研究生: |
金泫佑 KIM, HYEN WOO |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
基於逆向設計的群衆募資課程設計 Crowdfunding curriculum design based on backward design |
指導教授: |
吳彥濬
Wu, Yen-Chun |
口試委員: |
王致遠
Wang, Chih-Yuan 田麗珠 Tien, Li-Chu 吳彥濬 Wu, Yen-Chun |
口試日期: | 2023/07/27 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
全球經營與策略研究所 Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 85 |
中文關鍵詞: | 群衆募資 、回報型群眾募資 、教育課程 、課程設計 、逆向課程設計 |
英文關鍵詞: | Crowdfunding, Reward-based model, Curriculum, Curriculum design, Backward design model |
研究方法: | 主題分析 、 文件分析法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301437 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
雖然群眾募資市場正處於急遽成長的情況下,其中以「Reward based crowdfunding」,該模式主要是以「先募資、後提供產品」的方式進行;但是實際上群眾募資其實有很多不同的形式,不過有關於群眾募資的教育及研究數據,比起快速成長的市場明顯不足;目前可以學習群眾募資知識的方式主要集中於線上學習,實體課程則是幾乎沒有的情況。
本研究目的是以大學生為研究對象, 並且為其設計Reward-based crowdfunding的教育課程。因此分析了群眾募資以及Reward-based crowdfunding,分析課程設計模型並選擇了Backward desin model為本研究的設計模型。本教育課程的對象為大學生, 因此設計了16周的群眾募資教育課程。
透過分析設計的實體教育課程以及線上課程的比較可得知兩者的共同點, 以及透過設計的教育課程, 可以看出實體教育課程的優點, 且提出用Backward design model的課程設計的好處。
從這份研究得知,透過實體課程學習後,可以提升學習者對於群眾募資的了解與深度認識,透過這個過程更能培養出學習者的競爭力,以及希望能夠透過本研究提供群眾募資不同面向的思考模式。
The crowdfunding market is experiencing rapid growth, with "Reward-based crowdfunding" being a prevalent approach where funds are raised first and then products or rewards are provided to backers. There are various forms of crowdfunding, but research and data on crowdfunding in education are notably lacking compared to the thriving market.
Currently, most people learn about crowdfunding through online resources, as crowdfunding courses are scarce. This study aims to address this gap by focusing on college students and designing an educational curriculum for Reward-based crowdfunding. The research involves analyzing crowdfunding and Reward-based crowdfunding, as well as selecting the Backward design model for the course design.
The educational course is designed to span 16 weeks and specifically targets college students. By comparing proposed crowdfunding curriculum and online courses, the study seeks to identify commonalities between the two and highlight the advantages of proposed crowdfunding curriculum. The Backward design model is proposed as a beneficial curriculum design approach.
The study reveals that learners who take crowdfunding courses can gain a deeper understanding of crowdfunding and enhance their competitiveness. Ultimately, the research aims to offer different thinking approaches for crowdfunding education.
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63-97.
Aldridge, N., & Fowles, J. (2013). Cause‐related marketing and customer donations in an online marketplace. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(1), 52-59.
Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Short, J. C., & Webb, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53-73.
Alonso, I. M. (2015). Crowdfunding in islamic finance and microfinance: A case study of egypt. Access to Finance and Human Development—Essays on Zakah, Awqaf and Microfinance, 1(8), 85-94.
Antonenko, P. D., Lee, B. R., & Kleinheksel, A. J. (2014). Trends in the crowdfunding of educational technology startups. Techtrends, 58, 36-41.
Bas, G., & Beyhan, Ö. (2019). Revisiting the effect of teaching of learning strategies on academic achievement: A meta-analysis of the findings. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 70-87.
Bento, N., Gianfrate, G., & Thoni, M. H. (2019). Crowdfunding for sustainability ventures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117751.
Block, J. H., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2018). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50, 239-250.
Choi, S., Kim, H., Chung, M., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Online donation experiences, donation awareness, and intention of future donation among teenagers in south korea. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(5), 622-633.
Cicchiello, A. F., Kazemikhasragh, A., & Monferrà, S. (2020). Gender differences in new venture financing: Evidence from equity crowdfunding in latin america. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(5), 1175-1197.
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Emes, C. (2005). Principles of learner-centered curriculum: Responding to the call for change in higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(4), 85-110.
Coursera. (2022). Coursera reports fourth quarter and full year 2021 financial results. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220210005825/en/coursera-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2021-financial-results
Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P.-Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics.
Grant, J. (2018). Principles of curriculum design. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice, 71-88.
Griffiths, P. (2020). The fintech industry: Crowdfunding in context. Advances in Crowdfunding: Research and Practice, 241-270.
Heminway, J. M., & Hoffman, S. R. (2010). Proceed at your peril: Crowdfunding and the securities act of 1933. Tenn. L. Rev., 78, 879.
Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine, 14(6), 176-183.
Intelligence, M. (2023). Crowdfunding market size and share analysis - Growth trends & forecasts (2023 - 2028). https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/crowdfunding-market
JegelevičIūTė, S., & ValančIenė, L. (2015). Comparative analysis of the ways crowdfunding is promoted. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 268-274.
Jenik, I., Lyman, T., & Nava, A. (2017). Crowdfunding and financial inclusion. Cgap (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor) Working Paper, 41. https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/Working-Paper-Crowdfunding-and-Financial-Inclusion-Mar-2017.pdf
Kazmark, J. (2013). Kickstarter before kickstarter. https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/kickstarter-before-kickstarter
Kelting-Gibson, L. M. (2005). Comparison of curriculum development practices. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 26-36.
Kirby, E., & Worner, S. (2014). Crowd-funding: An infant industry growing fast. Iosco Research Department, 2014, 1-63.
Kunz, M. M., Bretschneider, U., Erler, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 425-461.
Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2018). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers. Springer.
Marchegiani, L. (2018). From mecenatism to crowdfunding: Engagement and identification in cultural-creative projects. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 13(2), 143-151.
Mctighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2004). Understanding by design professional development workbook. Eric.
Ministry Of Education, Y., & Sport. (2015). Curriculum framework of general education and technical education. In: Moeys. https://www.scribd.com/document/648402049/Curriculum-Framework-of-General-Education-and-Technical-Education
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Moritz, A., & Block, J. H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A literature review and research directions. Springer.
Ordanini, A., Miceli, L., Pizzetti, M., & Parasuraman, A. (2011). Crowd‐funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 443-470.
Rodrigo, R. T. (2017). Reflections and insights on the models of learning: Subject-centered, learner-centered and problem-centered design models. Researchgate. Retrieved September, 20, 2021.
Sauermann, H., Franzoni, C., & Shafi, K. (2019). Crowdfunding scientific research: Descriptive insights and correlates of funding success. Plos One, 14(1), E0208384.
Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2010). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming.
Shneor, R. (2020). Crowdfunding models, strategies, and choices between them. Advances in Crowdfunding: Research and Practice, 21-42.
SträHle, J., & Bulling, L. (2018). Case study: Marillion. Fashion & Music, 245-264.
Wang, Z., & Yang, X. (2019). Understanding backers’ funding intention in reward crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Technology in Society, 58, 101149.
Wiggins, G. P., & Mctighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design. Ascd. https://www.google.com.tw/books/edition/Understanding_by_Design/N2EfKlyUN4QC?hl=ko&gbpv=1
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Ascd. https://jaymctighe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Learning-Principles-handouts-set1.pdf
Wiggins, G. P., & Mctighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. Ascd. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=lcS7wETyCeAC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ko&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Wiggins, G. P., & Mctighe, J. (2012). The understanding by design guide to advanced concepts in creating and reviewing units. Ascd. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/books/DG2-sample-chapters.pdf
Zhao, L., & Li, Y. (2020). Crowdfunding in China: Turmoil of global leadership. Advances in Crowdfunding: Research and Practice, 273-296.
Ziegler, T., Johanson, D., Zhang, B., Ben, S., Wang, W., Mammadova, L., Hao, R., et al. (2018). The 3rd Asia pacific region alternative finance industry report. Cambridge: The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2019-04-3rd-asia-pacific-alternative-finance-industry-report.pdf