technology Management, 32(2), 8-15.
Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: an empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record, 77(239), 323-337.
Ciftci, M., & Zhou, N. (2016). Capitalizing R&D expenses versus disclosing intangible information. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46(3), 661-689.
Curtis, A., McVay, S., & Toynbee, S. (2020). The changing implications of research and development expenditures for future profitability. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(2), 405-437.
Dechezleprêtre, A., Einiö, E., Martin, R., Nguyen, K. T., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Do tax incentives for research increase firm innovation? An RD design for R&D (No. w22405). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gelman, A. (2005). Analysis of variance—why it is more important than ever. The annals of statistics, 33(1), 1-53.
Guerard, J. B., & Stone, B. K. (1987). Strategic planning and the investment-financing behaviour of major industrial companies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(11), 1039-1050.
Hsieh, P. H., Mishra, C. S., & Gobeli, D. H. (2003). The return on R&D versus capital expenditures in pharmaceutical and chemical industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(2), 141-150.
Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value.
Koopmans, R. J. (2006). R&D challenges for the 21st century. Soft Matter, 2(7), 537-543.
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of accounting and economics, 21(1), 107-138.
Morbey, G. K. (1988). R&D: Its relationship to company performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management: AN INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION OF THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 5(3), 191-200.
Morbey, G. K., & Reithner, R. M. (1990). How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research-Technology Management, 33(3), 11-14.
Pakes, A. (1985). On patents, R & D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of political economy, 93(2), 390-409.
Sougiannis, T. (1994). The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. Accounting review, 44-68.
Szewczyk, S. H., Tsetsekos, G. P., & Zantout, Z. (1996). The valuation of corporate R&D expenditures: Evidence from investment opportunities and free cash flow. Financial Management, 105-110.
Tyagi, S., Nauriyal, D. K., & Gulati, R. (2018). Firm level R&D intensity: evidence from Indian drugs and pharmaceutical industry. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 167-202.
Warusawitharana, M. (2015). Research and development, profits, and firm value: A structural estimation. Quantitative Economics, 6(2), 531-565.
Wolff, M. F. (2007). Forget R&D spending-think innovation. Research Technology Management, 50(2), 7.
Yeh, M. L., Chu, H. P., Sher, P. J., & Chiu, Y. C. (2010). R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model. Applied economics, 42(3), 389-401.
王秋菊 (2011)。由傳統走向高科技的台灣化學工業,科學發展期刊報,第457期,P.76~P.79,民國一○○年
石倍如, 洪偉峰(2008)。企業獲利與廣告,研發支出,電子產業的關係:台灣股票市場的實證研究. 2008. PhD Thesis. 大葉大學會計資訊學系碩士班.
金偉燦、芮妮.莫伯尼(2010)。邁向價值創新。哈佛商業 評論。
姜義軒、朱博湧、彭火樹 (2000)。台灣電子產業與非電子產業 Tobin's q 之差異及其成因之研究 (Doctoral dissertation).
張大寧、王克陸 (2007) 。研發投資對公司價值影響之研究-以 LCD 產業為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
張佩瑜、曾聖文、詹益壽 (2010). 高科技產業經營績效的差異性分析:以台灣 IC產業為例. 東亞論壇, (467), 133-150.
曹淑琳. (2021). 以 Cobb-Douglas 生產函數分析新冠肺炎後台灣半導體產業研發投入與獲利能力之關聯性. 中科大學報, 8(1), 25-52.
鄭雯芳、朱靜眉、謝淑玲、戴志璁(2018) 。 研發密集度對評價模型之影響-以台灣生技業為例。全球商業經營管理學報, (10), 99-107.
廖振盛. (2011). 台灣半導體產業研發活動, 技術效率與規模效率之研究. 運籌與管理學刊, 10(2), 17-30.
廖麗芳. (2018)。化工產業獲利能力之比較分析。
羅凱禎. (2016) 。我國化學產業之現況與展望. 證券服務, (654), 95-96.