本實務報告主旨在說明做為一位貝利茲語言機構新手線上華語教師的我，初任職於貝利茲語言機構的三個月間，藉由我實踐貝利茲教學法系統化教學流程的實作歷程之反思，包含檢視貝利茲教學法因應成人教育學理論之成人學習特性，以及反思我在教學時所面對之挑戰及回應方式和態度。藉由教學反思，我如何調整我的教學。期待以我的報告，能帶給對貝利茲教學法、成人線上華語教學及藉著教學反思提升教學之教師能有所助益。
本研究主要探討研究目的為（一）闡述現今貝利茲教學法之系統化教學流程於成人線上華語課程之實踐。（二）探究貝利茲教學法因應成人學習者學習特性之現況。（三）我由貝利茲教學法之實踐過程，以Schön的反思理論為基礎，並以Gibbs之反思循環架構，進行教學歷程之反思。
透過教學反思，研究結果顯示在實踐貝利茲教學法時，除了採用貝利茲教學法之系統化教學流程之外，更需藉由因應不同成人學習者特性，觀察學生於課堂中之反應，適時調整教學。貝利茲教學法雖有系統化流程之設計，也非常具有彈性。在貝利茲教學法操作程序中，也顯現出針對成人教育理念設計之原則。研究結果也顯示，身為新手貝利茲線上華語教師的我，透過教學反思，我能逐步調整自己的教學方式及教學觀念，進而能在華語教學領域能有所成長。

This study examines the first three months of my teaching at Berlitz, through a new teacher’s perspective. Through my teaching, I reflected on the efficacy of the Berlitz Method. I also examined how the Berlitz Method affirms the andragogy assumptions. The study shows what challenges I encountered when implementing the Berlitz Method’s teaching cycle online, and how I overcame those challenges.
This study discusses three areas of teaching Mandarin Chinese to adult learners online. First, the current practice of the Berlitz Method. Second, the Berlitz Method in facilitating adult learners’ learning attributes. Thirdly, I conduct my teaching reflection based on Schön’s reflection theory and combine with Gibbs’ reflective cycle.
The Berlitz Method can facilitate adult student learning. The findings suggest that in order to best implement the Berlitz Method when teaching adult learners online, a flexible and adjustable approach needs to be performed based on observation of the individual students. By reflecting on teaching experiences, a new teacher is able to grow further in his/her teaching career.

一、中文文獻
（一）書籍類
宋如瑜。（2018）。華語文教學實務。臺北：正中。
宋如瑜。（2020）。華語教師課堂話與發展。臺北：正中。
何淑真、張孝裕、陳立芬、舒兆民、蔡雅薰、賴明德。（2020）。華語文教學導論（修訂二版）。臺北：三民。
（二）期刊類
王洪強（2006）。貝立茲教學法─一種務實的外語教學方法。世界教育信息。9， 50，61-62。
代澤群（2017）。淺析直接法在對外漢語課堂教學中的運用。山西青年。　5，97-98。
石波（譯）（1985），T. Fleming（著）：貝利茲速成教學法。世界博覽。10，52-54。
付繼偉（2005）。直接法與高級漢語教學的模式。雲南大學學報。3　（2），1-5。
宋如瑜（2008）。反思性模擬教學－銜接理論與實踐的華語師資培育策 略。中原華語文學報，(2)，179-203。 doi:10.30107/CYJTCSL.200810.0011
宋如瑜（2010）。華語實習教師課堂話語質量分析－以師資培訓為中心的探索。中原華語文學報，(5)，91-113。 doi:10.30107/CYJTCSL.201004.0004
李豔娟（2009）。試析外語在對外漢語教學中的地位和作用。科技創新報導。 5，165-166。
周婷婷、師會敏、楊帆（2013）。對外漢語相對直接法教學模式探討。重慶科技學院學報。9，205-207。
周洲 (2009)。四種外語教學方法探析。中共貴州省委黨校學報，6，120-121。doi:CNKI:SUN:SJLL.0.2009-06-043
楊信彰 （1991）。談外語教學法與大學英語教學貝立茲教學法引起的深思。廈門大學學報，2，144─150。
葛芳（譯）（1984)，T. Fleming（著）。貝力子語言學校。國外外語教學。1984，12，77-80。
梁社會、郭聖林 （2006）。直接法在對外漢語生詞教學中的應用。中國成人教育。12，149-150。
陳紅 (2009) 。語言觀的演變與外語教學法流派的發展。滁州學院學報。11，02，76-78。doi:CNKI:SUN:CZSB.0.2009-02-030
曾妙芬、耿子怡、蔡羅一（2021）。從教師反思分析線上中文教學有效原則之應用。國際漢語教學研究。1，27-38。
董方（2011）。淺談“直接法”在對外漢語初級口語教學中的應用。語言教學研究。7，116-117。
靳洪剛（2018）。提問互動法續論：語言課堂教師提問的實施程序、策略及應用技巧。臺灣華語教學研究，(16)，3-20。doi:10.29748/TJCSL.201806_(16).0002
蔡喬育（2010)）。增強成人華語學習的動機：Wlodkowski動機的時間連續模式的應用。華語文教學研究。7（2)，81-96。
蔡喬育(2013) 。論成人後設認知表述及其對外成人華語教育的啟示。僑教與海外華人研究學報。2，1-9。
蔡喬育（2016） 。成人華語數位教材使用的優勢和限制：成人學習特性的觀點。語教新視野。5，41-56。
（三）其他研究及論文
杜紅梅（2011）。貝立茲教學法在對外漢語教學中的實際運用。漢語國際教育碩士論文。華東師範大學，上海，中華人民共和國。　　　
董雅琪（2011）。貝立茲教學法在對外漢語一對一教學中的應用研究。漢語國際教育碩士論文。山東師範大學，濟南，山東，中華人民共和國。　　　　　
羅曉蘭（2016）。直接法在肯亞中級漢語綜合課中的應用研究-以肯尼亞華文學院常規班為例。漢語國際教育碩士論文。蘭州大學，蘭州甘肅，中華人民共和國。
二、英文文獻
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2020). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition. New York: Pearson Education.
Berlitz, M. D. (1916). Method for Teaching Modern Language English Part First Book. New York: M.D. Berlitz
Ely, E. E. (1977). The non-traditional student. American Assocication of Community Colleges Annual Conference, 1997, Anaheim CA, United States.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. London: Further Education Unit.
Kara, Mehmet & Erdoğdu, Fatih & Kokoç, Mehmet & Cagiltay, Kursat. (2019). Challenges Faced by Adult Learners in Online Distance Education: A Literature Review. Open Praxis, 11(1), 5. doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.1.929
Killion, J. P & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Education Leadership. 48(6), 14-16.
Knowles, M. S. (1972). Innovations in Teaching Styles and Approaches Based Upon Adult Learning. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8(2), 32–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23038299
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: from pedagogy to andragogy. Rev. and Updated. [Wilton, Conn.] : Chicago, Association Press.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: a neglected species. Houston: Gulf Pub. Co., Book Division.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in Action. Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F. III, Swanson, R. A., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The Adult Learner (9th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1988). The natural approach: Language acquisi tion in the classroom. London: Prentice Hall Europe. http://sdkrashen.com/content/books/the_natural_approach.
Lindeman, E. C. (1926). The Meaning of Adult Education. New York, Windham Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. M. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mcmillan, K., & Weyers, J. (2013). How to improve your critical thinking and reflective skills. Harlow, England: Pearson.
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley brand.
Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. (2020). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. South Melbourne, Vic.: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Posner, G. J. (2005). Field experience: a guide to reflective teaching. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
Stieglitz, G. J. (1955). The Berlitz Method. The Modern Language Journal, 39(6), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/319907
Valli, L. (1997). Listening to other voices: A description of teacher reflec-tion in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education. 72(1), 67-88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1493261
Williams, K., Williams, M., & Spiro, J. (2020). Reflective writing. Red Globe Press.
Yang, Y. (2018). A Study on the Behavior Description of Learners Under Berlitz Pedagogy Based on the Apriori All Algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 102(2), 1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5179-y
Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Bailey, A. (2000). An Examination of the Construct of Critical Reflection: Implications for Teacher Education Programming in the 21st Century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248710005100105
三、英文網站
What is the Berlitz Method? (n.d.). Berlitz. Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://www.berlitz.com/about/the-berlitz-method
Linguists online. (n.d.). The Economist. Retrieved December 14, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/business/2013/01/05/linguists-online
LibGuides: Reflective writing: Differences between discursive and reflective writing. (2022). Hull.ac.uk. from https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/reflectivewriting/reflection5