本研究發展了一套擴增實境系統輔助國小學生學習幾何概念，並進行教學實驗評估此系統對學生學習態度與成就之影響。系統之發展選定國小「長方體與正方體」幾何單元，讓學生透過平板電腦掃描（實境）展開圖，觀察（擴增）動畫摺合成立體圖之過程。學生可以自由組合實境圖卡構成不同之展開圖，再透過平板電腦觀察驗證其是否能摺合成立體圖。教學實驗之參與者為新北市某國小五年級兩班學生共47人（實驗組23人，控制組24人），教學實施包括「長方體與正方體」及「正立方體展開圖」兩個活動，教學時間共2節課。於教學實驗後，讓學生分別填寫成就測驗卷及態度問卷，用以分析及評估系統之成效。
研究結果發現，運用擴增實境輔助學習幾何概念對學習成就並無顯著影響，但對學習者之學習興趣有顯著提升；且學生對於系統使用持有較高的滿意度。建議未來研究可以提高系統的互動性，優化使用者介面，以凸顯擴增實境功能；並設計一套能讓教師自行擴充其它立體物件或展開圖之擴增實境系統。

The purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were purposes of this study were to develop to develop to develop to develop an augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality augmented reality (AR) (AR) (AR) (AR) system system system system system to assist ssist elementary lementary lementary lementary school chool chool students to learn to learn to learn geometryeometry eometry concepts onceptsoncepts . We We We evaluateevaluate evaluate d the the effectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the system effectiveness of the system effectiveness of the system effectiveness of the system effectiveness of the system effectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the system effectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the system effectiveness of the systemeffectiveness of the system in terms of in terms of in terms of in terms of in terms of students ’ learning achievement learning achievement learning achievementlearning achievementlearning achievementlearning achievementlearning achievement learning achievementlearning achievement learning achievement and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes and their attitudes toward learning toward learning toward learning toward learning . The . The . The . The concepts ofconcepts ofconcepts of concepts ofconcepts of concepts of “cuboid andand cubecube ” from geometry from geometry from geometry from geometry from geometry from geometry from geometry curriculumcurriculum curriculum curriculum were were were were covered in our AR system.covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system.covered in our AR system.covered in our AR system. covered in our AR system.covered in our AR system. With the AR system,With the AR system, With the AR system, With the AR system, With the AR system, With the AR system,With the AR system,With the AR system, With the AR system, students can students can students can students can use a pad to use a pad to use a pad to use a pad to use a pad to use a pad to use a pad to scan scan scan a net a net a net a net (assembled with 6 assembled with 6 assembled with 6 assembled with 6 square square square AR markers AR markers AR markers AR markers ) to visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of visualize the process of how it how it how it beingbeingbeing folded into folded into folded into folded into folded into folded into a cubea cubea cubea cube . FortyForty FortyForty-sevensevenseven seven fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students fifth grade students from from two classes two classestwo classes two classes participated in participated in participated in participated in participated in our our experiment experiment experiment experiment experiment of of evaluating the AR tool.evaluating the AR tool. evaluating the AR tool. evaluating the AR tool.evaluating the AR tool.evaluating the AR tool. evaluating the AR tool. evaluating the AR tool. evaluating the AR tool. One One class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the class with 23 students served as the AR tool tool group and the group and the group and the group and the group and the group and the group and the other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as other class with 24 students served as the traditional tool traditional tool traditional tool traditional tool traditional tool traditional tool group.group. The results revealed that The results revealed thatThe results revealed that The results revealed that The results revealed that The results revealed that The results revealed that The results revealed thatThe results revealed that The results revealed that : (1) there w (1) there w(1) there w (1) there w(1) there w(1) there was no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the as no significant difference between the two groupgroup s in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement in terms of achievement scores, (2) scores, (2) scores, (2) scores, (2) scores, (2) scores, (2) students in the AR group students in the AR group students in the AR groupstudents in the AR group students in the AR groupstudents in the AR group students in the AR groupstudents in the AR group showed showed showed interest interest interest interest in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the in learning as compared to the traditional traditional traditional tool group tool grouptool grouptool group , (3) students , (3) students , (3) students , (3) students were were satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied with the experience of usingexperience of usingexperience of using experience of using experience of using experience of usingexperience of usingexperience of using experience of usingexperience of using experience of using the AR tool AR tool . We suggest We suggest We suggest We suggest We suggest future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop future studies to develop similar similar similar similar AR tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry tools to help students learn geometry by increas increasincreasincreasing ing ing the interactivity of the tool interactivity of the toolinteractivity of the tool interactivity of the toolinteractivity of the tool interactivity of the tool interactivity of the toolinteractivity of the toolinteractivity of the toolinteractivity of the tool interactivity of the tool interactivity of the tool , improving improving improving improving the user user interface interfaceinterfaceinterface interfaceinterface, and , and , and extending extending extending extending features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning toolsfeatures to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools features to let teachers design their own AR learning tools.

朱鳳傳、康鳳梅（2000）。工程圖學。台北：全華書局。
李梓楠、鄭英豪（2006）。國小學童幾何論證表現之初探。
李豪文（2008)。從課程組織探討一到三年級數學教科書之幾何內容。
宋嘉恩（2007）。台北縣國小學童空間能力與推理能力相關因素研究。台北市立教育大學自然科學系研究所碩士論文。
林保平（2008）。科技融入數學課程與教學的意涵與實例。科學教育，(312)，19-31。
林為光（2011）。不同虛擬實境多媒體設計輔助對國小學童體積概念學習效益之研究。國立台中教育大學數位內容科技學系碩士論論文。
邱俊宏（2004）。多媒體電腦輔助教學對國小學童學習線對稱圖形成效之研究。國立屏東師範學童數理教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
吳明郁（2004）。國小四年級學童空間能力學習的研究：以立體幾何展開圖為例。國立臺北教育大學數理教育研究所學位論文，1-217。
林福來、黃敏晃（1993）。分數啟蒙課程的分析，批判與辨證。科學教育學刊，J (1)， 1-28。
郭世文（2008）。擴增實境應用於博物館展示的初探。科技博物，12(4)，25-37。
郭其綱、鄭泰昇（2008）。擴增實境技術應用於建築與城市戶外導覽之研究—以「古蹟導覽系統」與「隱形招牌」應用為例。建築學報第66期，145-166。
陳采穗（1998）。虛擬實境在加強空間能力學習之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學資訊研究所碩士論文。
陳眉期（2011）。擴增實境輔助立體幾何概念學習系統之使用性暨學習效益評估（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台南大學。
徐偉民、林美如（2009）。台灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報。(16)，47-73。
翁穎哲，譚克平(2008)。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育，15-30。
教育部（2008）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域綱要。
康鳳梅（2001）。機械製圖交線與展開提昇學生空間能力之研究。第十六屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文，313-322。
張世明、袁媛（2006）。萬用揭示板的開發與教學應用之研究。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文。
張景中、曹培生(1996)。從數學教育到教育數學。臺北市:九章。
曹雅玲、陳穎瑤、曾怡嘉（2008）。國小學童的空間能力之相關研究。台灣數學教師電子期刊，15期。
黃榆婷（2010）。應用悅趣化數位教材於國小學童空間學習成效與展開圖解題歷程之研究。國立臺北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所學位論文，1-222。
楊明獻（2008）。改進國中理化課程教學—以 [光的折射] 單元為例。科學教育，(306)，27-42。
劉好（2000）。平面圖形教材的處理。載於台灣省國民學校教師研習會（主編），國民小學數學科新課程概說（高年級）（頁194-213）。台北：台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
謝旭明、吳博雅（2013）。電腦輔助教學對國小三年級學童面積概念學習成效之研究。International Journal of Science and Engineering，3(3)，33-40。
魏春蓮、陳光勳（2006）。資訊科技融入國小四年級學童立體展開圖學習之研究。國立臺北教育大學。
魏義峰（2002）。3D-電腦輔助繪圖在工程圖學之應用。雄工學報。
藍順德(2006)。教科書政策與制度。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
羅成婷（2010）。運用 GSP 軟體融入國小幾何面積教學成效之研究。臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系學位論文，1-84。
Alcañiz, M., Contero, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Augmented reality technology for education. New Achievements in Technology Education and Development, 247-256.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence, 6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47.
Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented reality in education. New Horizons for Learning, 12. Retrieved from http://www.it.civil.aau.dk/it/education/reports/ar_edu.pdf
Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1) 31-48.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Collins, A. (1992).Toward a design science of education. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (pp. 15-22).
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
Cuendet, S., Bonnard, Q., Wang, S., & Lenh, S. D. (2013). Designing augmented reality for the classroom. Computers & Education, 1-13.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-14.
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp.420-464). New York: Macmillan publishing Company.
Dünser, A., Steinbügl, K., Kaufmann, H., & Glück, J. (2006, July). Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter's international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI , 125-132.
Dominguez, M. G., Martin-Gutierrez, J., Gonzalez, C. R., & Corredeaguas, C. M. M. (2012). Methodologies and Tools to Improve Spatial Ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 736-744.
El Sayed, N. A., Zayed, H. H., & Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045-1061.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). NMC horizon report: 2012 higher education edition.
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297-302.
Linn, M. C, & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child development, 56, 1479-1498.
Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 4, 181-248.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Luís Saorín, J., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C., & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics, 34(1), 77-91.
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995, December). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Photonics for Industrial Applications (pp. 282-292). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Kail, R. (1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 1, 311-365.
Serio, A. D., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computer & Education, 1-11.
Tarng, W., & Ou, K. L. (2012, March) A Study of Campus Butterfly Ecology Learning System Based on Augmented Reality and Mobile Learning. Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on, 62-66.
Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory applications in chemistry education.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 938-942.
Van Hiele, P.M ., & Van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1958). A method of initiation into geometry. In H. Freudenthal(Ed), Report on methods of initiation into geometry (pp.67-80).Groningen: J.B.Wolters.
Van Hiele, P.M .(1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL:Academic Press.
Wagner, D., & Schmalstieg, D. (2006). Handheld Augmented Reality Displays. Virtual Reality Conference, (321-321). IEEE.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
Woods, E., Billinghurst, M., Looser, J., Aldridge, G., Brown, D., Garrie, B., & Nelles, C. (2004). Augmenting the science centre and museum experience. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, 230-236.
Yu, D., Jin, J. S., Luo, S., Lai, W., & Huang, Q.(2010). A useful visualization technique: A literature review for augmented reality and its application, limitation & future direction. Visual Information Communication , 311-337.
Yamashita, N., Taki, H., & Soga, M. (2012). A learning support environment for earthquake disaster with a simulation of furniture falling by mobile AR. Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2012 International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE.